The Trump New York Verdict: Constitutional, Legal, and Prudential Questions episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 5, 2024 · 1H 1M

The Trump New York Verdict: Constitutional, Legal, and Prudential Questions

from FedSoc Forums · host The Federalist Society

A New York City jury recently convicted former President Donald Trump of 34 criminal counts of falsifying business documents. In New York, it is a misdemeanor to falsify business records with “the intent to defraud,” a crime with a two year statute of limitations. If the falsification is carried out for the purpose of concealing another crime, it is a felony, with an extended statute of limitations. Following the verdict, Bragg pointed to the prosecution’s methodical presentation of “extensive hard evidence” in support of the outcome. Some legal experts agree. Others, however, have criticized the DA’s case and predict it will be overturned on appeal for any of several reasons. These include questions about Judge Merchan's impartiality, the prosecution’s legal theory, the evidence allowed and not allowed at trial, and the jury instructions. One much-discussed question, for example, is that Manhattan District Attorney Bragg’s case charged Trump with a felony records violation, but he did not specify until his closing argument what other crime(s) the records violations were designed to conceal. Moreover Judge Merchan's jury instructions told the jury that they need not agree on that question, but instead that they only had to agree that the violations were designed to conceal a crime. Was this correct as a matter of statutory and constitutional law? In addition, there are questions about whether some of the conduct alleged actually constituted a crime, for either statutory or constitutional reasons. There are also important questions about the propriety and prudence of bringing charges of this type against a former President of the opposite party from that of the other actors in the system. Finally, there are many important questions about what happens next. Join us for an expert discussion of this historic case and its wide-ranging legal and prudential implications. Featuring: Sarah Isgur, Senior Editor, The Dispatch Prof. William G. Otis, Adjunct Professor of Law, Georgetown Law

A New York City jury recently convicted former President Donald Trump of 34 criminal counts of falsifying business documents. In New York, it is a misdemeanor to falsify business records with “the intent to defraud,” a crime with a two year statute of limitations. If the falsification is carried out for the purpose of concealing another crime, it is a felony, with an extended statute of limitations. Following the verdict, Bragg pointed to the prosecution’s methodical presentation of “extensive hard evidence” in support of the outcome. Some legal experts agree. Others, however, have criticized the DA’s case and predict it will be overturned on appeal for any of several reasons. These include questions about Judge Merchan's impartiality, the prosecution’s legal theory, the evidence allowed and not allowed at trial, and the jury instructions. One much-discussed question, for example, is that Manhattan District Attorney Bragg’s case charged Trump with a felony records violation, but he did not specify until his closing argument what other crime(s) the records violations were designed to conceal. Moreover Judge Merchan's jury instructions told the jury that they need not agree on that question, but instead that they only had to agree that the violations were designed to conceal a crime. Was this correct as a matter of statutory and constitutional law? In addition, there are questions about whether some of the conduct alleged actually constituted a crime, for either statutory or constitutional reasons. There are also important questions about the propriety and prudence of bringing charges of this type against a former President of the opposite party from that of the other actors in the system. Finally, there are many important questions about what happens next. Join us for an expert discussion of this historic case and its wide-ranging legal and prudential implications. Featuring: Sarah Isgur, Senior Editor, The Dispatch Prof. William G. Otis, Adjunct Professor of Law, Georgetown Law

NOW PLAYING

The Trump New York Verdict: Constitutional, Legal, and Prudential Questions

0:00 1:01:47

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

REFRA REFRA www.refra.frCommunauté Francophone des Utilisateurs de RenoiseNous vous proposons : Le guide de démarrage rapide, traduit en français, et agrémenté de vidéos Le manuel de référence, traduit en français, 99% fidèle à l'original Des forums d'entraide, avec des trucs & astuces, et des tutoriels divers... (Formants filters, Wobble, Vocoder...) Une webradio diffusant des musiques faites avec Renoise The Let's Talk Bitcoin Network The LTB Network provides a tokenized platform for podcasts, articles, and forums about the ideas, people, and projects building the new digital economy and the future of money. STAR WARS The Vintage Rebellion Podcast The Star Wars Vintage Rebellion Podcast - SWTVR - Podcast Team The Star Wars Vintage Rebellion Podcast is brought to you by five vintage Star Wars Toy collectors. The team discuss vintage star wars collectibles, recent threads and stories from across social media and forums, the current vintage market, oddball items, as well as covering stories that have been rocking the vintage collecting community. There are also interviews with all types of collector as well as an events section where you can discover Star Wars events in your area. All this plus much much more, so download this podcast now! Cato Audio Cato Institute Every month, CatoAudio puts you right in the middle of important policy debates in Washington. Through highlights from the Cato Institute’s dynamic Policy Forums, speeches, debates, and conferences, you can listen to in-depth discussions from well-known political leaders, authors, political experts, pundits, journalists, and other nationally respected scholars. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of FedSoc Forums?

This episode is 1 hour and 1 minute long.

When was this FedSoc Forums episode published?

This episode was published on June 5, 2024.

What is this episode about?

A New York City jury recently convicted former President Donald Trump of 34 criminal counts of falsifying business documents. In New York, it is a misdemeanor to falsify business records with “the intent to defraud,” a crime with a two...

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this FedSoc Forums episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!