EPISODE · May 1, 2026 · 46 MIN
Packers Back Lucas Van Ness, and Questions Grow About RB Depth
from Jen, Gabe & Chewy
Jen, Gabe, and Chewy spend the 7AM hour reacting to the Packers’ decision to exercise Lucas Van Ness’ fifth-year option, a move that surprised much of the fan base and sparked immediate debate about whether his production has truly justified that kind of commitment. Jen and Gabe break down the thinking behind the move, exploring whether the Packers are betting on future upside rather than past results, and whether the cost is reasonable given how expensive pass rushers have become around the league. Chewy pushes back hard, arguing the decision feels more like a gamble and a face-saving move than a reward for actual performance. The crew also compares Van Ness to other recent 13th overall picks, showing just how far his numbers trail players who made immediate impact for their teams. That leads to a broader discussion about Brian Gutekunst’s drafting philosophy, how often the Packers bet on traits over proven production, and whether Micah Parsons’ presence on the opposite side of the defense should finally put Van Ness in a position to succeed. Later in the hour, Jason Wilde joins the show and adds his perspective on the decision, explaining why the Packers likely view the option as a manageable one-year investment at a premium position. Jason discusses the Nick Perry comparison, the dangers of letting a player break out in a contract year without team control, and why Green Bay may still believe Van Ness can become a productive pass rusher. He also touches on the upside of the young edge rushers behind him, including Baron Sorrell, Colin Oliver, and Deny Dennis-Sutton, while noting that the fifth-year option also serves as a bit of insurance while those players develop. The conversation then shifts to the Packers’ backup running back situation, where Jason and the crew question whether the team can really count on MarShawn Lloyd after his injury-plagued start to his career. They debate whether Green Bay should still add competition to that room, whether Chris Brooks is enough of a fallback option, and if the Packers are again asking fans to trust hope and projection over proven reliability. The hour closes with more listener reaction and a larger theme emerging around the Packers: how often can a contender keep betting on upside before it eventually catches up with them?
What this episode covers
Jen, Gabe, and Chewy spend the 7AM hour reacting to the Packers’ decision to exercise Lucas Van Ness’ fifth-year option, a move that surprised much of the fan base and sparked immediate debate about whether his production has truly justified that kind of commitment. Jen and Gabe break down the thinking behind the move, exploring whether the Packers are betting on future upside rather than past results, and whether the cost is reasonable given how expensive pass rushers have become around the league. Chewy pushes back hard, arguing the decision feels more like a gamble and a face-saving move than a reward for actual performance. The crew also compares Van Ness to other recent 13th overall picks, showing just how far his numbers trail players who made immediate impact for their teams. That leads to a broader discussion about Brian Gutekunst’s drafting philosophy, how often the Packers bet on traits over proven production, and whether Micah Parsons’ presence on the opposite side of the defense should finally put Van Ness in a position to succeed. Later in the hour, Jason Wilde joins the show and adds his perspective on the decision, explaining why the Packers likely view the option as a manageable one-year investment at a premium position. Jason discusses the Nick Perry comparison, the dangers of letting a player break out in a contract year without team control, and why Green Bay may still believe Van Ness can become a productive pass rusher. He also touches on the upside of the young edge rushers behind him, including Baron Sorrell, Colin Oliver, and Deny Dennis-Sutton, while noting that the fifth-year option also serves as a bit of insurance while those players develop. The conversation then shifts to the Packers’ backup running back situation, where Jason and the crew question whether the team can really count on MarShawn Lloyd after his injury-plagued start to his career. They debate whether Green Bay should still add competition to that room, whether Chris Brooks is enough of a fallback option, and if the Packers are again asking fans to trust hope and projection over proven reliability. The hour closes with more listener reaction and a larger theme emerging around the Packers: how often can a contender keep betting on upside before it eventually catches up with them?
NOW PLAYING
Packers Back Lucas Van Ness, and Questions Grow About RB Depth
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Jun 4, 2026 ·25m
Jun 3, 2026 ·34m