How primary elections enable polarized amateurs episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 24, 2022 · 49 MIN

How primary elections enable polarized amateurs

from The Science of Politics · host Niskanen Center

In the 2022 primary elections, many incumbent legislators have lost their seats to more extreme candidates, and Trump-endorsed newcomers are winning races against established professionals. Both are the culmination of ongoing trends. Rachel Porter finds that primary electorates, especially on the Republican side, are far more extreme than general electorates. And primary voters have increasingly been preferring amateur candidates over experienced politicians, partially because those candidates can now raise early national money. While that can mean more diversity in the candidate pool, it may also drive congressional dysfunction.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 24, 2022

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

How primary elections enable polarized amateurs

0:00 49:27

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Science of Politics?

This episode is 49 minutes long.

When was this The Science of Politics episode published?

This episode was published on August 24, 2022.

Can I download this The Science of Politics episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!