Does Free Will Really Exist? | Jonathan Edwards

An episode of the Reformed Thinking podcast, hosted by Edison Wu, titled "Does Free Will Really Exist? | Jonathan Edwards" was published on April 1, 2026 and runs 33 minutes.

April 1, 2026 ·33m · Reformed Thinking

0:00 / 0:00

Summary

Deep Dive into Freedom of the Will by Jonathan Edwards - Wherein It Is Considered Whether There Is Or Can Be Any Sort of Freedom of Will, As That wherein Arminians Place the Essence of the Liberty of All Moral Agents; and Whether Any Such Thing Ever Was or Can Be Conceived ofIn his critique of the Arminian doctrine of human liberty, Jonathan Edwards argues against the notion that the freedom of the will consists of a self-determining power, perfect indifference, and absolute contingence. Edwards demonstrates that if the will determines all its own free acts, every free act of choice must be determined by a preceding free choice, creating an absurd infinite regress. If the first act in this sequence is not determined by the will, it is not free under the Arminian definition, rendering all subsequent acts unfree.Edwards asserts that nothing comes to pass without a cause, including human volition. The Arminian proposition that free acts occur without a cause undermines the foundational principle of cause and effect, which is necessary for proving the existence of God. Instead, Edwards posits that every act of the will is necessarily connected to the dictates of the understanding and the influence of motives. The mind always chooses what appears to be the greatest good in its present view, meaning the will is necessarily driven by antecedent motives rather than spontaneous self-determination.Additionally, Edwards dismisses the idea of liberty as a state of perfect indifference, since the very act of choosing implies preference, and choice cannot coexist with absolute indifference. Finally, he demonstrates that God's absolute and certain foreknowledge of the future actions of moral agents completely refutes the concept of contingent volitions. If human actions were genuinely contingent and devoid of all necessity, God could not accurately predict the future, rendering biblical prophecies mere uncertain guesses. Therefore, God's infallible foreknowledge proves that future events are inherently necessary and indissolubly connected to their causes.Reformed Theologian GPT: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-XXwzX1gnv-reformed-theologianYoutube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReformedExplainerSpotify Music: https://open.spotify.com/artist/1t5dz4vEgvHqUknYQfwpRI?si=e-tDRFR2Qf6By1sAcMdkdwhttps://buymeacoffee.com/edi2730

Episode Description

In his critique of the Arminian doctrine of human liberty, Jonathan Edwards argues against the notion that the freedom of the will consists of a self-determining power, perfect indifference, and absolute contingence. Edwards demonstrates that if the will determines all its own free acts, every free act of choice must be determined by a preceding free choice, creating an absurd infinite regress. If the first act in this sequence is not determined by the will, it is not free under the Arminian definition, rendering all subsequent acts unfree.

Edwards asserts that nothing comes to pass without a cause, including human volition. The Arminian proposition that free acts occur without a cause undermines the foundational principle of cause and effect, which is necessary for proving the existence of God. Instead, Edwards posits that every act of the will is necessarily connected to the dictates of the understanding and the influence of motives. The mind always chooses what appears to be the greatest good in its present view, meaning the will is necessarily driven by antecedent motives rather than spontaneous self-determination.

Additionally, Edwards dismisses the idea of liberty as a state of perfect indifference, since the very act of choosing implies preference, and choice cannot coexist with absolute indifference. Finally, he demonstrates that God's absolute and certain foreknowledge of the future actions of moral agents completely refutes the concept of contingent volitions. If human actions were genuinely contingent and devoid of all necessity, God could not accurately predict the future, rendering biblical prophecies mere uncertain guesses. Therefore, God's infallible foreknowledge proves that future events are inherently necessary and indissolubly connected to their causes.

Reformed Theologian GPT: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-XXwzX1gnv-reformed-theologian

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReformedExplainer

Spotify Music: https://open.spotify.com/artist/1t5dz4vEgvHqUknYQfwpRI?si=e-tDRFR2Qf6By1sAcMdkdw

https://buymeacoffee.com/edi2730