#164 - Should Social Media Companies Honor the First Amendment? episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 26, 2020 · 57 MIN

#164 - Should Social Media Companies Honor the First Amendment?

from Open to Debate · host Open to Debate

MOTION: Constitutional Free Speech Principles Can Save Social Media Companies from Themselves President Trump posted similar content on Facebook and Twitter. Twitter flagged it. Facebook did not. Both have come under fire for those decisions. Just how should social media companies police user content? Revisit our debate on social media content moderation policies and whether the U.S. Constitution should be the guiding light in a new era of political speech.  FOR THE MOTION: David French - Senior Writer, National Review Corynne McSherry - Legal Director, Electronic Frontier Foundation AGAINST THE MOTION: Nathaniel Persily - Professor, Stanford Law Marietje Schaake - International Policy Director, Stanford's Cyber Policy Center & Fmr. Member, European Parliament We're funded by our listeners. To support our debates, donate online at iq2us.org/support A message from our sponsor: Get an extra 3 months Free on a one year package. Expressvpn.com/debate Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 26, 2020

Embed this episode

Ready to play

#164 - Should Social Media Companies Honor the First Amendment?

0:00 57:58

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Open to Debate?

This episode is 57 minutes long.

When was this Open to Debate episode published?

This episode was published on June 26, 2020.

Can I download this Open to Debate episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!