Editori scientifici, una mafia? malascienza pt2 episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 30, 2020 · 43 MIN

Editori scientifici, una mafia? malascienza pt2

from Mentecast · host Massimo & Adrien

I grandi editori scientifici impongono prezzi, si rifiutano di ritrarre pubblicazioni e tradiscono le stesse regole di peer-review che hanno imposto? Un problema che sembra non avere soluzioni. Seguici anche su: YOUTUBE https://youtube.com/channel/UCSccnE9-Y9PfJC2thw-vgtg FACEBOOK https://facebook.com/mentecast/ SPOTIFY https://open.spotify.com/show/6rEXAE1nfxmfdzY9dtFYO7 iTUNES https://podcasts.apple.com/it/podcast/mentecast/id1458522809? SOUNDCLOUD https://soundcloud.com/user-613167048 TWITTER https://twitter.com/mentecast INSTAGRAM https://instagram.com/mentecast FONTI: Al Gore e le investigazioni del 1981 https://books.google.it/books?id=umgkhP4hJLEC&pg=PT102&lpg=PT102#v=onepage&q&f=false La definizione di "scientific misconduct" https://books.google.it/books?id=CeGnUwL3zawC&pg=PA105&lpg=PA105#v=onepage&q&f=false Open Access Gold e i guadagni degli editori di riviste accademiche https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYIwVDX0y9Q https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science Riviste Predatorie https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/aug/10/predatory-publishers-the-journals-who-churn-out-fake-science Aaron Swartz e i documenti di JSTOR https://www.justice.gov/archive/usao/ma/news/2011/July/SwartzAaronPR.html Sci-Hub, la lotta per l'Open Access e l'open science https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/scientific-research-shouldnt-sit-behind-a-paywall/ https://www.vox.com/2016/2/17/11024334/sci-hub-free-academic-papers https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/mar/28/paywalls-block-scientific-progress-research-should-be-open-to-everyone https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/6/3/18271538/open-access-elsevier-california-sci-hub-academic-paywalls https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2018/jun/29/elsevier-are-corrupting-open-science-in-europe Petizione GoFree2Science https://freeaccesstoscience.wesign.it/en Università di Washington, echo chamber scientifica https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.24326 https://soc.washington.edu/research/projects-and-grants/echo-chambers-science-impact-academic-recommender-systems-dissemination Il costo sulle librerie accademiche americane e il "bundling" https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/scientific-research-shouldnt-sit-behind-a-paywall/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/39728381_Numeracy_Open-Access_Publishing_to_Reduce_the_Cost_of_Scholarly_Journals https://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/01/21/elsevier-my-part-in-its-downfall/13/ Singapore Statement on Research integrity https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954607/ La Méthode Scientifique - Rétractations : post-publication, scientifique triste https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/la-methode-scientifique/retractations-post-publication-scientifique-triste Registered Reports https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02674-6 https://www.cos.io/our-services/registered-reports Idrossiclorochina, lo scandalo https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/mysterious-company-s-coronavirus-papers-top-medical-journals-may-be-unraveling https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/10/surgisphere-sapan-desai-lancet-study-hydroxychloroquine-mass-audit-scientific-papers https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext Frances Arnold ritratta https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/jan/06/nobel-prize-winner-demonstrates-best-way-apologize-chemist-frances-arnold

I grandi editori scientifici impongono prezzi, si rifiutano di ritrarre pubblicazioni e tradiscono le stesse regole di peer-review che hanno imposto? Un problema che sembra non avere soluzioni. Seguici anche su: YOUTUBE https://youtube.com/channel/UCSccnE9-Y9PfJC2thw-vgtg FACEBOOK https://facebook.com/mentecast/ SPOTIFY https://open.spotify.com/show/6rEXAE1nfxmfdzY9dtFYO7 iTUNES https://podcasts.apple.com/it/podcast/mentecast/id1458522809? SOUNDCLOUD https://soundcloud.com/user-613167048 TWITTER https://twitter.com/mentecast INSTAGRAM https://instagram.com/mentecast FONTI: Al Gore e le investigazioni del 1981 https://books.google.it/books?id=umgkhP4hJLEC&pg=PT102&lpg=PT102#v=onepage&q&f=false La definizione di "scientific misconduct" https://books.google.it/books?id=CeGnUwL3zawC&pg=PA105&lpg=PA105#v=onepage&q&f=false Open Access Gold e i guadagni degli editori di riviste accademiche https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYIwVDX0y9Q https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science Riviste Predatorie https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/aug/10/predatory-publishers-the-journals-who-churn-out-fake-science Aaron Swartz e i documenti di JSTOR https://www.justice.gov/archive/usao/ma/news/2011/July/SwartzAaronPR.html Sci-Hub, la lotta per l'Open Access e l'open science https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/scientific-research-shouldnt-sit-behind-a-paywall/ https://www.vox.com/2016/2/17/11024334/sci-hub-free-academic-papers https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/mar/28/paywalls-block-scientific-progress-research-should-be-open-to-everyone https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/6/3/18271538/open-access-elsevier-california-sci-hub-academic-paywalls https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2018/jun/29/elsevier-are-corrupting-open-science-in-europe Petizione GoFree2Science https://freeaccesstoscience.wesign.it/en Università di Washington, echo chamber scientifica https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.24326 https://soc.washington.edu/research/projects-and-grants/echo-chambers-science-impact-academic-recommender-systems-dissemination Il costo sulle librerie accademiche americane e il "bundling" https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/scientific-research-shouldnt-sit-behind-a-paywall/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/39728381_Numeracy_Open-Access_Publishing_to_Reduce_the_Cost_of_Scholarly_Journals https://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/01/21/elsevier-my-part-in-its-downfall/13/ Singapore Statement on Research integrity https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954607/ La Méthode Scientifique - Rétractations : post-publication, scientifique triste https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/la-methode-scientifique/retractations-post-publication-scientifique-triste Registered Reports https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02674-6 https://www.cos.io/our-services/registered-reports Idrossiclorochina, lo scandalo https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/mysterious-company-s-coronavirus-papers-top-medical-journals-may-be-unraveling https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/10/surgisphere-sapan-desai-lancet-study-hydroxychloroquine-mass-audit-scientific-papers https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext Frances Arnold ritratta https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/jan/06/nobel-prize-winner-demonstrates-best-way-apologize-chemist-frances-arnold

NOW PLAYING

Editori scientifici, una mafia? malascienza pt2

0:00 43:44

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Mentecast?

This episode is 43 minutes long.

When was this Mentecast episode published?

This episode was published on June 30, 2020.

What is this episode about?

I grandi editori scientifici impongono prezzi, si rifiutano di ritrarre pubblicazioni e tradiscono le stesse regole di peer-review che hanno imposto? Un problema che sembra non avere soluzioni. Seguici anche su: YOUTUBE...

Can I download this Mentecast episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!