PodParley PodParley

Interpreting the 2018 Election

What are the implications of the 2018 election re…

An episode of the The Science of Politics podcast, hosted by Niskanen Center, titled "Interpreting the 2018 Election" was published on November 20, 2018 and runs 35 minutes.

November 20, 2018 ·35m · The Science of Politics

0:00 / 0:00

What are the implications of the 2018 election results? Julia Azari and Rachel Bitecofer are two political scientists who followed it closely and know how it compares to prior cycles. Azari is an election analyst and party scholar who finds that politicians claim electoral mandates for action based on the results of elections. We talk about early interpretations of 2018 as a referendum on Trump and why we simplify election results with stories. Bitecofer is an election analyst and a forecaster of the 2018 election who finds that demographics and partisanship are now destiny. We talk about why negative partisanship makes election results easier to foresee as partisans choose clear sides but shift turnout. Photo: Erik Hersman under CC BY 2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/whiteafrican/3004595893

What are the implications of the 2018 election results? Julia Azari and Rachel Bitecofer are two political scientists who followed it closely and know how it compares to prior cycles. Azari is an election analyst and party scholar who finds that politicians claim electoral mandates for action based on the results of elections. We talk about early interpretations of 2018 as a referendum on Trump and why we simplify election results with stories. Bitecofer is an election analyst and a forecaster of the 2018 election who finds that demographics and partisanship are now destiny. We talk about why negative partisanship makes election results easier to foresee as partisans choose clear sides but shift turnout. Photo: Erik Hersman under CC BY 2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/whiteafrican/3004595893
Challenging Climate Jesse Reynolds and Pete Irvine Asking tough questions about the science, technology, and politics of climate change, two climate researchers challenge leading experts on one of the defining issues of our age. Every two weeks, they explore how we can fight global warming by cutting greenhouse gas emissions, carbon removal, adaptation and solar geoengineering. Dr. Jesse Reynolds and Dr. Pete Irvine consider the roles of computer models and persuasive narratives, economics and public policy, and renewable energy and national security in the climate debate, and look beyond to issues such as biotechnology and international development.Support us at Patreon.Questions or comments? Email [email protected] or tweet @ChalClimateSee more information on Jesse Reynolds and <a href="https://www.ucl.ac.uk/earth- Oxford Food Governance Group: The Politics and Practices of Food Oxford University The Oxford Food Governance Group is an interdisciplinary group of researchers from the Institute for Science, Innovation and Society (InSIS), Said Business School, and the Unit for Biocultural Variation and Obesity (UBVO) at the University of Oxford, who share an interest in food governance practices. Looking at the politics of food distribution, sustainability, and governance of the food supply among other topics, this series will look at how we get our food and why it matters. The Muckraking Ida Tarbell and C. Gull Discussions of politics, culture, social justice, science, technology, and all the news that’s fit to criticize. Led by Ida Tarbell and C. Gull https://themuckraking.wordpress.com/ The Christian Science Monitor - News csmonitor.com A daily selection of audio reports from csmonitor.com
URL copied to clipboard!