EPISODE · Jul 12, 2024 · 53 MIN
Experts discuss 2024 Supreme Court rulings
from Noon Edition · host Indiana Public Media
The Supreme Court issued several major decisions, including Trump v. The United States, which ruled the former president is partly immune for his involvement in efforts on Jan. 6 to overthrow the 2020 election results. In another case, it overturned the precedent set by the 1984 Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which had given deference to governmental agencies in interpreting laws it administers. Then toward end of June, the court's 5-4 decision said the Sackler family could not be shielded from civil lawsuits for its role in the opioid crisis. But it stalls a $6 billion settlement that would go to states and and victims of the epidemic in compensation. The court also made key decisions on cases addressing racial gerrymandering, abortion access and care, gun rights, and restrictions on people experiencing homelessness.We'll talk with guests Friday about these decisions and their implications for the US legal system.You can follow us on X @WFIUWTIUNews or join us on the air by calling 812-855-0811 or toll-free at 1-877-285-9348. You can also send questions for the show to [email protected] can also record your questions and send them in through email.GuestsBeth Cate, Clinical Associate Professor O'Neill School of Public and Environmental AffairsLaura Wilson, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Indianapolis and Research Associate for the Mike Downs Center for Indiana Politics Abdul-Hakim Shabazz, editor and publisher of Indy PoliticsSteve Schwinn, Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Development University of Illinois Chicago
What this episode covers
The Supreme Court issued several major decisions, including Trump v. The United States, which ruled the former president is partly immune for his involvement in efforts on Jan. 6 to overthrow the 2020 election results. In another case, it overturned the precedent set by the 1984 Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which had given deference to governmental agencies in interpreting laws it administers. Then toward end of June, the court's 5-4 decision said the Sackler family could not be shielded from civil lawsuits for its role in the opioid crisis. But it stalls a $6 billion settlement that would go to states and and victims of the epidemic in compensation. The court also made key decisions on cases addressing racial gerrymandering, abortion access and care, gun rights, and restrictions on people experiencing homelessness. We'll talk with guests Friday about these decisions and their implications for the US legal system. You can follow us on X @WFIUWTIUNews or join us on the air by calling 812-855-0811 or toll-free at 1-877-285-9348. You can also send questions for the show to [email protected]. You can also record your questions and send them in through email. Guests Beth Cate, Clinical Associate Professor O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs Laura Wilson, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Indianapolis and Research Associate for the Mike Downs Center for Indiana Politics Abdul-Hakim Shabazz, editor and publisher of Indy Politics Steve Schwinn, Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Development University of Illinois Chicago
NOW PLAYING
Experts discuss 2024 Supreme Court rulings
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.