EPISODE · Mar 19, 2025 · 20 MIN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., Et Al., decided 29 Jan 25
from CAFC News Brief
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, holding patents for its drug EYLEA®, sued Samsung Bioepis and other companies for patent infringement after they filed applications to market biosimilars. The appeals court upheld the lower court's assertion of personal jurisdiction over Samsung Bioepis, a South Korean company, based on its nationwide marketing plans. The court also found that Regeneron demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm if the injunction wasn't granted, thus affirming the preliminary injunction. The court's decision centered on the patentability of Regeneron's claims and Samsung Bioepis's failure to raise substantial questions of invalidity.
What this episode covers
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, holding patents for its drug EYLEA®, sued Samsung Bioepis and other companies for patent infringement after they filed applications to market biosimilars. The appeals court upheld the lower court's assertion of personal jurisdiction over Samsung Bioepis, a South Korean company, based on its nationwide marketing plans. The court also found that Regeneron demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm if the injunction wasn't granted, thus affirming the preliminary injunction. The court's decision centered on the patentability of Regeneron's claims and Samsung Bioepis's failure to raise substantial questions of invalidity.
NOW PLAYING
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., Et Al., decided 29 Jan 25
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Apr 21, 2026 ·13m
Apr 19, 2026 ·16m
Apr 17, 2026 ·13m
Apr 13, 2026 ·11m
Apr 11, 2026 ·16m