PodParley PodParley

What are we doing when we vote?

This year marks the 100th anniversary of the first federal election to be held in Australia after the passage of Senator Herbert Payne’s private member’s bill, which made voting compulsory. In 1922, only 57.95 per cent of registered voters turned out. Payne’s home state of Tasmania had the poorest showing (45.93 per cent), whereas Queensland — where voting in state elections had been compulsory since 1914 — saw the highest (82.66 per cent). As Judith Brett writes: “It was clear that Queensland’s compulsory voting for state elections had carried over to the federal sphere, perhaps from habit, perhaps because Queenslanders didn’t distinguish between state and federal elections and thought they would be fined for not voting. Or perhaps, as advocates of compulsory voting hoped, it was because being forced to vote made people more politically aware and engaged.” Whichever reason best accounts for the enviable voting behaviour on the part of Queenslanders, the prospect of making Australia’s federal elections more truly representative — and therefore, ideally, endow its governance with greater legitimacy — overcame lingering fears in some quarters about the violation of individual liberties. When Australians went to the polls on 14 November 1925, not only did voter turnout jump to 91.39 per cent, but the requirement to vote did not lead to a rise in informal voting.  Voting is part of our cultural fabric, and compulsory voting — along with preferential voting and a non-partisan election commission —  has saved Australia from some of the anti-democratic distortions we’ve seen in other nations. But because voting is what Australians do, how often to we reflect on what we’re doing when we vote, and what we’re communicating about power, accountability, ourselves and our aspirations for Australia?

An episode of the The Minefield podcast, hosted by Australian Broadcasting Corporation, titled "What are we doing when we vote?" was published on April 23, 2025 and runs 53 minutes.

April 23, 2025 ·53m · The Minefield

0:00 / 0:00

This year marks the 100th anniversary of the first federal election to be held in Australia after the passage of Senator Herbert Payne’s private member’s bill, which made voting compulsory. In 1922, only 57.95 per cent of registered voters turned out. Payne’s home state of Tasmania had the poorest showing (45.93 per cent), whereas Queensland — where voting in state elections had been compulsory since 1914 — saw the highest (82.66 per cent). As Judith Brett writes: “It was clear that Queensland’s compulsory voting for state elections had carried over to the federal sphere, perhaps from habit, perhaps because Queenslanders didn’t distinguish between state and federal elections and thought they would be fined for not voting. Or perhaps, as advocates of compulsory voting hoped, it was because being forced to vote made people more politically aware and engaged.” Whichever reason best accounts for the enviable voting behaviour on the part of Queenslanders, the prospect of making Australia’s federal elections more truly representative — and therefore, ideally, endow its governance with greater legitimacy — overcame lingering fears in some quarters about the violation of individual liberties. When Australians went to the polls on 14 November 1925, not only did voter turnout jump to 91.39 per cent, but the requirement to vote did not lead to a rise in informal voting.  Voting is part of our cultural fabric, and compulsory voting — along with preferential voting and a non-partisan election commission —  has saved Australia from some of the anti-democratic distortions we’ve seen in other nations. But because voting is what Australians do, how often to we reflect on what we’re doing when we vote, and what we’re communicating about power, accountability, ourselves and our aspirations for Australia?

This year marks the 100th anniversary of the first federal election to be held in Australia after the passage of Senator Herbert Payne’s private member’s bill, which made voting compulsory. In 1922, only 57.95 per cent of registered voters turned out. Payne’s home state of Tasmania had the poorest showing (45.93 per cent), whereas Queensland — where voting in state elections had been compulsory since 1914 — saw the highest (82.66 per cent). As Judith Brett writes:

“It was clear that Queensland’s compulsory voting for state elections had carried over to the federal sphere, perhaps from habit, perhaps because Queenslanders didn’t distinguish between state and federal elections and thought they would be fined for not voting. Or perhaps, as advocates of compulsory voting hoped, it was because being forced to vote made people more politically aware and engaged.”

Whichever reason best accounts for the enviable voting behaviour on the part of Queenslanders, the prospect of making Australia’s federal elections more truly representative — and therefore, ideally, endow its governance with greater legitimacy — overcame lingering fears in some quarters about the violation of individual liberties.

When Australians went to the polls on 14 November 1925, not only did voter turnout jump to 91.39 per cent, but the requirement to vote did not lead to a rise in informal voting.

 Voting is part of our cultural fabric, and compulsory voting — along with preferential voting and a non-partisan election commission —  has saved Australia from some of the anti-democratic distortions we’ve seen in other nations.

But because voting is what Australians do, how often to we reflect on what we’re doing when we vote, and what we’re communicating about power, accountability, ourselves and our aspirations for Australia?

Chapter 21

Apr 13, 2026 ·17m

Chapter 22

Apr 13, 2026 ·23m

Chapter 23

Apr 13, 2026 ·22m

Chapter 24

Apr 13, 2026 ·18m

Chapter 25

Apr 13, 2026 ·27m

Chaper 26

Apr 13, 2026 ·17m

The Communication Paradox Dave Harries / Angela Jones Angela Jones and Dave Harries share their journey exploring the communication paradox - the tension between perfection and authenticity in business communications. Follow their insights and discoveries, as they discuss the communication paradox, interview expert guests and travel through the minefield of communications learning lots and (hopefully) growing a little along the way. The Late Shift The Late Shift Four unlikely friends embark on a creative endeavour that could only be spawned by narcissism, delusion, and an absence of any voice of reason. Marvel as they delve into the secrets of history, tread lightly through the minefield of conspiracy theories, and ruthlessly smother the creepy pasta you ordered with their own ridicule sauce, all without any responsible adult to tell them it's past bed-time.So sit back, open your mind, and regret it immediately because it's time for the Late Shift.intro: @aka-dj-quads Courage in Betrayal Angela Tobler This podcast if for anyone who has felt the sting of betrayal and is ready to find hope and healing. I will share my story as well as the lessons I have learned to help you navigate the minefield that is betrayal. Recovery is not some far off destination that one day you'll reach, but rather a commitment within yourself to find everyday. Start today and join me as we discuss the good the bad and the next steps. It doesn't matter where you are on your journey, all that matters is realizing that through small and simple steps, great things come to pass. I see greatness within you, all that is required is for you to have a desire to reach it. You can feel better, you can heal and peace is possible. Join me and let me show you how. Great Relationships: Gen X & Gen Z Deb Knupp Are you a Gen X parent who wants the best for your child and you keep having “misses” in your efforts to connect? Do you wish there was a way that you could bridge the gap and have an authentic, meaningful relationship with your Gen Z-er that brings out the best for both of you? Or maybe you are a Gen Z-er that wishes your Gen X parents understood how to connect with you and finally got a clue. Or as a Gen Z-er, you are tired of all the negative labels that older generations place on you as emotional, fragile or lazy.Join Sydney Knupp (Gen Z) and Deb Knupp (Gen X) as they interview their Gen Z guests on topics that most parents are afraid or don’t know how to talk to their kids about - everything from mental health to substance abuse, sex to schoolwork, and navigating the minefield that is friend and family dynamics in your teens and early 20s. Gain insight through the lens of Gen Z on how to speak with your kid and build a collaborative relations
URL copied to clipboard!