Does Trump's Massive $454 Million Penalty Violate His 8th Amendment Rights? episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 1, 2024 · 16 MIN

Does Trump's Massive $454 Million Penalty Violate His 8th Amendment Rights?

from Newsmakers · host CBN News

As 2024 presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump continues to face various court battles, an appeals court granted him at least a temporary reprieve from a $454 million fine. With Trump up against a deadline earlier this week to pay the penalty, the appeals court lowered the sum to a $175 million bond, giving the former president 10 days to secure the monies. This not only at least temporarily lowered the sum but also relieved Trump from New York Attorney General Letitia James's pledge to seize his assets should he be unwilling or unable to pay the larger penalty. If, in months to come, the appeals court does rule in the attorney general's favor and against Trump, he could still be forced to pay the $454 million bond. Some critics have claimed the sum is unheard of, with a number of talking heads alleging the massive bond is a violation of the 8th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which reads, "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." Bradley Jacob, a professor at Regent University School of Law, told CBN News the 8th Amendment is "primarily about criminal law in a criminal court," which is noteworthy considering Trump's case is civil. Jacob went on to explain some of the parameters and confines of the 8th Amendment text. "You can't give cruel and unusual punishments," he said. "You can't tar and feather someone; you can't impale them on a stake — those kinds of things are not permitted under the Constitution." Jacob continued, "Bail can't be way out of proportion to the crime; if you're going to go on trial for jaywalking, they can't put $10,000 bail on that ... those kinds of issues." Despite the criminal aspects of the 8th Amendment, Jacon said there have been some court cases indicating excessive fines could also apply to a fine or judgment in a civil case "if the amount of money that's in the judgment is just way out of proportion to the offense." This is why some might be claiming this is the case in Trump's current battle. Hear him explain.

As 2024 presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump continues to face various court battles, an appeals court granted him at least a temporary reprieve from a $454 million fine. With Trump up against a deadline earlier this week to pay the penalty, the appeals court lowered the sum to a $175 million bond, giving the former president 10 days to secure the monies. This not only at least temporarily lowered the sum but also relieved Trump from New York Attorney General Letitia James's pledge to seize his assets should he be unwilling or unable to pay the larger penalty. If, in months to come, the appeals court does rule in the attorney general's favor and against Trump, he could still be forced to pay the $454 million bond. Some critics have claimed the sum is unheard of, with a number of talking heads alleging the massive bond is a violation of the 8th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which reads, "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." Bradley Jacob, a professor at Regent University School of Law, told CBN News the 8th Amendment is "primarily about criminal law in a criminal court," which is noteworthy considering Trump's case is civil. Jacob went on to explain some of the parameters and confines of the 8th Amendment text. "You can't give cruel and unusual punishments," he said. "You can't tar and feather someone; you can't impale them on a stake — those kinds of things are not permitted under the Constitution." Jacob continued, "Bail can't be way out of proportion to the crime; if you're going to go on trial for jaywalking, they can't put $10,000 bail on that ... those kinds of issues." Despite the criminal aspects of the 8th Amendment, Jacon said there have been some court cases indicating excessive fines could also apply to a fine or judgment in a civil case "if the amount of money that's in the judgment is just way out of proportion to the offense." This is why some might be claiming this is the case in Trump's current battle. Hear him explain.

NOW PLAYING

Does Trump's Massive $454 Million Penalty Violate His 8th Amendment Rights?

0:00 16:08

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Ukraine Calling Громадське радіо Welcome to Ukraine Calling, Hromadske Radio’s weekly English-language current affairs program. In 2024, we revamped the show with a new format, making it available not only as a podcast but also on YouTube for a more immersive experience.Started in 2016, the podcast is now hosted by Brian Bonner, a seasoned American journalist with extensive experience in Ukraine. Join Brian as he engages in insightful interviews with top newsmakers and fascinating individuals who have captivating stories to share.Запис Ukraine Calling спершу з'явиться на hromadskeradio.org. The Tape Bloomberg and iHeartRadio Matt Miller and Paul Sweeney focus on market coverage as Wall Street begins its day, with analysis from Bloomberg Opinion writers, Bloomberg Intelligence analysts, and influential newsmakers. Vermont Viewpoint Vermont Viewpoint Vermont Viewpoint covers a lot of ground, both geographically and topically. You'll hear from lawmakers, newsmakers, business people and your own friends and neighbors. This is the show you want to tune into to hear what compelling and/or fun topic you'll be introduced to each day. RSN Country Racing Show RSN Racing And Sport RSN-927 presents Victoria’s only show dedicated to the state’s vital country racing scene.Every week, Gareth Hall and Maggie Payne & Harry Coffey talk with the racing newsmakers and personalities from around the state.It’s the grass-roots racing report. And you can catch it on-air on RSN Central, or by podcast.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Newsmakers?

This episode is 16 minutes long.

When was this Newsmakers episode published?

This episode was published on April 1, 2024.

What is this episode about?

As 2024 presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump continues to face various court battles, an appeals court granted him at least a temporary reprieve from a $454 million fine. With Trump up against a deadline earlier this week to pay the penalty, the...

Can I download this Newsmakers episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!