EPISODE · Apr 14, 2025 · 12 MIN
Deep Dive into Religious Affections by Jonathan Edwards - It Is No Sign One Way Or the Other, That Religious Affections Are Very Great, Or Raised Very High
from Reformed Thinking · host Edison Wu
Jonathan Edwards, in the provided excerpts from "Religious Affections," addresses the question of how to discern genuine spiritual experiences from superficial emotionalism. A key point he emphasizes is that the intensity or height of religious affections is not a reliable sign of true grace. Experiencing strong emotions in response to religious matters, whether joy, sorrow, or zeal, does not automatically mean those affections are genuinely spiritual or saving. Conversely, a lack of highly intense emotions doesn't necessarily indicate a lack of true religion.Edwards argues against two common but incorrect approaches to evaluating religious affections. The first is condemning all strong religious feelings as mere "enthusiasm" or delusion without proper examination. He points out that true religion, if it involves affections, should naturally lead to strong feelings when faith is vibrant. Scripture itself commands and portrays high degrees of love for God, hatred of sin, and rejoicing in His promises. The second error is assuming that anyone who exhibits strong religious affections possesses true grace. Edwards uses numerous biblical examples, such as the Israelites' fleeting fervor, the Galatians' wavering affection for Paul, and the multitudes' fickle praise of Jesus, to illustrate that intense religious feelings can be temporary and superficial, not rooted in a truly transformed heart.Therefore, the mere greatness of religious affections is "no sign one way or the other" regarding their spiritual authenticity. Edwards aims to move beyond this unreliable criterion. His purpose is to encourage a more discerning approach, one that looks at the underlying nature and source of religious affections rather than simply their intensity. He sets the stage for a deeper analysis where he will outline specific characteristics that distinguish genuinely gracious affections from those that are not. The consensus of "all orthodox divines" also supports the idea that highly raised religious affections do not necessarily equate to true religion.Reformed Theologian GPT: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-XXwzX1gnv-reformed-theologianPatreon: patreon.com/edi_reformed
What this episode covers
Jonathan Edwards, in the provided excerpts from "Religious Affections," addresses the question of how to discern genuine spiritual experiences from superficial emotionalism. A key point he emphasizes is that the intensity or height of religious affections is not a reliable sign of true grace. Experiencing strong emotions in response to religious matters, whether joy, sorrow, or zeal, does not automatically mean those affections are genuinely spiritual or saving. Conversely, a lack of highly intense emotions doesn't necessarily indicate a lack of true religion.Edwards argues against two common but incorrect approaches to evaluating religious affections. The first is condemning all strong religious feelings as mere "enthusiasm" or delusion without proper examination. He points out that true religion, if it involves affections, should naturally lead to strong feelings when faith is vibrant. Scripture itself commands and portrays high degrees of love for God, hatred of sin, and rejoicing in His promises. The second error is assuming that anyone who exhibits strong religious affections possesses true grace. Edwards uses numerous biblical examples, such as the Israelites' fleeting fervor, the Galatians' wavering affection for Paul, and the multitudes' fickle praise of Jesus, to illustrate that intense religious feelings can be temporary and superficial, not rooted in a truly transformed heart.Therefore, the mere greatness of religious affections is "no sign one way or the other" regarding their spiritual authenticity. Edwards aims to move beyond this unreliable criterion. His purpose is to encourage a more discerning approach, one that looks at the underlying nature and source of religious affections rather than simply their intensity. He sets the stage for a deeper analysis where he will outline specific characteristics that distinguish genuinely gracious affections from those that are not. The consensus of "all orthodox divines" also supports the idea that highly raised religious affections do not necessarily equate to true religion.Reformed Theologian GPT: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-XXwzX1gnv-reformed-theologianPatreon: patreon.com/edi_reformed
NOW PLAYING
Deep Dive into Religious Affections by Jonathan Edwards - It Is No Sign One Way Or the Other, That Religious Affections Are Very Great, Or Raised Very High
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Feb 8, 2026 ·26m
Jan 23, 2021 ·4m
Jan 13, 2021 ·10m
Jan 8, 2021 ·6m
Jan 6, 2021 ·15m