EPISODE · Apr 1, 2026 · 40 MIN
Ahead of the Ruling: Nelson Mullins’ Matt Abee on Pung v Isabella County - #8
from The Innovative Investor Podcast: Property Debt Wealth in the Modern Era · host Stephen Morel
In this episode of The Innovative Investor Podcast, Stephen speaks with Matt Abee, partner at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, about a landmark Supreme Court fight that could redraw the rules of tax sale investing nationwide. Stephen and Matt trace the journey from last year’s Tyler v. Hennepin County decision to the current Pung v. Isabella County case, explaining why a Michigan family’s fight over a $2,000 tax bill and $76,000 auction “surplus” could end up redefining what counts as “just compensation” under the Takings Clause. Drawing on Matt’s deep experience representing tax lien investors, mortgage servicers, and financial institutions in more than 30 states, they unpack how the court might weigh fair market value versus auction proceeds, and why that distinction matters to both deed-state and lien-state players. As the justices pressed on issues of auction fairness, due process, and the homeowner’s own role in triggering a tax sale, Matt lays out three possible outcomes, from a sweeping new rule that forces states to pay full market value, to a narrower “fairness-of-auction” standard that sends cases back for fact-finding at the lower-court level. Along the way, they explore how different states have built wildly diverse sales processes (South Carolina’s administrative treasurer versus North Carolina’s full‐blown judicial foreclosure) and why investors must now consider not only the upside of a lien purchase but also the looming risk of constitutional claims. With the Supreme Court’s decision expected soon, Matt and Stephen offer practical advice on how to assess legal exposure, partner with the right counsel, and stay ahead of a ruling that could “spell the end of tax sales in America,” as the Solicitor General warns. Whether you’re a seasoned portfolio manager or just getting started in tax-linked real estate debt, this conversation makes one thing clear: the future of tax sale investing is no longer solely about yield or location, but about legal intelligence and process, knowing when an auction is truly fair, when to bid, and when to walk away. Tune in for expert insight on Pung’s high-stakes cert petition, learn how to fortify your underwriting, and discover why the best investors of tomorrow will be those who understand both title and tea leaves. Timestamps1. Overview of Pung v Isabella County and why it matters for tax-sale investors – 00:02 2. How Pung differs from Tyler v Hennepin on tax-sale takings – 02:07 3. Facts of the Pung dispute: principal-residence exemption, $2 K debt, $76 K sale vs. $194 K FMV claim – 05:00 4. Key takeaways from the Feb 25 Supreme Court arguments (fairness of auction, issue preservation) – 13:21 5. Likely SCOTUS outcome and what lien- and deed-state investors need to know – 20:49 Get in Touch with Stephen and Matt Abee Website: https://jurisdeed.com/ Waitlist: https://jurisdeed.com/waitlist Stephen's LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenmorel-jd/ Matt's LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-a-abee-3631832b/ Nelson Mullins: https://www.nelsonmullins.com/ Cases Mentioned Pung v. Isabella: https://www.nelsonmullins.com/insights/alerts/additional_nelson_mullins_alerts/all/u-s-supreme-court-hears-arguments-in-pung-v-isabella-county Tyler v. Hennepin County: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinio... Chapters (00:00:00) - Tax Lien Appeals(00:00:53) - The Pung Case(00:02:41) - Pung vs. Hennepin County: The Tax Sales(00:05:12) - On the Tax Lien Issues(00:05:40) - Tax Lien Investor: The Peng Family(00:14:18) - Trump on the Value of Real Estate(00:14:40) - Supreme Court oral arguments on eminent domain case(00:25:54) - Nebraska Tax Lien Case, Who Pays?(00:34:46) - Tax Sales and Foreclosure: Similar but Different(00:35:59) - The Deed Line
What this episode covers
In this episode of The Innovative Investor Podcast, Stephen speaks with Matt Abee, partner at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, about a landmark Supreme Court fight that could redraw the rules of tax sale investing nationwide. Stephen and Matt trace the journey from last year’s Tyler v. Hennepin County decision to the current Pung v. Isabella County case, explaining why a Michigan family’s fight over a $2,000 tax bill and $76,000 auction “surplus” could end up redefining what counts as “just compensation” under the Takings Clause. Drawing on Matt’s deep experience representing tax lien investors, mortgage servicers, and financial institutions in more than 30 states, they unpack how the court might weigh fair market value versus auction proceeds, and why that distinction matters to both deed-state and lien-state players. As the justices pressed on issues of auction fairness, due process, and the homeowner’s own role in triggering a tax sale, Matt lays out three possible outcomes, from a sweeping new rule that forces states to pay full market value, to a narrower “fairness-of-auction” standard that sends cases back for fact-finding at the lower-court level. Along the way, they explore how different states have built wildly diverse sales processes (South Carolina’s administrative treasurer versus North Carolina’s full‐blown judicial foreclosure) and why investors must now consider not only the upside of a lien purchase but also the looming risk of constitutional claims. With the Supreme Court’s decision expected soon, Matt and Stephen offer practical advice on how to assess legal exposure, partner with the right counsel, and stay ahead of a ruling that could “spell the end of tax sales in America,” as the Solicitor General warns. Whether you’re a seasoned portfolio manager or just getting started in tax-linked real estate debt, this conversation makes one thing clear: the future of tax sale investing is no longer solely about yield or location, but about legal intelligence and process, knowing when an auction is truly fair, when to bid, and when to walk away. Tune in for expert insight on Pung’s high-stakes cert petition, learn how to fortify your underwriting, and discover why the best investors of tomorrow will be those who understand both title and tea leaves. Timestamps1. Overview of Pung v Isabella County and why it matters for tax-sale investors – 00:02 2. How Pung differs from Tyler v Hennepin on tax-sale takings – 02:07 3. Facts of the Pung dispute: principal-residence exemption, $2 K debt, $76 K sale vs. $194 K FMV claim – 05:00 4. Key takeaways from the Feb 25 Supreme Court arguments (fairness of auction, issue preservation) – 13:21 5. Likely SCOTUS outcome and what lien- and deed-state investors need to know – 20:49 Get in Touch with Stephen and Matt Abee Website: https://jurisdeed.com/ Waitlist: https://jurisdeed.com/waitlist Stephen's LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenmorel-jd/ Matt's LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-a-abee-3631832b/ Nelson Mullins: https://www.nelsonmullins.com/ Cases Mentioned Pung v. Isabella: https://www.nelsonmullins.com/insights/alerts/additional_nelson_mullins_alerts/all/u-s-supreme-court-hears-arguments-in-pung-v-isabella-county Tyler v. Hennepin County: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinio...
NOW PLAYING
Ahead of the Ruling: Nelson Mullins’ Matt Abee on Pung v Isabella County - #8
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Mar 26, 2026 ·1m
Mar 19, 2026 ·34m
Feb 18, 2026 ·11m
Feb 11, 2026 ·45m