is sending growth. Dave, welcome to the show. Chris, good to see you. Thanks for having me.
Thanks for stirring up a shitstorm on my LinkedIn post today. Thank you for everything. And I love this format. Your audience, the people that come to this, are always super thoughtful and engaged.
And so anytime you reach out and want to chat marketing, I'm happy to do it. And this topic is, I'm not the MQL conversion rate ratio guy. That's your wheelhouse. The thing we're going to talk about today is a little bit more my wheelhouse.
So I'm excited to be here and chat with you, my friend. I love that. Yeah, and I've been able to be relatively successful with it too. So I'm looking forward to sharing it.
So everyone, the topic here is community and social. And I'm sure content's going to get in here as well. And we might get into the area of influencer and some more like experimental sponsorships, sponsoring podcasts or influencers or events or communities and some things that I hear people thinking about doing. And so all those kind of topics are in bounds.
Let's start with community Dave. I think there's a really interesting perspective that I wanted to try and hear from you. And I think the core sort of where I want to set it is the difference between when you have a community and the community is your business, for instance, for like you or pavilion or something like that, versus if you're a SaaS company and you build a community as like the side car to your product as a way to try and like grow with an area. I actually think the mechanics of how you do it and why are very different.
And we've seen examples, like there was a big acquisition spree where high profile SaaS companies would acquire a community and their newsletter sales act or via outreach and other ones like that, that I'm not the only one to sort of judge this, but on the outside, many of them looked like failure acquisitions. What do you think of those ingredients, especially given your knowledge from in-house? Like what are the ingredients and things that are important to actually be successful with a community, like an owned community strategy for a B to B business? Ooh, that's steep, man.
And you think that there was a failure? I don't know who could argue. I don't know if I know enough to argue on either side of that. But if it was a failure, I think it makes a lot of sense why.
And I actually think one of the reasons why I look at Exit 5 now and it's been successful actually think about all the time that this would be much different if it was inside of a company and because that is because there would be some quest to, how do we nurture this audience and get them to buy our product at some point? And I think that's where a lot of this breaks down and a lot of things that work to build a successful community. Like if I look at how Chris Walker came up, he started with nothing and just was writing his thoughts on LinkedIn and built a following. And that following there led to other things.
I think when you start with the other way around, when you already have a company and you're like, oh, let's go build a community now. It's very hard to do that because you start looking at the time and the resources and how many people are working on this project and who's gonna manage it? And then like if the three people working on your community inside of the company aren't doing some other things and that thing's not working, it brings in measurement to this as far as people's time, budget, investment, how is this converting? What are the goals of it?
I've been in a couple of companies where we unintentionally built community like when I was at Drift as example, we didn't set out to build a community. The CEO and I gave a cancel, we had a podcast and we were active on social media and we just had no goals. We're like, hey, we're gonna just, we're passionate about this topic, we're gonna talk about what we're doing as we're building this company and just see where it goes and that grew organically. And I think anytime something grows organically, you know it's working by people telling you.
And I think when you try to force to build something inside of the company, you even measure community in a weird way. Like when you start to build your company, right? You had pipeline coming from your existing audience. You need to have to figure out like, well, how do I know this is working?
You know this is working because your first 10, 20, 100 customers were like, oh, I follow you on LinkedIn and I listen to your podcast. So a lot of the measurement stuff is where this starts to break down inside of the company. But I wonder if you would articulate it differently. How would you answer that question?
I think it's precise. And I think that when you're building a community on its own versus when you're building it in a company, there starts to be competing objectives and conflicts of interest that I think get you away from the first principles of why you would build a community in the first place. So when you see the communities that tend to be more sticky and more engaged, you often don't see them attached to a product or a company. You see them as an independent entity that monetizes against the community because the way they monetize is directly correlated to the members being more successful.
Where in SAS it's not necessarily like that. Or if you're selling a beat, it doesn't have to be SAS, any type of beat of the product. That the objective of the community is to be a lead in to sell the product, not necessarily provide value to the members. And so you don't get this nice grassroots movement.
So I think it all comes back to first principles of why you're doing it in the first place. It's to share great information. Yes, we're all business professionals. We're all doing this for a reason.
So we have to have some scrutiny over is this worth our time. It's valuable. When I always looked at it at the beginning, it was our people coming back next week. The people that are on the show, if I did the show and we did another one next week, did you all come back and watch it again?
Was it that valuable that you would dedicate another hour of your time to come learn and professionally develop and stuff like that? And when you start to see the repeat visitors and that type of engagement, you know that you're onto something. And so I think just looking at what are the right things that you need in a community, I think that would be one of the core ingredients. I also think so much of the value of community to me is also not just the direct sales ROI.
It's like you do a session with 100 people and we talk about this topic and chat blows up. And it was a really fun and engaging session. We just got incredible data on like, oh, this topic is really interesting. Let's go do more.
And so I've loved having community involved in my marketing and brand building efforts because it's like the ultimate, you just feel like you have your finger on the pulse of like what types of content that you can create, right? All of your content strategy over the years, Chris, I'm sure has been like, you had an idea, wrote a LinkedIn post about it. Oh shit, that got a ton of comments. People are really interested in this topic.
Let's go do an event about that. Let's go do a podcast about that. Let's go write a bunch of articles about that. Maybe there's something that we should be educating our customers about.
And so so much of this community piece is the feedback loop. And I get a ton of ROI from that specifically. And I hate the conversation with the VP of sales or CFO about like, well, how many customers do we get? Well, this thing is actually a Trojan horse for our content strategy.
I'm talking to customers all the time, even if it's just 10 or 20 of them on a Zoom call. It could be at scale with comments on a LinkedIn video or post, right? Or it could be in a smaller format. But that's a huge piece of that.
And now with exit five as just an example, it's the business that I'm working on right now, I might have an idea, like I got to come on and talk to you all today. I might have an idea at the end of this. I'm going to go put that in our Slack and be like, hey, I got the topic for next week's newsletter. And then I send that out.
And then the response to that is really good. Hey, we should go do a 50 person meetup, focus on how to build B2B community. I think that's such an underrated piece of community building that the business side of the house doesn't often see. It's this feedback loop.
And I guess let's go back to marketing, right? I believe in the science of marketing, but also so much of this is an art. And I think the great marketers are great taste makers in that industry. If you're selling to finance or HR or whatever, you know that industry really well.
That is such a key ingredient to being able to do successful marketing. I want to talk through, because I see a lot of companies now and people are even coming to me looking at it. I think people have matured a little bit in how they think about an influencer relationship over the past couple of years or a sponsorship with a thought leader. Back in the day it was literally, I would get a DM and it was like, hey, we'll pay you a hundred bucks to post and tag our company.
Here's exactly what you want to post. And it's just no, you know? But I think that conversations people are having now are much more thoughtful around engaging influencers and having a sponsored event with them and then creating different types of assets with it and having a less directly promotional, like B2C direct response type of view on influencer. I would love to hear what you're seeing.
And also a lot of people might be thinking about doing this in some fashion, whether it's for extra five or marketing as their buyer, and they're looking at it in a different community, I think it would be valuable for people as they explore this uncharted territory. So about two years ago, a year and a half ago is when I went all in on this business, and I did a lot of the things, I did a lot of those, paid me $100 to post on LinkedIn. I just wanted to try all these different formats of like, I want to monetize this content slash influencer type business. What I learned was no surprise, the offer and the copy and the content really matters, the fit of something really matters.
And so if somebody reached out and they're like, Hey, we'll pay you X to promote this thing or do some ads on your podcast, it's not going to convert, right? The stuff that works really well is when like all of the circles in the Venn diagram overlap really well, right? It's the right customer, it's the right fit. It's a product that we use or involved with in some way.
And if you go B2B or B2C, it's all the same things, right? You can tell if you're following someone on Instagram and they clearly have never used that product or just a very random product for them to be promoting. And so one thing that I'm trying to do now that we've hired a team is just we're trying to be much more thoughtful and specific and almost like bring an account management approach to the companies that we work with from a sponsorship standpoint. It's like, Hey, we've learned a bunch about this audience, like you can't just send us copy and we're just going to put it out and it's going to magically work.
Like we know what this audience wants. Let's massage this. Let's just copy together. And I think that's a big piece of this is like even in just picking who you're going to, if you want to do an influencer partnership, who are you going to work with and why?
And I can tell when people reach out to us as an example, like, Oh, this person has never read or involved in anything that we've ever done versus someone who's like, Hey, I've been a member of the community for a year and a half. I listen to all your podcasts. I work at this company. Here's a product that we want to talk about and here's a creative way to do it.
Just like marketing comes back to having that deep understanding of the customer and what's going to be interesting to them. And I think you have to do it in an authentic way. I'll give you an example. I'm happy to share this.
I'm obsessed with copywriting and writing and the creative side of business. I want to find a company that's in the AI and content creation space and I want them to sponsor exit five for the year. And I want to be a partner with them, but I really want to go all in and like use the product to the max and talk about the use cases. And once a week, right about like, Hey, here's two interesting things we did with the product, we do the product this week and help them drive the roadmap and take our feedback and do the sponsor stuff with them, do podcasts ads, do LinkedIn, do, you know, webinars, whatever, but those are going to be the best types of partnerships.
We have one now. There's a company called NAC and they do email design and they basically reached out and they're like, Hey, we'll help you level up all your emails for the whole year. We'll be your featured email sponsor. And that's a perfect fit for us because we got to send out emails every week anyway that email.
We use their tool. We design all our emails and their tool. We send it out. That's a very natural fit.
And so I'm trying to get smarter about like, let's do this with products that we actually use and have a deep knowledge of. And I think that's kind of the insight that is so obvious from like the consumer world that we're now trying to bring here and this can apply whether you sell to marketers or HR. If you don't have a deep understanding of that industry, what they're interested in, how they might use your product, it's not going to be a fit and the audience is smart enough to know that. Yeah.
And this is bleeding into a topic that I've talked about, which looking at influencers and key opinion leaders differently. This is really a key opinion leader strategy. Just to bring people back in like 2016 when I worked at a medical device company, we would find people like Dave, but they were doctors at Seattle Children's Hospital and they posted content about medicine on Facebook and they would speak at the conferences and they would do sponsored webinars with us and they would use our product and they would test it in different ways and they would give us product feedback and they would be on their advisory board. And we had like five to 10 people like that in every single segment of our business that could help in promotion, but also product feedback and thought leadership and taking references for customers and building different best practices and guidelines about how to use the product.
And I think those type of low volume and very, very high quality depth of partnerships, which I'm calling a key opinion leader strategy will become a cornerstone in B2B SaaS like it is in medical device and pharma and manufacturing and other industries like that. I think that's a really awesome insight and to know it's not just marketers. It's not just me and Dave in your industry, if you're selling to CFOs or respiratory therapists or B2B business consultants with less than five employees, whatever audience you're going after, there are thought leaders in the space that have social media profiles have trust, would get a ton of value from your product, give you great feedback on your product, tell other people and being able to try and figure out how you align with those people, whether in a formal partnership or just having them come on your podcast and do some content collaboration, I think there's just a very large opportunity in that space overall. I think a lot of people tend to try to go wide with influencers and I think less wide and more depth would be a better approach.
Yeah, one question I've seen come up in our community as more people are talking about influencers is people are like, hey, where can I find a list of influencers in my industry? That's a huge, that's a red flag to me. I'm not an influencer marketing expert, but if you have to go and find a, where are the info, hey, does anyone have it? Where can I find a list of the influencers in my industry?
Like that seems nuts to me. How do you, you need to know that it's never going to work unless you know and that comes from you watching YouTube, listening to podcasts, going to events like I'm sure in your medical device sales days, Chris, I'm sure you personally had a deep understanding because you're reading blogs, you're reading news in the space, like you have to know those things personally. There's not going to be some database that's like, oh yeah, here are five influencers you could work with. You got to know that stuff.
I've done this at two software companies at Drift and Privy where we would find people that would come up in the space and we would give them free access to our product, right? Invite them to events, have them on webinars, host them at our podcast like with no ask back just this, both of the founders that I work with had this idea of like, if we believe in our product and we give it away to the right people, they're going to use it and tell others about it. This idea like anything in marketing, by the way, is not new. Seth Godin has been talking about this idea forever.
It might have been back in the early 2000s with his book, Permission Marketing. He called influencer something different. He called them sneezers. He basically said, sneezers are the people in your industry that when they sneeze, everybody else gets sick and infected with your message.
You want to find who the sneezers are in your industry. Fascinating. I know a lot of people probably came from the content side too. And so I want to get a little bit deeper into just LinkedIn specifically, LinkedIn dynamics are changing.
I've noticed it over the past 30 days and I think that there's a consistent sort of evolution inside of LinkedIn. So we'd love to hear how you assess the current state. You're like a pretty strong organic player. You'd love to hear sort of what you're seeing.
And if there are any other channels that you think how people should reallocate their time and anything new and exciting when it comes to content distribution on social. LinkedIn, man. It's a gift in the curse. They're clearly making a lot of changes because things fluctuate a lot.
I don't have any new interests when it comes to channels. I continue to be really bullish on LinkedIn and X, aka Twitter. I like those channels from a content distribution standpoint because I think it provides the lowest barrier to be successful, which is written word, which is text, right? You don't have to make 500 highly produced TikTok videos and hope that one lands, you can learn much quicker.
And so I think I would still be going hard on LinkedIn and Twitter. I think Twitter is a very underrated opportunity. They're just trying to make a lot of changes and become more of a content platform with long form video, short form video. The algorithm is all going crazy.
It is a little bit buggy. Things do break a lot, but I'm still very interested in there. And then LinkedIn, it's not going to go anywhere. And I think especially in a B2B context, even if the algorithm continues to change, LinkedIn is the place that I would want to be spending time because we care about ourselves first and our jobs, our jobs are a big part of our identity.
People are always going to be checking LinkedIn because LinkedIn has basically replaced the resume. And so your customers are going to be on LinkedIn. The algorithm is going to continue to change. I think that it's frustrating from a creator standpoint.
They don't seem to have a good hold on what we actually want on LinkedIn. The fact that I can't pin a comment is a ridiculously simple feature. I don't know, Chris, things haven't changed that much on the content side. I do think that it's not the era of five, let's say five to eight years ago.
We're simply being there is enough and you can get an advantage. I grew really fast on LinkedIn because I just was there earlier and posting about marketing in 2016, 2017. I think now there is so much noise on all those channels. I think you need to be more thoughtful about what is your angle going to be and what is the message going to be.
It's the same way that I think the most important ingredient in marketing in a company is the positioning and the story. I think having your clear angle, I know when I see a Chris Walker post show up in my feed, I know what I'm going to get. I think that's why that is successful. If you were posting about what you ate that day, what you work out is that day, what book you were reading, here's the pictures from me on the beach.
You clearly are human. You have other interests. You just have channeled it into, you know that LinkedIn works and when you talk about B2B revenue, go to market, that's what the audience wants. I think you have to be that level of laser focus.
A lot of people in the last year or two have seen this guy Justin Welch blow up on Twitter and LinkedIn. It's not because he talked about 15 different things. He's like, I'm a solo pernuer. This is my brand.
I'm going to be the page for other people who are interested in this space and he blew up accordingly. You have to be able to focus on one or two core topic and message areas and go super deep. I think that's true for YouTube, TikTok, LinkedIn, Instagram, Twitter. It's very hard to be successful unless you're a Kardashian level famous, just posting random pictures about what's going on in your life.
What's your thought on the B2B LinkedIn company page at this point? I spent time with 100 million A.R. companies that invest 25k a month on a content agency and stuff like that to support an organic social channel. They only posted on LinkedIn.
They only engage in coming from employees because they put it in a Slack channel and they get 100 employees to like it. None of their customers are seeing it. It just feels like they're just doing it to make themselves feel good. Is there a strategy for a B2B company page on LinkedIn anymore?
Yeah, it's a good question. It's a great question. We have 65,000 followers on the LinkedIn page for exit five and it drives nothing for us. Nothing.
I don't even know what purpose those followers serve. We're focused on we have somebody that's managing now. We're trying to focus on driving engagement. Man, this is why I'm like, I'm like, I'm going to start like a B2B social media agency because these people don't have any idea what they're doing.
But here's the hard part. I think the way to win is through personal pages and that's very hard to do. So I think the company page to answer your question. My strategy for the company page would be to treat like the news ticker.
It needs to exist. It needs to look good. It needs to have regular updates there because I do think that whenever I'm evaluating a company, your value, whoever, it's the same way I might go to Crunchbase and see how much funding they raise and from who, whatever. People do that for LinkedIn.
You need to have the presence there because that's how everybody searches for jobs or advisory opportunities or whatever it is. So the page needs to exist and it needs to be active. But I would do it with like, here's a webinar thing that we're doing. Here's some company news.
Here's details about an event. Here's this milestone. I think it's okay to do that if you just know what that is and treat it that way. I call it the news ticker strategy.
Just treat it as your news thing, right? I think the only way you're going to make a meaningful impact on the business though from LinkedIn is through personal pages. And so this is personal profiles. And so this would be, it could be one.
It could be two or three. It could be 10. But I think this is not 10 years ago on LinkedIn. You can't just have people be like, rah, rah, we work at this company.
We're awesome. Like we did that at Drift seven years ago and it worked really well because there was an arbitrage opportunity. There wasn't nobody else was doing that. And so we could basically take over the feed in a day.
But now you have to win with actual content and thoughtfulness and the biggest thing that you need to win with thought leadership, but what a lot of people make a mistake with thought leadership is they don't actually have any interesting and original thoughts. Look at Chris as an example, very opinionated data driven, clear lane. You have to have that level of content to be successful. And so I would try to enable the one to three people inside your company to do that and to talk about what's going on in the company.
Maybe that's the CEO, the VP of marketing and the VPS sales or whoever. Maybe there's one other voice. Usually you can find two or three people like that inside the company. I would try to spend most of the time focusing on content and then encouraging employees, anybody at the company that wants to write about what we're doing here and wants to amplify your message.
Sure. And people often are very passionate about the company that they're working at. So why not enable them to be advocates and amplify your brand that way? But I think it's like one or two key people in the company and then treat the company page like the new sticker.
There are so many agencies and people now that are popping up and doing ghost writing and stuff for founders. I think that's really hard though because the thing that's missing is you can't just post content. LinkedIn engagement matters so much in the reach of your content. And so I don't know how you're going to outsource the commenting and replying to people.
Like Chris is in the comments all the time. I know that's him. I know it's not some VA responding for him. That's what it takes to be successful.
And I think as a marketer, how can we make that case to these executives? You know, we hear over and over and over again. They don't have the time to do this. I'm like, okay, but they don't say that about hiring or recruiting or accounting or engineering or finance.
It has to be like, hey, we believe this is a strategic priority to do this. And here's how we're going to do it and approach it that way. David, like your input to I think there's simply just a fundamental shift in the order in the process of how social is working. And so I think back to 2015 and the process that we would use at that point is we would build 10 pieces of content and then we would run all 10 pieces of content and ads and then hope that one of them or a couple of them worked well.
And then if they worked well, then we would post it organically. And I think it's almost completely flipped now where you make the 10 pieces of content, you have to have a distribution or engine organic to go and figure it out. Then you see clearly this content worked with this audience and then you use paid distribution to amplify whether thought we are ads or other something like that. And you know the content works in advance.
It's not a strategy I see many people deploying because organic is hard. Many people can't come to the grips with the fact that when they go organic, it's going to tell them the content isn't good. So they'd rather just keep running it paid and call it testing. It's crazy.
I really think in terms of efficiency, it's just a much smarter strategy. Yeah, it's such a good insight. I hope people take that down. And this is like, if we go back to like, why should you be creating organic social content anyway?
Even if it's not for those other reasons, everyone spends on paid. We all default to like, how do you grow a business paid? That is what the advice often is. Okay, to Chris's point, why would you not use data?
And like, I haven't done any paid advertising for exit five. But if we wanted to, right now I have three ideas that would be great lead magnets or whatever we want to call it because we have so much content. I know what the hits are and they're already there. So I love that point as a way to like, instead of going and spending money, we already have some ideas of content that we think is going to be successful.
Then let's go put money behind that. I think that's a great insight, Chris. Thanks, Dave. All right, Sydney.
Take it away. This one was so relevant to what you all were talking about. So I had to jump in. This question's from Abby.
I'd like to hear your thoughts and strategies on building a following around a group of people versus one single person. I don't think it works like that, unfortunately. It's very hard to say and follow these three specific people. I think I would say a group of people can talk about a topic, but naturally one out of three is going to grow faster than the others.
But again, if you're doing on behalf of the company, I think each one of those is important. I just would treat it like a, you're trying to go for like this surround sound effect. And so Chris might have more engagement and followers, but Dave also has a little bit and Sydney also has a little bit and one plus one plus one equals four. And we're going to get more out of this than like, it's never going to be even.
I could see how this could get slippery inside of a company, but I would just come up with a clear strategy and messaging and hey, these are the three people that are going to write about it and we're going to do this for six to 12 months or we're going to see where we end up. It's going to be impossible to have the finger on a control to grow three profiles perfectly. Yeah. The way I look at it is like you have the band and then you have the lead singer in the band and you have the drummer in the band, you have the person that drives the tour bus.
And the way you look at it is like the company is the band and then the people inside of the company are the lead singer and the backup singer and the different people inside of it. And knowing that the lead singer might get more views and engagement and popularity than the person that's drumming. I think it's totally normal and I think just thinking about it and like with that type of analogy might help some people. Yeah.
And just to give you another side of this. So one thing, you know, I was like, I'm a solopreneur. I'm a solopreneur. Hiring sucks.
I'm never hiring anybody and then I hired two people and it's been amazing. And one of the reasons it's been amazing is because now instead of just me talking about exit five on LinkedIn, there's two other people that are going to do that. And over time, that's just going to add to this pie. And now we kind of have, I love the band analogy.
We have multiple personalities coming at it from multiple different ways. We all have different voices. We're all going to have different insights. I think that's a strategy that is just unintentionally awesome.
What do you say we just roll into questions about the audience of the time stuff they want to know? It seems like the perfect time. So let's do it. All right.
So let's go into questions here. We have a question from Chris. So let me just bring him on and Chris, you're unmuted and go ahead and ask your question. This has come up with some other marketing agencies that I talked to and they have CEOs that want to be thought leaders, but are uncomfortable being the face of the company.
So how do you persuade those people that there's no one better? And if you want to be a thought leader, it has to be you. I know that sounds sort of impossible, but that has come up. Chris, I want you to go first.
It's kind of hard to take a horse and pretend it's a zebra. Oftentimes, I feel like the people that want to do it are going to do it and the people that need a bunch of convincing around it are never going to do it or be successful. And at some point, people have like a realization or somebody's message breaks through to them or they see it in real life in one sample experience and now they believe it. I don't like playing the convincing game.
I say that very often. I think that people that are not bought into it set themselves up to fail and therefore the other people that are supporting the project to fail as well. I just don't like the situation. I like that.
I'll just add, I think it depends on who the person is. If it's like, ideally, this should be the founder of the CEO. And if they're not willing to write content about the business, that's like, why? I don't understand that.
You're not willing to promote your business. Okay. And then let's drill down even more. Let's talk about we're not asking you to get on TikTok and do some dances.
Like you're literally writing texts. You're writing words. You can be very successful on LinkedIn with just writing copy only copy and you're probably already writing hundreds of Slack messages, internal emails, or knows how many notion docs and whatever. And you're at the center of this universe.
I can partner up with you and like we're going to help you arrange some of your thoughts. But let's do this. Let's be realistic about what being the face of the company means. Like you're just showing up in someone's LinkedIn feed.
This person's probably not going to be on your TV screens and phones every minute of the day. They're not going to feel like they're everywhere. It's just about a couple times a week showing up in the LinkedIn feed, sharing relevant stories and insights about the company that you're spending time building. I like Chris's advice of like, it's hard to convince somebody, but I just would reframe it differently.
Like let's talk about what being the face of the company means, right? Yeah, Dave, I think that's a great answer. There's sort of another point that I've been thinking about that I'd like your feedback on, which is like, there's a lot of people that play tennis and only a few people that are like very financially successful in playing tennis. And I think that a lot of founders might get into the idea of just going through the motions and expecting to get a top 1% outcome when they put in not top 1% effort or impact.
And to me, there's such a small pool of creators and quote unquote personal brands on any channel that become successful. You really are the top 1% of outcomes. And I think those people have top 1% mindsets. They have top 1% work ethic consistency.
They have top 1% industry expertise. They have top 1% commitment to the strategy. And so I just want people to be realistic. If you're an executive to quantify your expectations of what you're trying to get out of it and then really decide whether or not it's worth it.
I don't see people getting a big impact on LinkedIn mailing it in once a week. With a text post. I just think that it requires a whole level of commitment and focus that if you're not going to put in, I question whether you should do it in the first place unless you just truly like enjoy it and aren't expecting results out of it. And back to what we talked about earlier.
Like you're never going to get the feedback loop spinning fast enough if you're just writing one post a week. You know, I could write an amazing post, but I just posted it the wrong time and it doesn't work. Let's think about the context here. To your point, you don't need we're mostly talking like a B2B higher revenue type of audience here.
Like you don't need hundreds of thousands of followers for you writing on LinkedIn to be meaningful. You could get one new customer. You get one partnership opportunity. The other side of this, we've only looked at this from a revenue standpoint.
Not enough people talk about the employment branding side of this piece about if you're the key executive or executives or founders inside of the company. This is about attracting not just customers to you, but partners to you, investors, advisors, candidates, all that's going to come. You don't have to become Mr. Beast level of fame for this to be successful.
You can have a couple hundred, a couple thousand followers on LinkedIn in B2B and have it be wildly meaningful. And if you get no customers, but you're out there refining your thoughts and that next presentation you need to give is going to be better because of something that you wrote and got feedback on in LinkedIn. Then the ROI is a no brainer for me there. Can I just follow up with what has worked?
I mean, for my end, please. Yeah, I would love to know that. Yeah. You know, I'm in the business sort of now I have a podcast because you've been on it, but interviewing CEOs just to create that content so they don't even have to sit down and write.
We have a pre-interview. We figure out what the topics are and ask them today. I got an email from one of my clients where a competitor texted them to say, Hey, you're doing a great job on that content you're putting out on LinkedIn. It's totally getting noticed.
So they just got to throw that out. Chris, that's a great tip for people like interviewing them and then being able to hear their words or I've had success by putting people in a situation that they're already comfortable in or do anyway. Like they're going to go and your CEO is going to speak at that conference no matter what and just recording it, putting them like on them and just recording what they were already doing. Or maybe your CEO loves to do a webinar.
They like doing the your small company. They like doing the bi-weekly group demo and being able to record the stuff that they already do. They feel comfortable in and figuring out how to create the sawdust off of that. The other things that can be created off of the things they're already doing or comfortable with.
That could be another strategy. That's on the creation side. There's a whole other side on distribution and feedback loop and engagement that I'm not going to get into. But one part of the equation is the creation.
Awesome. We've got Abby queued up next. Hi, everybody. So my question is around, I understand the power of creating engagement or following on LinkedIn through sharing an angle or opinion or some of your knowledge.
But I want to hear your thoughts on sharing customer success stories, especially when they're hesitant to come on camera and do some recordings. So like written customer success stories or testimonials and how you can share those or create engagement out social without sounding like you're beating your own chest and making sure that you and everyone else is sharing those is really highlighting the customer. For this one, I think it's great. I try to do this often.
But the trick to social media content is that if you just only posted this, it wouldn't work. And so you need to think of it in the list of all the other content. And so let's say you're going to write 10 posts, 10 pieces. You're going to create 10 pieces of content for LinkedIn.
If 10 of those are customer stories, you're never going to build an audience and get engagement and get a following in that area. If two out of 10 are customer stories and the other, what's my math? Eight are adding value, giving value, providing useful insight. I think this is like originally a Gary V.
Thing, but he's so right about it. You need to give, give, give, give and then ask. And so if people just see customer stories while even though they're great, all of our brains go off and like, this is an ad of some kind, this is a promo of some kind, right? But if you can give away a ton of value and the other eight posts and then when you have a customer story to talk about, heck yeah, write about it on LinkedIn, put the quotes in there.
You only have 3000 characters, which runs out really quickly in a LinkedIn post. I think you got to figure out like, what's the right format and delivery there? But if it's like 20% of your content, I think that's the right way to sneak it in. Same as if you got a webinar you want to promote, if you want to promote people to actually go and sign up for your stuff, I just would put it in that bucket right now.
When I promote exit five, for example, I try to do it with customer quotes and testimonials. And so that could be a screenshot of something, somebody said, I might copy the text from an email that I got and use it in that context. And so that way every time I'm promoting exit five, it's backed up with a customer story. But I think you have to just be aware of like the whole picture of all the stuff that you're promoting versus just posting customer stories.
Great thoughts. They have a couple of things to add, both like presently on LinkedIn, but also like back in the day with a Facebook, for instance, in terms of content distribution, I've had a lot of success. If you reframe content as if it was a news cycle or a short PR announcement, and so you got this long customer story on your website, it's a bunch of pros and there's a seven minute video on it and things like that and taking it and cutting it down and writing a short four paragraph blog that says blah, blah, blah customer gets ex-result with ex-company, make it feel like a news announcement or a PR announcement, write out the blog, stick a customer quote in it. I feel people are much more receptive to stuff like that.
If it feels like news or if it's positions like news rather than like, here's our huge long customer story that we use for sales enablement. So I think just repurposing and repositioning the same asset and message into a different more consumable format that's appropriate for the channel. You can do that and post it. The header image shows up.
There's a link. People are going to click on it. They're still going to go to your website, but they're going to land on a different framing of the exact same information, which leads me to the next point of that ends up being a really interesting model for paid after that. I think like social proof and customer testimonials are great.
If you share a organic engagement, but if it's a really good piece of content, you should pay the three to seven cents that it costs to get it in front of your exact target customer and precise targeting. So I think using some, you don't have to go on spend a million bucks, but some pay distribution to get that to the people who matter. I think it's another core component. And then lastly, in just the content variation, Dave alluded to this a little bit, but like whether it's the news banner with the image that then has the link or whether it's a picture with a quote or whether it's a video that's 30 seconds and is that video like a raw cut from a podcast or is it a professionally produced animation.
I think you just have a lot of flexibility on it. You know what the message is. You know what the customer is, but how you actually tell that story and how you get it to the right people. I think there's a lot of creativity in there, which is some of the magic in marketing.
All right. Now, another question they can't talk. I'm going to read that for them, but how do you communicate to management if they're concerned about employee spaces being the company and gaining followers? How do you combat basically personal brand of an employee?
This customer is worried that this employee is going to life. If they build a personal brand. Tough deal. I get frustrated with this question because it's like, we want all the benefits from the thing, but none of the risk and in business and life and there's going to be risks to anything.
And so you risk the employee building up a brand on social media and leaving. However, with that, you also get lots of benefits from that. And so I think there's going to be trade offs. It's never going to be this.
Obviously, if you think this person is leaving now, then don't make them the face of the company, but we often make this up and I hate this excuse. Do we know that Sydney is leaving? No, we're just saying, okay, we don't want her to build a following a link because what if one day she does leave? Okay.
So what should we do instead? I don't know. Let's do more paid. Let's do more company page.
It's not apples to apples comparison. There's some trade offs, Chris. What's your opinion on this business owner? That executives and founders of B2B companies have not figured out how to properly quantify the value that's created from someone that has a personal brand on LinkedIn.
They're pumped to pay their best sales route, 450 grand a year. But then you got someone that's blowing up as a marketing manager or an SDR or your HR manager that's you're targeting them. That's blowing up on LinkedIn making 95k a year and they're scared that person's going to leave. Well, the person is now a lot more valuable than when they entered your company and made $95,000.
If you don't want to lose them, just like you don't want to lose your CTO or whoever else is really important in your company incentivize the people. So they want to keep staying long term. It's just I don't see this is rather complicated. People are leaving because they have options.
So what you need to do as employers continue to be their best option and many employers take that type of stuff for granted are no longer the best option. The employee leaves because they're a lot more valuable than the financial benefits they're getting from the company. And that's the right decision for them. And so I think just having an objectivity as executives around this and say, okay, this person is more valuable.
Are we willing to pay the money to continue to have them at our company or incentivize them long term with stock options or whatever we decide so that they'll be invested in the long term and we can build this together or not? You want the best player in the NFL? You better be ready to pay up for the best player. And if you want to have a mediocre player, then that's what you're going to pay for.
And I just think that people haven't properly quantified the impact that comes from someone that really knows how to do this yet. And the company benefits on the way up. Let's say you are that employee making 95 grand, but you blow up on LinkedIn like there's because you're talking about your company like the company is benefiting from that. You're wildly under investing in this resource that you're getting a lot of unexpected value from.
So I can understand why it's a challenging conversation inside of the company, but I think that the pros outweigh the cons. And if you don't do it, another company in your industry is going to and people want to buy from people and they're going to continue to follow people on LinkedIn and learn about them from them. So it's a scarcity versus abundance thing, I think. Great way to end.
Totally agree. Awesome. We're going to do one more live question and then give you guys enough time to kind of wrap up with closing thoughts or final questions between you two. So let's bring on Casper.
I have a question about the testing your messaging on organic before going paid. And I totally agree with the concept. One thing I wanted to add is most of people on LinkedIn as a role in my business, like 99% of people in LinkedIn, like don't have a huge following. At least in my case, what I've seen is I've gotten a lot better insights actually like talking to potential customer, my existing customers and just like to talk to people on a live event or webinar.
I want to hear your thoughts on like the whole posting on LinkedIn because I see like this. If you have like say, you know, the next 30 posts on LinkedIn, again, and you want to find out what's working the best in terms of like testing your messaging, you know, if you get like an average, you have like the same average of likes or engagement posts. How can you even figure out even with you guys like you, Dave and Twiz, if you have 50 or other followers, if you get like 500 or 600 likes post and everybody's like, Oh, great points. Like, how do you know what's like really working on what you should put in front of your target group to actually like drive up really new.
I think there's a real meaningful difference between messaging and then putting content in and seeing if it works or not in the channel. To me, messaging is what you say and why you say it and content is how you say it and where you say it. And so when you think about messaging, I totally agree that that's way to figure out messaging, go and talk to customers, run the test, see what works and sales processes, collect customer insights, run surveys, do your own. Do product marketing and strategy to figure that stuff out or be in a community and try things like a lot of the stuff that I post on LinkedIn.
I'm not guessing because I already said it in front of a bunch of people and I saw your heads not earlier. And so I'm not really trying to figure out the messaging, so to speak, when I post things on LinkedIn, but how I say it and what time I post on it and whether it's a video or a text post or I use the vertical video, because I'm testing something from TikTok, those are the things that are interesting to figure out. And then just if you find something that works that you can then you have validated with an audience and then you can just add a little bit of money to make sure the right people see it. I think it's a sound strategy, but thank you for the clarification.
That's really important. I do not recommend using LinkedIn paid or LinkedIn organic to try and figure out your messaging as an early stage company. I think that you should go out and talk to customers and do real product marketing to figure that stuff out and have a real hypothesis and test it in sales and close deals and then start to use the advertising once you have it actually proven out. Yeah, just to build on that.
I talked to customers like exit five members often now and I might write something or the community or say something on a conversation exactly what you said with this Chris and I see people's head not and I might make a note. I use that line about whatever life is too short to work for a CEO doesn't get marketing, some nonsense like that. I see everybody like in the room light up and I'm like, okay, then when I'm going to write my next batch of LinkedIn content, I'm going to then try that message there and then okay, you get a bunch of reactions to that. That's how you know.
And so I'm obsessed about I have this like notion file where I am screenshotting LinkedIn messages, email replies, things people say on social and I just call it like the exit five messaging swipe file. I'm always looking for ways that people are talking about our business there and then I use that to then go and write the LinkedIn content. I think that's such an important distinction, Chris, because we kind of start talking about like test on LinkedIn, see what works, but it actually starts in smaller. It starts in like you might have a dinner with pepper, whoever, right?
And you're like, oh, we talked about this. This concept is really interesting. Now I'm going to go write some content about that and go see what their reaction is. The other thing I want to mention is you mentioned like, you know, every post has 500 likes or whatever.
That might be true. I do think that there is some gut and qualitative part of this also, which is like, let's take it. Don't just go and look at likes, but very clearly, if you go and read the comments, you can get a sense of, oh, the reaction to this one is different. And so if you just looked at 500 likes, 30 comments and every post had the same, you're not going to that's not the same level of insight to be like when I actually go and I see that's an ICP level customer that, oh, interesting, this CMO is never commented on anything I've written before.
So we need to build in that level of qualitative piece here to match the actual hard data. I think that's a very underrated thing. Also, sometimes I use this app called shield and this just proves the point here, which is like, I use shield and I go and I look at posts that I wrote two or three years ago, right? They were popular them.
I sort them by impressions and engagement and I literally copy them and I repost them again and they have the same reaction. And so that's just a sign to me that, oh, this topic is really interesting. When I write this like 10 tips to grow your career faster and be marketing, I could post that every three weeks and it's going to have a good response. That's a good enough sign for me that, okay, maybe I should go make a talk around this or there should be a video that we go make.
I do think that that's a very underrated piece of being able to use LinkedIn. Perfect. Dave, thanks for being here, man. It was really awesome to see you personally.
Everyone that came to the event, thank you. We're going to have this once a month. The next one up is with the CMO of Cognizmo of Koursey, who was wrote famous book. She did mention me in the book, which I'm happy about, but her journey is the first time CMO really moving from a very lead generation oriented to a demand creation and demand generation oriented.
Just a great success story. So looking forward to having her on the show next month, Sydney can talk through how you get registered for that one as well. But Dave, any final stuff you want people, any key points you want people to take away before we head out? No, this was great.
It was energized to be talking to you again. That was very exciting. I put a link to exit five in the chat. We did this a while ago and it was great.
So just you can use a DG promo code that's in the chat. If you want to come in and talk more about, we talk about LinkedIn and stuff like this a lot in our community. Feel free to come and do that. Otherwise, I'll see you in Chris's comments somewhere on LinkedIn in the future.
Thanks, Dave.