28: Mission: Impossible 3

Episode 28 of the The Last Star In Hollywood podcast, hosted by Next Word, titled "28: Mission: Impossible 3" was published on April 24, 2024 and runs 92 minutes.

April 24, 2024 ·92m · The Last Star In Hollywood

0:00 / 0:00

Summary

This week, Ethan Hunt returns with more guns in JJ Abrams’ 2006 action sequel Mission: Impossible 3! What is the Rabbit’s Foot? Why add extra team members if you’re going to do nothing with them? Does Philip Seymour Hoffman deliver an actually perfect performance? Content warning: violence, imprisonment Unanswered Questions: Is Abrams a good fit for this series? Can we read the militarism of this movie as a response to the Bourne series? How do we read the treatment of women throughout the film, specifically in terms of the combination of physical empowerment and innocence? Further reading: Angus McPhail MacGuffin Super 8 (2011) The 99p Challenge Man Up (2015) “Life And Death” (Michael Giacchino) “Impossible” (Kanye West) Casino Royale (2006) “Not While I’m Around” (The Morning Show) The Last Star In Hollywood Definitive List Of Tom Cruise Films The Last Star In Hollywood: Production Schedule Thanks for listening! For bonus shows, extra content and more, support The Last Star In Hollywood and the Next Word network by visiting Patreon.com/NextWord! Join us next time as we resurrect United Artists and seek Academy validation with Robert Redford’s Lions For Lambs (2007)! The Last Star In Hollywood is a Next Word production.Copyright © 2024 The Last Star In Hollywood. All Rights Reserved. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Episode Description

This week, Ethan Hunt returns with more guns in JJ Abrams’ 2006 action sequel Mission: Impossible 3! What is the Rabbit’s Foot? Why add extra team members if you’re going to do nothing with them? Does Philip Seymour Hoffman deliver an actually perfect performance?

Content warning: violence, imprisonment

Unanswered Questions:

Is Abrams a good fit for this series?
Can we read the militarism of this movie as a response to the Bourne series?
How do we read the treatment of women throughout the film, specifically in terms of the combination of physical empowerment and innocence?