A Discussion of Labor Law: Is the Taft-Hartley Act Being Interpreted as Written? episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 1, 2024 · 1H 2M

A Discussion of Labor Law: Is the Taft-Hartley Act Being Interpreted as Written?

from FedSoc Forums · host The Federalist Society

The 1947 Taft-Hartley amendments to the National Labor Relations Act, doggedly opposed by organized labor, included compliance with practicable portions of the federal rules of evidence and civil procedure, barring the Board from treating supervisors and independent contractors as protected employees, expressly incorporating employer free-speech rights, and more. Where are the Taft-Hartley amendments today and why? Featuring: Fred B. Jacob, Solicitor, National Labor Relations Board Hon. John F. Ring, Partner, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, former Chairman of the National Labor Relations Board

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 1, 2024

Embed this episode

Ready to play

A Discussion of Labor Law: Is the Taft-Hartley Act Being Interpreted as Written?

0:00 1:02:02

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of FedSoc Forums?

This episode is 1 hour and 2 minutes long.

When was this FedSoc Forums episode published?

This episode was published on August 1, 2024.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this FedSoc Forums episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!