EPISODE · Nov 18, 2019 · 38 MIN
Hernandez v. Mesa Post-Argument SCOTUScast
from SCOTUScast · host The Federalist Society
The case of Hernandez v. Mesa arises from a 2010 confrontation on the U.S.-Mexican border in which U.S. Border Patrol agent Jesus Mesa shot and killed Sergio Hernandez, a teenage Mexican national. Although the FBI apparently cleared Mesa of wrongdoing, and Hernandez was not standing on American soil at the time he was shot, the Hernandez family filed suit against Mesa and the federal government based on the Supreme Court's decision in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, which held that a federal agent can be found liable in damages under the Fourth Amendment for committing an unconstitutional search and seizure.The central issue now before the Supreme Court is whether the Hernandez family can recover damages in a Bivens action for the killing of their son in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments when there is no other available remedy under federal law. To discuss the case, we have Peter Thomson, Special Counsel, Stone Pigman Walther Wittmann LLC.As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.
What this episode covers
The case of Hernandez v. Mesa arises from a 2010 confrontation on the U.S.-Mexican border in which U.S. Border Patrol agent Jesus Mesa shot and killed Sergio Hernandez, a teenage Mexican national. Although the FBI apparently cleared Mesa of wrongdoing, and Hernandez was not standing on American soil at the time he was shot, the Hernandez family filed suit against Mesa and the federal government based on the Supreme Court's decision in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, which held that a federal agent can be found liable in damages under the Fourth Amendment for committing an unconstitutional search and seizure.The central issue now before the Supreme Court is whether the Hernandez family can recover damages in a Bivens action for the killing of their son in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments when there is no other available remedy under federal law. To discuss the case, we have Peter Thomson, Special Counsel, Stone Pigman Walther Wittmann LLC.As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.
NOW PLAYING
Hernandez v. Mesa Post-Argument SCOTUScast
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.