Supreme Court Leans Toward Upholding Birthright Citizenship; Rules Against Conversion Therapy Ban Restrictions episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 3, 2026 · 2 MIN

Supreme Court Leans Toward Upholding Birthright Citizenship; Rules Against Conversion Therapy Ban Restrictions

from Supreme Court Tracker - SCOTUS News · host Inception Point AI

The US Supreme Court wrapped up its March argument session this week, hearing cases like Abouammo v. United States, Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties, Pitchford v. Cain, and the high-profile Trump v. Barbara on birthright citizenship. In Trump v. Barbara, argued April 1, justices appeared skeptical of President Trump's January 2025 executive order denying citizenship to children born in the US to undocumented or temporarily present mothers without citizen or permanent resident fathers. Drawing on the 14th Amendment and the 1898 Wong Kim Ark precedent affirming jus soli birthright citizenship, several justices, including Gorsuch and Barrett, probed the government's arguments about "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," referencing historical exclusions like Native Americans and hypotheticals on dual citizens or trafficked parents. Trump attended oral arguments in a historic move, but the court seemed to lean toward upholding birthright citizenship, with a decision expected by late June or early July; lower court blocks remain in place. Earlier Tuesday, the court ruled in Chiles v. Salazar that Colorado's conversion therapy ban, as applied to talk therapy, regulates speech based on viewpoint and demands stricter First Amendment scrutiny, overturning lower courts. Religion News Service noted concerns from LGBTQ faith leaders about risks to youth, while liberal voices criticized the decision for ignoring potential harms from non-affirming therapists. On Thursday, justices held a private conference to vote on petitions, with orders due Monday at 9:30 a.m. EDT. The next arguments start April 20. Separately, the Board of Immigration Appeals on April 2 clarified obstruction of justice definitions under immigration law, aligning with recent Supreme Court guidance in Pugin v. Garland. Thanks for tuning in, listeners—please subscribe for more updates. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quietplease.ai. For more http://www.quietplease.ai Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

The US Supreme Court wrapped up its March argument session this week, hearing cases like Abouammo v. United States, Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties, Pitchford v. Cain, and the high-profile Trump v. Barbara on birthright citizenship. In Trump v. Barbara, argued April 1, justices appeared skeptical of President Trump's January 2025 executive order denying citizenship to children born in the US to undocumented or temporarily present mothers without citizen or permanent resident fathers. Drawing on the 14th Amendment and the 1898 Wong Kim Ark precedent affirming jus soli birthright citizenship, several justices, including Gorsuch and Barrett, probed the government's arguments about "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," referencing historical exclusions like Native Americans and hypotheticals on dual citizens or trafficked parents. Trump attended oral arguments in a historic move, but the court seemed to lean toward upholding birthright citizenship, with a decision expected by late June or early July; lower court blocks remain in place. Earlier Tuesday, the court ruled in Chiles v. Salazar that Colorado's conversion therapy ban, as applied to talk therapy, regulates speech based on viewpoint and demands stricter First Amendment scrutiny, overturning lower courts. Religion News Service noted concerns from LGBTQ faith leaders about risks to youth, while liberal voices criticized the decision for ignoring potential harms from non-affirming therapists. On Thursday, justices held a private conference to vote on petitions, with orders due Monday at 9:30 a.m. EDT. The next arguments start April 20. Separately, the Board of Immigration Appeals on April 2 clarified obstruction of justice definitions under immigration law, aligning with recent Supreme Court guidance in Pugin v. Garland. Thanks for tuning in, listeners—please subscribe for more updates. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quietplease.ai. For more http://www.quietplease.ai Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

NOW PLAYING

Supreme Court Leans Toward Upholding Birthright Citizenship; Rules Against Conversion Therapy Ban Restrictions

0:00 2:12

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Supreme Court Tracker - SCOTUS News?

This episode is 2 minutes long.

When was this Supreme Court Tracker - SCOTUS News episode published?

This episode was published on April 3, 2026.

What is this episode about?

The US Supreme Court wrapped up its March argument session this week, hearing cases like Abouammo v. United States, Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties, Pitchford v. Cain, and the high-profile Trump v. Barbara on birthright citizenship. In Trump v....

Can I download this Supreme Court Tracker - SCOTUS News episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!