Quiet Canines Podcast

The Coast Is The ArgumentThe tanker ban is a law built from 50 years of coastal protection, First Nations leadership, local opposition, federal policy and environmental risk. It protects Dixon Entrance, Hecate Strait, Queen Charlotte Sound and Haida Gwaii from large crude oil tankers. That coast carries salmon, whales, seabirds, fisheries, tourism, Indigenous law and local economies that depend on clean water. A major spill in those waters would threaten food systems, marine life, cultural practice, coastal jobs and the public trust that governments owe to people who live beside the risk.Poilievre says there is no environmental argument against lifting the tanker ban. The coast is the environmental argument. The law exists because those waters are remote, rough, productive and hard to protect after a spill. It blocks tankers carrying more than 12,500 metric tonnes of crude oil or persistent oil from stopping, loading or unloading at ports along the north coast, and it allows smaller shipments so northern communities can receive fuel.The Strait And The StandoffHecate Strait separates Haida Gwaii from mainland B.C. and is famous for treacherous water. Fishing vessels, ferries and container ships have all run into trouble in this stretch. Mariah McCooey, director of hydrography for the Pacific region of the Canadian Hydrographic Service, describes a cocktail of risks in any area of open water. Hecate Strait adds a danger of its own. The strait is shallow, and that shallow bottom stacks big Pacific waves even higher.Alberta’s oil sector, Premier Danielle Smith and federal Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre want the ban lifted or changed. They argue it hinders Alberta’s ability to export oil to key markets in Asia. First Nations and environmental groups want the moratorium kept. They say the ban protects sensitive coastal areas and marine ecosystems that anchor the provincial economy and Indigenous ways of life.The People He ErasesPoilievre called the opposition a radical group of fake environmentalists. That phrase erases First Nations, coastal communities, fishers, local governments and families who have opposed crude tankers for decades. Coastal First Nations describe the ban as the product of generations of advocacy by the people whose territories, fisheries, beaches and economies would face the damage first. The insult asks Canadians to ignore the people who would live with the spill so the pipeline can be discussed as a national project instead of a local risk. A serious leader asks who carries the danger, who gets the profit and who pays when the promise fails.Whales Share These WatersThe tanker debate is also a whale debate. B.C. waters are used by killer whales and other marine mammals that depend on sound, salmon and clean habitat. Southern Resident killer whales are endangered, and federal measures in 2026 include distance rules and management zones because vessel disturbance, prey loss and contaminants threaten their survival. More tanker traffic would add pressure in waters already governed by rules protecting whales.Poilievre says pipelines are safer than rail, but that comparison narrows the issue to one part of the chain. A pipeline to the southern coast also carries whale risk because more tanker traffic affects waters used by Southern Residents. Oil must be produced, moved, stored, loaded and shipped, and each stage creates risk. A project can reduce some danger on land while increasing danger at sea.Read The Polls CloselyPoilievre says British Columbians overwhelmingly support pipelines from Alberta to the Pacific. Some polls show majority support for pipeline access in broad terms, and those polls measure a general idea. This project asks for specific things: lifting the north coast tanker ban, crude tankers in Hecate Strait, consent from First Nations and public financing. Support for each of those remains an open question.The Alberta numbers don’t even show overwhelming support. Polling released by the Pembina Institute found 61 per cent of Albertans oppose using taxpayer money for a new pipeline, and 67 per cent believe Alberta’s economy depends too heavily on oil and gas. Poilievre says government should get out of the way and let the private sector build. Alberta voters appear far less enthusiastic when the bill moves to public money.Taxpayers Hold The RiskA project with overwhelming public support and a strong business case would have a private proponent ready to finance it. Reuters reported the plan would be built by Trans Mountain Corporation, which the federal government owns, with Pembina Pipeline holding a 10 per cent stake during construction. The federal and Alberta governments would be majority owners. That structure puts public ownership in the lead and private capital in a limited position.That structure exposes the weakness inside Poilievre’s slogan. The project still needs review, financing, route decisions, Indigenous participation, port capacity, whale protections and public risk tolerance. Projects built to run for decades also face demand risk as markets and governments shift away from fossil fuels. By the time a new pipeline reaches completion, taxpayers could be left with a stranded asset they were told the private sector would build.Authority Comes With ConditionsOttawa regulates pipelines that cross provincial or international borders. The Canada Energy Regulator confirms that federal role, and the Constitution gives Parliament authority over works and undertakings that connect provinces. That authority gives Ottawa the lead role over an interprovincial pipeline. It also requires a regulator, review, Indigenous consultation, project conditions and legal compliance.British Columbia keeps authority over land and water a pipeline would cross. The B.C. Energy Regulator says interprovincial pipelines can require provincial approvals under the Land Act, the Water Sustainability Act and the Forest Act. Those approvals concern Crown land, water use and permits to cut trees. Federal jurisdiction gives Ottawa power over the undertaking, provincial law governs parts of the route.The Alaska Comparison Falls ApartPoilievre says Americans already move tankers through the same waters. Canada has routing rules, reporting rules, restrictions and a voluntary tanker exclusion zone that keeps loaded Alaska tankers away from the coast. The north coast ban concerns large crude tankers stopping, loading or unloading at northern B.C. ports. A tanker travelling offshore under routing rules carries a different risk than an export system that brings crude tankers repeatedly into the north coast.What Poilievre Wants ForgottenCanada is being asked to weaken coastal protection so a project backed by public money can search for export access through waters that governments have guarded for decades. The tanker ban protects one of the most sensitive coasts in Canada from large crude oil tankers. It reflects First Nations leadership, local opposition, environmental risk and decades of public policy. Poilievre wants Canadians to believe Mark Carney is the only obstacle to a pipeline. The Spin Doctor is hoping Canadians forget why the tanker ban exists in the first place. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

What follows is a transcript of remarks delivered at a recent press conference by Justice Srinivasan Muralidhar, Chair of the United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem and Israel, and by Australian human rights lawyer Chris Sidoti, a member of the commission. I have included a link to the report and the press conference so that readers can hear the commissioners in their own words. The report contains descriptions of harm done to children and will be difficult for some people to read.A United Nations Commission of Inquiry has found that Israeli authorities and security forces deliberately targeted Palestinian children, concluding that their actions amount to genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in Gaza and the occupied West Bank.In a report released globally today, the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, found that Palestinian children had been subjected to targeted killing, starvation, torture, sexual violence, arbitrary detention, and repeated displacement. The commission found that much of the harm suffered by Palestinian children was not incidental, but intended to destroy the existence of the Palestinians in Gaza as a group.The report is titled: The Essence of Childhood Has Been Destroyed: Israel’s Deliberate Targeting of Palestinian Children in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Since 7 October 2023.It reports that more than 20,000 children have been killed directly, with many more dead from starvation, disease, and the collapse of Gaza’s health system.Justice Srinivasan MuralidharBased on all the evidence gathered, the report makes legal findings and concludes that the Israeli authorities and the Israeli security forces have deliberately targeted and killed Palestinian children and destroyed their childhood. Israeli authorities and the Israeli security forces are responsible for crimes against humanity, including persecution, and war crimes in the Gaza Strip and war crimes in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem.The report released today further substantiates the finding on genocide. The protection, care, and survival of Palestinian children and pregnant women are inextricably linked to the Palestinian people’s fundamental rights to self determination, as children represent the future bearers of their collective identity and resilience. By targeting children, Israel is eroding the foundational structure of Palestinian society, weakening the demographic vitality and overall capacity of the Palestinian people to sustain and exercise its right to determine its future as a people.The report concludes that settler violence in the West Bank functions as a means of implementing Israeli state policies, with both the state and violent settler groups working in collaboration towards the same strategic objective: unlawful territorial expansion.The report by the Board of Peace to the Security Council in May this year, pursuant to Security Council Resolution 2803, claims that the conditions for Palestinians in Gaza have improved. This contradicts the findings of this commission.The Israeli Prime Minister has been clear. Israel aims to seize at least 70% of the Gaza Strip, in clear violation of the ceasefire agreement and international law.The reality is that Palestinians continue to be killed and harmed in Gaza, even after the ceasefire was announced in October last year, and the amount of humanitarian aid allowed into Gaza remains very much below the necessary levels needed.Lastly, the commission condemns the severe mistreatment of the flotilla activists detained by the Israeli forces. Such public disregard of international law would support the findings of the commission in previous reports that Palestinian detainees were severely mistreated, including tortured, raped, and sexually abused by Israeli forces.The commission welcomes the opening of judicial investigations in a number of countries about these events.In this report, we made a series of recommendations to the State of Israel and to the member states, as well as the Security Council, which we hope the member states will act upon and the other bodies to whom we have addressed them will act upon.We intend to continue pursuing the fulfillment of our mandate, including in relation to making recommendations, in particular on accountability measures with a view to preventing and ending impunity and ensuring accountability, including state responsibility and individual criminal and command responsibility.Chris SidotiThis report is a thematic report dealing with the situation of children. When presenting reports, I try to be legal, technical, and dispassionate. But today I want to speak very personally.For me, this report has been the most difficult of the 17 reports that the commission has produced. Some events stay with me long after a report is investigated, written, and released. The events that stay with me are the events concerning children.The report we released today is looking at the Israeli military killing, maiming, and damaging the lives of Palestinian children. The chair has referred to the fact that there were over 20,000 Palestinian children in Gaza killed between October 2023 and October 2025. Twenty thousand or more, maybe 22,000, directly killed by the violence.The child whose death struck me most personally was not killed directly by the violence and was not included amongst those 20,000 to 22,000 recorded deaths. Those deaths were all children whose bodies were identified and who were injured by warfare or bombings.The girl I am talking about, age 12, had celiac disease. Celiac disease is a manageable disease. Children do not die with celiac disease.When her situation came to public attention, it was dismissed by the Israeli authorities on the basis that this girl had a pre existing condition. The evidence was there. We saw the photos and the videos of this child.She suffered seriously from malnutrition and diarrhea. She lost a third of her body weight over a six month period. From March to May 2025, Israeli authorities imposed a total siege on Gaza. No food was getting in during that period, and certainly not the food required by a child with celiac disease. That is when her weight loss began.In October 2025, suffering from severe acute malnutrition, she was admitted to the Nasser Medical Center. The doctors applied for her to be medically evacuated from Gaza so that she could receive the level of treatment needed to save her life. The Israeli authorities did not reply.In October 2025, the child died. She did not die of celiac disease. Children do not die of celiac disease. She died of starvation, the direct result of the policies implemented by the Israeli government and the Israeli military.Oh, and I should add that two weeks after she died, the Israeli authorities approved her medical evacuation.The child whose death struck me most on the West Bank was in a different situation. He was directly killed. He was in the refugee camp of Al Farah, in the town of Tubas. A 14 year old boy.He was shot by an Israeli military patrol as he was leaving his house. The patrol had been in the area, but at the time there had been no fighting taking place.He was shot, badly injured, and was lying on the ground. He was surrounded by a company of Israeli soldiers who were chatting, and probably some of them smoking, over a period of 45 minutes while this 14 year old boy bled to death.During the period, he was able to move a little. He pushed his cap out to indicate that he was still alive and needed attention. A soldier kicked the cap back at him.On another occasion, he was crying out and, again, the response was kicking towards him.Later in the period, a soldier came up and dropped a stone next to him, trying to frame this innocent child as a stone thrower when there is no evidence whatsoever that the child was doing anything more than going out to play.His mother was watching from the house that he had just left. As the mother sought to leave the house to go to the child, to rescue him or attend to him, she was shot at by the Israeli military patrol.There was a Palestinian Red Cross ambulance nearby. Whenever the ambulance tried to approach the scene of the child lying there, a laser targeted weapon was aimed at the driver of the ambulance so that the laser was hitting the driver in the middle of the head. The driver, of course, withdrew in fear of being shot.For 45 minutes, this child bled to death while surrounded by Israeli soldiers who not only showed no concern for him whatsoever, not only did nothing themselves to assist the child, but actively prevented the child’s mother from reaching him and the ambulance from assisting him.After this child died, the soldiers took his body away, and the body has still not been returned to the family for burial. An Israeli military force holding a child’s body as hostage.I have three questions today for Israeli people. Through this press conference, I want to speak to them directly.What kind of people are your soldiers who would allow a 14 year old child to bleed to death over a 45 minute period?What kind of people are your military leaders that would inculcate a culture where soldiers feel free to do this, acting with total impunity?What kind of people are your leaders when they give orders? They make statements that encourage this kind of conduct, not merely permit it, but encourage it.I saw a couple of weeks ago that Israeli President Herzog made a statement about some extremist Israeli settlers. He described, and I quote the report of what he said directly: “a wave of terrible violence that is being carried out by an anarchist mob, acts that defile and violate every basic moral, legal, and Jewish norm.”Herzog was speaking about a handful of extremist settlers, and he was right in the way in which he described them. But he should have gone on to describe the key institutions of Israeli society, the government, the Knesset, the political parties, and the military in exactly the same terms. An anarchist mob committing acts that defile and violate every basic moral, legal, and Jewish norm.I am a lawyer, so I can only speak legally. There is no doubt whatsoever. There can be no doubt in anyone who reads today’s report that every international legal norm has been violated by the actions of the Israeli authorities towards Palestinian children. And they need to be held accountable.Recommendations to CanadaIn the report, the commission makes recommendations to all the Member States and those involved in ceasefire negotiations:(a) Arrest any Israeli officials against whom arrest warrants have been issued by the ICC and extradite them into the custody of the ICC;(b) Employ all means reasonably available to them to prevent the commission of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity and to ensure full compliance with the Geneva Conventions in the Occupied Palestinian Territory;(c) Cease the transfer of arms and other equipment or items, including jet fuel, to the State of Israel or third States where there is reason to suspect their use in military trade or operations that have involved or could involve the commission of genocide, war crimes or crimes against humanity or other violations of the Geneva Conventions in the Occupied Palestinian Territory;(d) Conduct investigations under domestic or universal jurisdiction of Israeli individuals or organisations suspected of having participated in unlawful acts of violence against Palestinian children, including Israeli suspects holding dual or multiple nationalities;(e) Impose targeted sanctions, including prohibiting financial dealings and revoking or denying visas of individual Israeli ministers and officials and Israeli military personnel who may be responsible for inciting or committing violence relating to the abuse, killing or maiming of children;(f) Impose targeted sanctions on extremist settlers, including a ban on financial transactions and travel, as well as on private entities, including charities, that support the settlement enterprise;(g) Exhort Israel to end the siege of Gaza immediately, completely and permanently and allow unhindered humanitarian access to deliver aid and other support tailored to children’s needs in Gaza;(h) Support political solutions and processes aimed at achieving lasting peace in Palestine, based on the right of Palestinians to self-determination and rooted in the principle of inclusivity and ownership, engaging and listening to Palestinians, including children;(i) Support and facilitate access to justice for victims of crimes against children as a key component of any political solutions and process. Call to ActionThese are the findings of a United Nations commission of inquiry. Canadians should be asking Prime Minister Mark Carney and Minister of Foreign Affairs Anita Anand what the government intends to do, and asking the same of every Canadian business that maintains commercial ties to the Israeli government or military. Read the report, watch the press conference, and decide what you expect of them. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Let’s find his kilt. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Let’s help him find his beloved kilt. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

The universal appeal of the ultimate underdog story. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit quietcanines.substack.comThe tartan army from Scotland invade Boston. And Bostonians fall in love. World Cup 2026.

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit quietcanines.substack.comThis has to be the best story coming out of the World Cup so far.

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit quietcanines.substack.comDaily Reflection: Friday, June 19The Enduring Spirit of Boston

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit quietcanines.substack.comShould social media companies be allowed to create apps they know are addictive to your children?

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit quietcanines.substack.comJerry Seinfeld said Palestine does not exist.

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit quietcanines.substack.comWe tell ourselves Canada is different from the United States when it comes to border enforcement. But as the European Union adopts mass detention and offshore processing, we need to ask: are these actually the values we want to import?It’s essential the ICE-ification of EU migration policy.I’ll be posting an article about this that will be available to …

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit quietcanines.substack.comThe False Promise of Homogeneity

Leader of political party in BC vandalizes rainbow crosswalk on the first day of Pride Month This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Guess which Canadian premier is fighting with Elon Musk? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Are you paying attention to what’s going on in Albania? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

If You Thought JD Vance Was Better Than Donald Trump You’d Be Wrong This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Guess Which Premier Confronted Danielle Smith in Public? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

This Referendum Could Cost You Your Job This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Does MAGA Now Stand For Make Alberta Great Again? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Landlords Might Soon Be Forced to Allow Pets This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Is Trump the Most Corrupt President in History? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

The Tail Is Wagging the Dog in Alberta This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Here’s Why You Hate Them This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Does This Mean UCP and NDP Voters in Alberta Are Friends? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

We have traded rigorous policy analysis for political team jerseys, turning our democracy into a high-stakes professional sports league. Driven by Social Identity Theory, political affiliation has shifted from a practical evaluation of public services into a core cultural identity. Our party preference serves as a mental shortcut to sort neighbors into a friendly “in-group” or a hostile “out-group.”Once this tribal firewall is built, cognitive biases mirror sports fandom. We routinely defend flawed legislation and ignore local service failures just to ensure our side wins the news cycle.However, looking across the aisle during a governance crisis isn’t a betrayal of your identity. Just as a hockey fan can root for another Canadian team to bring the cup home, demanding accountability from our elected officials means prioritizing the collective good over a party logo. Politicians are employees, not franchise quarterbacks. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Extremism Is Going Mainstream This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

The UCP just turned a pro-Canada movement into a separatist referendum. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Canada’s Public Healthcare System Is Under Attack This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

The Pipeline Deal Fracturing Canada Right Now This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Here’s Why Working People Should Not Elect Conservatives This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Premier Danielle Smith knows the notwithstanding clause cannot override Indigenous and Treaty rights protected under Section 35 of the Constitution. So why is she publicly claiming she can use it against the court ruling that quashed Alberta’s separation petition?This video examines the political strategy behind those comments.Smith is caught between a separatist movement demanding stronger action and her own repeated statements that she does not support Alberta leaving Canada. By attacking the courts and invoking the notwithstanding clause, she can appear defiant without actually triggering a referendum she may not want to own politically.The video also revisits Smith’s own words from last year when she acknowledged that Treaty rights and Indigenous rights cannot simply be voted away. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Kevin O’Leary Wants to Merge the U.S. and Canadian Economies This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Separation Is the Virus. Moderate Conservatives Are the Vaccine. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Is this a Political Campaign or a Holy War? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Is Elections Alberta Conspiring Against Alberta Separatists? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Canadians Will Forgive This. But First, You Have to Own It. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Good News for Canada. Bad News for Alberta Separatists This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

A tale of two premiers is currently unfolding within the NDP, offering a sharp lesson for the future of British Columbia’s political landscape. While Manitoba’s Wab Kinew holds a 61% approval rating, Premier David Eby’s popularity has dropped to 37%. The disparity lies in their approach to governance: Kinew has embraced “pragmatic populism” by focusing on tangible pocketbook relief, such as his permanent fuel tax reduction. In contrast, Eby’s 2026 budget introduced a record $13.3 billion deficit and halted the indexing of tax brackets, effectively raising costs for the middle class during an affordability crisis.The friction also extends to communication. While Kinew frames reconciliation through economic participation and healthcare, Eby has become entangled in complex regulatory battles and ideological shifts that many voters find disconnected from their daily struggles. For the BC NDP to survive a Conservative surge in 2028, the party may need to shift its focus from macro-level institutional restructuring to the micro-level household budget. Kinew’s success proves that voters will support a deficit-running government if they feel the leader is truly fighting for them on a common-sense level. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Worried About Hantavirus? Check the Weather, Not the Doctor. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Canada’s most popular leader?(It’s not Mark Carney) This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Alberta Separatists Should Ask For Their Money Back. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

What Do You Call a Karate Dojo Where Nobody Learns Karate? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Alberta is a Warning. What a Conservative Government Actually Means for BC This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

The Ten Steps to Breaking Democracy in Alberta This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Have You Heard of the 3.5% Rule?Here’s How Albertans Can Fight Back This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

This group is the greatest threat to Alberta Separatists. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Canadian Premier Drops Truth Bomb About War in Iran This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

Why won’t the Premier of Ontario let us see his phone records. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

When the rules don’t work for the government, the government just changes the rules. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe

The rift between Mitch Sylvestre and David Parker has officially moved from a private disagreement to a public legal firestorm. At the heart of the falling out is the Centurion Project database, an app Parker allegedly presented to Sylvestre in April 2026 to assist with the independence referendum petition.Sylvestre claims that upon seeing the database—which reportedly contained private information for nearly three million Albertans—he immediately questioned its legality and refused to use it. He described the encounter as a definitive breaking point, citing concerns that the data was being used in a way that violated provincial privacy laws and the Election Act.Since that meeting, the fallout has escalated. An Edmonton judge has ordered the database shut down, and Elections Alberta has launched an investigation into how confidential voter lists were obtained. As authorities apply enhanced scrutiny to Sylvestre’s signatures, this divide highlights a major fracture within Alberta’s grassroots movements over ethics and data privacy. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit quietcanines.substack.com/subscribe