PodParley PodParley

Social Media Cases Could Impact Public Discourse Online

An episode of the Cases and Controversies podcast, hosted by Bloomberg Law, titled "Social Media Cases Could Impact Public Discourse Online" was published on February 23, 2024 and runs 22 minutes.

February 23, 2024 ·22m · Cases and Controversies

0:00 / 0:00

The Supreme Court will hear arguments Monday in fights over laws in Florida and Texas that seek to stop social media platforms from censoring conservative speech online. At issue are provisions that require platforms to keep up certain kinds of content and inform users when posts are removed. The justices are being asked to decide if those requirements are constitutional under the First Amendment’s right to editorial judgment. Scott Wilkens, senior counsel at Columbia University’s Knight First Amendment Institute, joins Cases and Controversies to discuss how the justices are likely to approach a case that could impact public discourse online for decades to come. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments Monday in fights over laws in Florida and Texas that seek to stop social media platforms from censoring conservative speech online. At issue are provisions that require platforms to keep up certain kinds of content and inform users when posts are removed. The justices are being asked to decide if those requirements are constitutional under the First Amendment’s right to editorial judgment. Scott Wilkens, senior counsel at Columbia University’s Knight First Amendment Institute, joins Cases and Controversies to discuss how the justices are likely to approach a case that could impact public discourse online for decades to come. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.
Crime Waves QCODE Crime Waves dives into the strangest true crime stories you've never heard of, investigating real cases that defy belief. Each season is a deep dive into a compelling, season-long mystery, focusing on narratives that feel ripped from a conspiracy thriller but are chillingly real.Hear the stories told by the people who were there: the witnesses, the investigators, and the ones who were left to pick up the pieces.Season 1: Cold Truth - Hosted by award-winning journalist and author David Kushner, this season follows the life, violent death, and legacy of Dr. Eugene Mallove, a fierce advocate for the controversial energy known as cold fusion. His murder investigation unravels a dark web of conspiracy, passion, and how his dream of a brighter future ultimately caught up with him.Season 2: Renaissance, TX - The Texas Renaissance Festival is the largest—and rowdiest—ren fai The legal system is a joke. Hunter Scott This is a small yet informative conversation/discussion about the highly controversial outcome about Adnan Syed's case, and why it is wrong. The twominuteupdate's Podcast New cases and issues relevant to prosecutors in two minutes or less Average But Owning It Haley and Maddie Listener Guide: - ICYWW will always be true crime cases and stands for "Incase you weren't wondering" - TTFI will always be based around less structured, conversational topics and stands for "Table Talks for Idiots" (us not you) Maddie doesn't have a hobby. Haley has too many, and has taken it upon herself to get Maddie unreasonably hooked on something-- anything. (true crime, social causes, the Kennedys, to name a few). Post-college graduation is primetime for a quarter-life crisis and some soul searching: on Average but Owning it, Maddie and Haley are going to do a little bit of both.
URL copied to clipboard!