EPISODE · Sep 12, 2025 · 7 MIN
Jupally Lakshmikantha Reddy vs. State of AP & Anr. 2025 INSC 1096
from Nyay Samachar · host Scoot Legal Translation & Transcription Services
It focuses on the quashing of criminal proceedings against the appellant. The case originated from an accusation that an educational society, run by the appellant, submitted a forged no-objection certificate (NOC) from the Fire Department to obtain institutional recognition. However, the Court found that an NOC was not required for buildings under 15 meters, and the appellant's building was 14.20 meters, meaning the alleged false representation did not induce the Education Department. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed, and the criminal proceedings for cheating and forgery were quashed as essential ingredients of these offenses, such as dishonest inducement or the making of the forged document, were not met.
What this episode covers
It focuses on the quashing of criminal proceedings against the appellant. The case originated from an accusation that an educational society, run by the appellant, submitted a forged no-objection certificate (NOC) from the Fire Department to obtain institutional recognition. However, the Court found that an NOC was not required for buildings under 15 meters, and the appellant's building was 14.20 meters, meaning the alleged false representation did not induce the Education Department. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed, and the criminal proceedings for cheating and forgery were quashed as essential ingredients of these offenses, such as dishonest inducement or the making of the forged document, were not met.
NOW PLAYING
Jupally Lakshmikantha Reddy vs. State of AP & Anr. 2025 INSC 1096
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.