Daily Devotion

Litigation Practice Group PodcastOn March 8, Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood of the District Court of Guam struck down a Guam law that permitted only those who meet the definition of “Native Inhabitants of Guam� to vote in a future status plebiscite. This decision has been met with opposition from elected officials, protests at the federal courthouse, public rallies, and now an appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Supporters of the plebiscite are forcing a reexamination of the role of the United States on this strategically important island and�opponents contend�they are doing so without giving all citizens a voice in the process. What did the district court decide, and what does the reaction say about the rule of law and respect for the Constitution?� Christian Adams joined us to discuss the latest in�Davis v. Guam.Featuring:J. Christian Adams, Election Lawyer Center

Civil Rights Practice Group PodcastAlthough a territory of the United States and subject to the Constitution�s guarantees of non-discrimination, Guam law permits only those who meet the definition of “Native Inhabitants of Guam� to vote in a future status plebiscite. Guam thus excludes most citizens of the United States from voting in the plebiscite. Supporters of the plebiscite are forcing a reexamination of the role of the United States on this strategically important island without giving all citizens a voice in the process. What are the implications for the reach of the U.S. Constitution and U.S. national security? An ongoing lawsuit against Guam will be discussed.Featuring:J. Christian Adams,��Election Lawyer Center

This episode is also available as a blog post: http://brucesbible.website/2022/02/25/guam-covid-update/ --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/bruce-dinsman/support

This episode is also available as a blog post: http://brucesbible.website/2021/08/21/covid19-guam-update/ --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/bruce-dinsman/support