Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors episode artwork

EPISODE · Jan 10, 2025 · 1H 20M

Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors

from Supreme Court Opinions · host SCOTUS Opinions

In this case, the court considered this issue: Does a plaintiff’s claim under the Administrative Procedure Act “first accrue” under 28 U-S-C § 2401(a) when an agency issues a rule, or when the rule first causes harm to the plaintiff? The case was decided on July 1, 2024. The Supreme Court held that an Administrative Procedures Act claim does not accrue for purposes of 28 U-S-C §2401(a) until the plaintiff is injured by final agency action. Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the 6-3 majority opinion of the Court. The text of 28 U-S-C §2401(a) states that a civil action against the United States must be filed "within six years after the right of action first accrues." The Court interpreted this language according to its traditional meaning in the context of statutes of limitations, concluding that a right of action "accrues" when the plaintiff has a "complete and present cause of action"—that is, when the plaintiff has the right to file suit and obtain relief. For an Administrative Procedures Act claim, this requires both final agency action (as specified in 5 U-S-C § 704) and an injury to the plaintiff (as required by 5 U-S-C § 702). The Court rejected arguments that APA claims should be treated differently from other civil actions against the government, emphasizing that § 2401(a) uses standard accrual language that had a well-settled meaning when it was enacted in 1948. The Court also distinguished § 2401(a) from other statutes that explicitly start the clock at the time of final agency action, noting that Congress chose different language for §2401(a). By interpreting "accrues" consistently with its traditional meaning, the Court concluded that an APA claim does not accrue until the plaintiff has both experienced an injury and the agency action causing that injury has become final. Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined the majority opinion in full and wrote a separate concurrence. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented and was joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe.

In this case, the court considered this issue: Does a plaintiff’s claim under the Administrative Procedure Act “first accrue” under 28 U-S-C § 2401(a) when an agency issues a rule, or when the rule first causes harm to the plaintiff? The case was decided on July 1, 2024. The Supreme Court held that an Administrative Procedures Act claim does not accrue for purposes of 28 U-S-C §2401(a) until the plaintiff is injured by final agency action. Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the 6-3 majority opinion of the Court. The text of 28 U-S-C §2401(a) states that a civil action against the United States must be filed "within six years after the right of action first accrues." The Court interpreted this language according to its traditional meaning in the context of statutes of limitations, concluding that a right of action "accrues" when the plaintiff has a "complete and present cause of action"—that is, when the plaintiff has the right to file suit and obtain relief. For an Administrative Procedures Act claim, this requires both final agency action (as specified in 5 U-S-C § 704) and an injury to the plaintiff (as required by 5 U-S-C § 702). The Court rejected arguments that APA claims should be treated differently from other civil actions against the government, emphasizing that § 2401(a) uses standard accrual language that had a well-settled meaning when it was enacted in 1948. The Court also distinguished § 2401(a) from other statutes that explicitly start the clock at the time of final agency action, noting that Congress chose different language for §2401(a). By interpreting "accrues" consistently with its traditional meaning, the Court concluded that an APA claim does not accrue until the plaintiff has both experienced an injury and the agency action causing that injury has become final. Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined the majority opinion in full and wrote a separate concurrence. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented and was joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe.

NOW PLAYING

Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors

0:00 1:20:44

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

The Laura Ingraham Show Laura Ingraham The most-watched woman in the history of cable news brings her no-holds-barred political and cultural commentary to podcasting with The Laura Ingraham Show. A bestselling author, breast cancer survivor, and mother of three internationally adopted children, Laura was the most listened-to woman in talk radio before launching her own podcast. A trailblazer across media platforms, she brings a unique perspective to this twice-weekly show, drawing on her experience as a white-collar criminal defense litigator and a Supreme Court law clerk.New episodes drop twice a week—delivering the clarity, courage, and common sense America needs. SGP Radio Originals SGP Radio I conduct interviews, talk about the real & fake of wrestling, giving my takes & opinions on social and current matters and there's much more in store. Follow SGP Radio to know when new content is live and on demand.SGP Radio is a nonstop 24/7 broadcast and podcast radio station by Gerald Roberts Hotline: 917-283-8956 For bookings, guest spots, interviews and all other SGP Radio inquiries contact Gerald Roberts emailing [email protected]. All content on SGP Radio ancillary and primary platforms are the original works of those associated with SGP Radio or third party content that SGP Radio has written consent to reproduce and redistribute. Recommendation: Must Be 18 years or olderAdvertising Disclaimer: Ads on our platforms don't inherently reflect the views of our company, affiliates or those associated with us.SGP Radio Hotline: 718-952-8034 or 917-283-8956 on WhatsApp<a href="https://www.sgpradio.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopene Two Flawed Broads Two Flawed Broads Two Flawed Broads is a podcast hosted by two women who are unapologetically themselves. With humor and wit, they discuss their journeys of self-discovery and personal growth. The hosts, Alexys and Sherri, discuss a variety of topics, from pop culture to politics, and share their personal experiences and opinions and encourage their listeners to do the same. Join these two flawed but fabulous women as they offer a fresh perspective on the world around us. Across The Pond Liberty Stacia Whittecar and Kirstin Clark Welcome to "Across the Pond Liberty," the podcast that paints the New York Liberty's journey in vibrant colours, uniting fans from both sides of the Atlantic. Join hosts Stacia from Kansas and Kirstin from Scotland, as they embark on an exhilarating season-long journey with the Liberty, delivering the latest news, updates, and a shared passion for the team. Meet Your Hosts: 🏀 Stacia: Hailing from Kansas, Stacia's love for the New York Liberty transcends geographical boundaries. With her deep understanding of the game and unwavering support for the team, Stacia is your guide to all things Liberty, both on and off the court. 🏀 Kirstin: Crossing the ocean from Scotland, Kirstin adds an international touch to the podcast. Her genuine passion for the Liberty and her unique perspective from across the pond contribute a fresh outlook that connects fans worldwide. Diving into the Liberty's World: "Across the Pond Liberty" is you

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Supreme Court Opinions?

This episode is 1 hour and 20 minutes long.

When was this Supreme Court Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on January 10, 2025.

What is this episode about?

In this case, the court considered this issue: Does a plaintiff’s claim under the Administrative Procedure Act “first accrue” under 28 U-S-C § 2401(a) when an agency issues a rule, or when the rule first causes harm to the plaintiff? The case was...

Can I download this Supreme Court Opinions episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!