PodParley PodParley

When Liberals and Conservatives Use Genetics to Explain Human Difference

Public debate on genetic research often assumes t…

An episode of the The Science of Politics podcast, hosted by Niskanen Center, titled "When Liberals and Conservatives Use Genetics to Explain Human Difference" was published on June 6, 2018 and runs 20 minutes.

June 6, 2018 ·20m · The Science of Politics

0:00 / 0:00

Public debate on genetic research often assumes that conservatives will prefer genetic explanations for human differences, while liberals will point to environmental factors—perhaps exacerbating political divides on race. But Stephen Schneider finds that conservatives prefer explanations based on personal choice; attributing individual differences to genetics is associated with liberalism and higher tolerance. But when asked to explain racial group differences, Elizabeth Suhay finds that conservatives are attracted to genetic explanations if they are exposed to media messages on genetics and race. Both say people choose their political views first and then select the explanations that fit them.

Public debate on genetic research often assumes that conservatives will prefer genetic explanations for human differences, while liberals will point to environmental factors—perhaps exacerbating political divides on race. But Stephen Schneider finds that conservatives prefer explanations based on personal choice; attributing individual differences to genetics is associated with liberalism and higher tolerance. But when asked to explain racial group differences, Elizabeth Suhay finds that conservatives are attracted to genetic explanations if they are exposed to media messages on genetics and race. Both say people choose their political views first and then select the explanations that fit them.
Challenging Climate Jesse Reynolds and Pete Irvine Asking tough questions about the science, technology, and politics of climate change, two climate researchers challenge leading experts on one of the defining issues of our age. Every two weeks, they explore how we can fight global warming by cutting greenhouse gas emissions, carbon removal, adaptation and solar geoengineering. Dr. Jesse Reynolds and Dr. Pete Irvine consider the roles of computer models and persuasive narratives, economics and public policy, and renewable energy and national security in the climate debate, and look beyond to issues such as biotechnology and international development.Support us at Patreon.Questions or comments? Email [email protected] or tweet @ChalClimateSee more information on Jesse Reynolds and <a href="https://www.ucl.ac.uk/earth- Oxford Food Governance Group: The Politics and Practices of Food Oxford University The Oxford Food Governance Group is an interdisciplinary group of researchers from the Institute for Science, Innovation and Society (InSIS), Said Business School, and the Unit for Biocultural Variation and Obesity (UBVO) at the University of Oxford, who share an interest in food governance practices. Looking at the politics of food distribution, sustainability, and governance of the food supply among other topics, this series will look at how we get our food and why it matters. Negotiating Harmony Navigating Politics and Affairs Alexandre Luc Smith In "Negotiating Harmony," we delve deep into the ever-evolving landscape of political science and current affairs. Join us on an intellectual journey as we explore the intricacies of global politics, dissect pressing issues, and unearth the historical contexts that shape our world.Our podcast brings together seasoned experts, scholars, and thought leaders who passionately share their insights and analysis on the most critical matters of our time. From international relations and diplomatic intricacies to domestic policy debates, we leave no stone unt The Muckraking Ida Tarbell and C. Gull Discussions of politics, culture, social justice, science, technology, and all the news that’s fit to criticize. Led by Ida Tarbell and C. Gull https://themuckraking.wordpress.com/
URL copied to clipboard!