Episódio 02

An episode of the Sensu Comum podcast, hosted by Sensu Comum, titled "Episódio 02" was published on June 27, 2021 and runs 39 minutes.

June 27, 2021 ·39m · Sensu Comum

0:00 / 0:00

Summary

Pós-verdade e o negacionismo.

Episode Description

Pós-verdade e o negacionismo.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

Apr 11, 2026 ·3m

Romans Chapter 1

Apr 11, 2026 ·29m

Romans Chapter 2

Apr 11, 2026 ·13m

Romans Chapter 3

Apr 11, 2026 ·17m

Romans Chapter 4

Apr 11, 2026 ·11m

Romans Chapter 5

Apr 11, 2026 ·13m

Similar Podcasts

The James Carrington Podcast james carrington Common sense commentary from a moderate liberal L'Entr-eux Deux Au Coeur de l'Encre Vous allez suivre un ingénieur suite à une construction sur la lune qui a mal tourné,il va tomber au sens propre comme au figuré dans un nouveau Monde, mais est-ce le bon ou le mauvais. Et où est-ce que l'on peut bien être ? Que de questions. À la fin, seul lui pourra vous le dire… (OU PAS !) Commata: Communication Theory and Research Commata Commata: the plural of comma.In each episode we take an extended pause to deconstruct the complex and multi-faceted syntactic and semantic nuances that comprise human interaction. The Chrysopa Commata is a green, winged insect that - much like communication - defies simple categorization, interpretation, and all sense of shared understanding. Chrysopa have been moved from one genus to another and back again.Cover art "Chrysopa commata1" by Teemu Rintala and Timo Lehto. Licensed under Creative Commons 4.0. available at: https://artsdatabanken.no/Pages/223055/Strekgulloeye Commentary on Romans by Theodoret of Cyrus (c. 393 AD - c. 466 AD) LibriVox Theodoret was born at Antioch, A.D. 386. His studies were pursued under Theodore of Mopsuista and Chrysostom, from the works of the latter of whom the present commentary is by many esteemed little more than an abridgement. This, however, on comparing the writings of both those Fathers, can hardly perhaps be admitted in its fullest sense."Of all the Fathers, who have composed works of different kinds, Theodoret is one of those who has been very happy in every one of them. There are some who have been excellent writers in matters of controversy, but bad interpreters. Others have been good historians, but bad divines. Some have good success in morality, who have no skill in doctrinal points. And very rare is it for those who have addicted themselves to works of piety to be good critics. Theodoret had all these qualities, and it may be said, that he has equally deserved the name of a good interpreter, divine, historian, writer of controversies, apologist for religion, and autho

URL copied to clipboard!