The Aperture Field Notes

I have been spending serious time lately considering the role of empathy and emotional intelligence in the world today. Like many, I find myself astonished by what I’m seeing across the world - acts that seem to disregard the very principles we have spent centuries developing as a human species.In my curiosity, I’ve been returning to the works of thinkers from the past, reading their original texts (there is no shortage of material here), from The Theory of Moral Sentiments to more modern works like Integrity, and of course Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ, which helped bring the language of ‘EQ’ into the mainstreamAs I followed the thread, I kept discovering something interesting: not only are these thinkers describing similar underlying dynamics through different lenses, but we have in fact, been circling these ideas for thousands of years. Empathy isn’t a new concept, it’s something continually rediscovered, reinterpreted, and renamed.And yet, despite this long lineage of thought, it feels as though we have lost something.. perhaps our shared internal picture of what these ideas actually mean in practice. Each work I return to offers another fragment of that image that feels both familiar and strangely absent in how we engage with one another today.So I’ve decided to follow that thread more deliberately.This series is an attempt to piece together connections across centuries of thought and tradition, to revisit texts and ideas that have in many cases been reduced to soundbites or dismissed as outdated, and to see whether something essential may have been left behind in the process.Some of the authors I’ll be exploring may be surprising, as often what they are remembered for today captures only a fraction of what they were actually trying to articulate.I'm very interested in hearing your own reflections as this unfolds, whether they align, challenge, or take the conversation somewhere unexpected. So, with that, consider this an open exploration into the deeper question of how we perceive, relate to, and make sense of one another individually, collectively, and within an increasingly complex world.What I can’t yet reconcile is why something so persistent keeps getting lost.. I suspect that’s where this needs to go next… Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe

This is a short audio reflection drawn from a recent piece exploring a subtle shift in how we relate to inclusion, systems, and change.After spending time with a group of senior women leaders and reading a piece by Katrina C. Foster, I found myself sitting with a different kind of question.. not only why it is changing, but on why it feels like the signal is becoming harder to see.In this reflection, I trace a pattern I’ve encountered over time: How ideas emerge, become systems, and then slowly lose coherence as their form remains but their underlying signal thins.I'm not adding another take on what should happen next, but I am instead attempting to make visible the moment we may be in: between systems, where the old is losing legitimacy, and the new has not yet fully formed.You can read the full written piece here at The Aperture Field on Substack. Get full access to The Aperture Field Notes at notes.theaperturefield.com/subscribe