U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Palomar-Santiago, Case No. 20-437 episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 28, 2021

U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Palomar-Santiago, Case No. 20-437

from Audio Arguendo · host U.S. Supreme Court

Immigration: When can a defendant charged with unlawful reentry assert the invalidity of the original order of removal as an affirmative defense if they previously failed to exhaust administrative remedies? - Argued: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:26:38 EDT

NOW PLAYING

U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Palomar-Santiago, Case No. 20-437

0:00 0:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Audio Arguendo?

Episode duration information is not available.

When was this Audio Arguendo episode published?

This episode was published on April 28, 2021.

What is this episode about?

Immigration: When can a defendant charged with unlawful reentry assert the invalidity of the original order of removal as an affirmative defense if they previously failed to exhaust administrative remedies? - Argued: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:26:38 EDT

Can I download this Audio Arguendo episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!