Kant 8_1: Refutation of Idealism

(Lecture 8, part 1) Refutation of Idealism. Recorded by Dr Susan Stuart.

An episode of the Kant's Epistemology podcast, hosted by University of Glasgow, titled "Kant 8_1: Refutation of Idealism" was published on July 11, 2012 and runs 48 minutes.

July 11, 2012 ·48m · Kant's Epistemology

0:00 / 0:00

Summary

(Lecture 8, part 1) Refutation of Idealism. Recorded by Dr Susan Stuart.

Episode Description

(Lecture 8, part 1) Refutation of Idealism. Recorded by Dr Susan Stuart.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

01 - Where The Sparks Go

Apr 22, 2026 ·5m

02 - The Good Sea Monster

Apr 22, 2026 ·5m

03 - Mother Turker and Her Chicks

Apr 22, 2026 ·7m

04 - The Fairies and the Dandelion

Apr 22, 2026 ·4m

05 - Mr 'Possum

Apr 22, 2026 ·7m

06 - The Rooster that Crowed Too Soon

Apr 22, 2026 ·5m

Similar Podcasts

Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals, The by Immanuel Kant (1724 - 1804) LibriVox The Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals, also known as The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals or Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals or Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals, is Immanuel Kant's first contribution to moral philosophy. It argues for an a priori basis for morality. Where the Critique of Pure Reason laid out Kant's metaphysical and epistemological ideas, this relatively short, primarily meta-ethical, work was intended to outline and define the concepts and arguments shaping his future work The Metaphysics of Morals. However, the latter work is much less readable than the Fundamental Principles. (Summary from Wikipedia) The Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals Immanuel Kant The Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals, also known as The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals or Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals or Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals, is Immanuel Kant's first contribution to moral philosophy. It argues for an a priori basis for morality. Where the Critique of Pure Reason laid out Kant's metaphysical and epistemological ideas, this relatively short, primarily meta-ethical, work was intended to outline and define the concepts and arguments shaping his future work The Metaphysics of Morals. However, the latter work is much less readable than the Fundamental Principles. (Summary from Wikipedia) Kant's Critique of Pure Reason Oxford University A lecture series examining Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. This series looks at German Philosopher Immanuel Kant's seminal philosophical work 'The Critique of Pure Reason'. The lectures aim to outline and discuss some of the key philosophical issues raised in the book and to offer students and individuals thought provoking Kantian ideas surrounding metaphysics. Each lecture looks at particular questions raised in the work such as how do we know what we know and how do we find out about the world, dissects these questions with reference to Kant's work and discusses the broader philosophical implications. Anyone with an interest in Kant and philosophy will find these lectures thought provoking but accessible. Of the Injustice of Counterfeiting Books by Immanuel Kant (1724 - 1804) LibriVox This essay of Kant’s on copyright argues that the unlicensed copying of books cannot possibly be permissible, due to the fact that it assumes a consent on the part of the author which it is logically impossible for the author to give. The argument is dependent upon an assumption that the writings be commodified, for the reason why the author is unable to possibly give consent to multiple publishers is due to the author’s will – to communicate with the public – necessitating the profitability of the publisher, for, it is assumed, there is no way to communicate with the public at large without a great expense which can only be borne by a publishing firm. This is, of course, no longer a necessary assumption. Other arguments here are also of interest: this is a foundational document in claims regarding the moral rights of authors, and Kant’s account of the connection between the communicative intent of the author and the rights resultant is of continuing importance (even though

URL copied to clipboard!