Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., decided March 13, 2025 episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 30, 2025 · 13 MIN

Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., decided March 13, 2025

from CAFC News Brief

The central issue here is the proper calculation of patent term extensions (PTEs) for reissued patents under the Hatch-Waxman Act, specifically whether the extension should be based on the original patent's issue date or the reissued patent's issue date. The court affirms the district court's finding that for reissued patents retaining claims to a drug product that underwent regulatory review after the original patent's issuance, the PTE should be calculated from the original patent's issue date, supporting the purpose of compensating for lost market exclusivity during regulatory delays.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 30, 2025

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., decided March 13, 2025

0:00 13:31

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of CAFC News Brief?

This episode is 13 minutes long.

When was this CAFC News Brief episode published?

This episode was published on March 30, 2025.

Can I download this CAFC News Brief episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!