In Conversation With Martha Ngoye Acting ED episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 2, 2026 · 12 MIN

In Conversation With Martha Ngoye Acting ED

from VOW 88.1 · host Pretty Ngwenya & KHANYISILE YENDE

The Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg on Monday said it did not have the jurisdiction to decide over the application for the dismissal of the application by former presidents Jacob Zuma and Thabo Mbeki for Justice Sisi Khampepe to recuse herself from the TRC inquiry. In a majority judgment consented to by two judges, the court upheld a preliminary argument by the Khampepe Commission that as Justice Khampepe is a judge, although retired, Zuma and Mbeki should have obtained prior permission to haul her before the court. The court said they should have first asked the permission of Chief Justice Mandisa Maya before they launched the review proceedings. This is per Section 47 of the Superior Courts Act, which states that the head of court must give the go-ahead before legal proceedings may be instituted against a judge. This is, amongst others, to safeguard judges from being hauled to court by aggrieving parties who are unhappy about remarks a judge might make about them in judgments. Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi earlier argued on behalf of the commission that the matter should be struck from the roll as it is not properly before the court. His argument was that Section 47 of the Superior Courts Act clearly stated that a judge - which includes a retired judge - can never face civil legal proceedings (which includes a review application in this case) prior to the go-ahead of the head of the court. This was not done in this case. “She is left to dry on her own,” he said. Ngcukaitobi pointed out that Section 47 is the only protection she has, which she is being denied. Zuma and Mbeki sought Justice Khampepe’s removal as chair of the commission probing apartheid-era cases to determine whether there was political interference in not prosecuting those cases. They argued that her failure to disclose the full extent of her role as deputy years ago in the National Prosecuting Authority, as well as the role she played earlier during TRC hearings, creates a reasonable apprehension of bias. Instagram · Twitter

The Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg on Monday said it did not have the jurisdiction to decide over the application for the dismissal of the application by former presidents Jacob Zuma and Thabo Mbeki for Justice Sisi Khampepe to recuse herself from the TRC inquiry. In a majority judgment consented to by two judges, the court upheld a preliminary argument by the Khampepe Commission that as Justice Khampepe is a judge, although retired, Zuma and Mbeki should have obtained prior permission to haul her before the court. The court said they should have first asked the permission of Chief Justice Mandisa Maya before they launched the review proceedings. This is per Section 47 of the Superior Courts Act, which states that the head of court must give the go-ahead before legal proceedings may be instituted against a judge. This is, amongst others, to safeguard judges from being hauled to court by aggrieving parties who are unhappy about remarks a judge might make about them in judgments. Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi earlier argued on behalf of the commission that the matter should be struck from the roll as it is not properly before the court. His argument was that Section 47 of the Superior Courts Act clearly stated that a judge - which includes a retired judge - can never face civil legal proceedings (which includes a review application in this case) prior to the go-ahead of the head of the court. This was not done in this case. “She is left to dry on her own,” he said. Ngcukaitobi pointed out that Section 47 is the only protection she has, which she is being denied. Zuma and Mbeki sought Justice Khampepe’s removal as chair of the commission probing apartheid-era cases to determine whether there was political interference in not prosecuting those cases. They argued that her failure to disclose the full extent of her role as deputy years ago in the National Prosecuting Authority, as well as the role she played earlier during TRC hearings, creates a reasonable apprehension of bias.

NOW PLAYING

In Conversation With Martha Ngoye Acting ED

0:00 12:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

The 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene (Full Audiobook) Robert Greene Amoral, cunning, ruthless, and instructive, this multi-million-copy New York Times bestseller is the definitive manual for anyone interested in gaining, observing, or defending against ultimate control – from the author of The Laws of Human Nature.In the book that People magazine proclaimed “beguiling” and “fascinating,” Robert Greene and Joost Elffers have distilled three thousand years of the history of power into 48 essential laws by drawing from the philosophies of Machiavelli, Sun Tzu, and Carl Von Clausewitz and also from the lives of figures ranging from Henry Kissinger to P.T. Barnum.Some laws teach the need for prudence (“Law 1: Never Outshine the Master”), others teach the value of confidence (“Law 28: Enter Action with Boldness”), and many recommend absolute self-preservation (“Law 15: Crush Your Enemy Totally”). Every law, though, has one thing in common: an interest in t Welcome to the BeauMovation Podcast. Noluthando Tshabalala Season 1: The Power Of Identity with 11 dynamic guests. Temps de Dol Temps de Dol Soy 1 de 4. Lo he sido dos veces. Aquí te traigo mi tiempo de duelo para que, si también estás transitando un proceso de duelo gestacional sepas que no estás sola. Hablemos. Escuchemos. Visibilicemos. Y, sobretodo, acompañemos. KoperCrabb Podcast Navene Koperweis & Chaney Crabb The #1 place for underground musicians to hang out, KoperCrabb Podcast is a weekly podcast hosted by drummer Navene Koperweis and vocalist Chaney Crabb of the band Entheos.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of VOW 88.1?

This episode is 12 minutes long.

When was this VOW 88.1 episode published?

This episode was published on April 2, 2026.

What is this episode about?

The Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg on Monday said it did not have the jurisdiction to decide over the application for the dismissal of the application by former presidents Jacob Zuma and Thabo Mbeki for Justice Sisi Khampepe to recuse herself from...

Can I download this VOW 88.1 episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!