Talking Tech - Episode 24

George and Ian wish AIM a Happy 30th Birthday, consider its success and follow Charlie Munger’s edict of ‘invert, always invert’ to gain some context. 1,700 companies on AIM in 2007 was too many (polite way to say it), but 700 now is too few.  The politically impossible bail out is not the answer, but what can be done for little cost and risk to the public purse? Perhaps if we make it more profitable for fund managers, and in particular for those with credible voices, for whom improving the quality of the businesses they invest in is a goal.   George wants to know how you make a Staveley scale? (Other fund managers are available.) George raises the issue of small-cap and AIM plc governance. How much does it cost, and what, realistically, can a NED actually do?  He relates a story of frustration from a NED contact. Inevitably this leads to the RC Fornax shambles and whether fund managers know how much DD gets done by the NOMADs. On the companies front it’s a tough market for Hays, progress for Capita and for Oxford Metrics it’s back to normal but with concerns over US university and research spending under the new regime.