Harvard Law Students Grade Trump’s First Year Back | ATB #17 episode artwork

EPISODE · Jan 29, 2026 · 1H 13M

Harvard Law Students Grade Trump’s First Year Back | ATB #17

from Approach the Bench · host Approach the Bench

WEEK 17: Welcome to Will’s home. In the snow. This week, we open with a long overdue feedback segment — responding to some of the strongest reactions we’ve gotten all season (including the Israel episodes, Larissa Part 1 & 2, and the Gen Z/Ozempic debate). We read comments ranging from thoughtful critiques to outright hostile takes, and we talk about what it means to have real disagreement online without turning into either cowards or flamethrowers.Then we hit an appetizer we keep getting asked: Does Harvard have a serious Christian community? And does it help or hurt to be a conservative Christian applying to — or surviving at — Harvard Law?The main course is the episode title: we rate Year One of the Trump administration across five categories, from F to A+:- National Security / Foreign Policy (Rubio at State, NATO pressure, China tariffs, Ukraine strategy, Israel/Iran posture, global institutions)- Immigration (border emergency posture, asylum policy changes, interior enforcement, detention levels, and the moral tradeoffs)- Culture War (DEI rollback, Title IX/sex-and-gender policy, religion/parental rights, Department of Education and foreign aid, Planned Parenthood funding fights)- Economy (GDP swings, inflation, wages, jobs, debt, youth unemployment, and whether tariffs are strategy or self-harm)- Moral + Effective Leadership (executive power, staffing, DOJ posture, special counsel policy, and the administration’s aggressive use of pardons)We try to do what most commentary won’t: give the best version of the case for each move and the most serious objections — then land on a grade.And because we can’t help ourselves, we close with Girl Problems:- Dating across Christian denominations- Do you date one person at a time?- Promise rings: sweet, cringe, or situational?- How do you plan to raise kids in this modern era?Email [email protected] with your questions/comments or submit a voice memo at https://www.speakpipe.com/approachthebench for a chance to be featured on the show! You can also submit anonymous comments through this Google Form: https://forms.gle/9Zjxzkpwajivx19z800:00 Introduction2:54 Reviewing ALL the Feedback13:17 Being Christian and Conservative at Harvard Law19:45 Grading Trump’s First Year Back57:51 Girl Problems

WEEK 17: Welcome to Will’s home. In the snow. This week, we open with a long overdue feedback segment — responding to some of the strongest reactions we’ve gotten all season (including the Israel episodes, Larissa Part 1 & 2, and the Gen Z/Ozempic debate). We read comments ranging from thoughtful critiques to outright hostile takes, and we talk about what it means to have real disagreement online without turning into either cowards or flamethrowers.Then we hit an appetizer we keep getting asked: Does Harvard have a serious Christian community? And does it help or hurt to be a conservative Christian applying to — or surviving at — Harvard Law?The main course is the episode title: we rate Year One of the Trump administration across five categories, from F to A+:- National Security / Foreign Policy (Rubio at State, NATO pressure, China tariffs, Ukraine strategy, Israel/Iran posture, global institutions)- Immigration (border emergency posture, asylum policy changes, interior enforcement, detention levels, and the moral tradeoffs)- Culture War (DEI rollback, Title IX/sex-and-gender policy, religion/parental rights, Department of Education and foreign aid, Planned Parenthood funding fights)- Economy (GDP swings, inflation, wages, jobs, debt, youth unemployment, and whether tariffs are strategy or self-harm)- Moral + Effective Leadership (executive power, staffing, DOJ posture, special counsel policy, and the administration’s aggressive use of pardons)We try to do what most commentary won’t: give the best version of the case for each move and the most serious objections — then land on a grade.And because we can’t help ourselves, we close with Girl Problems:- Dating across Christian denominations- Do you date one person at a time?- Promise rings: sweet, cringe, or situational?- How do you plan to raise kids in this modern era?Email [email protected] with your questions/comments or submit a voice memo at https://www.speakpipe.com/approachthebench for a chance to be featured on the show! You can also submit anonymous comments through this Google Form: https://forms.gle/9Zjxzkpwajivx19z800:00 Introduction2:54 Reviewing ALL the Feedback13:17 Being Christian and Conservative at Harvard Law19:45 Grading Trump’s First Year Back57:51 Girl Problems

NOW PLAYING

Harvard Law Students Grade Trump’s First Year Back | ATB #17

0:00 1:13:19

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Approach the Bench?

This episode is 1 hour and 13 minutes long.

When was this Approach the Bench episode published?

This episode was published on January 29, 2026.

What is this episode about?

WEEK 17: Welcome to Will’s home. In the snow. This week, we open with a long overdue feedback segment — responding to some of the strongest reactions we’ve gotten all season (including the Israel episodes, Larissa Part 1 & 2, and the Gen Z/Ozempic...

Can I download this Approach the Bench episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!