EPISODE · Feb 7, 2022 · 8 MIN
Podcast: Pension Disputes EP1 - Could M&B judgment undermine validity of rule amendments?
from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer Podcasts · host Herbert Smith Freehills Podcasts
In the first podcast of our new Pension Disputes series, Antonia Pegden, a Senior Associate in our Disputes team, discusses the judgment handed down in the Mitchells & Butlers rectification case with Pensions Professional Support Consultant, Tim Smith. In the conversation, Antonia discusses:why this judgment is significant;the merits of the bona fide purchaser defence, run for the first time in the context of a rectification claim in this case; andthe impact of the judge's findings on what constitutes effective consultation with a scheme's actuary on the validity of rule amendments.To receive future podcasts in this series direct to your inbox subscribe to our UK pensions blog.To view our other pensions podcasts, including the other podcasts in this series, click here.If you would like to discuss any of the topics covered in this podcast speak with your usual HSF adviser or contact one of our specialists.
What this episode covers
In the first podcast of our new Pension Disputes series, Antonia Pegden, a Senior Associate in our Disputes team, discusses the judgment handed down in the Mitchells & Butlers rectification case with Pensions Professional Support Consultant, Tim Smith. In the conversation, Antonia discusses: why this judgment is significant;the merits of the bona fide purchaser defence, run for the first time in the context of a rectification claim in this case; andthe impact of the judge's findings on wh...
NOW PLAYING
Podcast: Pension Disputes EP1 - Could M&B judgment undermine validity of rule amendments?
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Jun 15, 2022 ·8m
May 25, 2022 ·20m
May 19, 2022 ·16m
May 15, 2022 ·34m
May 12, 2022 ·1m