PodParley PodParley

Self Identity, Part II

Does it make sense to think we can duplicate persons, so that people can divide just like cells?

An episode of the Philosophical Problems podcast, hosted by Professor Andrew Brennan, titled "Self Identity, Part II" was published on March 20, 2013 and runs 42 minutes.

March 20, 2013 ·42m · Philosophical Problems

0:00 / 0:00

Does it make sense to think we can duplicate persons, so that people can divide just like cells? Since splitting means dividing one person into two people, the obvious answer seems to be that persons are unable to undergo fission. By looking at the old example of the Ship of Theseus we find that it is possible to think of artefacts dividing, in that one ship can become two. More precisely, a set of time-slices that constitute one ship can be shared by two different future sets of time slices that constitute two different ships. Exactly the same can be said of person fission of the sort that could happen using Star-Trek-style teleporter technology. Copyright 2013 Jack Reynolds / La Trobe University, all rights reserved. Contact for permissions.

Does it make sense to think we can duplicate persons, so that people can divide just like cells? Since splitting means dividing one person into two people, the obvious answer seems to be that persons are unable to undergo fission. By looking at the old example of the Ship of Theseus we find that it is possible to think of artefacts dividing, in that one ship can become two. More precisely, a set of time-slices that constitute one ship can be shared by two different future sets of time slices that constitute two different ships. Exactly the same can be said of person fission of the sort that could happen using Star-Trek-style teleporter technology.

Copyright 2013 Jack Reynolds / La Trobe University, all rights reserved. Contact for permissions.

Cambridge Pragmatism: A Research Workshop Cambridge University Cambridge Pragmatism: a Research Workshop31 May — 1 June, 2012 :: Winstanley Lecture Theatre, Trinity College, CambridgeThemesPragmatists approach philosophical problems by enquiring about the practical role of disputed notions — truth, causation, value, or necessity, for example — in human life. Over the past century, many distinguished Cambridge philosophers have been pragmatists in one sense or another. Most famously of all, the remarkable shift in Wittgenstein's views when he returned to Cambridge in 1929 is distinctly pragmatist in nature: it focuses on the many things that we humans do with language. In the same period, many of Frank Ramsey's contributions to topics such as probability, belief, causation and laws have a deeply practical character. Later, it is easy to identify pragmatist strands in von Wright’s views of causation, Anscombe’s writings on indexical thought, Mellor’s work on tense and on success semantics, and Craig’s view of knowledge, to name just four of the Problems of Philosophy, The by Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970) LibriVox The Problems of Philosophy is one of Bertrand Russell's attempts to create a brief and accessible guide to the problems of philosophy. Focusing on problems he believes will provoke positive and constructive discussion, Russell concentrates on knowledge rather than metaphysics.Russell guides the reader through his famous distinction between "knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description" and introduces important theories of Plato, Aristotle, René Descartes, David Hume, John Locke, Immanuel Kant, Georg Hegel and others to lay the foundation for philosophical inquiry by general readers and scholars alike. (Summary from Wikipedia) Academy Refugees Tina-Desiree Berg Ever thought philosophy was about solving problems that don't exist? Or do you believe that philosophical discourse was only for elites? Ron and Tina think that there is more to it. Two grad school drop-outs that left the Academy to find out.Co-hosted by Tina-Desiree Berg, MA in Philosophy, and Ron Placone, Comedian and MA in Media Studies. Lend us your ears, if you please! We are the Academy Refugees. Philosophers on Medicine Jonathan Fuller For the deepest problems in healthcare, philosophy is the best medicine. In this podcast series, Jonathan Fuller, MD, PhD (University of Toronto) speaks to philosophers about their work on medicine and healthcare. You will hear from philosophers on the meaning and reality of disease, on their skeptical worries about evidence-based medicine, on current movements and controversies that shake medicine to its philosophical foundations. Visit our website at www.philosophersonmedicine.com.
URL copied to clipboard!