EPISODE · Jun 18, 2026 · 8 MIN
Why Government Software Licenses Cost More Than Buying
from Government Spending with Fexingo: Budget, Deficits, and Public Finance Explained · host Fexingo
Lucas and Luna break down why governments pay vastly more for software licensing than buying outright. Using the US Department of Defense's $45 million spend on Microsoft Office licenses in 2025 as a case study, they explore how procurement rules, budget cycles, and vendor lock-in inflate costs. The episode reveals that the DoD's per-seat cost for Office 365 was nearly triple the commercial rate, and examines why switching to open-source alternatives like LibreOffice hasn't happened despite years of pilot programs. Lucas explains the concept of 'licensing inertia' and how it costs US federal agencies an estimated $2 billion annually in software overspend. Luna challenges whether mandates for 'commercial off-the-shelf' software are actually driving up costs instead of saving money. They wrap up discussing a 2024 Government Accountability Office report that found 80% of federal software licenses were underutilized, yet agencies kept renewing them. A sharp look at how public sector software buying is broken. #GovernmentSoftwareLicensing #PublicProcurement #DoDSpending #MicrosoftOffice365 #SoftwareCosts #VendorLockIn #LibreOffice #OpenSource #BudgetWaste #GAOReport #LicensingInertia #TaxpayerMoney #Economics #GovernmentSpending #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #FreeSoftware #CommercialOffTheShelf Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Why Government Software Licenses Cost More Than Buying
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.