Welcome to Potsy of America. My guest today is an old friend of mine. She actually stole my car literally 25 years ago. She gave it back.
It's fine. But now I'm guessing it. I'm guessing it. Long story.
But today, Sarah Longo has left a life of crime behind her to become the publisher of the bulwark. You can find her on excellent podcast, like the next level, the focus group. Sarah, it's great to see you. Thanks, man.
It's great to see you. You are in my office, just so people know. It's very nice. It's a very professional, very nice office here in DC.
And I'm so grateful to be here because I wanted to take stock at this political moment. We're like six months out from the midterms. We're all letting ourselves get excited. But you do more focus groups with voters than anyone I know, like, several a week.
And I want to ask you about those conversations because we're all sickos who who were up the latest polls. But I think you can really learn interesting insights by listening to voters, what a crazy concept. It's almost like they're the people who comprise the democracy of ours. It's almost like they make a decision.
And by the way, if listeners are as obsessed with this stuff as we are and they want to learn more, you should right now pause the podcast and pre-order Sarah's book, How to Eat an Elephant, One Voter at a Time. You'll learn about Sarah's life, our time in politics, the insight she's gleaned from literally thousands of hours of focus group conversations with voters. And also, if you pre-order it now, what that means is when the New York Times bestseller list comes out, she will be on it. And like, Don Jr.'s triggered two or whatever bullshit book is getting bulk ordered by the RNC will get bounced.
That's right. So I think this is important. It is important to me that no super PAC is buying this book to get it on the list, that it is made up of real people in large part because I want people to hear. And sometimes they were like, oh my god, do I have to listen to voters?
I'm like, yes. Will you do a JBL impression right now? I was doing a JBL impression, yeah. Sarah and the Bullwork team, they're an independent pro-democracy media, so are we a quick media.
Check out everything the Bullwork is doing. Go to Substack, they have amazing podcasts, they do written content. You should be a subscriber, I've been a subscriber for a long time. It's a good, nice of you.
It's great stuff. And by the way, please follow Patsy America here on YouTube and consider becoming a subscriber to what we're doing here. Go to crickit.com slash friends because as Sarah knows, subscribing is literally the best thing you can do for independent media. Advertising is great, but it is not enough.
And if you subscribe, you get to add free episodes, get bonus episodes, Patsy America. Deep dives into polling with the end fight for so it's a good deal. crickit.com slash friends. OK, so Sarah, let's start with what you're hearing about Donald Trump himself.
On a focus group pod, you guys recently talked about. It was like Catholic Trump and Harris voters. You talked about it was Trump voters were angry at him. There was an interesting Iran war pod.
Like, tons of great episodes people should check out. But what are the big themes and problems and concerns that keep arising? Yeah, OK, so the easy one is, so we asked the same question at the beginning of every group. How do you think things are going in the country?
There was only one answer to that question that we are hearing right now. Great. Thank you for coming to tell me something. It is bad.
Nobody thinks things are good, including some of the people who still support Trump. Like, they don't think things are going well. People who are still writing with Trump just tend to have hope that maybe they will start going well at some point because you got to trust the plan. Tommy, trust the plan, we might get there.
But the big thing is just costs, right? Everybody talks about how do you think things are going to be like bad? Gas prices are high or suddenly in a war with Iran. You know, I want to trump to deport criminals, but he's doing all this other stuff.
And it's this pervasive feeling. In fact, we just did a focus group. And I really like this group. It was people who are still a proverse of Trump.
People who are still rocking with him, that 32%. I've cut my bush line, right? But people who are, let's call it below the bush line. People who are like, I'm still in it with Trump.
Surprised I managed to get that by you without you giggling. I did smile. Do you know that I coined that phrase entirely innocently? And only until I said it to Tim Miller?
The reason I'm laughing is because I was texting with Tim about this today. And I asked him for Oppo about you. And he responded the bush line. Yeah.
Well, they bastardized things that I take purely. You're so insecure with them. So, but the people who are still riding with Trump who think things are going great, even they think that the state of the country, like the way that we relate to each other is awful. Like they feel like the country's a powder keg.
They feel like we're too divided. They're scared about civil war. And so there's this like deep, pervading sense or pervasive sense of unease. But the prices are the things you hear, because when prices are high, people's anxiety is high.
And they've been high kind of now for a long time. And so people are starting to crack. And I got to tell you, a year ago, what we would hear from these voters is, OK, like Trump is going to fix it. And like Rome wasn't built in a day, but I think he's going to get there.
And like every week, you just seem sort of the sliding off of the optimism from Trump voters that say, I think things are going to get better. Like they just see things getting worse. It jiesled that I've heard from others. Like folks probably heard of Swing Left.
They are a great grassroots organization. They're doing this big canvassing project called Ground Truth, where they don't do like a walk list. It's not like the Democratic Party saying like, hey, knock on these Democratic doors. They're talking knocking on every door.
And they're trying to have longer conversations. And you know, issue is rise and fall, right? Like the Iran war happens and all of a sudden that spikes in what they're hearing. But the number one issue, like lingering pervasive issue, is about the integrity of the political system itself.
It's about trust and that ranges from corruption. It's people feeling like politicians lie and they're self-healing. It's that the system is corrupted or captured by corporate interests. And it's just, you know, it's interesting that they're hearing that you're hearing the same thing.
Like that is like the mood music. Yeah. And I think like to the extent that we now take our signals are also bifurcated and everywhere, but they all come together in this thing that we now call vibes. And one of the things I talk about in the book is the rise of the vibes voter.
And like the vibes are bad and Trump's vibes are bad. And the, you know, it's funny, the way you just said it, which is around corruption and things, a lot of the things about doing the focus groups is to get a lot of specifics into that. It's like, what are people angry about? Well, they're angry that Trump lied and said, we weren't gonna get into these stupid wars.
And now we're at war with Iran. They're upset about Epstein. Epstein comes up a lot. I think a lot of people thought like, this isn't a real story, this isn't actually gonna matter.
But for a lot of the voters, Epstein isn't just about Epstein. It's about the idea that Trump was supposed to be somebody who was going to be transparent, right? And he was gonna put people in his cabinet. There's a secret cabal running everything, but we're gonna tell you the truth.
We're on your side. And there's a sense of betrayal around that, which is why I always think about the people who are still part of the people who approve of Trump for them, what they have is like, they're keeping the face in Trump that it's gonna come, but they're clear that it hasn't come yet. And we're not getting it right now. Interesting.
So we both are in the media world now, but like at heart, we're political hacks who especially focus on messaging and how to go after Trump. The messaging that resonates with me, my bias and my prior is around corruption. Because I think the corruption bucket gives you the why, right? It's like it explains why Trump is pushing that tax policy is because his donors want them, bad foreign policy, crypto, like it can apply to everything.
I think Senator John Ossoff has been messaging this, I think in a really effective, interesting way. We'll drop in a clip here. How much do you guys know about Jared Kushner? Ivanka's husband, he's on the Saudi payroll for $2 billion.
And now he's leading American diplomacy in the Middle East, apparently while at the very same time asking princes and shakes across the Arab world to give him billions more. Can you imagine like a normal sitting US ambassador just hitting up Saudi Crown Prince, Muhammad bin Salman for billions of dollars? The rules are for us, not for them. And it's not just Jared getting in on the action.
A company owned in part by Eric and Don Jr. has been pitching golf kingdoms on its drone interceptors during this war, never before. Have we seen so little effort to hide so much corruption? Do you think this is effective messaging, what Ossoff is saying?
Is this kind of thing like popping in groups? Yeah, and here's the thing about corruption. Okay, so I'm gonna put a different frame on it, which is like I said, people are focused on prices, they're focused on affordability, but you can make everything an economic issue. Corruption especially can be an economic issue, right?
It's about a total story you're telling. And it's saying he is getting rich while you're getting poor. Everything has to have the contrast to it. You know, I'm talking to people, I'm like, him bad, you good, like let's get like some real basics, right?
Trump bad, you good. Public is bad, Dan's good, right? He break, we fix. It's like get the contrast in there.
I am minorly developing an obsession with John Ossoff, entirely based on tight shirts and message. Which is funny, because that's not for me exactly, but it is, it's for me either. Hard not to see it, yeah. But yeah, the calm stuff just has me swimming.
The demeanor, the vibes, the way he's doing, so there's a couple of things he's doing. One is cadence where he's holding an audience in his hand, and that's the stuff you can't teach. Some of it is that the handsomeness of it all, like the optics of feeling like, oh, oh, you look, you look like a person I could see being president. He's got nice young man energy, similar to Obama.
And some other people to judge have some of that, you know, nice young man energy, which I think works with a lot of the moms. I think, you know, there's always a soccer mom or a, you know, security mom, whatever, let's just have the nice young man moms, they could be coming out for Democrats this time. But the thing about Ossoff is that he is a natural contrast storyteller. He is saying, and a lot of people get, they worry, well, look, if I start talking about corruption and people don't get bored or they don't understand the ins and outs, he trusts people to understand where he's going with it.
And he says, have you heard? Did you know? Did you see this? I'm here to give you this information.
If you haven't been getting it in your bubble. It's so simple. It's like an old Leno bit. Like you hear about this one?
You read this one? Yeah. And so I am finding him from an optics cadence and message discipline standpoint to be doing the thing that I've been feeling pretty desperate for politicians to do, which is find a way to retortly get your arms around the chaos. And people get distracted, it feels like it's so much.
And the voters feel like it's too much. He's like, no, gonna focus your attention on these things. And they provide the contrast, not just him versus Trump, but the way in which he's approaching issues versus the corruption of Trump. And corruption, Trump's getting richer.
You're getting poor. That's the contrast. Yeah. I'm going to read about it around.
I'm saying congrats Don and Eric on your drone contract from the Pentagon or whatever. I don't know if you know this, but Tundra Biden had a painting. Yeah, right. Yeah.
I'm going to have a burisma. I want to talk about the Democrats to chip away at this Trump coalition from 2024 and kind of build their own big motley anti-Trump coalition. You and your co-host on the next level and the spirit of debate about Tucker Carlson and his turn from Trump and denunciation of Trump. Let's listen to Tucker talking about that.
You and I and everyone else who supported him, you wrote speeches for him, I campaigned for him. We were implicated in this for sure. Yes. It's not enough to say why I changed my mind or like, oh, this is bad, I'm out.
It's like in very small ways, but in real ways, you and me and millions of people like us for the reason this is happening right now. Yes. So I do think it's like a moment to wrestle with our own consciences, you know, we'll be trying to buy it for a long time. I will be, and I won't say I'm sorry for misleading people and it was not intentional.
That's what we'll say. You and JBL and Tim, you know, I think you guys have different takes on how to respond to Tucker or what you made of Tucker, I'll let you talk about that. But I think I sort of landed in the middle ground listening to you guys like, yes, you know, Tucker is someone I think we should be skeptical of because he's sort of in the media political business. It was knowable and there's evidence that he did know that Trump was a Charlotte in, but I do think he was sincerely disappointed and angry that Trump went full neo-con and like invaded Venezuela, now is where we're with Iran.
A lot of it is undergirded by this anger at the Israeli government in Bibi Nanyahu, that can be written into anti-Semitism and we have to watch that. But I'm curious, like, how do you think Democrats use these comments because it's him? It's Alex Jones, it's Candace Owens, not like Lib fan favorites usually, but saying things that are potentially helpful to us. Yeah, I mean, this, I think this ends up being like kind of weirdly an academic debate as opposed to a practical one because it's a practical matter.
Use the shit out of all of it, right? Like amplify the fractures in their coalition. Like again, just with the framework of them going to bed, like you want them to fall apart and wanna hold your side together. Like, and I think that though, people get wrapped up a little bit in whether you have to sort of welcome people into the tent.
This is a bridge. So people decide who's in the coalition and who's out of the coalition. Is there a gate somewhere? Well, there's been a big, big conversation lately, right?
I know you guys have also talked about this on Piker, who's a more leftist or Twitch streamer who said some offensive things about Israel or a bunch of other topics. And that's been part of this question too. And like, how do you think about that? How do we define whether there are gates?
Yeah, I mean, I think, look, there's sort of like, is something somebody says bad objectively, right? So I think, I think Tucker Carlson is a malign actor. I think he is a liar. I think the reason that he has decided to take on Trump on this issue isn't because he's got super sincerely held beliefs or maybe he does as part of his worldview.
But also, he was specifically brought into the White House multiple times. I think tried to talk Trump out of Iran, Trump went against him, now Tucker's going against him. They're all falling apart. But like, Tucker is not a good person, in my opinion.
Like, I think he has been a malign actor on our politics and I think he does overall more damage. That doesn't mean that Tucker Carlson doesn't have an audience and doesn't play a role in helping to sort of fracture that coalition. And so sometimes amplifying his disagreements, he is a particular kind of messenger for people. But that's like a utility.
It's not, hey, let's have them in the coalition. And because there is no- Because they're not part of it. They don't wanna be part of the coalition. Also, because there is no gate keeping around the coalition, right?
Like, there's nobody who decides, I mean, the DNC can decide who speaks at a platform. But like, and that was sort of, you know, my argument with Tim around Piker was, I felt like Tim, and Tim, I don't wanna like speak out of school because he's not here to talk about, but I felt like he was kind of downplaying some of the toxicity of the things that Piker was saying. And more than that, I just cared about our platform. I didn't want it to sound like we didn't have a clear sense of who this guy is and what he is saying and what he talks about.
But like, if that guy says, I like John Ossoff because I agree with his views on this, well then like, okay, that's, and so I just, this idea of people being gatekeepers on this stuff, but I do think we should all as moral actors be gatekeepers about what is right and what is wrong. And so for me, if my lines are liberal versus illiberal, then when people are using violent rhetoric, if they side with terrorists or wanna, you know, pump up terrorists or celebrate them in ways or the Chinese Communist government or Putin's annexation of Crimea, you know, or that, you know, 9-11 happening was a, what was it, America deserved 9-11? And be like, these are out of context. And then I go and watch the context and I'm like, they're not out of context.
You just, you have an explanation for why you think these things to be true. Okay, well that's an academic debate or an intellectual debate and we can have that debate. I'm just telling you, I think those things are wrong. And I think it's a moral line.
I think that they're not good, but that doesn't mean, but the idea that like, contractors can't talk to each other or people can't debate ideas, like. You're not supposed to be deplatforming. No, that was very like 2018-2020, right? It's like, all the scolding of people when I joke in or like scolding of bar still sports or things like.
But people can inflate the idea of saying, I think that person's ideas are bad or I object to what that person's saying. Like, I don't think stealing stuff from stores is an act of righteous courage against corporations. Like, I think that is, I think that's basically you've decided, okay, well, we're just gonna opt out of having a society in laws. I objected to Donald Trump, was the illiberalism of Donald Trump, the violent rhetoric of Donald Trump.
Now, some players like a streamer who most of the country doesn't know about it. He's not president, he's not president. He's not president. Today's show is sponsored by strawberry.me.
You don't have to be actively unhappy at work to want something more, John. The most successful people know this, and they didn't figure it out alone. They have mentors, coaches, and people guiding them every step of the way. That's where strawberry.me, career coaching comes in.
Career coaching through strawberry.me can help you get unstuck, uncover what you really want, identify obstacles holding you back, develop a step-by-step plan, turn your goals into reality. I mean, I just have a career coach, wouldn't it? Yeah, it would. I've heard of the region beta paradox.
No. This is an idea that basically, people will stay in a bad relationship or they'll stay in a mediocre job, and ironically, things would have to get worse for them to go seek something better. And so you live in this space where, actually, if your life got worse, you would make it better, but because you live in this little area of the chart where you don't change it. It seems like that's the space where you get strawberry.me.
You need some coaching. Because you don't wanna fall to that lower space. It's called the region beta paradox. There you go.
And so strawberry.me, get you out of there and get you to that next level to make you feel better about your job, your life, and you can improve. Go to strawberry.me slash cricket and find out if career coaching is right for you. That's strawberry.me slash cricket to get 50% off your first session. Pause the America brought you by Haya.
Some children's vitamins on the market today contained up to seven grams of sugar per serving and are stuffed with artificial additives and petroleum-based guys. Haya took the opposite approach. Zero sugars, zero gummy additives, just clean nutrition. And these other people are like, we can't make the vitamins without the Iranian oil.
No, not Haya. Design for kids, do it up. Haya shifts straight to your door. You get an awesome reusable bottle with your first order and then they send refills every month, unless you remember at the store.
Haya worked with pediatricians to create a powerful chewable vitamin. The packs a blend of 12 organic fruits and vegetables, plus 15 essential vitamins and minerals into every dose. Haya, John, you have children. Yeah, Charlie loves Haya.
And we started giving him so many of his like two. And we're like, oh, he's never gonna have all of his vitamins that he needs. And because he's only eatin' spaghetti. And he likes Haya, it's delicious, it's not full of sugar and gets them all the nutrients he needs.
And here's something every parent needs to hear. If getting your kids to eat their vegetables, feels like an impossible daily battle. Haya's new kids daily greens plus super foods is a total game changer. It's basically chocolate milk stuff with veggies.
It's a greens powder designed specifically for kids. That's packed with 55 plus whole food source ingredients. Just mix one scoop with milk or milk alternatives and watch them actually enjoy something that's secretly feeling their growing bodies. We've worked out a special deal with Haya for their best-selling children's vitamin received 50% of your first order to claim this deal.
You must go to HayaHealth.com slash Crooked. This deal is not available on their regular website. So go to H-I-Y-A-H-E-A-L-T-H HayaHealth.com slash Crooked and get your kids the full body nourishment they need to grow into healthy adults. Maybe like a less disgust, maybe more complicated, more interesting case is Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Yeah, okay. Who has voted in some bad ways, some said some noxious things, that's held some terrible views. But I've been listening to her pretty closely for the better part of the year, talk about her opposition to the war in Iran, some of the things she said about the war in Venezuela. I think she's been saying about Gaza.
And it just strikes me as totally sincere. And now maybe it's all a political game that is setting up a run for the presidency in 2028, whatever we'll find out. But I was talking to Ilhan Omar a couple weeks ago about this and whether she had reached out to Marjorie Taylor Greene. And it was interesting here, Ilhan Omar who's taken more attacks, who's been treated more viciously by MTG than a lot of Republicans, showed such grace and was like, yeah, we should give her a hug, welcome her to the coalition.
I thought it'd be interesting to hear that from her that she was thinking like that. Yeah, and I think, look, I think grace is good. I also, and I think part of what's happening though is like they're finding common ground, right? Like they share their feelings about Israel, I think are like both sincerely held and are maybe closer to each other than Marjorie Taylor Greene's are too many in her own party.
And that might be true of Ilhan Omar and some of the members of her own party. And so if they can, they find that common ground. And so, but like, that might not be true if they didn't have like an issue that was binding them together that they both care passionately about. And that is, I think that increased skepticism of Israel is totally warranted in this moment.
I think that increased skepticism of the American government is quite warranted in this moment. But like, that wouldn't necessarily bind me together with somebody that would be like the glue that holds us together. But I think that we have and have had now for a while a fracturing of the old way of politics orienting the parties. And so as these issues shift and there's these huge changes in the way people are thinking about different things, Israel being one of them, you're gonna start to see sort of the strange bedfellows.
But politics is always like that, right? Politics binds strange bedfellows. And I think that is fine. Again, this is where, is it really welcoming somebody into a coalition?
Cause I think there's a difference. And this is when you say, I carry you, like we're together in this. And this is why the question of do politicians go on, like these more really incendiary podcasters, people who are more for shock, shock politics. It's like, okay, you've got two, there's two sides of that coin.
There's the side that's trying to reach audience. And so you need to go everything everywhere, all at once you gotta be going, finding audience, going into uncomfortable places, having new conversations. You also have the judgment to know that for some people, you will end up owning some of their baggage and some of the worst things that they said, if you're not willing to press them on it. Or you don't have to vote it.
And so that is the thing with Marjorie Taylor Greene. It's like, I think that she got into Congress and thought maybe it was gonna be easier for her to just love Trump enough to get things done. And then that didn't happen. And now maybe she's mad she didn't have enough influence or whatever she's looking for influence in other ways.
I just don't know that I think, I'm not gonna be like, boy, I really want to run hang out with Marjorie Taylor Greene. But Jingle does. I love to work out with her. Maybe do a crossfit.
I mean, I think it's a conversation just sort of like thinking about Democrats offer grace, whether the amount of number of hoops we make you jump through to kind of like get to be treated as sincere versus Trump, who's like, oh, you like Trump? Oh, you called me Hitler back at it? You're VP now. J.D.
Vance. You know what I mean? Like, oh Bobby Kennedy, you like Trump now? You hate these vaccines?
Fuck it, I hate vaccines to be like, come on in. But that's bad, right? We think that's- It was a real coalition ultimately, right? We ultimately don't think it's good as an objective matter that J.D.
Vance specifically, who did say Trump was Hitler, then was like, please Mr. Trump, let me be all your things, all for you. I hope you're gerbils. I hope you're gerbils.
Yeah. It's a joke. But so I guess there's the part of me that is, again, every successful political coalition that has ever existed has involved, like especially at really fractious times, has involved lots of strange bedfellows, has involved lots of weird coalitions. So I think you want your coalition to be as big as possible.
And I don't think we can or like, we can't like police who everybody talks to you. Like what you want out of your political leadership is you want somebody who's so good. Okay, this is why when I was objecting to the idea that you have to go on someone's podcast to reach their audience. My point is a bigger point that's much beyond like a particular person.
It is John Ossoff is really good. He will make me, Antison Piker, be like, I support that guy. Not because he comes to us to like reach our audience. I think we've gotten a little too obsessed with these micro conversations around Joe Rogan of the left or podcasters in general.
Like actually it's about the candidates. It's the candidates, the initial leadership. And can we find ways to say, I can support that person and can they appeal to a really large coalition for a variety of reasons? And you want it to be because they're leaning into the thing, like the good things, the things that we're like, yes, I find goodness in this person.
A lot of people tag into them. Not, hey, I hate the same people you do. Right, yes, we're sure. We want unifying messages, especially on our side.
Let me just ask you a couple more things that are wrong, because I can imagine like a half dozen ways that this is bad for Trump politically. There's, gas prices are up. People are sick of wars in the Middle East generally. The price tag of the war itself is huge, like $30 billion, $40 billion already has been burned.
Then there's the fact that Trump lied. And he said he would not go to war in the Middle East. What are you hearing though from voters who are expressing frustration about the war, especially that Trump supporters you guys have to talk to who've spoken out? Yeah, I would say the main thing is people thought.
And this was always my take on it was Trump could get away with it if it was a really short period of time. Because if it was kind of in and out like the first Iran bombing was. It was 12-day war. It was like, yeah.
But by the time it's happened, it's like, it's already by it with the voters and they're back to carrying just about costs. The longer this goes on, you've got two things. You've got the impacts here at home, which is really around gas prices, but ultimately it's gonna be all things getting more expensive, which on top of the tariffs. And this is the thing about something like the Iran war.
Voters know what caused it. Voters know that tariffs cause the price increases and they know that the Iran is causing gas and gas prices. When they know where it came from, that's the first bucket of the problem. Then you get to the second bucket of the problem, which is you said no more of this stuff.
Like you wanna go in and do a smash and grab job, like Venezuela or whatever. And like, I don't have to feel it, fine. You end up in a prolonged thing where now listening to you be like, hey, Vietnam was 18 years. What are you guys complaining about?
What crazy comment, by the way. Yeah, like, and then they're like, wait a minute, because this is where Trump is boxed in on this. And this is going back to Marjorie Taylor Greene and Tucker Carlson. The thing about them is that they are creating, there's a fraction in the Republican party right now.
There's the America first swing, right? Which is, no, we're not gonna do wars because we're gonna focus on people here at home. Then there's the MAGA establishment. And that is the Rubio and that is Trump.
And so America firsters are like, you are not helping the American people. You are lying. You're not doing what you said. And there was a real part of his coalition that feels betrayed because Trump, and again, this is when I say everything is an economic issue.
It's like, how would you do one thing, man? Maybe two. Maybe you wanna do it all just like you're in the border. But like, it was about prices and you're not doing it.
And so literally everything you're doing that is not that makes us mad. Yeah, you hear this from Nick. You hear this from very vocal people. Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, Nick Kelly, Candace Owens, a lot of people.
Again, a lot of flawed messengers there, but they have audience. You mentioned Epstein a minute ago. So the Epstein files saga, it was long, but it feels like a lifetime ago at this point. But how much does the mishandling of Epstein kind of linger with voters who were angry with him and how does it manifest?
Yeah, so the main thing again, is it goes to a lot of Trump's voters believed that the central promise of Trump. So I think there's the people who, these are the more casual voters who are just like, Trump's a business guy. He's gonna lower prices. But then there's the voters who really know Trump is gonna smash the system.
And all of the things you guys have been hiding from us, the deep state, talk a lot about this in the book, the grammar of hidden knowledge, the idea that there are big structural forces, keeping information from regular people, and then meant to keep people down. Trump was gonna disrupt all that. When you don't get the Epstein files, and for whatever reason, it's funny, if you go back, cash, but tell promise to the Epstein files, on the promise to the Epstein files, Trump didn't really. But yeah, look at that.
He was like, dude, he advanced promise to the Epstein files. This was not what Trump wanted to do. And Trump is mad now that he is at the center of it, but they feel like it disrupts the central promise of his, which is that I was gonna be your guy, who's gonna show you everything and be transparent. And so they just, and they basically have started to be like, probably, yeah, he's in them, you know, and it's like, we know he's in them now.
And so I do think there's, the people who have either decided that matters to them, because it has disrupted so much of this, it's cumulative, it's not just the Epstein files, it's like, well, I didn't get the Epstein files, and I won't get lower prices. And people are basically like, I guess I get a secure border, and bad stuff's happening to trans people. Like, that's the only thing, that is the only thing that they feel like is going right for Trump, and the rest of it, they're not getting, and people are like, oh, general, those kind of reach for the trans stuff is something that they're glad about. Like, that's not driving their votes, that's not the essential thing pushing most people.
Yeah, and the other interesting thing about Epstein, I think you guys talked about this on one of your focus group episodes, was being into conspiracy theories used to be a thing that maybe people were embarrassed about, now they're like, oh, I'm a big conspiracy theory person, it's like, they're proud, and maybe they all just feel vindicated by the Epstein thing, because like, QAnon was just kind of aiming at the wrong target in hindsight, but it's interesting. What did one guy say? He was like, how does a conspiracy theory go, like turn into a fact and just give it time? But what is amazing is it used to hear people start their sentences with, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but, and you were always kind of like, okay, I'm not waiting to hear those conspiracy theories, but now they're like, I'm a big conspiracy theorist, well, let me tell you what I think about Erika Kirk's, like the body's buried in her basement, you know?
I mean, the Candace Owens of it all, the extent to which the conspiracy, I mean, used to be like, go to the grocery store and they'd be like, bat boy, kill seven or whatever stuff he used to see, and America's always had a strain of, you know, there's a second on the grass, no, whatever. They like it, it's fun. Now, and the way that people own it now, shows you how much people are leaning into this as a way of politics, as entertainment, the characters that they watch, and this is something that the right does, in some ways to its benefit and to its detriment, which is that they are creating an ecosystem of like, MAGA, soap opera stars, that people are like, have a Will Sartre, does it. Thank God for Will's, I wouldn't know what the hell was going on.
Like, who's mad at who, and who did what in the ballroom at T.P.O.S.A. event anyway? Yeah, there's a lot of like minor celebrities. I mean, Will Sartre's constantly saying like, wow, so-and-so, and I'm like, I'm sorry, who is that?
Who's like, you know, the girl who threw up in the plant at the Mar-a-Lago, and I'm like, I don't know this story. And so the conspiracy stuff is, and again, you hear it with people saying, well, I trust the plant, you know? Whatever Trump's doing, I trust the plant. I mean, it's sort of like, it's all the way from deep QAnon stuff that can be pernicious, and kind of dangerous, and maybe somebody to show up at a pizza shop with a gun, all the way over to Bravo doesn't have a new series now.
So I'm like really into what's happening with Erica. And the other thing, like having worked in government, I've just found that like, big government conspiracies are unlikely because when you have a bunch of people right into something, the odds of it remaining secret are very low, and the government is tends to be incompetent at all. I was just gonna say, like, you think the government can't figure out how to solve a bunch of these problems, but you think they know how to cover up? Exactly, they fake that stuff.
But you can totally see the appeal of it, which is like simple answers to why the world can feel chaotic and scary and why bad things happen to good people, right? Like, oh, it's because of that. This is why, you know, I tend to still be, despite all of the chaos we see, really, like, from the pro-American voter, because in some ways, they are being poisoned every day, and they're being lied to by their government every single day. I think that whether it's Epstein, whether it's the way that Trump has talked about war and around, like, we are both being lied to, and the only way we're getting information is on his like, janky social media feed, and like, that's how things are coming as privately owned.
Like, I have a hard time blaming the American people who for a long time are like, but he's the president. He certainly wouldn't lie about all of this stuff, or, and I just, and they're trying to parse this new information like this, which is a nightmare, and there's conflict merchants everywhere, telling them who to hate, and how to hate, and, you know, ginning people off. And so I just, I feel like, I feel like people, when that's why I like the focus groups are actually much nicer in person than actually the way when people fight with you on the internet, and they're just like, screaming things at you, you know, people in the groups that are really wrestling with stuff, they're just coming away with some wild conclusions. But you can see how to get there, if you listen to them based on the world that we live in.
Totally, and the algorithms that they're getting forced into. Pause America is brought to you by Helix. Sleep is so important. So important.
I just have some study that if you continually get less than six hours of sleep a night, and that happens for continuously for like more than a week, then it is almost like you are, you have the same sort of mental decline as if you stayed up for 48 hours straight. Oof, that's how important it is to get seven hours, at least seven hours of sleep, as an adult, as an adult. Like, truly like, no matter what you do, the last step is like, you can do everything right, and you're not getting sleep. It's the hardest thing to do.
Yeah, it's the hardest thing to do. But you know what makes it easier? Helix, that's why we love Helix mattresses here. We all have them in our homes, and they're great.
Helix makes buying a mattress easy. You take the Helix sleep quiz, and it will match you with the perfect mattress based on your personal preferences and sleep needs. You get free shipping and seamless delivery. Helix delivers your mattress right to your door with free shipping in the US.
The Happy with Helix guarantee offers a risk for your customer-first experience designed to ensure you're completely satisfied with your new mattress. So you can rest easy with seamless returns and exchanges. Plus, Helix offers 120 nights, sleep trial, and limited lifetime warranty. So go check it out, take the quiz, get your perfect Helix mattress, and you'll never have trouble sleeping again.
I'm having Don Luxe, fantastic. Love my Helix mattress. Go to Helix.com.cricket for 20% off-site-wide. That's Helix sleep.com.cricket for 20% off-site-wide.
Make sure you enter our show name after checkout. So they know we sent you Helix sleep.com.cricket. Pause to have America brought to you by fast-growing trees. Let's be honest, you might be skeptical about ordering plants online.
You're probably thinking, is this thing actually gonna show up alive? But after receiving multiple plants from fast-growing trees to our Cricut HQ, we can vouch for them. They have shipping plants down to a science. Fast-growing trees has built a whole system to protect your plants until they arrive.
Every plant is hand-picked and carefully inspected. Their packaging is designed specifically to keep them secure and transit so they don't get damaged. They have a lab, but they test the best packaging materials to protect against cold, heat, humidity, and more. You won't believe how good your plant looks.
When it arrives, we love fast-growing trees. Their plants are awesome. Pete, I hope to unbox the plants we received at the Cricut office. Green clums.
They're safe over here. The plants are very well secured in the box. They arrive looking healthy. All the soil remain in place.
There was no mess once the boxes were opened. The trees arrived a bit compressed, but a day after they unfolded to their full glory, they look like the plants you buy at your local nursery, plus every order is backed by their alive and thrive. So in case you don't have any issues with delivery, you're covered, fast-growing trees is America's largest on the nursery. Thousands of plants, trees for your every yard and climate.
They even make it easy to get plants that actually work for your yard delivered right to your door. Right now they have a great deal on spring planting essentials. And listeners get an additional 20% off on your first order, but code Cricut at checkout. That's 20% off at fast-growing trees.com with code Cricut, terms and conditions.
May, bye. A couple of quick issue things I'm just wondering if you're hearing about. I'm skeptical of that in terms of going to be one on like policy per se, but there are some policy areas that are popping. First of all, there's AI.
So there's some districts that go ahead and get right up on this the other day where fights over AI data centers are really their big deals in certain communities that don't want them there or do want them there. And then there's also just sort of anger from the left and the right at big tech, at the tech oligarchs. And it's like, it's the kind of thing where you could listen, I could read you a sentence and it could be Bernie Sanders or it could be Steve Bannon, right? It's like verbatim the same language.
How much are you hearing about AI, big tech, like in your groups? So tons of AI, not nearly enough about big tech. And let me, so I was actually, when I was doing the focus groups, specifically on the races for Mikey Sheerill, Abigail Spanburger, in both those races, the AI data centers were a huge issue. It came up all the time because people know how much water they're using.
They know that they're raising their energy prices again. It's an economic issue for them. They're like, hey, it's getting more expensive for me. And both of them made them parts of their campaigns, like they were addressing it because it's clearly something they're hearing from voters all the time.
And this is, but on the other thing, on the tech oligarchs, and this is also talk about this in the book, they need you to do me a favor. Okay, go tell all your democratic friends that they keep doing this thing where they're like big corporations, they're the bad guys. I'm like, can you guys just like, okay, I'm not here to talk you out of that, don't say, could you please just really focus on the big tech oligarchs? Sure.
Because they are both becoming outrageously wealthy at the expense of the health, both mental and physical, of the American people. They are taking two of our dominant human emotions, fear and anger, and they are algorithmically for their own profit and to keep us on those things. They are making us want to hate each other. They are the poisoners, in many cases, or they're the platforms that deliver the poison and try and keep you there.
And like Elon Musk should be an enemy that we name. Peter Thiel should be an enemy that we name. And you know what, it's not just that these guys walked in to help Trump because they knew he doesn't care about people, he doesn't care about their health and wellbeing, and he was gonna help them be proffly, he was gonna let them raid our data. Like these, we are not talking enough about the tech oligarchs as a specific element of the problem.
You just say big, nameless, faceless corporation. Fine, you know what, most Americans work for corporations. And so the tech oligarchs though, they are bleeding us. And look, I think there's lots of promise for AI too, and there's lots of downsides.
I'm not just like reflexively against it, but we do need to sort of balance our humanity here. And I think that these guys are not, there's a reason Elon Musk talks about immigration all the time, he wants to make sure that we think immigrants are the problem and not the tech oligarchs. Like they are playing a distraction game. And I do think people need to, so if you could just tell your friends who we're talking about, the big thing.
Listen up, what would you include? Mark Zuckerberg, Google, Tim Cookover, Apple. I mean, look, I fundamentally agree with you. I think that the more specificity and messaging, the better for a whole host of reasons, but these are like visualized, the enemy when you name it.
I'm with you though, my frustration with AI industry generally is like, we watched all these tech barons create social media and tell us it was gonna bring the world together and fix all our problems. And it created a massive number of problems. And then you have a bunch of the same people running it back and now doing the AI thing. And it goes from Elon to Mark Zuckerberg over at Facebook and then Sam Altman, who is running Y Combinator for a long time and incubating a lot of these companies.
And it just seems like there's no lessons learned. In fact, they care even less about being perceived as good guys. So they're just like rapacious capitalists who want it all. Okay, and so as somebody who doesn't necessarily discount people just because of rapacious capitalism, I would say, you know, my favorite description of the board because people are like, you're the capitalist wing of Antifa.
So good. But I think that for me, a lot of it is, and that's why, look, I believe in innovation. And I believe in trying to solve big intractable problems. And I think technology can be a big part of that.
What you do want is for it to not live in a place of nihilism. Like you want these guys are becoming extraordinarily powerful, extraordinarily powerful in our politics in ways. I mean, this is why I think the specificity of Elon Musk, like Elon Musk is somebody who I think you can look at and say, this person is doing an enormous amount of damage and doing it on purpose. I don't think every tech oligarch is like that.
And I think that you, you know, should probably be careful about not sort of lumping in everybody together. Because I think there are people who are like, actually there are responsible ways to do this. And like, what are the ways that you could regulate this? And but those people are becoming fewer and further between.
And one of the reasons that so many people could potentially lead to Trump, including Zuckerberg, including Washington Post, Bezos, Elon, whatever, is because they were like, well, this guy will just do what we want. And I'm not here for the social good. I'm here to get what I want. And look, again, doesn't all have to be social good, but it does have to be with like, I don't know some sense of responsibility to the health of the country.
And Elon is happy, happy to become a trillionaire at the expense of us destroying each other. Absolutely destroying anything in his way. Maha, the RFK junior, obviously, like exploded into the consciousness into popularity by demagoguing vaccines, primarily the COVID pandemic, supercharged everything that he was doing. But there was a part of Maha that is totally reasonable, right?
It's like healthier foods, less processed foods, fewer chemicals in what we're eating, you know, like thinking more about like what we're feeding kids, like all of that is eminently reasonable. And I have tons of friends, I'm sure you do too, who are like, Maha curious. And we're like, well, what, why are you critical of this RFK? Like, what is wrong with any of this, right?
It becomes a complicated conversation. But it was always obvious that as a political matter and as a political coalition, there was gonna be tension between sincere Maha and Trump's pro-corporation deregulation agenda, getting rid of the EPA, things like that. And you saw this explode recently, where they gave this sweetheart legal deal to the folks who make a roundup, which is this big weed killer that a lot of Maha folks absolutely hate because things like the cancer. Are you hearing anything about Maha these days?
Like, is there anger or opportunity for Democrats? I mean, I heard a lot about Maha going into the election. I mean, the number of, it's not just women, but it was a lot of women. We're like, I want red dyes out of food.
Like they have these specific issues that I was like, and I'm a parent, but I was like, I haven't been following them. I haven't been following them. Well, look, there are a bunch of things. I don't know if you feel this way.
There are a bunch of things as you become a parent that are happening with kids, where you're like, I don't know, it wasn't like this before. Nobody had, all these nut allergies, right? Or like, there wasn't, you didn't know tons of kids who were autistic. Or like, there's like all these things.
Things that feel new. Things that feel new, right? And so you're like, where is this coming from? Why is this happening?
And I think for parents who have autistic children who feel like they don't know exactly why, there's a lot of people who are like, okay, well, maybe he's gonna get to the bottom of some of this. And actually, I think it's, I'm not sure if I think it's less about what you just outlined. It's a little bit more like, he's basically a crank who is now, you know, he's like, well, we're getting rid of vaccines everywhere. And we're cutting all this medical research.
And what I hear about, Maha, when I do hear about it, is like, oh, I was excited for RFK, but like they haven't really gotten anywhere on like X, Y, or Z, whatever the bespoke issue was that they were interested in doing it. And in fact, there was a spate of time when they came out, there was a lot of people who were upset about the idea of like, it was Tylenol causing autism, in part because mothers felt like they were being blamed, like the idea that they took Tylenol. So the only thing you can take when you're pregnant for pain relief and to suddenly take that away from women and then say, and by the way, you're at fault if your children has a medical problem because you took that, it's so cruel. And if you don't think that those women haven't figured out how to read 11 peer reviewed studies on these things, like they have.
And so I think that there was, there was some real frustration about that. Now it doesn't come up as much, I think in part because I actually think that the amount of damage being done, especially on the, I don't know if you saw this the other day, but they have found an MRA vaccine that is showing tremendous signs of adding longevity to the lives of people with pancreatic cancer. Extraordinary though. Extraordinary medical breakthrough.
You think we've been spending more money on mRNA vaccines these days or not? And so like, and I think what's unfortunate is that unlike Trump's tariffs and unlike the war in Iran, Americans feel acute pain from those things. The cutting of scientific research, the gutting of those things, it's kind of thing that takes a decade to show up and it's also in discoveries not made and therefore much harder to figure out. And so I, you don't hear as much of that as directly, although it's there, but it's much more focused on prices.
But I just know that we are paying a lot and it's just we're gonna learn about it down the road. Yeah, Bill's coming to you later. We have a couple more things, I'm gonna get the hell out of your office. So we've been talking about the midterms.
Gallup just released a new polling this week about approval of Congress. They just ask people like, do you approve or disapprove of a Congress? It's like 4%. 10% approved.
Yeah, 86% disapproved. Congrats guys, you did it. The outside law was 9%. The partisan breakdown was 20% approval of Republicans, 11% from independents, 3% from Democrats, which is not surprising, it's the Republican Congress.
Now for contact, Congress' approval rating has been mostly under water since 1974. The average is 28% approved, 65% disapproved, which is bad, but 10% is terrible. Does that help Democrats? The people like Haiti Institution, we maybe have more challengers.
How do you think about that? Yeah, Congress is funny because it's weird to get to such a low approval rating when you're not doing anything. Literally nothing. And so I'm actually, I'm like, people are mad that they're not doing anything, especially on the Democratic side.
Here's what I do know. I know that Democratic voters are so frustrated with their leadership. I mean, they are mad, they're like down with the gerontocracy and for Keem Jeffries and Schumer don't start going toe to toe with Trump. And they are not satisfied by the answer of we're shut out from political power.
They're like, I don't know, you're up there. Can you go do something? They want to see reflected back to them. I keep kind of rejecting this fight that we have on Twitter about.
Does the Democratic party need to be more moderate? Does it need to be more progressive? Like all the voters really want is for it to be more aggressive. They could sort of take relief which side of the ideological spectrum you're on as long as you are going in there and reflecting the anger and upsetness that they feel what Trump is doing.
And when you're not doing that, they are mad, which is I think where you're getting sort of those Democratic numbers. And I think, look, so much of this is just, you gave me a body of the government and I think things are going terribly in the country. And so I want to tell you that I think they're doing a terrible job because the country feels bad. So I don't know that I, and interest in terms of how it affects the midterms, people blame the party in power.
I mean, that's the only reason that I think Democrats can't pick up the kind of seats that they picked up in 2018 is because there's not enough seats available. Like there's just because it's so close right now, they can't pick up 40 seats. But like they can certainly take control. 20, 40 seats, we'd have to be winning like Trump plus 12 districts.
Yeah, and I think like, look, you can get a wave where you are picking up Trump plus seven districts, Trump plus eight districts. I mean, that wave would have to be so big, but you know what? I'm not discounting it in part because, look, Democrats are extraordinarily motivated and Republicans are sucking wind. Yes, and that's where the Tucker stuff I think helps.
That's depressing. That's right. That's like, I love that. One counterpoint to this.
The New York Times reported that Republicans have a $600 million advantage in terms of fundraising of like Republican groups over Democratic ones. How much does that worry you? It's easy after 2024 to be like, we pissed away a billion dollars, didn't move the vote, a goddamn point, who cares anymore? But in midterms, it's a bit of a different story often.
So, okay. It doesn't worry me that much in the sense that the voters are given to the candidates. Like the Democratic candidates like Talery Go and Cooper and Mary Patola, like they're putting up huge numbers, like way over the Republican counterparts. And so, there's an asymmetry that is on either side where the actual Democratic candidates are out raising the Republican counterparts, whereas the Republican infrastructure and the committees are out raising their Democratic counterparts.
And so, in the past, right? So, there's like tons of the big money coming in, whereas I think a lot of the big money on the left is feeling stern and scared. People don't want to put their names on FEC reports because Trump will go after them. That is a real thing that is happening, which, and that's why, look, I don't know how much money's going into C4s or stuff, but like that money might be evening out somewhere, but there is a lot of chilling of civic participation via donation dollars because people are afraid of showing up on Donald Trump's radar.
Yeah, and the DOJ is- So, it worries me from that point of view. And then it worries me, I think, from, I don't want to just like, you know, crap on Ken Martin, but I do think that the DNC could stand to up its game a little bit. Yeah, I actually, we've been in touch with Ken's team. We're hoping to get him on the show sometime next week to talk about this and the fundraising and some of the concerns.
Because it is a challenging atmosphere, I'm sure it is an absolute slog for him to try to rebuild that place and clear the decks after 2024. But yeah, I'm anxious like you are. And also, but you're right, the candidate fundraising is better on the Democratic side. And that's also important because you get more efficient ad rates as a elected official than you do as a party committee or a pack.
So, that's something. Yeah, and for people who are like, oh, get money out of politics and stuff. I totally, I hear, I hear, but as right now, right, when you have only so many metrics for things, like money, especially the candidates, is a good metric for enthusiasm. And so the idea that these Democratic candidates are outperforming on the money side is just a good metric for, I think enthusiasm, especially in a midterm and not a presidential.
Yes, totally agree. Pause of America's brought to you by the Working Forest Initiative. The Working Forest Initiative is a cross-industry coalition promoting a role of working forest and driving economic growth and climate resilience. The backbone of the WFI's sustainability efforts is a diverse team of working forest professionals.
From timber landowners to hiring managers and accountants, GIS analysts mapping the future of our canopy and biologists protecting wildlife. These experts ensure our working forests remain healthy and resilient. These are the stewards ensuring America's forests thrive for generations to come. The foundational principle of working forest professionals is simple, always plant more trees than are harvested.
Planting is what makes working forest sustainable and sustainable workforce are how WFI cultivates healthy ecosystems that reduce wildlife risk, protect biodiversity, and provide sustainable solutions for the future. The coalition of working forest professionals is more than managed land. They cultivate a resilient, sustainable legacy. By championing these practices today, the WFI ensures America's forests remain a vibrant resource for our economy and a vital sanctuary for our environment for generations to come.
Last question, this is Anderson. Maybe you're responsible. Definitely premature speculation about 2028. On the Republican side, you have a great piece in the Atlantic this week about how groups, our focus groups, Trump voters are talking more and more about Marco Rubio, the archivist, I think that's his only job.
And the last about JD Vance, tell us more about that. So this is Marco Rubio is maybe the first candidate I've seen where like a meme seems to be springing to life. And so the meme of Marco Rubio in the chair like this, with the new job, whatever the job is, like I see the new coach of the Panthers, like every garbage job that you can get, it actually, it is a funny joke, but what it is showing people are, I think what people are taking away from that is like, there is one person in this administration who's not a total clown. Like, and so you gotta give him all the jobs because he's the only actual serious person.
And then that's one piece of it. And then another piece is they're kind of looking around and it's like, JD Vance, who people still will say is the heir apparent. And like, okay, yeah, yeah, like JD, on the magazine, like, I don't really feel it. He's for me and focus groups now having done this long enough to see different candidates rise and fall.
He's got total wrong to stand to spies from Republican voters. Where the longer they look at him, the more they're like, and it's like they want to like him or they want to do it. But like, he's not lighting anybody up. And he's getting themselves in the sour spot with those two groups I'm talking about.
He thought he was going to be able to stand over both of them and bring them together. And instead, he's sitting in the bad spot where Tucker's got this part of Marshall over here and Rubio is starting to marshal the mag establishment over here. And so that is just interesting to me. It also doesn't help it down, but he walks around his, you know, the White House, being like, we like better JD or Marco.
You know? Every donor at Margulogos is getting asked who likes better Rubio or Vince. Also like Rubio, I think it's got a lot of credit from the base on Venezuela operation because he's seen us owning that one. When it comes to Iran, they started a war and Marco Rubio has disappeared.
He went to the stage. He went to the UFC fight. Well JD Vance went over. JD Vance like sits on the tarmac for 21 hours and packs and gets humiliated, flies home.
JD and Marco goes to UFC fight. But also Marco Rubio like did one press conference where he went up on Capitol Hill and he was like, oh yeah, we invaded because the Israel, the lobby made us do it and then he walked away and created this huge disaster for everyone involved. And then it's not said a word since he just divorced himself in this problem, probably smart politically. Probably smart politically.
I think, and this is, so look, I think that those two are an interesting contrast to me. And I just, I think for me, one of the reasons I'm so interested in hearing the strange new respect from Trump voters and the focus groups is I think I had long thought that people from the pre-Trump era, Republicans from the pre-Trump era were a non-starter for voters. But what's interesting is that especially for younger voters, they don't even know Marco Rubio. The Marco Rubio that I was like, oh, this young man, I like him.
We'll see what he does. Yeah, that's why, but you know, he was like, he was gonna be the new person he led on immigration reform, whatever. Time magazine, right? It was like the future.
Nobody thinks that. Like these guys don't know that guy. They just know the guy who's been in the tank for Trump. And so they're sort of meeting him for the first time.
People who are like 30 and below. And then for a lot of the other people, he's been enough of a lap dog for Trump and transformed himself enough that like I obviously would never vote for him in a million years ever. But a lot of Trump voters might, like they wouldn't make a Haley but he's transformed himself enough. That was interesting to me.
That sucks. I'll just say on the Republican side, I think this is another reason I don't give Tucker sort of the genuine thing. It's like, I do think Tucker's thinking about running for president. Look, I was talking to someone yesterday who served in that world.
I asked this question and he thought, no, because it's like a lot of work. And also you have to have a genuine thick skin and Tucker doesn't seem like he's someone who's very mutualistic. But look, I've long wondered if he could jump to a primary and do very well on the Republican side. He would immediately have a base of support.
Yeah, it would be interesting. Last question on the Democratic side. Is anyone making your heart flutter? Yeah, so I already mentioned Ossoff and his communication side.
I tend to be, I'm from Pennsylvania. People get mad. They're like, no one will ever nominate Josh Shapiro. But like if you follow Pennsylvania politics closely, he is beloved in Pennsylvania.
There's just not that many Democrats who have a 60% approval rating. He's gonna beat his Democratic challenger. People are like, I'm sorry, is a Republican challenger? Everybody's like, I'm sorry.
Yeah, who's he even running against? Like it's a woman. I'm forgetting her name right now. But like it's a non-starter.