today we're talking about...STRESS! Fun!

Evidence Law Made Easy: Relevance

Release Date: 02/20/2024

Description: Relevance Defined. First, what exactly is relevance? Evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make a fact that is important to the case more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. In other words, for evidence to be relevant, it has to help prove or disprove a fact that matters to the ultimate issue in the case. The key question is always - does this evidence have any bearing on making any material fact more or less likely? If the answer is yes, the evidence meets the test for legal relevance. Determining Relevance. So how do courts determine if a particular piece of evidence is legally relevant to the case? Well, it’s important to keep in mind that the standard for relevance is very low. The evidence doesn’t have to definitively prove a fact - it just has to alter the probability for or against that fact even a little bit. Courts look at both the evidence itself and the issues in the case. They ask - does this evidence have any logical relationship or connection to the facts we need to prove here? For example, if the dispute is about whether a defendant was driving recklessly, a video showing the driver texting would be relevant because it makes reckless driving more probable. Excluding Irrelevant Evidence. Okay, so now we know how courts determine if evidence is relevant. But what happens if evidence is found to be irrelevant? The basic rule is that irrelevant evidence will be excluded from the case and the jury cannot hear it. This helps to avoid jury confusion and wasted time on facts that just aren’t important. There are a couple steps to objecting to evidence as irrelevant. First, the attorney makes an objection such as "Objection, irrelevant!" Then the judge will ask the attorney to explain why the evidence is irrelevant. The attorney needs to show how the evidence has no relationship or bearing on any material facts in the case. If the judge agrees, the evidence will be excluded and the jury will not get to consider it. Pretty simple right? --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Explicit: No

The City's Backyard Ep 109 Insult Comic LISA LAMPANELLI is coming to Music Theater of Connecticut and we chat with her about her retirement and why she will be in her own show called "IRRELEVANT coming soon this summer!"

Release Date: 07/16/2024

Description: Insult Comic Lisa Lampanelli drops by The City's Backyard to chat about retirement and her new show called "IRRELEVANT"! ANNOUNCING “LISA LAMPANELLI: IRRELEVANT!” TWO NIGHTS ONLY!MTC is thrilled to present an exclusive 2-night fundraising event: comedy icon Lisa Lampanelli's brand-new solo show! In this script-in-hand performance, the former comedian reveals all about her path to find relevance after her 2018 retirement. The ultimately hopeful journey will leave audience members saying: “If there’s hope for Lisa, there’s hope for me too!” Following each show will be a Q&A and talkback, as well as a post-show reception! Performances are Saturday, August 3rd, at 8:00pm and Friday, August 9th, at 8:00pm.INFO & TICKETS: https://www.musictheatreofct.com/irrelevant

Explicit: No

Logical Fallacies: Fallacies Of Relevance

Release Date: 08/27/2020

Description: Do you ever get frustrated when trying to make a presentation or convince your team at work about a certain way to do something but keep getting derailed by irrelevant points? You may be facing attacks from someone who is using logical fallacies in their arguments.Read more ›The post Logical Fallacies: Fallacies Of Relevance appeared first on Complete Developer Podcast. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Explicit: No

Evidence Law Class Session 2: Relevance and Admissibility

Release Date: 09/11/2023

Description: Welcome back to our Evidence Law class! In this session, we will explore the crucial concepts of relevance and admissibility in depth. These principles are essential for determining which evidence can be presented in court. By the end of this session, you will have a solid understanding of how these criteria shape the admissibility of evidence. Today Topics to be Covered: 1. Relevance of Evidence: - Defining relevance: Evidence must have a logical connection to the facts at issue in the case. - Standard for determining relevance: Whether the evidence makes the existence of a fact more or less probable. 2. Exclusion of Irrelevant Evidence: - Ensuring efficiency and focus in legal proceedings by excluding evidence that is not pertinent to the case. - Balancing probative value against potential for confusion or waste of time. 3. Admissibility Criteria: - Hearsay rule: Understanding the general prohibition on secondhand statements, with exceptions. - Character evidence: Exploring limitations on using a person's character to infer their behavior. - Opinion evidence: Differentiating between lay opinions and expert opinions. 4. Balancing Test: - Weighing probative value against potential prejudicial impact to determine admissibility. Here are some Examples and Case Studies: 1. Relevance in a Murder Trial: Imagine a murder trial where the defendant claims self-defense. Relevance becomes a key consideration: - Relevant evidence: The victim's prior violent behavior to establish the reasonableness of the defendant's fear. - Irrelevant evidence: The defendant's favorite color, which has no bearing on the case. 2. Hearsay Exception in a Contract Dispute: Consider a contract dispute where a party seeks to admit a statement made by a deceased contract partner: - Exception to the hearsay rule: The statement may be admissible if it falls under the "Dying Declaration" exception. Now for some Questions: 1. Relevance vs. Admissibility: Differentiate between relevance and admissibility in the context of evidence. Answer: Relevance pertains to whether evidence logically connects to the facts at issue, while admissibility concerns whether evidence meets specific legal criteria to be presented in court. 2. Hearsay Exception: Question. Can you provide an example of a situation where the hearsay rule might not apply? Answer: One such exception is the "Excited Utterance" exception, where a statement made under the influence of a startling event may be admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule. Join me next week for Session 3. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Explicit: No

Irrelevant

Release Date: 09/09/2020

Authors: [email protected]

Description: The "Irrelevant" podcast aims to explore the role of relevance in the generation of Intent and Action. The podcast will aim to hopefully bring down barriers to achievement and contentment through the strengthening of Intent.

Explicit: No

Living RELEVANT with Meninchie

Release Date: 09/08/2020

Authors: Kwame Boachie

Description: This podcast is custom-designed to enable you to recognize your potential and LIVE OUT your relevance. You possess potential energy but until you convert it into kinetic energy, you will remain irrelevant. Many people are sitting on gold mines, don’t be one of them. Knowledge is power! Join Meninchie on this journey to discovering and living out your relevance. Yes, it is not enough to only discover yourself but you need to LIVE OUT your RELEVANCE as well.

Explicit: No

AnyWhoot

Release Date: 08/12/2020

Authors: Hector Feliciano

Description: Discussion about anything relevant and irrelevant in today’s world. Irrelevant is our Niche

Explicit: No

Irrelevant

Release Date: 08/26/2020

Authors: Fracture

Description: Irrelevant is a podcast Fracture and Hotfire made. They talk about video games and mainly rant about fortnite.

Explicit: No

Irrelevant

Release Date: 08/28/2020

Authors: Megan and John

Description: A silly little podcast with Megan and John Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/irrelevantmeganandjohn/support

Explicit: No

Irrelevant

Release Date: 09/04/2020

Authors: Chris and Luke

Description: Welcome to Irrelevant, where amazing things happen. Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/irrelevantpodcast/support

Explicit: No

Irrelevant

Release Date: 09/24/2020

Authors: Dorota Wulw

Description: A bored teen talks about random stuff that pops into her head :)

Explicit: No

IrreleVANt

Release Date: 04/04/2021

Authors: Chris Jäschke, Felix Hoffmann

Description: Der Podcast rundum Vanlife und Van-Ausbau.Wir - das sind Chris und Felix - sprechen in diesem Podcast über den Ausbau eines Transporters zum Van, sowie über das Leben mit und in diesem.Bei unseren Umbauarbeiten an unserem Fiat Ducato und Peugeot Boxer haben wir uns lange über einzelne Themen unterhalten und wollen euch unsere Gedanken mitgeben. Wir wollen nicht den Anspruch an Vollständigkeit erfüllen, sondern hoffen, wir können euch ein paar Anreize geben. Wir freuen uns immer über Kommentare.Felix findet ihr auch auf Instagram und Youtube jeweils unter dem Namen downtovanuptolife.Wir wünschen euch viel Spaß beim Hören!Chris & Felix

Explicit: No

Irrelevant

Release Date: 04/28/2021

Description: Two teenage girls talking about the drama in their lives which is probably irrelevant to you

Explicit: No

irrelevant.

Release Date: 04/26/2021

Authors: Matt & JC

Description: An irrelevant show with your irrelevant hosts, Matt & JC, who talk about somewhat relevant topics, every week on Monday.

Explicit: No

irrelevant

Release Date: 04/29/2021

Authors: Marissa Womack

Description: hello my beautiful people! this is a podcast that goes through my life in alphabetical order. it allows me to share stories, advice, and opinions with all of you who may be in the same boat as i am. i hope you enjoy and can learn from my experiences! Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/marissa-womack/support

Explicit: No