Frontline Conversations

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Suhas Palshikar, political scientist and retired professor from Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, analyses the growing controversy around the delimitation debate in India, the recent defeat of a Constitution Amendment Bill linked to women’s reservation, and the larger political implications for federalism, representation, and democratic consensus. Drawing on historical context, constitutional provisions, and political developments, he explains why delimitation is emerging as a defining issue for India’s politics over the next decade. The conversation further explores key questions around population-based representation, the imbalance between States, and the need to reconcile democratic principles with federal realities. Palshikar also reflects on the dangers of politicising and “weaponising” issues like women’s reservation, and how such strategies could increase divisions within Indian democracy. Chapters: 00:00 | Intro: Delimitation row & political context 01:29 | Why the Bill failed in Parliament 02:32 | Constitution Amendment bill & consensus politics in India 04:33 | North vs South debate: Myth or reality? 06:06 | Is federalism under threat? 08:05 | Why delimitation is necessary 10:47 | Population control vs representation debate 15:36 | GDP-based representation debate 20:40 | Weaponisation of women’s reservation issue 22:54 | Civil society’s role in democracy 24:53 | Conclusion: Future of delimitation Perfect for: - UPSC aspirants preparing Indian polity, governance, and federalism - Students of political science and constitutional law - Journalists covering elections, Parliament, and policy debates - Viewers interested in the north vs south political discourse - Anyone seeking a deeper understanding of delimitation and India’s democratic structure Credits: Host: Amey Tirodkar Editing: Razal Pareed Producers: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar If you found this discussion insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more in-depth ground reports and political analysis. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online-subscription/ Follow us on: Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/frontlineindia/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/frontline_india Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/frontline.magazine LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/frontline-magazine-b12921295/ #Delimitation #IndianPolitics #Federalism #NorthVsSouth #WomensReservation #LokSabha #PoliticalAnalysis

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, sociologist, writer, and Dean, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Royal Global University, Guwahati, Surajit Mukhopadhyay analyses the changing dynamics of the West Bengal Assembly election 2026, focusing on how identity politics has come to shape electoral outcomes in the State. Drawing on historical and sociological insights, he explains how Bengal’s earlier politics—once centred on class and economic inequality under the Left—has gradually shifted towards assertions of ethnic, religious, and regional identities. Mukhopadhyay argues that the decline of Left politics has opened space for what he calls the “politics of primordial identities”, where communities mobilise around ethnicity, religion, and cultural recognition rather than purely economic concerns. He examines how tribal assertions, including the Kurmi demand for Scheduled Tribe status, and broader questions of linguistic and cultural recognition, are influencing key electoral regions such as Jangalmahal and North Bengal. He also explores the growing Hindu-Muslim binary in Bengal politics, while cautioning against simplistic narratives like “vote bank politics”. Instead, he emphasises voter agency, local socio-economic realities, and the role of perception in shaping electoral behaviour. The discussion further unpacks how political parties—including the Trinamool Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party—are navigating and, at times, amplifying identity-based narratives. Chapters: 00:00 | Introduction: Identity politics in Bengal 01:27 | From class to identity: Decline of Left politics 02:54 | Ethnicity and regional divides in Bengal 10:31 | Kurmi ST demand and tribal assertion 17:45 | Religion and the Hindu-Muslim binary 24:03 | Myth of vote bank politics 26:40 | BJP vs Trinamool: Narrative vs reality 32:23 | Election outlook and predictions Perfect for: - Students of political science and sociology - UPSC aspirants tracking Indian elections and society - Journalists covering elections, identity, and governance - Political observers interested in West Bengal politics - Anyone trying to understand how identity shapes modern elections Credits: Host: Suhrid Sankar Chattopadhyay Editing: Razal Pareed Producers: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar If you found this discussion insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more in-depth conversations. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online-subscription/ Follow us on: Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/frontlineindia/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/frontline_india Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/frontline.magazine LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/frontline-magazine-b12921295/ #WestBengalElections #BengalPolls #IdentityPolitics #Elections2026 #BJPvsTMC #bengalelections #bjpbengal #VoteBankPolitics #IndianPolitics #tmcbengal #UPSCCurrentAffairs #ElectionExplained #HinduMuslimvotebank #mamatabengal

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, part of a special interview series for Dalit History Month, acclaimed Tamil writer Bama reflects on over three decades of Dalit writing, the enduring legacy of B. R. Ambedkar, and the evolving realities of caste, resistance, and identity in India. She traces how Ambedkar’s call to “educate, organise, and agitate” transformed Dalit consciousness, while also pointing to the continuing challenges of unity and political organisation within Dalit communities. Drawing from her lived experiences and literary journey since "Karukku, Bama highlights how education and assertion have grown but structural inequalities persist. Bama also offers a powerful perspective on Dalit feminism, arguing that the experiences of Dalit women are distinct due to the intersection of caste and gender. She also speaks about writing as healing, the power of words, and the lessons she has learned from children and marginalised communities. Perfect for: -Students of sociology, literature, and gender studies -UPSC aspirants and competitive exam candidates -Researchers studying caste, Dalit history, and feminism -Journalists covering social justice and identity politics -Anyone interested in understanding caste and inequality in modern India Chapters: 00:00 | Introduction | Dalit history month 01:12 | Ambedkar’s legacy & Dalit assertion 04:42 | “Educate, agitate” vs lack of unity 06:53 | Dalit feminism explained 11:42 | Dalit literature & global reach 14:32 | Writing journey & life lessons 16:56 | Rural change, media, & youth 20:00 | Writing as healing & final thoughts Credits: Host: A. Mangai Editing: Razal Pareed Producers: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar If you found this discussion insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more in-depth ground reports and political analysis. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Francesca Albanese, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, discusses the ongoing crisis in Gaza, the global response to the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the role of international institutions in addressing alleged war crimes and human rights violations. Drawing on her reports, field insights, and legal analysis, she explains why she believes the situation in Gaza meets the definition of genocide under international law. Albanese reflects on her work within the United Nations, highlighting both its potential and its limitations. She argues that international law is being selectively applied, and that global powers are failing to uphold accountability despite mounting evidence and legal proceedings at institutions like the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court. The interview further examines India’s evolving relationship with Israel, raising questions about foreign policy, defence ties, and the broader implications for democracy and human rights. Albanese also opens up about the personal cost of her work, including sanctions, political pressure, and the challenges of speaking truth to power in an increasingly polarised world. Perfect for: UPSC aspirants tracking international relations and global conflicts Students of political science, international law, and human rights Journalists covering geopolitics and the Middle East Viewers seeking in-depth analysis beyond headlines Anyone trying to understand the Gaza war and global power dynamics Credits: Host: Prathap Nair Editing: Razal Pareed Producers: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar If you found this conversation insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more deep-dive discussions on global politics and current affairs. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, political strategist and former head of the AIADMK IT wing, Aspire Swaminathan, analyses the shifting dynamics of the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly election. Drawing on his experience in managing campaigns, setting up war rooms, and travelling extensively across the State, Swaminathan explains how what was once a clear two-front contest has evolved into a complex three-way battle shaped by perception, narrative, and emerging voter behaviour. Swaminathan argues that elections today are driven more by perception than performance. While the gap between the DMK and AIADMK has narrowed, actor Vijay’s entry has sparked strong enthusiasm among young voters. However, he cautions that this social media-driven momentum may not yet translate into real vote share, comparing it to a company's “valuation hype” without historical backing. He examines voter behaviour across caste, religion, and generational lines, noting that anti-incumbency remains limited. He also evaluates the BJP’s position in Tamil Nadu, highlighting strategic gaps, leadership absence, and weak organisational traction. Chapters: 01:32 | Why TN election 2026 is “peculiar” 02:43 | DMK vs AIADMK: Has the gap closed? 03:54 | Why Seeman connects with young voters 05:50 | Vijay’s massive youth appeal explained 06:59 | Social media vs ground reality in elections 07:52 | Is Vijay only an urban phenomenon? 12:59 | Vote share math: Who gains, who loses? 15:03 | Why DMK still has a slight edge 15:32 | Anti-incumbency vs real anger 18:56 | M.K. Stalin’s changing public image 20:49 | Dynasty politics: Does it still matter? 21:48 | What’s happening with BJP in Tamil Nadu? 24:51 | Inside election war rooms 26:11 | How narratives win elections 27:56 | Conclusion Perfect for: - Students of political science and electoral studies - UPSC aspirants tracking contemporary Indian politics - Journalists covering elections, strategy, and voter behaviour - Political observers interested in Tamil Nadu’s changing landscape - Anyone trying to understand how modern elections are actually won Credits: Host: R.K. Radhakrishnan Editing: Razal Pareed Camera and Production: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar If you found this discussion insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more in-depth conversations. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online-subscription/ Follow us on: Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/frontlineindia/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/frontline_india Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/frontline.magazine LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/frontline-magazine-b12921295/ #TamilNaduElections2026 #DMKvsAIADMK #TNPolitics #ElectionAnalysis #Seeman #MKStalin #EPS #TVKvijay #FrontlineConversations #YouthVote #VoteShare #PoliticalTrends #Election2026

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, part of a special interview series for Dalit History Month, historian and MacArthur Fellow Shailaja Paik discusses her work on caste, gender, and Dalit women’s history in India. She explains how her research challenges dominant narratives by centring the lived experiences of Dalit women, whose voices have long been absent from mainstream archives. Paik speaks about her books on Dalit women’s education and the cultural history of Tamasha performers, highlighting how caste operates through everyday practices, institutions, and control over women’s bodies and labour. She also introduces her concept of the “sex-gender-caste complex” to explain layered forms of oppression. From the legacy of B.R. Ambedkar and anti-caste movements in Maharashtra to contemporary debates on feminism, academic freedom, and caste in global contexts, Paik provides an analysis of why caste remains central to understanding modern India. She also discusses the challenges of writing histories that were never meant to be preserved and the importance of recovering marginalised voices. Highlights: - Shailaja Paik on Dalit women’s education - “Education freed and disciplined at the same time” - The politics of caste, gender, and sexuality - The “sex-gender-caste complex” explained - Tamasha performers and hidden cultural histories - Ambedkar’s legacy and anti-caste movements - Why caste still shapes everyday life - Feminism, archives, and erased histories Perfect for: - Students of history, sociology, and gender studies - UPSC aspirants and competitive exam candidates - Researchers studying caste, Dalit history, and feminism - Journalists covering social justice and identity politics - Anyone interested in understanding caste in modern India Credits: Host: Ayesha Minhaz Camera: Mridula Vijayarangakumar Editing: Razal Pareed Producers: Mridula Vijayarangakumar and Kavya Pradeep M If you found this discussion insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more in-depth conversations. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online-subscription/ Follow us on: Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/frontlineindia/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/frontline_india Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/frontline.magazine LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/frontline-magazine-b12921295/ #ShailajaPaik #DalitHistory #Ambedkar #DalitWomen #CasteInIndia #IndianHistory #FeminismIndia #DalitFeminism #FrontlineConversations #SocialJustice #CasteSystem #GenderStudies

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Felix Gerald, spokesperson for the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), discusses actor Vijay’s entry into politics and the party’s vision ahead of the Tamil Nadu Assembly election. He explains how Vijay’s long-standing social work through Vijay Makkal Iyakkam has built grassroots support and argues that the current political momentum is not merely driven by stardom but by sustained public engagement. Gerald speaks about Vijay’s political motivation, emphasising his decision to dedicate the next phase of his life to public service. He also discusses how the party views its growth trajectory, internal survey estimates, and its confidence in emerging as a major political force in Tamil Nadu. From the intersection of cinema and politics to questions of governance, corruption, and leadership style, Gerard provides insights into how TVK is positioning itself as an alternative in the State’s political landscape. He also addresses campaign challenges, public perception, and the broader appeal of Vijay as a leader cutting across social divisions. Highlights: Vijay’s political journey Why TVK says its rise is “not just stardom” The role of social work in building grassroots support Internal surveys and TVK’s growth claims Cinema as a political tool: “Jana Nayagan” and mass outreach Vijay’s leadership style and public messaging strategy Youth mobilisation and cross-community appeal Can TVK emerge as a major force in Tamil Nadu politics? Students of political science, governance, and electoral politics UPSC aspirants and competitive exam candidates Researchers tracking regional parties and celebrity politics in India Journalists covering Tamil Nadu politics and emerging parties Citizens interested in Vijay’s political journey and TVK’s rise Perfect for: If you found this discussion insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more in-depth conversations. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Maidul Islam, Professor at the Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Kolkata, examines the growing communalisation of politics in West Bengal and its implications for the 2026 Assembly election. He explains how the rise of the BJP, the spread of RSS networks, and the emergence of localised Muslim political formations are reshaping Bengal’s political landscape. Islam argues that while West Bengal historically remained insulated from large-scale communal violence, the post-2014 period marked a decisive shift. He looks into the rise of low-scale communal violence and warns that the pattern of communal riots and the rise of BJP are very synchronised. Tracing electoral data from 2014 to 2024, he explains how Bengal has transitioned into a bipolar contest between the BJP and the Trinamool Congress, marginalising traditional players like the Congress and the Left. From the role of welfare politics and identity mobilisation to the strategic use of voter enumeration processes such as SIR, Islam lays out how political narratives are being reshaped ahead of the elections. He also offers a detailed electoral forecast, suggesting that the Trinamool Congress could secure between 185 and 226 seats, depending on campaign dynamics and voter consolidation. Highlights: The rise of communal politics in West Bengal after 2014 “Low-scale communal violence” and its electoral implications Why BJP’s growth and communal tensions appear interconnected The decline of Congress and the Left in a bipolar political system The role of Muslim-majority districts in shaping electoral outcomes How SIR and voter dynamics are influencing political consolidation Why Trinamool has emerged as the dominant political force Seat-by-seat election prediction and possible scenarios Students of political science, public policy, and electoral studies UPSC aspirants and competitive exam candidates Researchers tracking communal politics and party systems in India Journalists covering elections, governance, and political trends Citizens interested in understanding West Bengal’s evolving politics Perfect for: Credits: Host: Suhrid Sankar Chattopadhyay Camera: Jayanta Shaw Editing: Razal Pareed Producers: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar If you found this discussion insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more in-depth conversations. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Manuraj Shunmugasundaram, national media spokesperson of the DMK, speaks about the key political narratives shaping the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly election. The discussion centres on the DMK’s latest manifesto, the Rs.8,000 coupon scheme debate, and the broader ideological framework of the Dravidian model of governance. It also discusses whether welfare measures should be viewed as “freebies” or as long-term investments in people, particularly in recognising women’s unpaid domestic labour. A major focus of the interview is the evolving political landscape, including the entry of actor Vijay and the emergence of a potential third force. Is Vijay’s political appeal built on sustained credibility or short-term hype? The discussion contrasts this with what the DMK describes as “time-tested governance” under M.K. Stalin. Chapters: 00:41 | Rs.8000 scheme debate   02:26 | Women welfare model   04:14 | DMK manifesto insights   05:46 | Dravidian model explained   06:54 | DMK alliance dynamics   09:27 | Stalin leadership model   10:39 | Opposition power play   13:34 | Tamil Nadu LPG crisis   16:30 | Federalism debate   18:53 | Temple control debate   21:38 | People’s Sanctum book   22:26 | Political personal journey 24:14 | Final takeaways -Perfect for viewers interested in: - Tamil Nadu politics and 2026 Assembly election analysis - DMK manifesto and welfare policy debates - Vijay’s political entry and opposition dynamics - Dravidian model and governance in Tamil Nadu - Federalism and Centre-State relations in India - UPSC polity and current affairs preparation Credits: Host: R.K. Radhakrishnan Editing: Razal Pareed Camera and Production: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar If you found this discussion insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more in-depth conversations. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online-subscription/ Follow us on: Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/frontlineindia/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/frontline_india Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/frontline.magazine LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/frontline-magazine-b12921295/ #dmk #TamilNaduElections #MKStalin #TNPolitics #LPGCrisis #FreebiesDebate #Vijaytvk #vijaypolitics #AIADMK #IndianPolitics #Election2026 #Federalism #LPGCrisis #WomenEmpowerment #DMKManifesto #DravidianModel#BreakingPolitics #FrontlineConversations

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, former Puducherry Chief Minister V. Narayanasamy speaks about the political landscape ahead of the 2026 Puducherry Assembly election. The discussion looks into the performance of the BJP–N.R. Congress government, with criticism on governance, corruption, and the unfulfilled promise of statehood. He explains the alliance politics and electoral strategy, with insights into Congress–DMK coordination, seat-sharing challenges, and the dynamics of coalition politics on the ground. The interview also analyses internal rifts within rival alliances, the role of smaller parties, and whether Congress is positioned for a comeback in Puducherry. Chapters: 01:09 | Failure of BJP's double engine government 01:32 | Statehood promise not kept 02:39 | Corruption allegations explained 02:57 | Counterfeit drug scam 06:28 | Alliance conflicts & seat sharing 07:24 | BJP's internal rift 08:56 | Governors Kiran Bedi and K. Kailashnathan 09:32 | Why Narayanasamy isn’t contesting 10:03 | Is Vijay a political factor? 10:14 | Puducherry statehood debate 11:21 | Communal harmony in Karaikal 11:54 | Nominated MLAs controversy 13:11 | MLAs Joining BJP 14:10 | Latchiya Jananayaga Katchi Perfect for viewers interested in: Puducherry politics and 2026 Assembly election Congress vs BJP vs N.R. Congress dynamics Statehood debate and Union Territory governance Corruption, policy, and governance issues Alliance politics and electoral strategy UPSC polity and current affairs preparation In-depth political interviews and analysis If you found this discussion insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more in-depth conversations. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, psephologist Arun Krishnamurthy joins Frontline to break down the evolving dynamics of the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly election. The discussion explores whether the State is moving beyond the traditional DMK–AIADMK binary and what the rise of Vijay’s TVK means for the political landscape. It looks at the role of women voters, Gen Z, and first-time voters, examining how emotional connection, welfare politics, and leadership perception are shaping electoral choices. The conversation also analyses whether schemes like the Rs.1,000 assistance and free bus travel have reached saturation, and if voter dissatisfaction could influence outcomes. A key focus is the emergence of a third political space, with TVK generating excitement among youth and urban voters. But the big question remains: will this enthusiasm translate into votes? The discussion also evaluates alliance arithmetic, vote transferability, and the balance between anti-incumbency and the desire for stability. Chapters: 00:00 | Introduction and context 00:41 | Why this election is different 02:03 | Jayalalithaa's legacy and emotional voting 00:59 | Women voters: Beyond welfare politics 05:06 | DMK welfare model: Strength or weakness? 06:15 | Rs.1000 Scheme controversy explained 08:57 | Voter mood: Stability vs change 14:34 | Is There Anti-Incumbency in Tamil Nadu? 20:53 | Can Vijay's TVK convert hype into votes? 22:51 | DMK vs AIADMK vs TVK 25:02 | Alliance Arithmetic & Vote Transfer 27:14 | Urban vs rural voting behaviour 28:13 | Is a third front a reality? 34:23 | VCK & NTK vote pattern 37:59 | Who has the most at stake? 39:59 | Final verdict Highlights: Why the Tamil Nadu 2026 Assembly election is “no longer a binary” Women voters shifting beyond welfare politics DMK governance: performance vs unmet promises AIADMK’s post-Jayalalithaa challenges Vijay’s TVK: excitement vs actual vote conversion Gen Z and first-time voters shaping the election Alliance politics, vote transfer, and ground reality Anti-incumbency vs stability debate Tamil Nadu politics and 2026 Assembly election analysis DMK vs AIADMK vs TVK contest Voter behaviour, women voters, and Gen Z impact Vijay’s political entry and TVK strategy Welfare politics and governance debates UPSC polity & current affairs preparation In-depth political interviews and ground reports Perfect for viewers interested in: Credits: Hosts: Vasanth Srinivasan and Ilangovan Rajasekaran Editing: Razal Pareed Camera and Production: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar If you found this discussion insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more in-depth conversations. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295   #TamilNaduElection2026 #VijayTVK #DMKvsAIADMK #TamilNaduPolitics #GenZVoters #WomenVoters #ElectionAnalysis #IndianPolitics #TVK #Stalin #Seeman #TN2026 #FrontlineConversations

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Kovai Sathyan, National Spokesperson of AIADMK, speaks about the high-stakes Tamil Nadu Assembly election, the AIADMK strategy under Edappadi K. Palaniswami, and the party’s battle against DMK. He addresses key issues shaping Tamil Nadu politics today, from the debate over NEET and the impact of the 7.5% internal reservation for government school students, to the controversy around the three-language policy and Centre-State relations. The conversation explores the AIADMK’s alliance with the BJP, countering criticism around political dependence and clarifying the dynamics of coalition politics in Tamil Nadu. He also responds to questions on minority votes, internal party challenges, and whether the 2026 election will remain a straight contest between AIADMK and DMK. Chapters: 0:00 | Introduction & stakes for EPS 1:06 | AIADMK alliance with BJP 1:56 | Three language policy 2:34 | NEET 4:13 | Adimai Katchi & Delhi visits 6:44 | Tamil Nadu 2021 & 2026 - Seat sharing & EPS’s leverage 7:41 | EPS as CM face and NDA vs State dynamics 9:21 | DMK and alliances 9:56 | Bringing AMMK on board 11:48 | Is AIADMK weak now? 14:43 | PMK’s family fight and strength 15:17 | Shiv Sena tussel and ECI statement 16:14 | Vijay’s TVK: noise vs ground reality 18:06 | Whose votes Vijay cuts & minority arithmetic 19:31 | AIDMK vs DMK: Dravidian Majors 20:02 | Minority arithmetic in Tamil Nadu Highlights: - AIADMK’s strategy to counter DMK in 2026 - Stand on NEET and medical admissions in Tamil Nadu - Impact of 7.5% reservation on MBBS seats - BJP-AIADMK alliance explained - Vijay’s political entry and its real impact - Minority vote dynamics in Tamil Nadu - EPS as the Chief Ministerial face Perfect for viewers interested in: - Tamil Nadu politics and 2026 election - AIADMK vs DMK rivalry - NEET controversy and education policy - Vijay’s political entry and TVK - BJP alliances in South India - Political interviews and election analysis If you found this discussion insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more in-depth conversations. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online-subscription/ Follow us on: Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/frontlineindia/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/frontline_india Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/frontline.magazine LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/frontline-magazine-b12921295/ #TamilNaduPolitics #AIADMK #DMK #EPS #Stalin #TN2026 #Elections2026 #NEET #BJPAlliance #VijayPolitics #BreakingPolitics #IndiaPolitics #PoliticalInterview #Frontline

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, former MP and founder of Telangana Jagruthi, K. Kavitha speaks about the Delhi liquor case, her five months in Tihar Jail, and the personal and political fallout that followed. Reflecting on the court’s verdict discharging the accused, Kavitha raises questions about the use of investigative agencies in political battles. Kavitha also addresses the internal crisis within the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS), her suspension from the party after two decades of political work, and her decision to resign from both the party and her MLC post. In the conversation, she reflects on the political costs of the case, the reputational damage she faced, and the challenges of being a woman in public life. Chapters: 00:00 | Introduction 01:45 | Delhi liquor case and court verdict 04:20 | Five months in Tihar Jail and personal costs 07:30 | Allegations of political targeting 10:15 | Misogyny and online abuse in politics 12:40 | Rift with BRS and resignation after 20 years 16:30 | Internal criticism of BRS leadership 19:45 | Telangana identity and regional politics 23:10 | TDP, Pawan Kalyan and Telangana autonomy debate 26:00 | Vision for a new political party 29:30 | What Kavitha wants from politics Highlights: - Kavitha’s response to the Delhi liquor case verdict - Her experience spending five months in Tihar Jail - Allegations of political targeting by investigative agencies - The BRS internal crisis and reasons for her resignation - Challenges faced by women in Indian politics - Debate over TTD funds and Andhra leaders inaugurating works in Telangana - Kavitha’s vision for a Telangana-first political party - The future of regional politics in Telangana Perfect for viewers interested in: - Telangana politics and regional parties - The Delhi liquor case and political investigations - BRS internal politics and the KCR family - Women in Indian politics - Telangana identity and regional autonomy debates - Contemporary political interviews and analysis Credits: Host: Ayesha Minhaz Camera: Amarnath Vallakirthi and JKM photography Editing: Razal Pareed Producers: Mridula Vijayarangakumar and Kavya Pradeep M If you found this discussion insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more in-depth conversations. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online-subscription/ Follow us on: Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/frontlineindia/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/frontline_india Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/frontline.magazine LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/frontline-magazine-b12921295/ #KalvakuntlaKavitha #DelhiLiquorCase #frontline magazine #TelanganaPolitics #KCR #BRS #kavithainteriew #Kavitha latest interview #IndianPolitics #TiharJail #TelanganaNews

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Physician-scientist and scientific consultant Dr Karishma S. Kaushik speaks about the realities of building a career in science—beyond awards, breakthroughs, and public recognition. Drawing from her book "The Real Deal", Kaushik reflects on the often-unseen side of scientific life: failed experiments, long periods of uncertainty, and the emotional resilience required to stay the course. She explains the idea of the “leaky pipeline” in STEM, explaining why many women enter science with promise but exit midway through their careers. The conversation explores structural barriers in India’s scientific ecosystem, from limited job opportunities and lack of transparency in hiring to the burden of invisible labour that disproportionately falls on women scientists. Highlights: Why most of science happens between achievements The reality of failed experiments and uncertainty in research The “leaky pipeline” and why women leave STEM careers Differences between research ecosystems in India and the US The role of bureaucracy in slowing down scientific work Why humour and community matter in scientific careers Debunking the myth of the “dream job” Practical advice for young women considering careers in science Women in STEM and career challenges Science careers and PhD life Research culture in India Workplace inequality and gender issues Career reality vs expectations UPSC essay, ethics, and social issues topics Perfect for viewers interested in: Credits: Host: Saatvika Radhakrishna Camera: Kavya Pradeep M Editing: Razal Pareed Producers: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar If you found this discussion insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Frontline for more in-depth conversations. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, defence analyst, author, and director of the Force Institute, Pravin Sawhney, examines the rapidly escalating war in West Asia following US–Israel strikes on Iran, and Iran's retaliatory attacks across the region. He argues that the conflict is fundamentally a “war of survival” for Iran and contends that it is unlikely to lose so long as it preserves its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Sawhney discusses the evolving military dynamics of the conflict, including Iran’s missile capabilities, the limits of Israeli air-defence systems such as Iron Dome, and the growing role of satellite navigation and modern warfare technologies. The conversation also explores the geopolitical dimensions of the crisis. Sawhney analyses the strategic support Iran is receiving from China and Russia, the shifting calculations of Gulf Cooperation Council states hosting US bases, and the economic risks posed by instability in the Strait of Hormuz. He argues that the war could reshape global deterrence politics and accelerate the transition to a multipolar world order. Highlights: -Why Iran views the war as an existential struggle for sovereignty -The military balance between Iran, Israel, and the United States -The role of Chinese satellite systems and modern warfare technologies -Russia and China’s strategic backing of Iran in a multipolar world -The vulnerability of US bases in the Gulf and changing GCC calculations -Economic risks surrounding the Strait of Hormuz and global energy flows -How the war could reshape global deterrence and world order -India’s diplomatic stance and the debate over its strategic autonomy Perfect for viewers interested in: -West Asia geopolitics and the Iran–US–Israel conflict -Military strategy and modern warfare technologies -The role of China and Russia in global power politics -Energy security and the Strait of Hormuz -India’s foreign policy and strategic autonomy -The emerging multipolar world order Credits: Host: Gowhar Geelani Editing: Razal Pareed Producers: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar If you found this conversation insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more in-depth discussions. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, author and journalist Sanjoy Hazarika speaks to writer Samrat Choudhury about his latest book, "River Traveller: Journeys On The Tsangpo-Brahmaputra From Tibet To The Bay Of Bengal"—a sweeping blend of memoir, reportage, history, and river journey spanning Tibet, Northeast India, and Bangladesh. The discussion traces the 2,900-kilometre journey of the Brahmaputra, from the Yarlung Tsangpo in Tibet to the Bay of Bengal, exploring geopolitics, China’s dam-building ambitions, climate uncertainty, and the fragile ecology of one of Asia’s great rivers. Hazarika reflects on travelling across high plateaus and floodplains, filming in Tibet in 1998, encounters with river dolphins, and even a tense moment being chased by pirates in the Bay of Bengal. The conversation also examines migration and citizenship debates in Assam, the complexities of the NRC, and the human stories that unfold along the river’s shifting banks. At its heart, this is also a philosophical meditation on humility, memory, and what it means to be “completely at the mercy of the river”. Perfect for: • Readers of travel writing, memoir, and narrative nonfiction • Students of geopolitics, migration studies, and environmental policy • Those interested in Northeast India, Tibet, Bangladesh, and river ecologies • Viewers concerned about climate change, dams, and water security Credits: Host: Samrat Choudhury Editing: Razal Pareed Producers: Mridula Vijayarangakumar and Kavya Pradeep M If you found this conversation insightful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more in-depth discussions. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online-subscription/ Follow us on: Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/frontlineindia/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/frontline_india Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/frontline.magazine LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/frontline-magazine-b12921295/ #SanjoyHazarika #Brahmaputra #Frontlinemagazine #RiverTraveller #YarlungTsangpo #ChinaDam #RiverDolphin #brahmaputrariver #NRC #Assam #ClimateChange #Hydropower #NortheastIndia #MigrationDebate #BayOfBengal

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Rajya Sabha MP and CPI(M) leader John Brittas reflects on what may be the most consequential State election in India today: the Kerala Assembly Election 2026. As Kerala heads into a high-stakes contest, Brittas examines whether the Left Democratic Front (LDF) can retain power for a third consecutive term, what anti-incumbency really means on the ground, and how the rise of the BJP is reshaping Kerala’s traditionally bipolar political system. Is Kerala now witnessing a tripolar shift? And what does that mean for the future of the Left in India? Brittas also addresses pressing national questions—from Centre–State fiscal tensions and allegations of financial discrimination, to the PM CARES transparency debate, minority consolidation, Hindu vote shifts, and the evolving media narrative around the CPI(M). Highlights: -Is there really anti-incumbency against the LDF? -Minority consolidation behind Congress—myth or reality? -Is Kerala moving from bipolar to tripolar politics? -“Soft Hindutva” allegations against the Left examined -Centre vs Kerala: fiscal injustice and federal tensions -Can LDF secure a comfortable majority again? Perfect for: -Students of political science and public policy -Journalists tracking State and national political shifts -Voters seeking deeper insight into Kerala’s 2026 elections -Anyone interested in federalism, democracy, and opposition politics in India Credits: Host- M. G. Radhakrishnan Editing- Razal Pareed Producers- Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

In this thought-provoking episode of Frontline Conversations, Professor Thomas Müller, who teaches at the University of Würzburg, reflects on one of the most fundamental yet elusive elements of social life: trust. Elaborating on his talk at the Madras Institute of Developmental Studies, Müller challenges the idea that trust can be planned, measured, or engineered in an age dominated by algorithms, ratings, background checks, and AI-driven decision-making. Can trust be rationally chosen, or does it always involve vulnerability and risk? And what happens when societies begin to “trust mistrust” instead? Müller distinguishes trust from reliability, explores how trust forms before conscious reasoning, and examines the psychological and political consequences of widespread distrust—particularly in institutions such as the media, the police, and democratic systems. He also reflects on how social media, algorithms, and artificial intelligence are reshaping how young people relate to each other and to institutions. Highlights: Why trust cannot be fully controlled, measured, or manufactured The difference between trust and reliability, and why it matters How social media and algorithms encourage control rather than trust Declining trust in media institutions and the rise of “trusting mistrust” The emotional and moral dimensions of trust in personal relationships Trust, risk, and vulnerability in the age of AI and reputation platforms What young people should unlearn about trust in hyper-connected spaces Perfect for: Students of sociology, psychology, education, and political theory Journalists and media professionals examining public trust and credibility Young people navigating relationships in algorithm-driven environments Anyone interested in trust, institutions, democracy, and social change Credits: Host: Saatvika Radhakrishna Camera: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar Editing: Razal Pareed Producer: Mridula Vijayarangakumar Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295   #Trust #Frontline #AIandSociety #thomasmüller #MediaCrisis #SocialMedia #GenZ #Algorithms #MediaStudies #PodcastIndia #IntellectualContent #Frontlinemagazine #CriticalThinking #PublicDiscourse

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, public intellectual and activist G. N. Devy explains why India’s upcoming caste census risks repeating a historic injustice by failing to properly count denotified and nomadic tribes (DNTs)—communities criminalised under colonial rule and still living with its consequences. Tracing the origins of stigma to the Criminal Tribes Act of 1871, Devy details how entire communities were branded as criminals, confined to settlements, forced into unpaid labour, and subjected to surveillance. Although these communities were officially “denotified” in 1952, he argues that the prejudice never ended—it merely shifted into policing practices, judicial indifference, and social exclusion. Devy, who founded the Denotified and Nomadic Tribes Rights Action Group, explains why the absence of reliable census data has kept DNTs invisible in policy-making for decades. He makes a strong case for a separate census column and subcategorisation, arguing that the central issue facing these communities is not just poverty, but a deep loss of dignity rooted in historical criminalisation. Highlights: -How the Criminal Tribes Act continues to shape modern policing -The demand for a separate DNT column in the caste census -Why dignity, not just welfare, is the core issue -How nomadic and semi-nomadic livelihoods complicate enumeration -What census data means for justice, planning, and democracy -Why missing this census could delay justice by decades Perfect for viewers interested in: -Denotified and nomadic tribes in India -Caste census and enumeration politics -Colonial legacies and modern governance -Policing, stigma, and preventive detention -Human rights and constitutional justice -Marginalised communities and state accountability Credits: Host: Amey Tirodkar Editing: Razal Pareed Producer: Kavya Pradeep M Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, filmmaker and theatre director Dakxin Chharra speaks about what it means to grow up in a community historically branded as “criminal”—and why that colonial stigma continues to shape policing, housing, cinema, and everyday life in India. Chharra discusses his journey from community theatre in Ahmedabad to founding Budhan Theatre, one of India’s most influential grassroots cultural movements. He explains how art became a form of survival and resistance for communities routinely pushed to the margins of citizenship. Drawing on lived experience, Chharra challenges the idea that Indian cinema and cultural institutions are neutral spaces. He argues that while stories of denotified tribes are often welcomed, storytellers from these communities are systematically excluded from resources, funding, and creative control. Through personal anecdotes and industry experiences, he exposes how narratives are frequently appropriated, sanitised, or retold without those who have lived them. Highlights: -What it means to be born into a “criminalised” community -Why colonial stigma still shapes policing and public perception -How Budhan Theatre turned art into a tool for justice -The politics of funding, caste, and control in Indian cinema -Why lived experience matters in representation -How theatre helped secure housing rights through the courts -Why denotified tribes remain invisible or misrepresented on screen Perfect for viewers interested in: -Denotified and nomadic tribes in India -Caste, community, and state violence -Indian cinema and cultural exclusion -Art as resistance and political theatre -Police custodial violence and human rights -Marginalised voices in storytelling Credits: Host: Saatvika Radhakrishna Editing: Razal Pareed Camera and Producers: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Author Asha Gopinathan speaks to Nandita Jayaraj about her book "Anna Mani: The Uncut Diamond", a biography of one of India’s most important yet overlooked scientists. The discussion traces the life and work of Anna Mani, a pioneering meteorologist whose contributions shaped India’s weather science, atmospheric research, and scientific instrumentation in the decades after Independence. Drawing on archival material, personal letters, and scientific papers, Gopinathan reflects on Mani’s journey from C.V. Raman’s laboratory to the India Meteorological Department, and on the institutional culture of science she helped build. The discussion also examines broader questions of recognition, gender, and nation-building in Indian science, including the circumstances under which Anna Mani was denied a PhD despite completing the required work, and what her career reveals about how scientific labour is valued and remembered. Highlights: Anna Mani’s contributions to Indian meteorology and atmospheric physics Building indigenous scientific instruments in post-Independence India Science as nation-building, beyond publications and prestige Gender, recognition, and the denial of a PhD The culture of scientific institutions then and now Why Anna Mani’s legacy still matters today History of Indian science and scientific institutions Women in science and STEM in India Meteorology, atmospheric research, and weather data Science, policy, and nation-building Forgotten figures in Indian intellectual history Perfect for those interested in: Credits: Host: Nandita Jayaraj Editing: Razal Pareed Producers: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, former Chief Election Commissioner Om Prakash Rawat speaks about the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and the growing controversy around large-scale voter deletions across several States. Drawing on his experience at the helm of the Election Commission of India (ECI), Rawat examines the legal basis of the SIR, the administrative pressures on Booth Level Officers, and the unintended consequences of placing a heavy burden of verification on voters themselves. He flags serious concerns over arbitrary deletions, logical discrepancies, and the fear and confusion the process has generated among ordinary citizens. Highlights: -Why the current SIR has led to unusually high voter deletions -The burden placed on voters and booth-level officers -Legal limits on demanding proof of citizenship -NRC fears and how SIR differs from Assam’s NRC -Risks to electoral credibility if eligible voters are excluded -The need for a more liberal, voter-friendly approach Perfect for those interested in: -Electoral reforms and voter list revisions in India -The functioning and credibility of the ECI -Voter disenfranchisement and democratic rights -SIR controversies in UP, Bihar, and other States Credits: Host: Soni Mishra Camera: Vedaant Lakhera and Vitasta Kaul Editing: Razal Pareed Producers: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Vamsi Vakulabharanam, co-director of the Asian Political Economy Program and associate professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, unpacks how caste operates in Indian cities, often invisibly, but no less powerfully than in villages. Speaking from the Madras Institute of Developmental Studies, where he delivered a lecture on Caste and Spaces in Indian Cities, Vakulabharanam challenges the popular belief that urbanisation dissolves caste hierarchies. Drawing on census data and comparative urban research, he shows how Indian cities remain deeply segregated by caste, class, and religion even when they appear socially mixed on the surface. He explains how cities can feel liberating for those escaping rural oppression, yet remain profoundly unequal spaces shaped by capitalism, housing markets, labour markets, and historical patterns of settlement. Comparing Indian cities with American cities, Vakulabharanam explores how caste-based segregation mirrors racial segregation elsewhere, while also tracing how histories of colonialism, migration, and industry continue to shape cities like Hyderabad and Mumbai. Highlights: -Why caste does not disappear in cities and how it reorganises itself -How urban segregation works through housing, labour, and credit markets -What mixed neighbourhoods can (and cannot) achieve -Drawing parallels between caste segregation in India and racial segregation in the US -The historical roots of urban inequality in cities like Hyderabad and Mumbai -Why “world-class” city visions often deepen exclusion -What fighting caste discrimination in cities realistically looks like today Perfect for viewers interested in: -Caste, class, and urban inequality in India -Indian cities, housing segregation, and labour markets -Comparative urban studies and political economy -Neoliberalism, smart cities, and development politics Credits: Host: Saatvika Radhakrishna Editing: Razal Pareed Camera and Producers: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar Special thanks to the Madras Institute of Development Studies for facilitating the interview and providing the venue. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online...#frontlineconversations #casteandcities #urbancaste #indiancities #urbaninequality #politicaleconomy #housingsegregation #labourmarkets #ambedkar #annihilationofcaste #smartcities #neoliberalism #socialjustice #developmentstudies Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

In this episode of Frontline Conversations, writer and journalist Rudraneil Sengupta speaks about his debut crime novel, “The Beast Within”, a gritty, dark work of crime fiction set in Delhi. Drawing on years of crime reportage, Sengupta explains why fiction, rather than non-fiction, allowed him to capture the deeper truths of crime, policing, and the nature of evil. Sengupta discusses how his close access to police officers, crime branch officials, and legal processes shaped the novel’s meticulous attention to police and bureaucratic procedure. He explains how real cases, field experiences, and encounters were decontextualised and reimagined to build a fictional narrative grounded in reality. The conversation also explores character creation, particularly the moral complexity of police officers and the city of Delhi itself as a living, breathing presence in the novel. Highlights: -Why Rudraneil Sengupta turned from non-fiction to crime fiction -How real police work and case files shaped “The Beast Within” -Inside the bureaucratic realities of Indian policing -Blending real crimes with fictional storytelling -Crime novels as social histories of cities and cultures Perfect for those interested in: -Indian crime fiction and noir -Police procedure and legal realism in novels -Delhi as a literary and social landscape -Global traditions of crime writing Credits: Host: Suhrid Sankar Chattopadhyay Camera: Jayanta Shaw Editing: Razal Pareed Producers: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on September 29, 2025. In this exclusive interview with Frontline, Siddiq Wahid, a Distinguished Professor from Shiv Nadar University and an expert on Tibet and Ladakh affairs, comments on the escalating crisis in Ladakh. He argues that the Centre must worry as growing discontent in the region threatens to take an unpredictable turn. With 75 years of demonstrated loyalty to India now being tested, Ladakh's patience is wearing thin over unfulfilled promises made by the Central government, according to the historian. Professor Wahid, who has written extensively on the region, warns that the Centre's handling of the peaceful protest movement—which seeks protection for Ladakh's unique identity, culture, language, land, and jobs—risks pushing a new generation of Ladakhi leaders into agitational and confrontational modes. This shift in leadership from older, calmer voices to younger, more assertive ones represents a dangerous inflexion point that the Central government cannot afford to ignore, particularly in a border region of such strategic importance. What makes the current situation especially significant is the unprecedented unity among Ladakh's diverse population of 3,00,000—including Muslims (Shia and Sunni), Buddhists, and Christians—with traditional divisions between Kargil and Leh, and between religious communities, being erased in the face of common concerns. Professor Wahid says this unity is a "headache" for the Centre, especially given what he describes as the BJP's strategy of exploiting fault lines. The primary concern driving this unified movement is jobs, compounded by frustrations over outsiders controlling the region's bureaucracy, administration, and police without understanding local sensibilities. He emphasises that Ladakh is resisting attempts at fragmentation and that its demands for constitutional protections are well within India's legal framework. He challenges what he calls "plain silly" accusations against prominent activists like Sonam Wangchuk, while stressing that the real challenge for Ladakhis is maintaining their unity and keeping their struggle peaceful—even as Delhi's continued neglect threatens to undermine the faith of border communities. Perfect for: Policy experts Historians Students of Indian politics Those interested in Ladakh Credits: Host: Gowhar Geelani Camera: Adil Abass and Idrees Abbas Produced by Saatvika Radhakrishna Editing by Razal Pareed

Published on September 12, 2025. In this episode of Frontline Conversations, writer and journalist Aatish Taseer discusses his new book “A Return to Self: Excursions in Exile”. A memoir-travelogue, the book probes belonging, identity, and migration in a world where history is politicised and purity is weaponised. Taseer reflects on the fragility of India’s urban elite, the failures of the Opposition, and how Narendra Modi’s rise exposed deep vulnerabilities in Indian democracy. He also speaks of his own exile after his OCI card was revoked in 2019, and how it reshaped his sense of self, privilege, and home. From Morocco and Uzbekistan to Andalusia and Sri Lanka, Taseer traces the afterlives of empire, the rise of ethno-nationalism, and the fragile promise of reconciliation in post-colonial societies. Highlights: -How A Return to Self came together after Taseer’s exile -India’s elite, their arrogance, and their decline -Opposition’s failure to reinvent itself after Modi’s rise -Privilege, exile, and belonging in a politicised world -The global wave of cultural purity and populism -Islam’s erasure from Andalusia and echoes in Ayodhya -Lessons from Sri Lanka and India on decolonisation -What “home” means when exile becomes permanent Perfect for: -Readers of memoirs and travelogues with political depth -Those interested in identity, migration, and belonging -Viewers curious about India’s democratic crisis under Modi -Students of post-colonial studies and global populism -Anyone seeking insights on exile, home, and creativity Credits: Host: Abhinav Chakraborty Producer: Kavya Pradeep M Creative assistance: Mridula Vijayarangakumar Editing: Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on September 8, 2025. In her new book, India: 5,000 Years of History on the Subcontinent, Audrey Truschke once calls historians “killjoys”. It is, she tells Frontline, because people often like to weave “fantastic, semi-mythical ideas about the past where everything comes together”. The task of the historian, then, is to untie these neat ribbons of conviction and insist: it was not like that, no, it was not like that at all. This, she admits, is hardly the most pleasant part of her work. “But be mad at the truth,” she says. “Don’t be mad at the messenger.” Never one to shirk from controversy or run away from a fight, Truschke, a professor of South Asian history at Rutgers University, has long been a target of the Hindu Right, not least for her book-length reappraisal of Aurangzeb. With India, however, her lens widens. Her canvas becomes panoramic, and her questions become yet more expansive. What distinguishes Truschke’s telling of South Asian history is her instinct to foreground the underdog. Whether it is the manual scavengers of the Indus Valley Civilisation, the nuns who shaped early Buddhism, or the labourers who sustained the Mughal empire, she coaxes us to look at the subcontinent’s past from the bottom up: “I think it is incumbent upon historians not to simply do the easiest thing—not to keep using the same texts over and over, telling only the most obvious stories—but instead to make a few corrective moves, and seek out lesser-told narratives”. Refusing the temptation to view the past through the low-hanging prism of the present, Truschke shows instead how yesterday’s discrimination deepens into today’s inequity. While Truschke expertly traces the genealogy of hate in her book, she cautions against blaming history for our prevailing ills and bigotry. “I, for instance, do not think that Manu is responsible for [caste] prejudice in modern-day India. Modern Indians who exhibit those prejudices are responsible for them,” she says. Asked if India will ever move past its caste bias, her reply is firm: “Assuming our world does not come to a screeching halt, I absolutely think Indians will.” This belief in a brighter tomorrow is also underwritten by a personal hope. Truschke longs for the day when travel to India is once again safe for her. “Not being able to travel to India is one of the great sadnesses of my life,” she says. “I look forward to the day it moves to a better place, one that welcomes historians—both its own citizens and those from the international community.” Perfect for: 1) Students of South Asian history 2) Historians 3) Sociologists 4) Anyone interested in Indian history Credits: Interview by Shreevatsa Nevatia Edited by Razal Pareed Produced by Team Frontline

Originally published on July 10, 2025 In this episode of Frontline Conversations, filmmaker Honey Trehan speaks about his upcoming biographical film "Punjab '95", which has run into a wall of censorship. The film, based on the life and legacy of Sikh human rights activist Jaswant Singh Khalra, revisits a dark, documented chapter of India’s recent history—mass disappearances, extrajudicial killings, and the abuse of power during the Punjab insurgency. Although "Punjab '95" is based on court records and official documents, the Censor Board has stalled its release by demanding over 120 cuts, including the removal of factual references to Punjab, specific dates, cremation records, and details of Khalra’s torture and abduction. Trehan opens up about the politically charged certification process, which he describes as a backdoor attempt to rewrite historical memory and suppress free expression. Context: Trehan reflects on why the current political and cultural climate makes it even more important to document resistance figures like Jaswant Singh Khalra. He argues that the real threat to law and order is not the film but the silencing of history. "Punjab '95" is not just about state violence in the 1990s—it is about the battle for democratic freedoms today. Highlights: -Why "Punjab '95" is facing censorship despite being based on court-verified facts -How Honey Trehan compares CBFC’s overreach to the very abuse of power the film critiques -The story of Jaswant Singh Khalra and the estimated 25,000 extrajudicial killings in Punjab -The legal hurdles, festival withdrawals, and negotiations around the film's certification -Why Trehan believes Khalra’s story is as important as that of Bhagat Singh or Sardar Udham -What the film’s censorship reveals about freedom of expression in India today Perfect for: -Viewers following debates on censorship, civil liberties, and political cinema in India -Students of history, journalism, law, and human rights -Filmmakers and artists facing state surveillance or suppression -Citizens concerned about freedom of speech and constitutional rights -Anyone interested in Punjab’s history and resistance movements Credits: Interview by Ashutosh Sharma Produced by Kavya Pradeep M. Edited by Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on August 22, 2025 In this episode of Frontline Conversations, political activist Yogendra Yadav talks about the growing crisis of credibility in the Election Commission of India. He criticises the Commission’s unusual press conference over mass voter deletions in Bihar under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), calling it the “biggest disenfranchisement drive in history.” Yadav warns that by making citizens prove their own citizenship, the Commission is undermining the foundations of Indian democracy. Drawing on data, legal arguments, and his Supreme Court petition, Yadav talks about the decline of public trust in the Election Commission, the targeting of research groups like CSDS, and the risks of repeating the Bihar exercise across the country. He also explains what the Commission must do to regain credibility and ensure fair elections. Context: The Election Commission’s SIR in Bihar asked voters to prove their citizenship with documents many don’t have. Critics say this could leave millions, especially the poor, without the right to vote. Public trust in the Commission is now at a historic low. Yadav, who has taken the issue to court, sees this as part of a bigger debate on citizenship, voter rights, and the future of Indian democracy. Highlights: -Why the Election Commission’s press conference backfired -SIR in Bihar as the largest disenfranchisement exercise in history -Declining public trust in the Election Commission -FIRs and show-cause notices against CSDS and academic institutions -What the Election Commission must do to restore credibility Perfect for: -Students and researchers of Indian politics and democracy -Journalists, legal experts, and policy analysts -Viewers concerned about elections, citizenship, and civil liberties Credits: Host: Soni Mishra Producer: Kavya Pradeep M Editor: Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on August 28, 2025 In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Sociologist and professor Surinder Jodhka speaks about caste, inequality, and education in contemporary India. Drawing on decades of research, Jodhka explores the paradoxes of caste in a democratic nation: even as modernisation and liberalisation promised its decline, caste has become more visible and complex. He discusses how caste operates in India’s neoliberal economy, the myth of “castelessness,” and the persistence of privilege across generations. The conversation highlights how private schooling and higher education reproduce inequalities, how affirmative action has reshaped access to opportunity, and why education remains a crucial site for struggles over equality, dignity, and citizenship. Context: Post-liberalisation India has seen rising aspirations, yet caste-based inequalities endure across schools, universities, and job markets. While affirmative action has enabled new mobility, debates around meritocracy and discrimination continue. Jodhka places these issues within a larger global discussion on inequality and democracy. Highlights: -Why caste remains central in a democratic India -Paradoxes of caste in the neoliberal economy -The myth of “castelessness” and its social consequences -How private schools reproduce privilege and exclusion -Affirmative action, meritocracy, and higher education debates -Education as a site of contestation over equality and justice -Caste as a global issue in universities abroad Perfect for: -Students and researchers of sociology, caste, and education -Journalists, educators, and policy thinkers -Viewers interested in inequality, democracy, and social justice Credits: Host: Vishal Vasanthakumar Producer: Kavya Pradeep M Editor: Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online...#surinderjodhka #caste #sociology #education #meritocracy #inequality #socialjustice #indianpolitics #democracy #neoliberalism #highereducation #castelessness #india Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on August 19, 2025 Sanjay Kumar, co-director of Lokniti-CSDS and a seasoned psephologist, offers a lucid critique of the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar’s electoral rolls, a first such exercise in over two decades. He notes the need to excise duplicates and update obsolete entries—but warns that the heavy documentation requirements and exclusion of widely held ID proofs (such as Aadhaar, ration cards, and voter ID) risk disenfranchising large segments of voters, especially migrants and those added after 2003. He states that, although the SIR is framed as a lawful effort to ensure accuracy, its implementation—requiring voters to proactively submit forms and supplementary documents—could unfairly penalise many, undermining the very democratic inclusivity it purports to uphold. The process's timing and its narrow geographic focus on Bihar have amplified political anxieties that the revision may be leveraged for partisan gain rather than electoral hygiene. Opposition voices, including the INDIA bloc, decry what they view as systemic bias; legal challenges and protests allege the exercise privileges the ruling coalition by selectively excluding likely dissenting voters. Amidst mounting political heat, the Supreme Court intervened on 14 August 2025 with interim directions: the ECI must disclose the names and reasons for deletion of over 65 lakh electors, allow Aadhaar and EPIC to support objections, and publish data at district and booth levels. Kumar’s concerns thus resonate beyond procedural critique—they underscore how administrative reform must tread carefully to reinforce, not erode, democratic legitimacy. Credits: Interview by Saba Naqvi Produced by Abhinav Chakraborty and Saatvika Radhakrishna Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook - / frontlineindia Twitter - / frontline_india Instagram - / frontline.magazine LinkedIn - / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on August 19, 2025 In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Politician and academic Manoj Kumar Jha talks about his new book “In Praise of Coalition Politics and Other Essays on Indian Democracy”, published by Speaking Tiger, and reflects on the future of Indian democracy after the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. Jha argues that coalition governments are essential to check the “majoritarian temptation” and warns against the erosion of institutions such as the Election Commission. Drawing on his parliamentary experience and political analysis, Jha discusses the INDIA alliance, Bihar’s political transition, the significance of the caste census, and why Bihar could once again set the tone for national change. He also speaks on Kashmir post–Article 370, Operation Sindoor, and the RSS’s growing influence in governance and academia. Context The 2024 elections returned the NDA to power but with reduced numbers, making coalition partners decisive. In Bihar, meanwhile, opposition parties allege that millions have been excluded from the electoral rolls in what they call a “special intensive deletion.” Jha places these developments within a larger debate on federalism, electoral credibility, and the rise of majoritarian politics. Highlights: -Why coalition politics is vital for democracy in India -The 2024 mandate as a check on arrogance and majoritarianism -INDIA alliance’s role beyond electoral politics -Declining faith in the Election Commission and voter exclusion in Bihar -RSS influence on governance, education, and public institutions -Kashmir, Article 370, and what the Pahalgam attack reveals -Operation Sindoor and India’s global positioning Perfect for: -Students and observers of Indian politics and democracy -Journalists, policy analysts, and civil society members -Viewers interested in federalism, elections, and social justice Credits: Host: Soni mishra Camera: Vitasta Kaul and Vedaant Lakhera Producers: Vitasta Kaul, Vedaant Lakhera, and Kavya Pradeep M Editor: Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online...#manojjha Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on May 24, 2025. On May 23, 2025, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) asked lead archaeologist K. Amarnath Ramakrishna to revise and resubmit his monumental 982-page report on the first two phases of the Keezhadi excavations. The ASI stated that two external experts had vetted the report and recommended changes to enhance its scientific rigour and authenticity. In this episode of Frontline Conversations, indologist and acclaimed author R. Balakrishnan, known for his seminal work "Journey of A Civilization: From Indus to Vagai", shares his insights into this unprecedented development with host R.K. Radhakrishnan. He speaks about the implications of returning a report of such scale and importance, the politics of archaeological narrative-making in India, and the wider significance of the Keezhadi findings for understanding Tamil civilisation and its links to the Indus Valley. Balakrishnan places the Keezhadi episode in historical context—from the early announcements of the Indus Valley Civilisation by the ASI in 1924 to the neglected reports of Adichanallur and the Dravidian paradigm in historical linguistics. He draws on decades of research, field visits, and institutional memory to offer a compelling defence of evidence-based history and public stakeholding in archaeological heritage. Watch the full video to know more Highlights: 1) Why was the Keezhadi report returned? 2) What makes Keezhadi’s findings significant? 3) The role of Tamil Nadu’s archaeological efforts 4) On delay, politics, and narrative control 5) Dravidian topocentrism and the significance of “Keeladi” 6) Can archaeology be misused to rewrite history? Credits: Interview by R.K. Radhakrishnan Camera by Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula V Editing by Sumiesh S

Published on August 15, 2025. In this episode of Frontline Conversations, filmmaker and writer Paromita Vohra discusses her latest documentary “Working Girls”, which explores the invisible labour of women across India—from erotic dancers in Madurai to domestic workers in Mumbai. Vohra blends humour, animation, and music to create a film that invites curiosity rather than guilt. The documentary, based on the Laws of Social Reproduction research project, examines how law defines women’s work, the politics of care, and the value society assigns to different forms of labour. Vohra reflects on her journey from 2002’s “Unlimited Girls”, which captured young women’s personal feminist freedom, to today’s feminist discourse dominated by elite voices. She critiques the homogenisation of Indian documentaries, the dominance of foreign funding, and the erasure of distinctive political and artistic styles. For her, the aim is not to “challenge” the dominant narrative, but to make it irrelevant by uncovering the hundreds of other narratives that exist. Chapters: 0:00 – Intro: Paromita Vohra and "Working Girls" 0:52 – “Laws of Social Reproduction” project 3:05 – Scope, locations and filmmaking process 11:12 – Vohra’s distinct documentary approach 19:27 – Marginalisation vs dominant narratives 28:14 – Why the title "Working Girls" 33:48 – AI’s impact on documentary filmmaking Highlights -How “Working Girls” reframes our understanding of work, care, and women’s rights -Why Vohra believes humour and pleasure belong in political cinema -The politics of recognition: why some women’s labour is legal and valued, and others’ invisibilised -Why she refuses to measure marginalised women only against dominant narratives -The link between ASHA workers’ struggles and broader systemic inequalities -How India’s documentary form has become homogenised and what’s been lost -The shift in feminism from the liberalisation era to today’s elite online discourse Perfect for: -Viewers interested in gender, labour rights, and feminist cinema -Students of sociology, gender studies, law, and political science -Anyone interested in documentary filmmaking -Citizens questioning dominant narratives and exploring multiple perspectives -Anyone curious about the untold stories of women’s work in India Credits: Interview by Mridula Vijayarangakumar Produced by Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula Vijayarangakumar Edited by Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on July 23, 2025. In this episode of Frontline Conversations, CPI(ML) Liberation leader Dipankar talks about major changes in India’s election process, starting with Bihar. Dipankar criticises what he calls the “biggest constitutional attack” in decades, pointing to voter exclusion and the politicisation of the Election Commission. With over 40 years of grassroots work, Dipankar explains how changes to voter lists, centralised control, and growing lawlessness are hurting Indian democracy and why Bihar may be the first to push back.He also talks about the INDIA alliance, Nitish Kumar’s decline, the BJP’s plans in Bihar, and the Left’s strong local presence. Context As Bihar prepares for Assembly Election later this year, a contentious debate has been triggered over the Election Commission of India's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, which is a pilot project that critics fear could disenfranchise millions of the State's most vulnerable citizens. Dipankar frames this as part of a broader redesign of democracy under the Modi government. Chapters: 00:00 – Concerns over EC’s pilot project in Bihar 01:00 – CPI(ML)’s work on the ground 01:55 – What’s really happening in Bihar 04:17 – Why BJP is out of power in Bihar 06:37 – Redesigning Indian democracy 08:35 – The ideology behind the redesign 09:26 – Challenges for the Left in Bihar 10:18 – Migration and Bihar’s labour crisis 11:52 – Bihar polls and BJP’s gameplan 13:21 – BJP’s South Bihar focus 14:15 – Chirag Paswan and Bihar politics 16:55 – Why Bihar’s core issues are ignored 17:44 – RJD and the shape of the opposition 19:03 – Inside Bihar’s political alliances 20:09 – Can the opposition unite? 22:24 – Structural flaws in the Election Commission 24:16 – What Bihar’s Muslims are saying 26:07 – 40 years of CPI(ML) in Bihar 27:51 – Bihar’s youth and their aspirations 29:51 – AIMIM’s role in the State 31:34 – Security lapses in Bihar 33:47 – How Kashmir shapes India’s foreign policy 36:41 – Closing thoughts Highlights: -Why Bihar’s electoral roll revision is more than a bureaucratic update -The link between digital exclusion and disenfranchisement -Election Commission’s changing role and centralisation of power -Bihar’s legacy of democratic resistance and why that matters now -The future of Nitish Kumar, Chirag Paswan, and BJP’s Bihar strategy -The challenges and potential of the INDIA alliance -India’s silence on Gaza and the cost of aligning with Netanyahu and Trump Perfect for: -Political observers and students of Indian democracy -Journalists, policy analysts, and human rights defenders -Viewers interested in federalism, elections, and social justice Credits: Host: Saba Naqvi Produced by Vitasta Kaul and Vedaant Lakhera Editor: Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on July 21, 2026. In this episode of Frontline Conversations, economist and former RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan offers an analysis of India’s economic direction, both at home and globally. In a broad conversation with senior journalist Sukumar Muralidharan, Rajan talks about global trade barriers, India’s industrial policy, and the challenges to achieving inclusive growth. He explains why India’s population advantage could be wasted, why high-value services might shape the country’s future more than manufacturing, and why real reform needs more decentralisation and competition. He also addresses growing concerns around data suppression, rising market risks, and the erosion of democratic accountability. Context: India stands at a crossroads: its economy is growing, but not fast enough to lift millions out of poverty before the country ages. Global challenges like the US trade barriers and changing trade patterns, along with domestic issues like unclear rules, powerful elites, and few new jobs, are holding India back. Raghuram Rajan shares a hopeful view on how India can change its growth path to become more competitive, fair, and prepared for the future. Chapters: 00:00 – Protectionism in Washington, DC: What it means for India 00:45 – Why the US is turning inward on trade 02:50 – Tariffs, China, and shifting trade dynamics 06:55 – The real cost of tariffs and trade tensions 08:12 – India's trade policy and economic headwinds 13:55 – Fixing India’s growth strategy: Manufacturing vs services Highlights: -Why the US tariffs aren’t just posturing and what they mean for India -How India’s protectionism creates uncertainty for business -Why India’s population dividend may be slipping away -Manufacturing’s limits and why services might hold the key -A strong case for decentralisation and community-level governance -The dangers of data suppression and state-led narrative control Perfect for: -Students and scholars of economics and development -Viewers interested in India’s economic and political trajectory -Policy professionals, journalists, and think tank researchers -Citizens seeking insight into governance, growth, and reform Credits: Host: Sukumar Muralidharan Produced by Kavya Pradeep M. and Saatvika Radhakrishna Assistant Producer: Zara Zafia Editor: Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online...

Published on July 17, 2025. In this episode of Frontline Conversations, veteran cricket writer Gideon Haigh speaks about his new book “Indian Summers”, a chronicle of over a century of India-Australia cricket. Haigh reflects on the evolution of one of modern cricket’s fiercest rivalries—from the epic 2001 Eden Gardens Test to India's back-to-back series wins in Australia. He discusses why Virat Kohli is a media magnet, what makes Pat Cummins a unique captain, and how India has become cricket’s commercial hegemon. Haigh also talks about the growing political influence in cricket administration, the influence of the BCCI and Jay Shah’s role. He ends with a defence of Test cricket as the most complex and rewarding format in the sport. Context: Over the last two decades, India and Australia have emerged as the twin centres of power in international cricket—on the pitch and off it. India’s rise as a cricketing superpower has reshaped the game’s finances, culture, and diplomacy. As Australia adapts to this shift, the India-Australia rivalry is not just sporting—it’s symbolic of cricket’s new world order. Gideon Haigh’s insights come at a moment when the sport stands at the crossroads of tradition, money, and global politics. Highlights: -Why India vs Australia is the future of Test cricket -How Virat Kohli redefined India’s cricketing image in Australia -Why Pat Cummins is a departure from the Aussie captain archetype -Cricket journalism in the digital age and the challenge of independence -Haigh’s critique of Jay Shah and the political capture of cricket -Can Indian players in global leagues fix world cricket inequality? -What Saudi investment could mean for cricket’s future Perfect for: -Cricket fans following India-Australia rivalry -Readers of Gideon Haigh and cricket literature -Those interested in sports, politics, and media -Viewers tracking BCCI’s global influence -Students of sports journalism Credits: Host: Aditya Mani Jha Producer: Kavya Pradeep M. Assistant Producer: Mridula Vijayarangakumar Editor: Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine

Published on July 28, 2025. As Bihar prepares for the 2025 Assembly election, a new voter list revision has sparked controversy, with fears that it could leave out Muslims, women, and marginalised castes. In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Ashish Ranjan, founder of the Data Action Lab for Emerging Societies, talks about what the data actually says and what it means for democracy in India. After spending two months on the ground in Bihar, Ashish questions claims of Aadhaar-related fraud, explains the role of caste in local politics, and talks about why Hindutva hasn’t fully taken hold in the State. He also discusses Nitish Kumar’s decline, Prashant Kishor’s entry, and what the 2025 election means for both the BJP and the RJD. Context: The Election Commission’s voter list update in Bihar has raised concerns about its timing, the Aadhaar requirement, and the risk of leaving out vulnerable voters. With Nitish Kumar losing ground and new parties stepping in, Bihar’s future is uncertain and could impact politics across the country. Chapters: 00:00 – Intro and Bihar election concerns 01:04 – Aadhaar vs population mismatch 01:32 – Voter list revision timing 02:36 – Census delay and data gaps 03:56 – Data sources and discrepancies 08:35 – EC actions and possible agenda 10:55 – Role of ECI and voter inclusion 14:38 – Nitish Kumar and Bihar’s unique politics 20:47 – Nitish’s decline and EBC vote 24:19 – Bihar’s unresolved struggles Highlights: -Why Aadhaar-linked voter roll revision may be targeting the wrong communities -The real numbers behind Bihar’s alleged “Aadhaar fraud” districts -How exclusion is replacing inclusion in India’s electoral process -Nitish Kumar’s shrinking base and the future of his EBC-women coalition -The BJP’s Bihar dilemma and its struggle to lead without allies -Prashant Kishor’s outsider strategy and the limits of electoral engineering -What Bihar’s caste dynamics reveal about power, representation, and resistance -Why Hindutva still doesn’t dominate Bihar and what that means for 2025 Perfect for: -Anyone following Indian elections, especially in the Hindi belt -Political journalists and researchers -Viewers interested in caste, democracy, and voter rights Credits: Host: Saba Naqvi Produced by Vitasta Kaul and Vedaant Lakhera Editor: Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on July 12, 2025. In this interview, Frontline speaks to Professor Jagdeep S. Chhokar, founding member of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), about the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. The ongoing revision has triggered alarm over mass voter deletions, particularly of migrant and marginalised communities, with critics calling it a covert citizenship verification drive ahead of the Assembly election. Chhokar explains why the EC’s decision to shift the burden of proving citizenship onto voters violates established legal norms and undermines voter rights. Despite the Supreme Court acknowledging that checking citizenship is not the EC’s job, the process continues, risking disenfranchisement on a massive scale. The interview explores how flawed documentation rules, timing, and inadequate outreach could keep lakhs of Bihari migrant workers off the final electoral roll, especially those working in cities or on farms across India. Context: As Bihar enters the Assembly election, the EC’s voter revision drive is under legal and civil society scrutiny. Chhokar details how the move affects internal migrants, why adding Aadhaar and ration cards may still fall short, and how bureaucratic opacity is eroding the EC’s public trust. Chapters: 0:00 – Bihar's SIR: Key concerns 0:52 – Supreme Court on SIR 1:07 – Analysing SC's observations 1:34 – Three documents suggested by Court 3:47 – What SIR means for democracy 8:15 – Why SIR shouldn’t link to elections 14:09 – EC’s role in citizenship checks 18:48 – Missing documents in voter list 20:29 – Migrant workers and voter access 24:07 – Is SIR practical for migrants? 27:33 – EC’s claims vs. ground reality 33:46 – EC’s image and the need for transparency Highlights: -Why the SIR may disenfranchise migrant workers and the rural poor -What the Supreme Court said about the EC's role in verifying citizenship -Why Aadhaar, ration, and EPIC cards were initially excluded -The mismatch between statistics and on-ground realities -What voter exclusions could mean for election day tensions -The erosion of EC’s credibility and transparency Perfect For: -Citizens concerned about voting rights and electoral integrity -Journalists covering elections, civil liberties, and migration -Students of political science, public policy, and law -Activists working on disenfranchisement and migrant labour rights -Anyone following the Bihar Assembly elections Credits: Interview by Soni Mishra Produced by Kavya Pradeep M. Edited by Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on June 30, 2025. Environmental activist Nimal Raghavan speaks to Frontline about his wide-ranging efforts to revive water bodies across India and in Kenya. Known for his data-driven, community-focused approach, Raghavan explains how he works with local administrations and government agencies to implement sustainable models of conservation. His work on over 250 projects emphasises the vital role of grassroots participation and policy-level collaboration. In this interview, Raghavan delves into the complex task of securing financial support from private enterprises. He reflects on the organisational skills, transparency, and resilience required to align public interest with private funding. He talks about what it will take for India to achieve complete sustainability, while drawing parallels between different States. Chapters: 0:00 – Meet Nimal Raghavan 01:51 – Cyclone Gaja’s impact 06:40 – Challenges in water projects 14:42 – India vs Kenya: water restoration 29:07 – Mega Foundations' work Perfect for: -Environmentalists and conservationists -Students of environmental sciences -Ecologists -Urban and rural planners -Journalists covering climate, environment, or rural development stories. Credits: Interview by Saatvika Radhakrishna Camera by Mridula V and Kavya Pradeep M. Produced by Kavya Pradeep M. and Saatvika Radhakrishna Edited by Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on June 23, 2025. In this episode of Frontline Conversations, senior journalist Saba Naqvi speaks with Syed Akif Zaidi, an Indian political analyst and research scholar at Al-Mustafa International University in Iran, who has lived in Iran for over 15 years. Speaking from Qom, near one of the sites (Fordo) bombed by the United States, Zaidi provides a detailed account of Iran's evolving response to an unprecedented escalation. As the US and Israel bomb Iranian nuclear sites, marking the first time nuclear powers have attacked a non-nuclear NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) signatory, Zaidi discusses what this moment means for West Asia, global balance, and the long-standing ideological conflict in the region. He contends that this attack represents a direct military confrontation between the imperial axis led by the US and Israel, and the resistance axis led by Iran, and details how the Iranian public has reacted with calm, clarity, and collective defiance. Drawing on historical insight and present-day observations, Zaidi outlines why Iran, despite facing two nuclear-armed adversaries, believes it is strategically and psychologically prepared for prolonged conflict—and why he believes American hegemony in the region is ending. Context: Zaidi examines how this conflict, which many call an act of war, rooted in a 45-year ideological standoff, has entered a dangerous new phase, with the risk of escalation, regional spillover, and potential nuclear consequences. From Tehran's internal mobilisations to Washington's strategic gamble, he analyses an unfolding global crisis. Chapters: 0:00 – Introduction 0:38 – Situation in Iran 1:53 – Iran-US conflict possible? 5:23 – Will Iran fight back? 12:50 – Use of nukes against civilians 15:15 – Iran's strategy 18:57 – What are the concerns? 29:21 – Internal challenges 34:28 – Why isn't Iran using nukes? 40:40 – India's role 49:46 – India-Iran relations 52:52 – Strait of Hormuz 56:31 – Iran's deterrence 57:19 – Iran's position Highlights: -Why the US-Israel attack marks a shift in global warfare -How Iran is managing public sentiment, resilience, and preparedness -The ideological conflict between the Resistance Axis and the Imperial Axis Iran's missile deterrence strategy and underground preparedness -Whether the US would consider using nuclear weapons again -The role of Russia, China, Turkey, and Pakistan—diplomacy versus action -What Iran's gradual retaliatory strategy could look like -Why Zaidi believes Iran does not need external military assistance Perfect for: -Viewers following the Iran–US–Israel conflict -Students of international relations, military strategy, and West Asian politics -Journalists covering geopolitics, nuclear policy, and global power shifts -Analysts examining the future of American influence in West Asia -Citizens seeking to understand the stakes of regional conflict -Anyone interested in civil resistance, deterrence, and ideological warfare Host: Saba Naqvi Produced by: Abhinav Chakraborty and Kavya Pradeep M. Editing: Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on June 10, 2025. In this episode of Frontline Conversations, filmmaker Varrun Sukhraj speaks with producer, director, and film historian Nasreen Munni Kabir on the life, legacy, and layered cinema of Raj Kapoor, marking his centenary year. From “Awara” to “Shree 420”, Kabir explores Kapoor’s artistic partnership with Khwaja Ahmad Abbas, his cinematic treatment of morality and class, and how his vision was shaped by political conviction, musical poetry, and emotionally complex characters. Kabir draws from decades of research and rare personal encounters, including her subtitling of Kapoor classics and time spent with Raj Kapoor himself. It is a richly personal and historically grounded conversation on the evolution of popular Hindi cinema—and the political and emotional truths it once dared to tell. Context This episode examines not only Raj Kapoor's films but the radical spirit that animated them. Nargis, for instance, wasn't just a romantic lead—she played a lawyer, a teacher, an ethical compass. These weren’t incidental choices. They were statements about a modern, secular India. Kapoor’s male protagonists, too, defied macho conventions—vulnerable, self-questioning, emotionally open. In his hands, songs weren’t interruptions—they were ideology in motion, crafted in lyrical partnership with Shailendra, Hasrat Jaipuri, and Mukesh. From political storytelling to gender representation, from cinematic authorship to the moral burden of success, Kabir shows why Raj Kapoor remains a foundational voice in Indian cinema—and what we’ve lost by drifting from that legacy. Highlights -How Raj Kapoor and Khwaja Ahmad Abbas shaped socially conscious mainstream cinema -Why Nargis’ roles in “Awara” and “Shree 420” were feminist statements ahead of their time -Raj Kapoor’s redefinition of heroism -Why Kapoor treated songs as scenes, not accessories -The power of lyricists like Shailendra in building ideological cinema -”From Mera Naam Joker” to “Bobby”: transition from idealism to spectacle Perfect for: -Admirers of classic Hindi cinema and film music -Students of film history, aesthetics, and political storytelling -Cultural critics, journalists, and researchers of post-independence India -Filmmakers exploring ethical storytelling in popular formats -Audiences curious about how femininity and masculinity were once written differently -Anyone interested in how Indian cinema once balanced entertainment with conscience Credits: Host: Varrun Sukhraj Produced by: Kavya Pradeep M. Production Assistant: Ilavenil I T Edited by: Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on June 6, 2025. In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Amit Baruah speaks with General N.C. Vij, former Chief of Army Staff and Director General of Military Operations during the Kargil War, about the evolution of India’s military doctrine—from the constraints of Operation Vijay to the assertive response of Operation Sindoor. Citing his new book “Alone in the Ring: Decision Making in Critical Times”, General Vij discuss the key moments in India’s military history, the changing nature of warfare, and the strategic dilemmas of dealing with a nuclear-armed adversary. He shares behind-the-scenes insights from critical episodes including the Kargil conflict, the Balakot air strikes, and India’s decision to withhold troops from the Iraq War. From the role of restraint in diplomacy to the rise of narrative warfare, this conversation offers a rare window into military decision-making at the highest levels. Context As India’s military posture evolves in the face of persistent cross-border terrorism, General Vij provides a comprehensive view of how strategic thinking has changed—from 1999 to 2025. He explains the challenges of operating under nuclear thresholds, the dilemmas of revealing losses during wartime, and why future conflicts will be shaped by both battlefield capability and media narratives. Whether it’s India’s abeyance of the Indus Waters Treaty, pressures from the U.S. over Iraq, or the technological transformation of modern warfare, Vij emphasises the importance of professional candor between the armed forces and civilian leadership. Highlights -Why India showed “more restraint than necessary” during Kargil -What changed between Operation Vijay and Operation Sindoor -How military strategy adapts under the shadow of nuclear threats -The rise of UAVs, drones, and standoff warfare -The untold story behind India’s refusal to send troops to Iraq -Why controlling the narrative is as crucial as battlefield success -The challenges of trust and timing in decisions like Siachen and Indus Waters Perfect for: -Viewers interested in India’s military strategy and leadership -Students of defence policy, security studies, and modern warfare -Analysts tracking South Asia’s nuclear and conventional dynamics -Readers of military memoirs and firsthand leadership accounts -Journalists covering India-Pakistan relations and war reporting -Citizens seeking deeper understanding of military-civilian decision-making -Anyone curious about the future of Indian military doctrine Credits: Host: Amit Baruah Produced by: Abhinav Chakraborty and Kavya Pradeep M. Production Assistant: Zara Zafia Edited by: Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on June 3, 2025. The four-day conflict from May 7 to 10, known as Operation Sindoor, has triggered fierce debate across South Asia and beyond. In this exclusive interview, veteran journalist and defence analyst Ajai Shukla joins Frontline’s Amit Baruah to discuss the air war, shifting nuclear postures, and the political narratives emerging from India and Pakistan. Context With Indian authorities remaining silent in the immediate aftermath of the operation, Pakistan seized the narrative advantage—until Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan broke ranks and admitted to Indian aerial losses in an international press interaction. This interview addresses the strategic fallout, media missteps, and the operational reality behind those headlines. Highlights -Why General Chauhan’s remarks in Singapore are a turning point -The impact of delayed Indian communication on global perception -India’s calculated ambiguity vs. Pakistan’s deterrent signaling -India’s evolving drone strategy and lessons from Ukraine -Ground vs. aerial effectiveness: Who came out ahead? Perfect For -Defence watchers -Strategic affairs students -Journalists -Policymakers -Anyone seeking clarity on how military realities shape India-Pakistan dynamics beyond the headlines. Credits: Host: Amit Baruah Produced by: Abhinav Chakraborty and Kavya Pradeep M. Production Assistant: Zara Zafia Edited by: Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on May 29, 2025. In this episode of Frontline Conversations, Amit Baruah speaks to the former head of R&AW's Pakistan desk Ramanathan Kumar about the fragile India-Pakistan ceasefire following Operation Sindoor. With conflicting narratives, rampant propaganda, and deep-rooted mistrust on both sides, Kumar offers an assessment of the military hostilities, the risks of renewed conflict, and the larger geopolitical implications of Chinese support to Pakistan. He also warns that while the ceasefire holds for now, another terrorist strike could trigger a dangerous escalation—especially under ideologically driven leadership on both sides. Context: The ceasefire that followed the military clashes between India and Pakistan from May 7–10 has temporarily halted a volatile confrontation—but for how long? Amid claims of victories, air strikes, and retaliations, this episode cuts through the disinformation to examine what really happened. Former R&AW officer Ramanathan Kumar draws on years of intelligence experience to explain the strategic and psychological dimensions of the conflict—from satellite imagery of damaged airbases to the dangerous implications of Pakistan’s evolving military doctrine under Field Marshal Asim Munir. Kumar delves into key issues like the limits of deterrence, the potential unraveling of the Indus Waters Treaty, and how propaganda—amplified by both governments and media—can distort public understanding and box leaders into dangerous corners. Highlights: -What really happened during Operation Sindoor -Why the current India-Pakistan situation is "Not War, Not Peace" -The strategic role of disinformation and propaganda in conflict -How commercial satellite imagery challenges official narratives -The growing China-Pakistan military axis and its implications for India -Indus Waters Treaty: Legal, environmental, and existential stakes -Lessons from past conflicts like Balakot and Operation Parakram Perfect for: -Viewers interested in India-Pakistan relations -Students of geopolitics and strategic affairs -Those seeking clarity amid conflicting war narratives -People interested in military and intelligence perspectives -Followers of India’s national security and foreign policy -Journalists and analysts tracking South Asian conflict dynamics -Anyone curious about the future of the Indo-Pak ceasefire Credits: Host: Amit Baruah Editing: Razal Pareed Production Assistant: Zara Zafia Producers: Abhinav Chakraborty and Kavya Pradeep M. Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on May 23, 2025. In a wide-ranging interview with Frontline Conversations, veteran journalist and Satya Hindi co-founder Ashutosh offers a stark analysis of India's political trajectory since 2014, characterising Narendra Modi's rise as a "right-wing revolution" that has fundamentally disrupted the nation's constitutional consensus. Speaking with host Abhinav Chakraborty about his new book "Reclaiming Bharat: What Changed in 2024 and What Lies Ahead", the former TV news anchor examines how the 2024 Lok Sabha election results signal potential cracks in the BJP's Hindutva project while warning that the RSS remains committed to dismantling Gandhian and Nehruvian ideals in its quest for a Hindu Rashtra. Context: "Reclaiming Bharat" offers a sharp, insightful analysis of India’s 2024 general election—one of the most consequential in the country’s history. Amid fears that a sweeping BJP victory could lead to fundamental constitutional changes, the party fell short of its ambitious “400 paar” target, despite Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s high-pitched campaign and the symbolic consecration of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. Surprisingly, even Ayodhya did not deliver a win for the BJP. Journalist Ashutosh dissects the gap between the BJP’s narrative and electoral outcomes, exploring why the party’s communal pitch failed to yield the expected results. Through a nuanced examination of political, social, and economic undercurrents, the book reveals how voters responded to the complex realities beneath the rhetoric. It is both a chronicle of a historic election and a lens into India’s uncertain political future. Highlights: Why Ashutosh decided to write Reclaiming Bharat Why Narendra Modi becoming Prime Minister in 2014 is a "right wing revolution" Significance of the 2024 Lok Sabha election results What BJP's political hegemony for Gandhi-Nehru's idea of a pluralistic India Validity of concerns of ECI's functioning and doubts over EVMs State of Muslims in India under Narendra Modi How BJP's defeat in Ayodhya shows fragility of Hindutva narrative Electoral impact of caste census in upcoming Bihar Assembly election Whom will RSS choose as Modi's successor in BJP People who wish to understand Indian politics Those interested in books about Indian politics People interested in Hindutva ideology People interested in the significance of the 2024 Lok Sabha election results Those who are interested in how BJP can be challenged by the Opposition Those interested in the RSS-BJP driven by Hindutva Those who like listening to interviews about Indian politics Perfect for: Read the interview here: https://frontline.thehindu.com/books/... Subscribe and support Frontline Conversations for such insightful and informative interviews. Credits: Host: Abhinav Chakraborty Editing: Razal Pareed Production Assistant: Kavya Pradeep M. Producer: Abhinav Chakraborty Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on May 19, 2025. In this episode of Frontline Conversations, senior journalist Amit Baruah engages in a wide-ranging discussion with former Indian Ambassador to the United States Navtej Sarna, exploring the complexities of the U.S.-India relations during the presidency of Donald Trump. This conversation comes at a time when Trump’s statements on mediation in Kashmir, escalating trade tensions, and erratic diplomatic signalling have raised important questions for Indian foreign policy. Drawing on decades of diplomatic experience, Sarna unpacks the deeper implications of Trump’s statements and policies for India. He cautions against overreaction to the President’s often improvisational rhetoric, emphasising instead the need for mature, long-term strategic thinking. Together, Baruah and Sarna critically examine whether Trump's approach to international relations is guided more by theatrics than consistent policy—and how India should respond. Key themes explored in the conversation: -Trump’s “offer” to mediate on Kashmir: What lies beneath the headline-grabbing remark, and why India must maintain clarity and consistency in its rejection of third-party mediation. -Strategic patience in diplomacy: How India should engage with the U.S. system beyond the White House, strengthening institutional relationships at multiple levels. -India’s position in a changing global order: Understanding the bilateral relationship in the context of Trump’s trade wars, especially with China, and what it means for India’s economic diplomacy. -The illusion of transactional diplomacy: Why a purely tactical approach to international relations can backfire, and how India can build resilience through long-term engagement. -The role of professional diplomacy: Sarna reflects on the importance of subtlety, historical awareness, and continuity in foreign policy—especially when faced with unpredictable political leadership. Sarna’s insights offer a clear-headed analysis that cuts through the noise of 24-hour news cycles, helping viewers understand the structural and strategic dimensions of the India-U.S. relationship in the Trump era and beyond. Perfect for: -Students of international relations and diplomacy -Journalists and political analysts -Those interested in US-India relations Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295   Credits: Interview by Amit Baruah Editing by Sumiesh S. Team Frontline: Kavya Pradeep M, Saatvika Radhakrishna

Published on April 15, 2025. In this exclusive interview with Frontline, Waheed Parra—youth leader and legislator from the People’s Democratic Party (PDP)—raises urgent concerns over the changing demographics of Jammu and Kashmir. Citing government data, Parra reveals that over 83,000 domicile certificates have been granted to non-locals in just two years, triggering deep anxiety about identity, land, and faith among Kashmiris. From the Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 to alleged land exploitation under the guise of development, Parra provides a pointed critique of the current administration and challenges the silence of mainstream parties, especially the National Conference. This hard-hitting conversation spotlights the post-Article 370 realities and their long-term implications on the Kashmiri identity. Context: Since the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A in August 2019, Kashmir has witnessed major legal and political shifts. The fear of demographic change—once dismissed as alarmist—is now surfacing in official figures. Waheed Parra, speaking from the legislative floor and the grassroots, argues that Kashmiris are being systematically disempowered through administrative decisions, selective inaction, and the weakening of political forums. Highlights: • 83,742 domicile certificates granted to non-locals—what the numbers reveal • Demographic anxiety and the erasure of Kashmiri identity • The politics of silence: Waheed Parra's critique of Omar Abdullah and the NC • The Waqf Act 2025 and its implications for religious autonomy • Environmental degradation and unchecked mining in the name of development Perfect for: • Viewers seeking a ground-level understanding of post-370 Kashmir • Scholars, journalists, and researchers following South Asian politics • Policy experts focused on federalism, identity, and minority rights • Anyone concerned with democracy, representation, and regional autonomy Credits: Interview by Gowhar Geelani Camera by Emm Xi Editing by Razal Pareed Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on May 9, 2025. With the government announcing plans to include caste in the upcoming census—the first such comprehensive exercise since 1931—India is once again confronting the deep questions of its social hierarchy. In this Frontline Conversations episode, senior journalist Saba Naqvi speaks to sociologist Sumeet Mhaskar to explore the significance, challenges, and far-reaching implications of this move. Context: As debates over social justice, political representation, and economic inequality intensify, the proposed caste census is emerging as a pivotal issue. Mhaskar argues that caste enumeration is not just a tool of political strategy or symbolic justice, but an essentiall mechanism for mapping India's layered social realities. The conversation also situates the census within the broader context of affirmative action, administrative resistance, and labour market inequalities. Highlights: • Why caste enumeration is critical to policymaking in contemporary India • Contrasting caste politics in Tamil Nadu and Bihar • The historic resistance of the Indian bureaucracy to reservation policies • The role of caste data in shaping inclusive welfare and employment policies • Challenges of declining public sector jobs and quality employment • Why understanding caste is essential, like gender or poverty, for tackling structural injustice Perfect for: • Students of sociology, public policy, and political science • Journalists and commentators on Indian society and governance • Advocates of data-driven policy and social equity Credits: Interview by Saba Naqvi Camera by Vitasta Kaul and Vedaant Lakhera Editing by Razal Pareed Produced by Kavya Pradeep M, Vitasta Kaul, and Vedaant Lakhera Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295

Published on April 17, 2025. In an exclusive interview for Frontline Conversations, the Tanzanian-British author Abdulrazak Gurnah talks to Aditya Mani Jha about his latest novel Theft, his first book since winning the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2021. He also discusses the themes such as class differences and migration throughout his body of work, why he spoke out against the practice of publishers using glossaries, his support for the anti-Israel BDS movement, among other things. Context: Abdulrazak Gurnah is the author of ten acclaimed novels, including the Booker-shortlisted Paradise (1994), the Booker-longlisted By the Sea (2001), and Afterlives (2020), which was shortlisted for the Orwell Prize for Fiction. A former English professor at the University of Kent and Booker Prize judge in 2016, he lives in Canterbury (UK). Gurnah's latest novel Theft is set in 1990s Zanzibar, where three young people—Badar, an uneducated servant, Karim, and Fauzia—dream of a better future. Badar finds friendship and belonging with Karim, but a false accusation disrupts their bond. As they navigate love and life, betrayal tests their friendship and changes their lives forever. Highlights: Abdulrazak Gurnah on the themes in his latest book Theft Gurnah on the themes across his entire body of work Why Gurnah was one of the first writers in the UK to speak out against use of glossaries Why Gurnah supported the anti-Israeli, pro-Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement The multifaceted changes in post colonial societies People interested in fiction Readers of books set in Africa Readers of fiction with themes of class differences Readers who like novels with migration as a theme Those interested in books by Abdulrazak Gurnah Those who like listening to interviews with Nobel Prize winning authors Perfect for: People interested in fiction Readers of books set in Africa Readers of fiction with themes of class differences Readers who like novels with migration as a theme Those interested in books by Abdulrazak Gurnah Those who like listening to interviews with Nobel Prize winning authors Subscribe and support Frontline Conversations for such insightful and informative documentaries. Credits: Interview: Aditya Mani Jha Editing: Sumiesh S. Producer: Abhinav Chakraborty Subscribe to Frontline: https://frontline.thehindu.com/online... Follow us on: Facebook -   / frontlineindia   Twitter -   / frontline_india   Instagram -   / frontline.magazine   LinkedIn -   / frontline-magazine-b12921295