Ep. 299 Clinical Decision-Making in Urodynamics: From Stress Incontinence to Neurogenic Bladders with Dr. Howard Goldman and Dr. David Ginsberg

When does urodynamics actually change management and when is it unnecessary? In BackTable Urology’s latest collaboration with the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU), Dr. Howard Goldman and Dr. David Ginsberg join Dr. Giulia Ippolito to discuss the evidence-based use of urodynamics across a range of clinical scenarios. --- Get the BackTable apphttps://www.backtable.com/app --- Timestamps 00:00 - Introduction 05:04 - Case: Male Urinary Retention12:38 - Case: Failed Sling18:44 - Case: Parkinson’s OAB21:50 - Case: Post-Prostatectomy26:48 - Prolapse Without Urodynamics32:29 - Obstruction Workup36:16 - Refractory OAB42:49 - Interstitial Cystitis45:18 - Recurrent UTI Evaluation50:16 - Conclusions --- More about this episode They review guideline-driven indications and limitations of urodynamic testing, emphasizing that many common conditions do not routinely require testing. Through case-based discussion, they highlight situations where urodynamics can meaningfully inform care, such as complex neurogenic patients and cases requiring differentiation between obstruction and detrusor underactivity. The conversation highlights the importance of clinical judgment, targeted use of adjuncts such as uroflow, and aligning testing with decision-making to optimize patient outcomes.This podcast is supported by the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU). --- Resources Female Urgency, Trial of Urodynamics as Routine Evaluation (FUTURE study)https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34702331/ --- BackTable Urology is the go-to podcast for urologists, urologic oncologists, and urogynecologists. Download the free BackTable app to get early access to new episodes, cases, and courses curated by physicians in your specialty. ► https://www.backtable.com/app