Freedom of Thought on Campus: Discussion and Debate at Georgetown

Is open discussion and debate essential to the function of the university?Many universities, including Georgetown, have adopted strong policies on academic freedom, affirming that deliberation or debate may not be suppressed because ideas put forth might be offensive, unwise, immoral or ill conceived.But when controversy arises on campus, concrete complaints about offensive speech can displace these abstract principles of academic freedom. What does an environment conducive to learning require? What kinds of limits should govern the ideas that students are exposed to by their teachers and classmates? Should students be exposed to ideas or opinions that are offensive? Should students have recourse to administrative action when faced with an offensive opinion? What kind of harm does offense entail? On the other hand, when administrators step in to punish offending speech, does that decision come with consequences? And who bears the resulting harm attendant on limiting who can speak or what opinions can be expressed? Who measures what kind of opinions or statements are harmful or not? Featuring:Prof. Eugene Volokh, Gary T. Schwartz Distinguished Professor of Law, UCLA School of LawProf. Andrew Koppelman, John Paul Stevens Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of LawModerator: Hon. Stephanos Bibas, Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ---To register, click the link above.