The Peds NP: Pearls of Pediatric Evidence-Based Practice

Welcome to our vaccine-focused mini-series, "Immunizations Updates"! Today we will use data from the United States' measles resurgence following the 2025 outbreak to explore what every pediatric provider needs to know as cases continue to climb. We walk through how measles slipped toward losing its elimination status, how today’s clinicians can rapidly rebuild their diagnostic instincts, and what early symptoms are most likely to be missed. We also break down high‑risk groups, key clinical clues, key references, practice tips, and highlights from Lyles & Carson’s recent 2026 reference for prevention and post-exposure prophylaxis for children with inflammatory bowel disease. Along the way, we’ll discuss practical strategies for vaccine advocacy, documentation, differential diagnosis, and post‑exposure management, giving you the tools to protect vulnerable kids and strengthen vaccine confidence in their communities. Website: www.thepedsnp.come Contact: [email protected] Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast AACN Essentials Mapping (Domain. sub-competency): 1.1f, 1.2g, 1.2h, 1.2i, 1.3d, 2.1d, 2.2j, 2.4g 3.1m, 3.2e, 3.3c, 3.3e, 3.3f, 3.5f, 3.5g, 3.6g 4.1i, 4.2f, 4.2k, 4.3e 9.1i, 9.2i, 9.3i 10.1c, 10.2g, 102i, 10.3l, 10.3o  References: American Academy of Pediatrics [AAP]. (2026). Measles Infection Prevention and Control Frequently Asked Questions. Patient Care. https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/measles/measles-frequently-asked-questions/#:~:text=Because%20measles%20in%20HCP%20has,of%20serologic%20immunity%20is%20demonstrated. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2026, February 20). Measles cases and outbreaks. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/measles/data-research/index.html Do, L. A. H., & Mulholland, K. (2025). Measles 2025. The New England Journal of Medicine, 392(25), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2504516 Kiang, M. V., Bubar, K. M., Maldonado, Y., Hotez, P. J., & Lo, N. C. (2025). Modeling reemergence of vaccine-eliminated infectious diseases under declining vaccination in the US. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.70336 Imdad, A., Mayo-Wilson, E., Haykal, M. R., Regan, A., Sidhu, J., Smith, A., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2022). Vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and mortality in children from six months to five years of age. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 3(3), CD008524. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008524.pub4 Lyles, J. L., & Carson, R. A. (2026). Prevention and post-exposure prophylaxis for measles in children with inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 10.1002/jpn3.70336. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70336 National Institutes of Health. (2025). Vitamin A and carotenoids. Health Information. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/VitaminA-HealthProfessional/ Rhodesia, R.E. (2025). Public health wake-up call: Will the US lose measles elimination status? News. Contagion Live. https://www.contagionlive.com/view/public-health-wake-up-call-will-the-us-lose-measles-elimination-status- Sheikh, I.N., Kamdar, K.Y., & Ardura, M.I. (2023). Ensure proper immunization for patients who received chemotherapy or transplantation. AAP News. https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/23569/Ensure-proper-immunization-for-patients-who?autologincheck=redirected World Health Organization [WHO]. (2024). Provisional measles and rubella data. Retrieved from https://immunizationdata.who.int/global?topic=Provisional-measles-and-rubella-data WHO. (2025). Measles. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/measles

Welcome to the Choosing Wisely Campaign series! This is the fifth and final episode of our 5-part series exploring the ABIM Foundation’s Choosing Wisely Lists. This campaign aims to promote conversations between clinicians and patients to avoid unnecessary medical tests, treatments, and procedures. Our last case-based episode focuses on a school-aged male presenting with new-onset enuresis. After a discussion of the differential diagnosis and evidence-based evaluation strategies, we apply recommendations from multiple AAP Choosing Wisely lists to create a care plan that is safe, resource-conscious, and child-centered. Throughout this episode, we’ll highlight how ethical care principles—beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice—guide high-value decision-making and help us avoid unnecessary imaging, laboratory studies, and interventions that add cost without improving outcomes. This familiar case in pediatrics is worthy of a rewind to relisten to a throwback episode that will reinforce your skills and emphasize the clinical diagnosis and management without added diagnostics, referrals, or medications.  This case closes out our series on Choosing Wisely in Pediatrics, but the principles we’ve explored should continue to inform your practice every day. If you missed earlier episodes, rewind to learn more about the campaign’s background and listen to cases on fever and cough, gastroenterology presentations, and more.   Series Learning Objectives: Introduction to the Choosing Wisely Campaign: Understand the origins, historical precedent, and primary goals of the campaign. Case-Based Applications: Explore five common presentations in primary and acute care pediatrics, applying concepts from various Choosing Wisely lists to guide management and resource stewardship. Effective Communication: Learn strategies for engaging in tough conversations with parents and colleagues to create allies and ensure evidence-based practices are followed. Modified rMETRIQ Score: 15/15 What does this mean?   Competencies: AACN Essentials: 1: 1.1 g; 1.2 f; 1.3 d, e 2: 2.1 d, e; 2.2 g; 2.4 f, g; 2.5 h, i, j, k 7: 7.2 g, h, k 9: 9.1i, j; 9.2 i, j; 9.3 i, k NONPF NP Core Competencies: 1: NP 1.1h; NP 1.2 k, m; NP 1.3 f, j, h 2: NP 2.1 j, g; NP 2.2 k, n; NP 2.4 h, i; NP 2.5 k, l, m, n, o 7: NP 7.2 m 9: NP 9.1 m, n; NP 9.2 n; NP 9.3 p References: AAP Section on Emergency Medicine & Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. (2022). Five things physicians and patients should question. Retrieved from https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/Choosing%20Wisely/CWEmergencyMedicine.pdf AAP Section on Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. (2023). Five things physicians and patients should question. https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/Choosing%20Wisely/CWGastroenterology.pdf AAP Section on Urology. (2022). Five things physicians and patients should question. Retrieved from https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/Choosing%20Wisely/CWUrology.pdf Daniel, M., Szymanik-Grzelak, H., Sierdziński, J., Podsiadły, E., Kowalewska-Młot, M., & Pańczyk-Tomaszewska, M. (2023). Epidemiology and Risk Factors of UTIs in Children-A Single-Center Observation. Journal of personalized medicine, 13(1), 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010138 McMullen, P.C., Zangaro, G., Selzer, C., Williams, H. (2026). Nurse Practitioner Claims and the National Practitioner Data Bank: Trends, Analysis, and Implications for Nurse Practitioner Education and Practice. Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 22(1), p. 105569, https://doi-org.proxy.lib.duke.edu/10.1016/j.nurpra.2025.105569 Tabbers, M. M., DiLorenzo, C., Berger, M. Y., Faure, C., Langendam, M. W., Nurko, S., Staiano, A., Vandenplas, Y., Benninga, M. A., European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, & North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology (2014). Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 58(2), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000266 UCSF Benioff Children's Hospitals. (n.d.). Constipation & urologic problems. https://www.ucsfbenioffchildrens.org/conditions/constipation-and-urologic-problems Vaughan, D. (2015). The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Deviance, and Culture at NASA. University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226346960.001.0001 Wilbanks, Bryan A. PhD, DNP, CRNA. Evaluation of Methods to Measure Production Pressure: A Literature Review. Journal of Nursing Care Quality 35(2):p E14-E19, April/June 2020. | DOI: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000411

Welcome to the Choosing Wisely Campaign series! This is the fourth episode of a 5-part series exploring the ABIM Foundation’s Choosing Wisely Lists. This campaign aims to promote conversations between clinicians and patients to avoid unnecessary medical tests, treatments, and procedures. Our third case-based episode presents a child with fever and cough. After a clear discussion of the case and thoughtful consideration of the etiology and treatment strategies, we use the AAP’s Choosing Wisely Hospital Medicine and Infectious Diseases lists to create a resource-conscious care plan that is safe and patient-centered. In the coming episodes, we’ll explore the pediatric lists and apply our knowledge to cases of common presentations seen in primary and acute care pediatrics.    Series Learning Objectives: Introduction to the Choosing Wisely Campaign: Understand the origins, historical precedent, and primary goals of the campaign. Case-Based Applications: Explore five common presentations in primary and acute care pediatrics, applying concepts from various Choosing Wisely lists to guide management and resource stewardship. Effective Communication: Learn strategies for engaging in tough conversations with parents and colleagues to create allies and ensure evidence-based practices are followed. Modified rMETRIQ Score: 14/15   Competencies: AACN Essentials: 1: 1.1 g; 1.2 f; 1.3 d, e 2: 2.1 d, e; 2.2 g; 2.4 f, g; 2.5 h, i, j, k 7: 7.2 g, h, k 9: 9.1i, j; 9.2 i, j; 9.3 i, k   NONPF NP Core Competencies: 1: NP 1.1h; NP 1.2 k, m; NP 1.3 f, j, h 2: NP 2.1 j, g; NP 2.2 k, n; NP 2.4 h, i; NP 2.5 k, l, m, n, o 7: NP 7.2 m 9: NP 9.1 m, n; NP 9.2 n; NP 9.3 p   References ABIM Foundation. (2019). Communicating about overuse with vulnerable populations. Retrieved from https://www.choosingwisely.org/files/Communicating-About-Overuse-to-Vulnerable-Population_Final2.pdf American Academy of Pediatrics [AAP] Committee on Infectious Diseases & Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. (2018). Five things physicians and patients should question. Retrieved from https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/Choosing%20Wisely/CWInfectiousDisease.pdf de Benedictis, F. M., Kerem, E., Chang, A. B., Colin, A. A., Zar, H. J., & Bush, A. (2020). Complicated pneumonia in children. Lancet (London, England), 396(10253), 786–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31550-6 Kato, H. (2024) Antibiotic therapy for bacterial pneumonia. J Pharm Health Care Sci 10, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-024-00367-5 Schlapbach, L. J., Watson, R. S., Sorce, L. R., Argent, A. C., Menon, K., Hall, M. W., Akech, S., Albers, D. J., Alpern, E. R., Balamuth, F., Bembea, M., Biban, P., Carrol, E. D., Chiotos, K., Chisti, M. J., DeWitt, P. E., Evans, I., Flauzino de Oliveira, C., Horvat, C. M., Inwald, D., … Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Sepsis Definition Task Force (2024). International Consensus Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock. JAMA, 331(8), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.0179 Smith, D. K., Kuckel, D. P., & Recidoro, A. M. (2021). Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Children: Rapid Evidence Review. American family physician, 104(6), 618–625. Society of Hospital Medicine, AAP, & Academic Pediatric Association. (2021). Five things physicians and patients should question. Retrieved from https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/Choosing%20Wisely/CWHospitalmedicine.pdf Yun K. W. (2024). Community-acquired pneumonia in children: updated perspectives on its etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Clinical and experimental pediatrics, 67(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2022.01452

Welcome to the Choosing Wisely Campaign series! This is the third episode of a 5-part series exploring the ABIM Foundation’s Choosing Wisely Lists. This campaign aims to promote conversations between clinicians and patients to avoid unnecessary medical tests, treatments, and procedures. Our second case-based episode presents an infant with diarrhea and diaper dermatitis. After a clear discussion of the case and thoughtful consideration of the etiology and treatment strategies, we use the AAP’s Choosing Wisely dermatology and gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition lists to create a resource-conscious care plan that is safe and patient-centered. In the coming episodes, we’ll explore the pediatric lists and apply our knowledge to cases of common presentations seen in primary and acute care pediatrics.    Series Learning Objectives: Introduction to the Choosing Wisely Campaign: Understand the origins, historical precedent, and primary goals of the campaign. Case-Based Applications: Explore five common presentations in primary and acute care pediatrics, applying concepts from various Choosing Wisely lists to guide management and resource stewardship. Effective Communication: Learn strategies for engaging in tough conversations with parents and colleagues to create allies and ensure evidence-based practices are followed. Modified rMETRIQ Score: 15/15   Competencies: AACN Essentials: 1: 1.1 g, 1.2f, 1.3de 2: 2.1 de, 2.2g, 2.4fg, 2.5 hijk 7: 7.2 ghk 9: 9.1ij, 9.2ij, 9.3ik NONPF NP Core Competencies: 1: NP1.1h, NP 1.2km, NP 1.3fjh 2: NP2.1jg, NP2.2kn, NP 2.4hi, NP2.5 klmno 7: NP7.2m 9: NP9.1mn, NP9.2n, NP9.3p   References ABIM Foundation. (2019). Communicating about overuse with vulnerable populations. Retrieved from https://www.choosingwisely.org/files/Communicating-About-Overuse-to-Vulnerable-Population_Final2.pdf AAP Section on Dermatology. (2021). Five things physicians and patients should question. https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/Choosing%20Wisely/CWDermatology.pdf AAP Section on Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. (2023). Five things physicians and patients should question. https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/Choosing%20Wisely/CWGastroenterology.pdf Harriet Lane Service (Johns Hopkins Hospital), Anderson, C. C., Kapoor, S., & Mark, T. E. (2024). The Harriet Lane handbook: a manual for pediatric house officers (23rd ed.). Elsevier.  Jauregui, J., Nelson, D., Choo, E., Stearns, B., Levine, A. C., Liebmann, O., & Shah, S. P. (2014). External validation and comparison of three pediatric clinical dehydration scales. PloS one, 9(5), e95739. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095739 Johnson, H., & Yu, J. (2022). Current and Emerging Therapies in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology and therapy, 12(12), 2691–2703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00829-4 Semon, A. K., Keenan, O., & Zackular, J. P. (2021). Clostridioides difficile and the Microbiota Early in Life. Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 10(Supplement_3), S3–S7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piab063

Welcome to the Choosing Wisely Campaign series! This is the second episode of a 5-part series exploring the ABIM Foundation’s Choosing Wisely Lists. This campaign aims to promote conversations between clinicians and patients to avoid unnecessary medical tests, treatments, and procedures. The first of our case-based episodes presents a school age child with syncope. After a clear discussion of the case and thoughtful consideration of an acute care differential, we use the AAP’s Choosing Wisely cardiac list to create a resource-conscious care plan that is safe and patient-centered. In the coming episodes, we’ll explore the pediatric lists and apply our knowledge to cases of common presentations seen in primary and acute care pediatrics.    Series Learning Objectives: Introduction to the Choosing Wisely Campaign: Understand the origins, historical precedent, and primary goals of the campaign. Case-Based Applications: Explore five common presentations in primary and acute care pediatrics, applying concepts from various Choosing Wisely lists to guide management and resource stewardship. Effective Communication: Learn strategies for engaging in tough conversations with parents and colleagues to create allies and ensure evidence-based practices are followed. Competencies: AACN Essentials: 1: 1.1 g, 1.2f 2: 2.1 de, 2.2g, 2.5 ij 6: 6.1 i 7: 7.2 ghk 9: 9.1ij, 9.2ij, 9.3ik NONPF NP Core Competencies: 1: NP1.1h, NP 1.2km 2: NP2.1jg, NP2.2kn, NP2.5 lo 6: NP6.1o 7: NP7.2m 9: NP9.1mn, NP9.2n, NP9.3p References: AAP Section on Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery. (2020). Five things physicians and patients should question. https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/Choosing%20Wisely/CWCardio.pdf Gilpin, K., & Goode, Z. (2024). Syncope. Pediatrics in review, 45(10), 606–608. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2023-006053

Welcome to the Choosing Wisely Campaign series! This 5-part series will explore the ABIM Foundation’s Choosing Wisely Campaign, its historical precedent, and its goals. We will discuss how this initiative aims to promote conversations between clinicians and patients to avoid unnecessary medical tests, treatments, and procedures. The introduction episode dives into the historic 2010 editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine that inspired over 80 professional societies to write their “Top 5 Lists” of tests and procedures that could be avoided in evidence-based care. To better understand the problem, we then pick apart the survey that provided insight into why we over order and the harm it causes to vulnerable populations.  In the coming episodes, we’ll explore the pediatric lists and apply our knowledge to cases of common presentations seen in primary and acute care pediatrics.  Author: Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC www.thepedsnp.com Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast Series Learning Objectives: Introduction to the Choosing Wisely Campaign: Understand the origins, historical precedent, and primary goals of the campaign. Case-Based Applications: Explore five common presentations in primary and acute care pediatrics, applying concepts from various Choosing Wisely lists to guide management and resource stewardship. Effective Communication: Learn strategies for engaging in tough conversations with parents and colleagues to create allies and ensure evidence-based practices are followed. Competencies: AACN Essentials: 1: 1.1 g, 1.2f 2: 2.1 de, 2.2g, 2.5 ij 6: 6.1 i 7: 7.2 ghk 9: 9.1ij, 9.2ij, 9.3ik NONPF NP Core Competencies: 1: NP1.1h, NP 1.2km 2: NP2.1jg, NP2.2kn, NP2.5 lo 6: NP6.1o 7: NP7.2m 9: NP9.1mn, NP9.2n, NP9.3p Modified rMETRIQ Score: 15/15 Learn more about our peer review process at www.thepedsnp.com/peerreview   References: ABIM Foundation. (2019). Communicating about overuse with vulnerable populations. Retrieved from https://www.choosingwisely.org/files/Communicating-About-Overuse-to-Vulnerable-Population_Final2.pdf Brody, H. (2010). Medicine's ethical responsibility for health care reform--the Top Five list. The New England journal of medicine, 362(4), 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0911423 Lipitz-Snyderman, A., & Bach, P. B. (2013). Overuse of health care services: when less is more … more or less. JAMA internal medicine, 173(14), 1277–1278. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6181 PerryUndem Research/Communication. (2014). Unnecessary tests and procedures in the health care system. Retrieved from https://www.choosingwisely.org/files/Final-Choosing-Wisely-Survey-Report.pdf Smith-Bindman, R., Chu, P. W., Azman Firdaus, H., Stewart, C., Malekhedayat, M., Alber, S., Bolch, W. E., Mahendra, M., Berrington de González, A., & Miglioretti, D. L. (2025). Projected Lifetime Cancer Risks From Current Computed Tomography Imaging. JAMA internal medicine, e250505. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0505 Wyman, O. (2019). Right Place, Right Time: Health Information & Vulnerable Populations. https://www.oliverwyman.com/RightPlaceRightTime.html  

This is the final episode of The Peds NP Acute Care PNP Faculty series. The series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education in collaboration to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    As I come to an end of my time as a faculty member at the Catholic University of America and our Acute Care PNP Faculty series, I remember my graduation from Johns Hopkins. These terminal moments are likened to a graduation, and serve as a wonderful time for reflection. The episode recollects the student speaker commencement address given at my graduation, filled with vehicular metaphors and acknowledgements of failure. A common theme of “Onward” is woven throughout to remind listeners that, at whatever graduation you find yourself celebrating right now, be hopeful and excited at the good that is left to do in the world.    The Peds NP will return in 2025 from Duke University… Author: Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC   Peer Review: This episode was peer reviewed using a modified revised METRIQ (rMETRIQ) Score. Learn more about The Peds NP's formal peer review process at www.thepedsnp.com/peerreview rMETRIQ Score: 12/15 What does this score mean? This episode underwent a formal quality assurance and peer review process. It received a lower score because of the editorial nature of the content that could not achieve the highest score for question 1 and 4 criteria. There is sufficient background to situate the listener, but there are no referrals to other valuable sites. References are sited, but they do not correspond to specific statements. Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: None Connect with The Peds NP email: [email protected] Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast   References: Carson, R.A. (2024). Student speaker commencement address [Speech transcript]. Johns Hopkins School of Nursing Commencement. https://alumni.jhu.edu/commencement-2016(Original work published 2016). 

Welcome to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    This episode reviews the features of a patient presentation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and goes in depth on how learners can incorporate trends, new findings, and summaries into a succinct discussion in family-centered rounds. After an introduction with some general best practices, the guide begins with effective pre-rounding and progresses to the step-by-step components of a PICU patient presentation. The template describes each component’s contents in detail, followed immediately by an example to demonstrate the practical application of each concept… “It might sound something like this:”... This episode is a valuable tool for any pediatric provider seeking to increase their skills in succinct synthesis and patient presentations, regardless of clinical setting.   This episode was peer reviewed by The Peds NP faculty series peer review team. You can read about our novel and scholarly approach to peer review, review our faculty lineup, and learn more about the series, competency mapping, references, and show notes at www.thepedsnp.com. There was no financial support or conflicts of interest to report. Follow me on Instagram @thepedsnppodcast.  Email me at [email protected].  Remember that this isn’t just a podcast, you’re listening for the kids.   Authors (alphabetical): Jackie Calhoun, DNP, CRNP, CPNP-AC, CCRN, Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Lena Oliveros, MSN, CPNP-AC, Priscila Reid, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, CPNP-AC Peer Review: This episode was peer reviewed using a modified revised METRIQ (rMETRIQ) Score. Learn more about The Peds NP's formal peer review process at www.thepedsnp.com/peerreview rMETRIQ Score: 15/15 What does this score mean? This episode underwent a quality assurance process using formal peer review and achieved the top scores based on established quality criteria for podcasts. Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: None Connect with The Peds NP email: [email protected] Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast   References:  Bolick, B.N., Reuter-Rice, K., Madden, M.A., Severin, P.N. (2020). Pediatric Acute Care: A guide for Interprofessional Practice (2nd ed.). Jones & Barlett Learning. Burlington, MA.    Oubre, R. (2024). Systems versus problem-based notes. Dr. Oubre’s Digest. https://droubredigest.beehiiv.com/p/systems-versus-problems-based-notes   Stanford Medicine. (nd). Coaching best practices– Presenting a patient. https://med.stanford.edu/content/dam/sm/peds/documents/Program%20Information/coaching/Coaching%20Feedback%20Summary_Presenting%20a%20Patient.pdf   UC San Diego School of Medicine. (2018). Overview and general information about oral presentation. Practical Guide to Clinical Medicine. https://meded.ucsd.edu/clinicalmed/oral.html

Welcome to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-edited by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    *This is the second episode in a 2 part series on enteral feeding. Listen to Episode 75: Malnutrition and Feeding Tube Selection first.   This episode walks through the decision-making for which enteral formula to select based on the patient's age, protein needs, and GI function. A list of commercially available examples is listed for each age group and protein type. Fluid and caloric goals are discussed to determine if concentrated formulas are appropriate. Lastly, the process of starting continuous feeds and advancing to bolus feeds while assessing for tolerance is reviewed. Build functional skills by following along with a case study that is continued from the prior episode. It's proof that there's more than just formula that goes into tube feedings.   Authors: Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Jessica D. Murphy, DNP, CPNP-AC, CPHON, CNE, & Marian Malone, DNP, APRN, CPNP-AC/PC Welcome to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    This episode reviews the features of a patient presentation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and goes in depth on how learners can incorporate trends, new findings, and summaries into a succinct discussion in family-centered rounds. After an introduction with some general best practices, the guide begins with effective pre-rounding and progresses to the step-by-step components of a PICU patient presentation. The template describes each component’s contents in detail, followed immediately by an example to demonstrate the practical application of each concept… “It might sound something like this:”... This episode is a valuable tool for any pediatric provider seeking to increase their skills in succinct synthesis and patient presentations, regardless of clinical setting.   This episode was peer reviewed by The Peds NP faculty series peer review team. You can read about our novel and scholarly approach to peer review, review our faculty lineup, and learn more about the series, competency mapping, references, and show notes at www.thepedsnp.com. There was no financial support or conflicts of interest to report. Follow me on Instagram @thepedsnppodcast.  Email me at [email protected].  Remember that this isn’t just a podcast, you’re listening for the kids.   Authors (alphabetical): Jackie Calhoun, DNP, CRNP, CPNP-AC, CCRN, Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Lena Oliveros, MSN, CPNP-AC, Priscila Reid, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, CPNP-AC Peer Review: This episode was peer reviewed using a modified revised METRIQ (rMETRIQ) Score. Learn more about The Peds NP's formal peer review process at www.thepedsnp.com/peerreview rMETRIQ Score: 15/15 What does this score mean? This episode underwent a quality assurance process using formal peer review and achieved the top scores based on established quality criteria for podcasts. Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: None Connect with The Peds NP email: [email protected] Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast References: Bechtold, M. L., Brown, P. M., Escuro, A., Grenda, B., Johnston, T., Kozeniecki, M., Limketkai, B. N., Nelson, K. K., Powers, J., Ronan, A., Schober, N., Strang, B. J., Swartz, C., Turner, J., Tweel, L., Walker, R., Epp, L., & Malone, A. (2022). When is enteral nutrition indicated? Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 46(7), 1470–1496. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2364 Becker, P., Carney, L. N., Corkins, M. R., Monczka, J., Smith, E., Smith, S. E., Spear, B. A., & White, J. V. (2014). Consensus statement of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 30(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533614557642 Green Corkins, K. (2015). Nutrition‐focused physical examination in pediatric patients. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 30(2), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533615572654 Hess, L., & Crossen, J. (2008). Pediatric Nutrition Handbook (3rd ed.). Cincinnati Children’s. Mehta, N. M., Skillman, H. E., Irving, S. Y., Coss-Bu, J. A., Vermilyea, S., Farrington, E. A., McKeever, L., Hall, A. M., Goday, P. S., & Braunschweig, C. (2017). Guidelines for the provision and assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the pediatric critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 18(7), 675–715. https://doi.org/10.1097/pcc.0000000000001134 Panchal, A. K., Manzi, J., Connolly, S., Christensen, M., Wakeham, M., Goday, P. S., & Mikhailov, T. A. (2014). Safety of enteral feedings in critically ill children receiving vasoactive agents. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 40(2), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607114546533 Yi, Dae Young. (2018). Enteral nutrition in pediatric patients. Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, 21(1), 12-19. http://doi.org/10.5223/pghn.2018.21.1.12

Welcome back to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    This episode begins with a brief review of malnutrition and pediatric nutritional assessment in acute care settings. Next we begin a choose-your-own-nutrition adventure by asking a series of questions that aid in medical decision-making for which nutrition route is appropriate, and, if enteral feeding is best, then determines the type of tube indicated. A case-based discussion with examples helps you to apply the concepts to a complex scenario. Our next episode will focus on formula selection, the initiation of feeds, and assessment of tolerance.   Authors: Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Jessica D. Murphy, DNP, CPNP-AC, CPHON, CNE, & Marian Malone, DNP, APRN, CPNP-AC/PC Welcome to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    This episode reviews the features of a patient presentation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and goes in depth on how learners can incorporate trends, new findings, and summaries into a succinct discussion in family-centered rounds. After an introduction with some general best practices, the guide begins with effective pre-rounding and progresses to the step-by-step components of a PICU patient presentation. The template describes each component’s contents in detail, followed immediately by an example to demonstrate the practical application of each concept… “It might sound something like this:”... This episode is a valuable tool for any pediatric provider seeking to increase their skills in succinct synthesis and patient presentations, regardless of clinical setting.   This episode was peer reviewed by The Peds NP faculty series peer review team. You can read about our novel and scholarly approach to peer review, review our faculty lineup, and learn more about the series, competency mapping, references, and show notes at www.thepedsnp.com. There was no financial support or conflicts of interest to report. Follow me on Instagram @thepedsnppodcast.  Email me at [email protected].  Remember that this isn’t just a podcast, you’re listening for the kids.   Authors (alphabetical): Jackie Calhoun, DNP, CRNP, CPNP-AC, CCRN, Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Lena Oliveros, MSN, CPNP-AC, Priscila Reid, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, CPNP-AC Peer Review: This episode was peer reviewed using a modified revised METRIQ (rMETRIQ) Score. Learn more about The Peds NP's formal peer review process at www.thepedsnp.com/peerreview rMETRIQ Score: 15/15 What does this score mean? This episode underwent a quality assurance process using formal peer review and achieved the top scores based on established quality criteria for podcasts. Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: None Connect with The Peds NP email: [email protected] Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast References: Bechtold, M. L., Brown, P. M., Escuro, A., Grenda, B., Johnston, T., Kozeniecki, M., Limketkai, B. N., Nelson, K. K., Powers, J., Ronan, A., Schober, N., Strang, B. J., Swartz, C., Turner, J., Tweel, L., Walker, R., Epp, L., & Malone, A. (2022). When is enteral nutrition indicated? Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 46(7), 1470–1496. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2364 Becker, P., Carney, L. N., Corkins, M. R., Monczka, J., Smith, E., Smith, S. E., Spear, B. A., & White, J. V. (2014). Consensus statement of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 30(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533614557642 Green Corkins, K. (2015). Nutrition‐focused physical examination in pediatric patients. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 30(2), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533615572654 Hess, L., & Crossen, J. (2008). Pediatric Nutrition Handbook (3rd ed.). Cincinnati Children’s.  Mehta, N. M., Skillman, H. E., Irving, S. Y., Coss-Bu, J. A., Vermilyea, S., Farrington, E. A., McKeever, L., Hall, A. M., Goday, P. S., & Braunschweig, C. (2017). Guidelines for the provision and assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the pediatric critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 18(7), 675–715. https://doi.org/10.1097/pcc.0000000000001134 Panchal, A. K., Manzi, J., Connolly, S., Christensen, M., Wakeham, M., Goday, P. S., & Mikhailov, T. A. (2014). Safety of enteral feedings in critically ill children receiving vasoactive agents. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 40(2), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607114546533 Yi, Dae Young. (2018). Enteral nutrition in pediatric patients. Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, 21(1), 12-19. http://doi.org/10.5223/pghn.2018.21.1.12

Meditation begins at 2:00.  This 5-minute meditation for pediatric providers is designed to help you center your day before your work to boost your wellness, improve resilience, and connect better with yourself, your patients, and your colleagues. First we’ll create a peaceful environment and establish the ground rules of meditation, then get your body into position. The guided meditation takes you through 5 minutes of breath to help you calm your mind and body while making room for empathy and patience. No judgment, but lots of kindness and compassion for your thoughts and feelings. The session ends by bringing body and mind back into your space and showing gratitude for the practice. Use this meditation every day before you go to work with infants, children, adolescents, and young adults to improve your wellness and their outcomes.  Welcome to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    This episode reviews the features of a patient presentation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and goes in depth on how learners can incorporate trends, new findings, and summaries into a succinct discussion in family-centered rounds. After an introduction with some general best practices, the guide begins with effective pre-rounding and progresses to the step-by-step components of a PICU patient presentation. The template describes each component’s contents in detail, followed immediately by an example to demonstrate the practical application of each concept… “It might sound something like this:”... This episode is a valuable tool for any pediatric provider seeking to increase their skills in succinct synthesis and patient presentations, regardless of clinical setting.   This episode was peer reviewed by The Peds NP faculty series peer review team. You can read about our novel and scholarly approach to peer review, review our faculty lineup, and learn more about the series, competency mapping, references, and show notes at www.thepedsnp.com. There was no financial support or conflicts of interest to report. Follow me on Instagram @thepedsnppodcast.  Email me at [email protected].  Remember that this isn’t just a podcast, you’re listening for the kids.   Authors (alphabetical): Jackie Calhoun, DNP, CRNP, CPNP-AC, CCRN, Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Lena Oliveros, MSN, CPNP-AC, Priscila Reid, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, CPNP-AC Peer Review: This episode was peer reviewed using a modified revised METRIQ (rMETRIQ) Score. Learn more about The Peds NP's formal peer review process at www.thepedsnp.com/peerreview rMETRIQ Score: 15/15 What does this score mean? This episode underwent a quality assurance process using formal peer review and achieved the top scores based on established quality criteria for podcasts. Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: None Connect with The Peds NP email: [email protected] Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast References: The Meditation Initiative. (nd). 5 minute guided meditation script. https://meditationinitiative.org/5-minute-meditation-script Mindful. (2024). How to start your day with meditation. https://www.mindful.org/how-to-start-your-day-with-meditation/

Welcome back to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.  This episode explores wellness for the pediatric nurse practitioner. We first discuss burnout in terms of its physical and mental impact on the provider as well as poorer patient outcomes and healthcare systems burdens. After we identify symptoms of burnout and compassion fatigue, we’ll discuss what wellness looks like in various systems at work from organizational culture of wellness to ease of daily work and finally personal resilience. We end with a discussion on self-compassion and introduce the evidence in support of meditation as a strategy to promote mind-body wellness. For some, this concept is new, so the technical aspects of meditation are unpacked to facilitate your own path to daily wellness. This episode pairs well with the 5-minute meditation for pediatric providers.    Authors: Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Bridget Sullivan Garmisa, MSN, MS, CRNP, RD Welcome to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    This episode reviews the features of a patient presentation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and goes in depth on how learners can incorporate trends, new findings, and summaries into a succinct discussion in family-centered rounds. After an introduction with some general best practices, the guide begins with effective pre-rounding and progresses to the step-by-step components of a PICU patient presentation. The template describes each component’s contents in detail, followed immediately by an example to demonstrate the practical application of each concept… “It might sound something like this:”... This episode is a valuable tool for any pediatric provider seeking to increase their skills in succinct synthesis and patient presentations, regardless of clinical setting.   This episode was peer reviewed by The Peds NP faculty series peer review team. You can read about our novel and scholarly approach to peer review, review our faculty lineup, and learn more about the series, competency mapping, references, and show notes at www.thepedsnp.com. There was no financial support or conflicts of interest to report. Follow me on Instagram @thepedsnppodcast.  Email me at [email protected].  Remember that this isn’t just a podcast, you’re listening for the kids.   Authors (alphabetical): Jackie Calhoun, DNP, CRNP, CPNP-AC, CCRN, Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Lena Oliveros, MSN, CPNP-AC, Priscila Reid, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, CPNP-AC Peer Review: This episode was peer reviewed using a modified revised METRIQ (rMETRIQ) Score. Learn more about The Peds NP's formal peer review process at www.thepedsnp.com/peerreview rMETRIQ Score: 15/15 What does this score mean? This episode underwent a quality assurance process using formal peer review and achieved the top scores based on established quality criteria for podcasts. Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: None Connect with The Peds NP email: [email protected] Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast References: Berwick, D. M., Nolan, T. W., & Whittington, J. (2008). The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health affairs (Project Hope), 27(3), 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759 Chan, G. K., Kuriakose, C., Blacker, A., Harshman, J., Kim, S., Jordan, L., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2021). An organizational initiative to assess and improve well-being in advanced practice providers. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 25, 100469-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2021.100469 Green, A. A., & Kinchen, E. V. (2021). The Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Stress and Burnout in Nurses. Journal of holistic nursing : official journal of the American Holistic Nurses' Association, 39(4), 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101211015818 Kabat-Zinn, J. (2005). Wherever You Go There You are (10th ed.). Hyperion Kriakous, S. A., Elliott, K. A., Lamers, C., & Owen, R. (2021). The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on the Psychological Functioning of Healthcare Professionals: a Systematic Review. Mindfulness, 12(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01500-9 Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2004). Areas of worklife: A structured approach to organizational predictors of job burnout. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Emotional and physiological processes and positive intervention strategies (pp. 91–134). Elsevier Science/JAI Press. Lennon, Y. (2023). The quintuple aim: What it is and why does it matter? Chess Health Solutions. https://www.chesshealthsolutions.com/2023/08/01/the-quintuple-aim-what-is-it-and-why-does-it-matter/#:~:text=The%20Quintuple%20Aim%20is%20an,system%20to%20establish%20health%20equity. Makary, M. A., & Daniel, M. (2016). Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 353, i2139. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2139 Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual review of psychology, 52, 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397 National Wellness Institute. (2024). NWI’s six dimensions of wellness. https://nationalwellness.org/resources/six-dimensions-of-wellness/#:~:text=Wellness%20is%20a%20conscious%2C%20self,a%20long%20and%20healthy%20life. Neff, K. D. (2023). Self-Compassion: Theory, Method, Research, and Intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 74(1), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031047 Panagioti, M., Khan, K., Keers, R. N., Abuzour, A., Phipps, D., Kontopantelis, E., Bower, P., Campbell, S., Haneef, R., Avery, A. J., & Ashcroft, D. M. (2019). Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 366, l4185. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4185 Peters E. (2018). Compassion fatigue in nursing: A concept analysis. Nursing forum, 53(4), 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12274 Shanafelt, T. D., & Noseworthy, J. H. (2017). Executive Leadership and Physician Well-being: Nine Organizational Strategies to Promote Engagement and Reduce Burnout. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 92(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004 Shanafelt, T. D., Larson, D., Bohman, B., Roberts, R., Trockel, M., Weinlander, E., Springer, J., Wang, H., Stolz, S., & Murphy, D. (2023). Organization-Wide Approaches to Foster Effective Unit-Level Efforts to Improve Clinician Well-Being. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 98(1), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.10.031

Welcome to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This collaborative series was created and peer-reviewed by national experts and leaders in acute care PNP education to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    This episode applies the concepts from the prior episode on “Delivering Bad News” (S11 Ep. 71) to a few examples where HIV status was disclosed to a pediatric patient. After reflection and discussion of a few ethical principles important to consent/assent, it’s time to practice delivering bad news in a case study. An unfolding case poses questions to get you thinking about what you might say. Make it interactive by pausing your podcast and answer the question yourself. The case walks you step-by-step through the process of delivering bad news to a child and their family using the SPIKES protocol. There's no perfect answer, but this example helps to prepare you for competency-based learning, so that you’re ready to deliver bad news in practice.   Authors (alphabetical): Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Ann Felauer, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Belinda Large, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, and Robyn Stamm, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC Welcome to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    This episode reviews the features of a patient presentation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and goes in depth on how learners can incorporate trends, new findings, and summaries into a succinct discussion in family-centered rounds. After an introduction with some general best practices, the guide begins with effective pre-rounding and progresses to the step-by-step components of a PICU patient presentation. The template describes each component’s contents in detail, followed immediately by an example to demonstrate the practical application of each concept… “It might sound something like this:”... This episode is a valuable tool for any pediatric provider seeking to increase their skills in succinct synthesis and patient presentations, regardless of clinical setting.   This episode was peer reviewed by The Peds NP faculty series peer review team. You can read about our novel and scholarly approach to peer review, review our faculty lineup, and learn more about the series, competency mapping, references, and show notes at www.thepedsnp.com. There was no financial support or conflicts of interest to report. Follow me on Instagram @thepedsnppodcast.  Email me at [email protected].  Remember that this isn’t just a podcast, you’re listening for the kids.   Authors (alphabetical): Jackie Calhoun, DNP, CRNP, CPNP-AC, CCRN, Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Lena Oliveros, MSN, CPNP-AC, Priscila Reid, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, CPNP-AC Peer Review: This episode was peer reviewed using a modified revised METRIQ (rMETRIQ) Score. Learn more about The Peds NP's formal peer review process at www.thepedsnp.com/peerreview rMETRIQ Score: 15/15 What does this score mean? This episode underwent a quality assurance process using formal peer review and achieved the top scores based on established quality criteria for podcasts. Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: None Connect with The Peds NP email: [email protected] Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast References Brouwer, M. A., Maeckelberghe, E. L. M., van der Heide, A., Hein, I. M., & Verhagen, E. A. A. E. (2021). Breaking bad news: what parents would like you to know. Archives of disease in childhood, 106(3), 276–281. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-318398  Cassim, S., Kidd, J., Keenan, R., Middleton, K., Rolleston, A., Hokowhitu, B., Firth, M., Aitken, D., Wong, J., & Lawrenson, R. (2021). Indigenous perspectives on breaking bad news: ethical considerations for healthcare providers. Journal of medical ethics, medethics-2020-106916. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106916 Field, M.J. & Behrman, R.E. (2003). When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Chapter 4 communication, goal setting, and care   planning. Committee on Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Institute of Medicine (US) Holmes, S. N., & Illing, J. (2021). Breaking bad news: tackling cultural dilemmas. BMJ supportive & palliative care, 11(2), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002700 Kaplan, M. (2010). SPIKES: A framework for breaking bad news to patients with cancer. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 14(4), 514-516.                   https://cjon.ons.org/cjon/14/4/spikes-framework-breaking-bad-news-patients-cancer Kumar, V., & Sarkhel, S. (2023). Clinical Practice Guidelines on Breaking Bad News. Indian journal of psychiatry, 65(2), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_498_22 Labaf, A., Jahanshir, A., Baradaran, H., & Shahvaraninasab, A. (2015). Is it appropriate to use Western guidelines for breaking bad news in non-Western emergency departments? A patients’ perspective. Clinical Ethics, 10(1–2), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477750915581797 Monden, K. R., Gentry, L., & Cox, T. R. (2016). Delivering bad news to patients. Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 29(1), 101–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2016.11929380 Mostafavian, Z., Shaye, Z. A., & Farajpour, A. (2018). Mothers' preferences toward breaking bad news about their children cancer. Journal of family medicine and primary care, 7(3), 596–600. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_342_17

Welcome back to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This collaborative series was created and peer-reviewed by national experts and leaders in acute care PNP education. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a learner can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach in a conversational way so that you can learn the nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.  This episode discusses a standardized approach to delivering bad news, founded in the literature. The SPIKES protocol is the most well recognized approach to create an environment, assess patient and family knowledge and preferences, deliver the news compassionately, and empathize prior to a summary. With examples of phrasing you can offer at each step, you’ll gain the skills necessary to deliver bad news.  Authors (alphabetical): Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Ann Felauer, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Belinda Large, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, and Robyn Stamm, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC Welcome to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    This episode reviews the features of a patient presentation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and goes in depth on how learners can incorporate trends, new findings, and summaries into a succinct discussion in family-centered rounds. After an introduction with some general best practices, the guide begins with effective pre-rounding and progresses to the step-by-step components of a PICU patient presentation. The template describes each component’s contents in detail, followed immediately by an example to demonstrate the practical application of each concept… “It might sound something like this:”... This episode is a valuable tool for any pediatric provider seeking to increase their skills in succinct synthesis and patient presentations, regardless of clinical setting.   This episode was peer reviewed by The Peds NP faculty series peer review team. You can read about our novel and scholarly approach to peer review, review our faculty lineup, and learn more about the series, competency mapping, references, and show notes at www.thepedsnp.com. There was no financial support or conflicts of interest to report. Follow me on Instagram @thepedsnppodcast.  Email me at [email protected].  Remember that this isn’t just a podcast, you’re listening for the kids.   Authors (alphabetical): Jackie Calhoun, DNP, CRNP, CPNP-AC, CCRN, Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Lena Oliveros, MSN, CPNP-AC, Priscila Reid, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, CPNP-AC Peer Review: This episode was peer reviewed using a modified revised METRIQ (rMETRIQ) Score. Learn more about The Peds NP's formal peer review process at www.thepedsnp.com/peerreview rMETRIQ Score: 15/15 What does this score mean? This episode underwent a quality assurance process using formal peer review and achieved the top scores based on established quality criteria for podcasts. Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: None Connect with The Peds NP email: [email protected] Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast References: Brouwer, M. A., Maeckelberghe, E. L. M., van der Heide, A., Hein, I. M., & Verhagen, E. A. A. E. (2021). Breaking bad news: what parents would like you to know. Archives of disease in childhood, 106(3), 276–281. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-318398 Buckman R. (1984). Breaking bad news: why is it still so difficult?. British medical journal (Clinical research ed.), 288(6430), 1597–1599. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.288.6430.1597 Buckman R. (2001). Communication skills in palliative care: a practical guide. Neurologic clinics, 19(4), 989–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0733-8619(05)70057-8 Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families, Field, M. J., & Behrman, R. E. (Eds.). (2003). When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Chapter 4 communication, goal setting, and care planning. National Academies Press (US).  Kaplan M. (2010). SPIKES: a framework for breaking bad news to patients with cancer. Clinical journal of oncology nursing, 14(4), 514–516. https://doi.org/10.1188/10.CJON.514-516  Ptacek, J. T., & Eberhardt, T. L. (1996). Breaking bad news. A review of the literature. JAMA, 276(6), 496–502. Sisk, B., Frankel, R., Kodish, E., & Harry Isaacson, J. (2016). The Truth about Truth-Telling in American Medicine: A Brief History. The Permanente journal, 20(3), 15–219. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/15-219 Varkey B. (2021). Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 30(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119  

Welcome back to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    For many scholars, the poster and its prerequisite abstract are the first product of dissemination of their work. This episode guides the new scholar through the entire process– from selecting a conference destination, writing the abstract in a concise manner, creation of the poster, and the poster session at the conference. Key pearls and pitfalls of abstract submission, the use of artificial intelligence, and your final poster presentation complete the beginner’s guide to dissemination.    This episode was peer reviewed by The Peds NP faculty series peer review team. You can read about our novel and scholarly approach to peer review, review our faculty lineup, and learn more about the series, competency mapping, references, and show notes at www.thepedsnp.com. There was no financial support or conflicts of interest to report. Follow me on Instagram @thepedsnppodcast.  Email me at [email protected].  Remember that this isn’t just a podcast, you’re listening for the kids.   Authors: (alphabetical) Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC and Mike Maymi, DNP, APRN, CPNP-AC, CCRN, CNE Welcome to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    This episode reviews the features of a patient presentation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and goes in depth on how learners can incorporate trends, new findings, and summaries into a succinct discussion in family-centered rounds. After an introduction with some general best practices, the guide begins with effective pre-rounding and progresses to the step-by-step components of a PICU patient presentation. The template describes each component’s contents in detail, followed immediately by an example to demonstrate the practical application of each concept… “It might sound something like this:”... This episode is a valuable tool for any pediatric provider seeking to increase their skills in succinct synthesis and patient presentations, regardless of clinical setting.   This episode was peer reviewed by The Peds NP faculty series peer review team. You can read about our novel and scholarly approach to peer review, review our faculty lineup, and learn more about the series, competency mapping, references, and show notes at www.thepedsnp.com. There was no financial support or conflicts of interest to report. Follow me on Instagram @thepedsnppodcast.  Email me at [email protected].  Remember that this isn’t just a podcast, you’re listening for the kids.   Authors (alphabetical): Jackie Calhoun, DNP, CRNP, CPNP-AC, CCRN, Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Lena Oliveros, MSN, CPNP-AC, Priscila Reid, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, CPNP-AC Peer Review: This episode was peer reviewed using a modified revised METRIQ (rMETRIQ) Score. Learn more about The Peds NP's formal peer review process at www.thepedsnp.com/peerreview rMETRIQ Score: 15/15 What does this score mean? This episode underwent a quality assurance process using formal peer review and achieved the top scores based on established quality criteria for podcasts. Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: None Connect with The Peds NP email: [email protected] Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast References: Barker, E., & Phillips, V.. (2021). Creating conference posters: Structure, form and content. Journal of Perioperative Practice, 31(7-8), 296–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750458921996254 Dave, T., Athaluri, S. A., & Singh, S. (2023). ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 6, 1169595. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1169595 Drury, A., Pape, E., Dowling, M., Miguel, S., Fernández-Ortega, P., Papadopoulou, C., & Kotronoulas, G. (2023). How to Write a Comprehensive and Informative Research Abstract. Seminars in oncology nursing, 39(2), 151395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151395 Freysteinson, W. M., & Stankus, J. A. (2019). The Language of Scholarship: How to Write an Abstract That Tells a Compelling Story. Journal of continuing education in nursing, 50(3), 107–108. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20190218-04

Welcome back to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-edited by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    This episode guides the novice pediatric provider on creations of an acute care differential diagnosis. It starts with a story about a Southerner in a snowstorm and the unfortunate car problem that resulted from an unexpected guest in the engine. A clear parallel ties the mechanic’s diagnosis with a few amateur onomatopoeias (“clunk, clunk, clunk”) with the skills needed to form illness scripts and develop differentials. A brief case study on an adolescent with acidosis introduces the idea of broad differential formation and the importance of a complete evaluation before diagnoses are eliminated. Medical decision-making is difficult, and a systematic approach to differential diagnosis formation is essential. The episode uses simple examples to help listeners apply the concepts and form a differential in real time. The discussion covers the importance of careful accrual of information, initial differential creation using a systematic approach, how to narrow your differential based on key findings of the assessment, and how to approach an open-ended differential honestly with families while avoiding cognitive bias. With the understanding that, “disease exists on a continuum that evolves and we see the patient at a snapshot in time,” the episode offers a step by step guide on how to build a differential. Classic mantras of The Peds NP are finally explained and tied to the development of your acute care differential. Every novice needs to listen to this episode before ever stepping foot in the clinical setting to be prepared for diagnostic reasoning and the process of narrowing your differential.   This episode was peer reviewed by The Peds NP faculty series peer review team. You can read about our novel and scholarly approach to peer review, review our faculty lineup, and learn more about the series, competency mapping, references, and show notes at www.thepedsnp.com. There was no financial support or conflicts of interest to report. Follow me on Instagram @thepedsnppodcast.  Email me at [email protected].  Remember that this isn’t just a podcast, you’re listening for the kids.   Authors (alphabetical):  Aimee Bucci DNP, APRN, CPNP-AC, Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, & Dani Sebbens, DNP, CPNP-PC/AC Welcome to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    This episode reviews the features of a patient presentation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and goes in depth on how learners can incorporate trends, new findings, and summaries into a succinct discussion in family-centered rounds. After an introduction with some general best practices, the guide begins with effective pre-rounding and progresses to the step-by-step components of a PICU patient presentation. The template describes each component’s contents in detail, followed immediately by an example to demonstrate the practical application of each concept… “It might sound something like this:”... This episode is a valuable tool for any pediatric provider seeking to increase their skills in succinct synthesis and patient presentations, regardless of clinical setting.   This episode was peer reviewed by The Peds NP faculty series peer review team. You can read about our novel and scholarly approach to peer review, review our faculty lineup, and learn more about the series, competency mapping, references, and show notes at www.thepedsnp.com. There was no financial support or conflicts of interest to report. Follow me on Instagram @thepedsnppodcast.  Email me at [email protected].  Remember that this isn’t just a podcast, you’re listening for the kids.   Authors (alphabetical): Jackie Calhoun, DNP, CRNP, CPNP-AC, CCRN, Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Lena Oliveros, MSN, CPNP-AC, Priscila Reid, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, CPNP-AC Peer Review: This episode was peer reviewed using a modified revised METRIQ (rMETRIQ) Score. Learn more about The Peds NP's formal peer review process at www.thepedsnp.com/peerreview rMETRIQ Score: 15/15 What does this score mean? This episode underwent a quality assurance process using formal peer review and achieved the top scores based on established quality criteria for podcasts. Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: None Connect with The Peds NP email: [email protected] Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast References: Balogh, E. P., Miller, B. T., Ball, J. R., Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine, & The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (Eds.). (2015). Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. National Academies Press (US). Brennan, M.M (2020). Teaching strategy 1: cultivating diagnostic decision-making with problem based learning: from most likely to least likely. Innovative Strategies in Teaching Nursing. doi: 10.1891/9780826161215 Carson, R. A., & Lyles, J. L. (2024). Cognitive Bias in an Infant with Constipation. The Journal of pediatrics, 113996. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.113996 Hammond, M. E. H., Stehlik, J., Drakos, S. G., & Kfoury, A. G. (2021). Bias in Medicine: Lessons Learned and Mitigation Strategies. JACC. Basic to translational science, 6(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.07.012Marshall, T. L., Rinke, M. L., Olson, A. P. J., & Brady, P. W. (2022). Diagnostic Error in Pediatrics: A Narrative Review. Pediatrics, 149(Suppl 3), e2020045948D. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-045948D Marshall, T. L., Rinke, M. L., Olson, A. P. J., & Brady, P. W. (2022). Diagnostic Error in Pediatrics: A Narrative Review. Pediatrics, 149(Suppl 3), e2020045948D. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-045948D Smith, S.K., Benbenek, M.M., Bakker, C.J., & Bockwoldt, D. (2022). Scoping review: diagnostic reasoning as a component of clinical reasoning in the U.S. primary care nurse practitioner education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78:3869-3896. doi: 10.1111/jan.15414  

Welcome to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This collaborative series was created and peer-reviewed by national experts and leaders in acute care PNP education to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a conversational approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.  This episode welcomes the acute care PNP student to clinical, where you’ll learn important bedside lessons that apply your knowledge to practical situations. Our faculty offered advice on preparation, clinical rotation best practices, and how to finish the rotation successfully. There are key pearls and pitfalls to guide the student toward gaining competency in their newfound skills. We acknowledge those pesky doubts that cause imposter syndrome, and encourage the role of the learner. Through it all, your clinical is what you make of it, and you can be confident that you have the skills to competently enter a new role. This episode was peer reviewed by The Peds NP faculty series peer review team. You can read about our novel and scholarly approach to peer review, review our faculty lineup, and learn more about the series, competency mapping, references, and show notes at www.thepedsnp.com. There was no financial support or conflicts of interest to report. Follow me on Instagram @thepedsnppodcast.  Email me at [email protected].  Remember that this isn’t just a podcast, you’re listening for the kids.   Authors (alphabetical): Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Brittany Christiansen, PhD, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, FNP-C, AE-C, CNE, Julie Kuzin, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Priscila Reid, DNP, FNP-C, CPNP-AC, Dani Sebbens, DNP, CPNP-AC/PC Welcome to The Peds NP Acute Care Faculty series! This series was created and peer-reviewed by national leaders in acute care PNP education collaborating with one another to meet the needs of our current and future colleagues. In the push for competency-based education where faculty verify the skills of what a student can do, rather than their knowledge, our series focuses on the application of didactic content with a practical approach so that you can learn nuances of clinical skills before you reach the bedside.    This episode reviews the features of a patient presentation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and goes in depth on how learners can incorporate trends, new findings, and summaries into a succinct discussion in family-centered rounds. After an introduction with some general best practices, the guide begins with effective pre-rounding and progresses to the step-by-step components of a PICU patient presentation. The template describes each component’s contents in detail, followed immediately by an example to demonstrate the practical application of each concept… “It might sound something like this:”... This episode is a valuable tool for any pediatric provider seeking to increase their skills in succinct synthesis and patient presentations, regardless of clinical setting.   This episode was peer reviewed by The Peds NP faculty series peer review team. You can read about our novel and scholarly approach to peer review, review our faculty lineup, and learn more about the series, competency mapping, references, and show notes at www.thepedsnp.com. There was no financial support or conflicts of interest to report. Follow me on Instagram @thepedsnppodcast.  Email me at [email protected].  Remember that this isn’t just a podcast, you’re listening for the kids.   Authors (alphabetical): Jackie Calhoun, DNP, CRNP, CPNP-AC, CCRN, Becky Carson, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC/AC, Lena Oliveros, MSN, CPNP-AC, Priscila Reid, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, CPNP-AC Peer Review: This episode was peer reviewed using a modified revised METRIQ (rMETRIQ) Score. Learn more about The Peds NP's formal peer review process at www.thepedsnp.com/peerreview rMETRIQ Score: 15/15 What does this score mean? This episode underwent a quality assurance process using formal peer review and achieved the top scores based on established quality criteria for podcasts. Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: None Connect with The Peds NP email: [email protected] Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast References: Carley, A., & Garrett, L. (2022). Supporting Role Knowledge and Role Transition in Neonatal APRN Students. Neonatal network : NN, 41(3), 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1891/11-T-752 Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086006 Edwards-Maddox S. Burnout and impostor phenomenon in nursing and newly licensed registered nurses: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2023 Mar;32(5-6):653-665. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16475. Epub 2022 Aug 2. PMID: 35918887. Lee, T., Lee, S. J., Yoon, Y. S., Ji, H., Yoon, S., Lee, S., & Ji, Y. (2023). Personal Factors and Clinical Learning Environment as Predictors of Nursing Students' Readiness for Practice: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Asian nursing research, 17(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2023.01.003 Scanlan JM, Laurencelle F, Plohman J. Understanding the impostor phenomenon in graduate nursing students. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2023 Dec 7;20(1). doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2022-0058. PMID: 38053510. White, A., & Rivera, L. (2023). Increasing Student Confidence Prior to an Obstetric Clinical Practicum. Nurse educator, 48(6), E195. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001381

At the peak of respiratory virus season, bronchiolitis is one of the most common presentations in infants and young toddlers. The characteristic wheeze and prolonged duration of illness can be distressing for parents, who may lack the practical knowledge of how to effectively implement supportive care. When the mainstay of treatment is supportive care without any single curative intervention, you need to be able to discuss the etiology, management, and anticipatory guidance on a level that the parents can understand. This episode introduces the idea of capacity-building family-centered care and takes a granular, detailed approach to improving family understanding and home care education so that you can facilitate better evidence-based care in the unrestricted environment of the home. By arming parents with the knowledge and skills needed to care for their infant at home and the clear, objective return criteria, you’re providing family-centered care and reducing unnecessary visits.    Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast Show notes and references thepedsnp.com Disclaimer   References Justice NA, Le JK. Bronchiolitis. [Updated 2023 Jun 26]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441959/ Rha, B., Curns, A. T., Lively, J. Y., Campbell, A. P., Englund, J. A., Boom, J. A., Azimi, P. H., Weinberg, G. A., Staat, M. A., Selvarangan, R., Halasa, N. B., McNeal, M. M., Klein, E. J., Harrison, C. J., Williams, J. V., Szilagyi, P. G., Singer, M. N., Sahni, L. C., Figueroa-Downing, D., McDaniel, D., … Gerber, S. I. (2020). Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Associated Hospitalizations Among Young Children: 2015-2016. Pediatrics, 146(1), e20193611. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-3611 Suh, M., Movva, N., Jiang, X., Bylsma, L. C., Reichert, H., Fryzek, J. P., & Nelson, C. B. (2022). Respiratory Syncytial Virus Is the Leading Cause of United States Infant Hospitalizations, 2009-2019: A Study of the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample. The Journal of infectious diseases, 226(Suppl 2), S154–S163. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiac120

In the eighth and final episode of the Health Equity in Pediatrics podcast series, the epilogue begins with my inspiration for the series, shares some parting sentiments, and discusses the results and conclusions of the cross-sectional study published in the special DEIB edition of Journal of Pediatric Health Care (March/April 2024). I’ll rewind to my childhood and walk you down the cobblestone brick paths of my hometown, the book that changed my perspective, and the words that helped a podcast create allies. I’ll share the results of the international series and post-survey cross-sectional study. The conclusions will fuel your soul about the series’ impact on listeners and implications for DEI education standardization. Now that you’ve listened, you can be confident that you can make a difference in the equitable care experienced by your patients. After touring the country talking about podcasting and health equity in pediatrics, I’m headed for one last stop in Denver. You’re invited to join me on March 13 at the NAPNAP national conference session 117 for “Scholarly Podcasting 101” where you can learn about quality standards and technology in podcasting, help decide the future of The Peds NP, and envision your own podcast. Disclaimer: This series was supported by the North Carolina Chapter of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners (NAPNAP) Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant whose mission is to support research and quality improvement aimed at improving health equity among infants, children, and adolescents. The content of this episode reflects my views and does not necessarily represent, nor is an endorsement of, NC NAPNAP or the Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant.  For more information, please community.napnap.org/northcarolinachapter References Carson, R.A., Sobolewski, B., & Bowen, F. (2024). Evaluating a health equity podcast for provider practice change: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, in press. Kapur, G. (2021). To drink from the well: The struggle for equality at the nation’s oldest public university. Blair/Carolina Wren Press.

Nirsevimab is the new FDA-approved monoclonal antibody RSV vaccine for the prevention of severe lower respiratory illness in infants. In this episode, we discuss the current recommendations on who gets the vaccine and when, how to use a lens of health equity to approach the current vaccine shortages, and how to discuss safety and efficacy with vaccine hesitant parents. Now that nirsevimab is on the routine infant immunization schedule, it’s extremely important and pediatric providers understand the recommendations and science behind the monoclonal antibody to help vaccine acceptance that will undoubtedly reduce bronchiolitis hospitalization. Instagram: @thepedsnppodcast Show notes and references thepedsnp.com Disclaimer   References: CDC Health Alert Network. (2023). Limited availability of nirsevimab in the United States—Interim CDC recommendations to protect infants from Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) during the 2023–2024 respiratory virus season. Emergency Preparedness and Response. https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2023/han00499.asp?c Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Frequently asked questions about RSV immunization with monoclonal antibody for children 19 months and younger. Vaccines and Preventable Diseases. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/rsv/hcp/child-faqs.html Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Vaccines for Children Program. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/vfc/index.html Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). General best practice guidelines for immunization. Vaccine Recommendations and the Guidelines of the ACIP. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/general-recs/index.html Jones, J. M., Fleming-Dutra, K. E., Prill, M. M., Roper, L. E., Brooks, O., Sánchez, P. J., Kotton, C. N., Mahon, B. E., Meyer, S., Long, S. S., & McMorrow, M. L. (2023). Use of Nirsevimab for the Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease Among Infants and Young Children: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, 2023. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 72(34), 920–925. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7234a4 Hill, D., & Parga-Belinkie, J. (Host). (2023, August 29). Immunizations special: RSV, Covid, pneumococcal disease, influenza (No. 170) [Audio podcast episode]. In Pediatrics on call. American Academy of Pediatrics. www.aap.org/podcast Rha, B., Curns, A. T., Lively, J. Y., Campbell, A. P., Englund, J. A., Boom, J. A., Azimi, P. H., Weinberg, G. A., Staat, M. A., Selvarangan, R., Halasa, N. B., McNeal, M. M., Klein, E. J., Harrison, C. J., Williams, J. V., Szilagyi, P. G., Singer, M. N., Sahni, L. C., Figueroa-Downing, D., McDaniel, D., … Gerber, S. I. (2020). Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Associated Hospitalizations Among Young Children: 2015-2016. Pediatrics, 146(1), e20193611. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-3611 Suh, M., Movva, N., Jiang, X., Bylsma, L. C., Reichert, H., Fryzek, J. P., & Nelson, C. B. (2022). Respiratory Syncytial Virus Is the Leading Cause of United States Infant Hospitalizations, 2009-2019: A Study of the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample. The Journal of infectious diseases, 226(Suppl 2), S154–S163. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiac120

Mental health is one of the greatest health risks encountered by children and adolescents in today’s world.  Stigma can be one of the biggest barriers to children being evaluated and treated for mental health problems, particularly in communities that are marginalized.  In the final episode of the miniseries on Health Equity in Children, we bring mental health into your everyday conversations to diminish stigma and give mental health the time it deserves to help your patients grow up happy and healthy. Want to make a bigger difference in health equity? Complete an anonymous survey here after you listen to the episode or visit www.thepedsnp.com and click the “Complete a Survey” button at the top of the page. The responses will provide greater insight into how podcasts impact education and behavior through microlearning of health equity concepts. After you complete a survey, you’ll receive a separate link to enter your email to a raffle for a $15 Amazon gift card.  Winners will be chosen at random and notified by email one week after the original publication date. This raffle was made possible by grant funding from the sources below.  Disclaimer: This series was supported by the North Carolina Chapter of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners (NAPNAP) Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant whose mission is to support research and quality improvement aimed at improving health equity among infants, children, and adolescents. The content of this episode reflects my views and does not necessarily represent, nor is an endorsement of, NC NAPNAP or the Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant.  For more information, please community.napnap.org/northcarolinachapter. References Bureau of Health Workforce, Health Resources and Services Administration, U. S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2019). Designated health professional shortage areas statistics. Retrieved from https://bhw.hrsa.gov/shortage-designa tion/hpsa-criteria Cotton, N. K., & Shim, R. S. (2022). Social Determinants of Health, Structural Racism, and the Impact on Child and Adolescent Mental Health. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 61(11), 1385–1389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2022.04.020 Cross, T. L. (1989). Towards a culturally competent system of care: A monograph on effective services for minority children who are severely emotionally disturbed. Harris, T. B., Udoetuk, S. C., Webb, S., Tatem, A., Nutile, L. M., & Al-Mateen, C. S. (2020). Achieving Mental Health Equity: Children and Adolescents. The Psychiatric clinics of North America, 43(3), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2020.06.001 Nápoles-Springer, A. M., Santoyo, J., Houston, K., Pérez-Stable, E. J., & Stewart, A. L. (2005). Patients' perceptions of cultural factors affecting the quality of their medical encounters. Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 8(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00298.x National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners, Developmental and Behavioral Health Special Interest Group, Frye, L., Van Cleve, S., Heighway, S., & Johnson-Smith, A. (2020). NAPNAP position statement on the integration of mental health care in pediatric primary care settings. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 34(5), p. 514-517, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2020.04.013 Pumariega, A. J., Rothe, E., Mian, A., Carlisle, L., Toppelberg, C., Harris, T., Gogineni, R. R., Webb, S., Smith, J., & American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) Committee on Quality Issues (CQI) (2013). Practice parameter for cultural competence in child and adolescent psychiatric practice. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(10), 1101–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2013.06.019 Song, J., Mailick, M. R., & Greenberg, J. S. (2018). Health of parents of individuals with developmental disorders or mental health problems: Impacts of stigma. Social science & medicine (1982), 217, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.044 Telesia, L., Kaushik, A., & Kyriakopoulos, M. (2020). The role of stigma in children and adolescents with mental health difficulties. Current opinion in psychiatry, 33(6), 571–576. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000644 Waid, J., & Kelly, M. (2020). Supporting family engagement with child and adolescent mental health services: A scoping review. Health & social care in the community, 28(5), 1333–1342. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12947 Walter, H. J., Vernacchio, L., Trudell, E. K., Bromberg, J., Goodman, E., Barton, J., Young, G. J., DeMaso, D. R., & Focht, G. (2019). Five-Year Outcomes of Behavioral Health Integration in Pediatric Primary Care. Pediatrics, 144(1), e20183243. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3243

It’s good advice for any pediatric provider to never assume anything.  In the sixth episode of the series on Health Equity in Children, we understand how not making assumptions is a best practice for pediatric providers from the evaluation and management of LGBTQ patients, to communicating with diverse families, and serving as an ally in health promotion.   Want to make a bigger difference in health equity? Complete an anonymous survey here after you listen to the episode or visit www.thepedsnp.com and click the “Complete a Survey” button at the top of the page. The responses will provide greater insight into how podcasts impact education and behavior through microlearning of health equity concepts. After you complete a survey, you’ll receive a separate link to enter your email to a raffle for a $15 Amazon gift card.  Winners will be chosen at random and notified by email one week after the original publication date. This raffle was made possible by grant funding from the sources below.  Disclaimer: This series was supported by the North Carolina Chapter of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners (NAPNAP) Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant whose mission is to support research and quality improvement aimed at improving health equity among infants, children, and adolescents. The content of this episode reflects my views and does not necessarily represent, nor is an endorsement of, NC NAPNAP or the Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant.  For more information, please community.napnap.org/northcarolinachapter. References Brown, C., Frohard-Dourlent, H., Wood, B. A., Saewyc, E., Eisenberg, M. E., & Porta, C. M. (2020). "It makes such a difference": An examination of how LGBTQ youth talk about personal gender pronouns. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 32(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000217 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). Health disparities among LTGBQ youth. Adolescent and School Health. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/disparities/health-disparities-among-lgbtq-youth.htm Coulter-Thompson, E. I., Matthews, D. D., Applegate, J., Broder-Fingert, S., & Dubé, K. (2023). Health Care Bias and Discrimination Experienced by Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Parents of Children With Developmental Disabilities: A Qualitative Inquiry in the United States. Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners, 37(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2022.09.004 Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Queen, B., Lowry, R., Chyen, D., Whittle, L., Thornton, J., Lim, C., Bradford, D., Yamakawa, Y., Leon, M., Brener, N., & Ethier, K. A. (2018). Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States, 2017. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002), 67(8), 1–114. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1 Kyriakou, A., Nicolaides, N. C., & Skordis, N. (2020). Current approach to the clinical care of adolescents with gender dysphoria. Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 91(1), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1.9244 National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners, Evans, S.C., Derouin, A.L., Fuller, M.G., Heighway, S., & Schapiro, N.A. (2018). NAPNAP position statement on health risks and needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning youth. The Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 33(2), p. A12-A14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2018.12.005 Roth, L. T., Friedman, S., Gordon, R., & Catallozzi, M. (2020). Rainbows and "Ready for Residency": Integrating LGBTQ Health Into Medical Education. MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 16, 11013. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11013 Simons, L. K., Leibowitz, S. F., & Hidalgo, M. A. (2014). Understanding gender variance in children and adolescents. Pediatric annals, 43(6), e126–e131. https://doi.org/10.3928/00904481-20140522-07

The seminal publication of the AAP’s Guideline on the Evaluation and Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Obesity serves as the source of our fifth episode in the series on Health Equity in Children.  The best practices for managing obesity go beyond discussions of beauty and body image to include systemic racism, obesity as a chronic disease, and the reckoning that children and adolescents with obesity are people first. Want to make a bigger difference in health equity? Complete an anonymous survey here after you listen to the episode or visit www.thepedsnp.com and click the “Complete a Survey” button at the top of the page. The responses will provide greater insight into how podcasts impact education and behavior through microlearning of health equity concepts. After you complete a survey, you’ll receive a separate link to enter your email to a raffle for a $15 Amazon gift card.  Winners will be chosen at random and notified by email one week after the original publication date. This raffle was made possible by grant funding from the sources below.  Disclaimer: This series was supported by the North Carolina Chapter of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners (NAPNAP) Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant whose mission is to support research and quality improvement aimed at improving health equity among infants, children, and adolescents. The content of this episode reflects my views and does not necessarily represent, nor is an endorsement of, NC NAPNAP or the Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant.  For more information, please community.napnap.org/northcarolinachapter. References Bell, C. N., Kerr, J., & Young, J. L. (2019). Associations between Obesity, Obesogenic Environments, and Structural Racism Vary by County-Level Racial Composition. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(5), 861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050861 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Inclusive communication principles. Gateway to Health Communication. https://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/Key_Principles.html Gmeiner, M. S., & Warschburger, P. (2020). Intrapersonal predictors of weight bias internalization among elementary school children: a prospective analysis. BMC pediatrics, 20(1), 408. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02264-w Hadjiyannakis, S., Ibrahim, Q., Li, J., Ball, G. D. C., Buchholz, A., Hamilton, J. K., Zenlea, I., Ho, J., Legault, L., Laberge, A. M., Thabane, L., Tremblay, M., & Morrison, K. M. (2019). Obesity class versus the Edmonton Obesity Staging System for Pediatrics to define health risk in childhood obesity: results from the CANPWR cross-sectional study. The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 3(6), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30056-2 Hampl, S. E., Hassink, S. G., Skinner, A. C., Armstrong, S. C., Barlow, S. E., Bolling, C. F., Avila Edwards, K. C., Eneli, I., Hamre, R., Joseph, M. M., Lunsford, D., Mendonca, E., Michalsky, M. P., Mirza, N., Ochoa, E. R., Sharifi, M., Staiano, A. E., Weedn, A. E., Flinn, S. K., Lindros, J., … Okechukwu, K. (2023). Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Obesity. Pediatrics, 151(2), e2022060640. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-060640 Haqq, A. M., Kebbe, M., Tan, Q., Manco, M., & Salas, X. R. (2021). Complexity and Stigma of Pediatric Obesity. Childhood obesity (Print), 17(4), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2021.0003 Puhl, R. M., & Himmelstein, M. S. (2018). Adolescent preferences for weight terminology used by health care providers. Pediatric obesity, 13(9), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12275 Puhl, R. M., Peterson, J. L., & Luedicke, J. (2011). Parental perceptions of weight terminology that providers use with youth. Pediatrics, 128(4), e786–e793. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3841 Yan J, Liu L, Zhu Y, Huang G, Wang PP. The association between breastfeeding and childhood obesity: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 13;14:1267. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1267. PMID: 25495402; PMCID: PMC4301835.

The fourth episode in our Health Equity in Pediatrics series highlights one of the simplest individual actions a provider can take to be an ally in health equity: Say your patients’ names correctly.  Saying a person’s name correctly validates their identity, family, culture, and heritage.  Whether the name is difficult to pronounce or varies from the name given at birth, providers can use simple tools to correctly pronounce names and address their patients in a way that honors both the patient and their caregivers.  Together we can answer William Shakespeare’s question, “What’s in a name?” with a lens of health equity. Want to make a bigger difference in health equity? Complete an anonymous survey here after you listen to the episode or visit www.thepedsnp.com and click the “Complete a Survey” button at the top of the page. The responses will provide greater insight into how podcasts impact education and behavior through microlearning of health equity concepts. After you complete a survey, you’ll receive a separate link to enter your email to a raffle for a $15 Amazon gift card.  Winners will be chosen at random and notified by email one week after the original publication date. This raffle was made possible by grant funding from the sources below.  Disclaimer: This series was supported by the North Carolina Chapter of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners (NAPNAP) Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant whose mission is to support research and quality improvement aimed at improving health equity among infants, children, and adolescents. The content of this episode reflects my views and does not necessarily represent, nor is an endorsement of, NC NAPNAP or the Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant.  For more information, please community.napnap.org/northcarolinachapter. References Dali, S., Atasuntseva, A., Shankar, M., Ayeroff, E., Holmes, M., Johnson, C., Terkawi, A. S., Beadle, B., Chang, J., Boyd, K., & Dunn, T. (2022). Say My Name: Understanding the Power of Names, Correct Pronunciation, and Personal Narratives. MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 18, 11284. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11284 Keister, A. (2022). Can I still use sir and ma’am? When should I use Mr., Mrs., Ms., and Mx? What to do when you don’t know someone’s gender. The Diversity Movement. Retreived from https://thediversitymovement.com/sir-maam-mr-mrs-ms-mx-what-to-do-when-you-dont-know-someones-gender/ Lebensohn-Chialvo F. (2021). That's not my name. Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare, 39(1), 163–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000588

The third episode in the Health Equity in Pediatrics series focuses on microaggressions, which are subtle slights, snubs, and digs that are seemingly innocent, innocuous, and naïve at first glance.  But their roots in harmful stereotypes and assumptions are psychologically disparaging and invalidating to the people from marginalized groups they offend. They reflect implicit bias that is unconsciously embedded into language and behavior.  As an ally, interrupting microaggressions can be a challenge that requires curiosity to confront.  The decision to interrupt is individual and complex, but this episode will provide allies with the skills to intervene through role play in several scenarios.   Want to make a bigger difference in health equity? Complete an anonymous survey here after you listen to the episode or visit www.thepedsnp.com and click the “Complete a Survey” button at the top of the page. The responses will provide greater insight into how podcasts impact education and behavior through microlearning of health equity concepts. After you complete a survey, you’ll receive a separate link to enter your email to a raffle for a $15 Amazon gift card.  Winners will be chosen at random and notified by email one week after the original publication date. This raffle was made possible by grant funding from the sources below.  Disclaimer: This series was supported by the North Carolina Chapter of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners (NAPNAP) Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant whose mission is to support research and quality improvement aimed at improving health equity among infants, children, and adolescents. The content of this episode reflects my views and does not necessarily represent, nor is an endorsement of, NC NAPNAP or the Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant.  For more information, please community.napnap.org/northcarolinachapter. References: Acholonu, R. G., Cook, T. E., Roswell, R. O., & Greene, R. E. (2020). Interrupting Microaggressions in Health Care Settings: A Guide for Teaching Medical Students. MedEdPORTAL : The journal of teaching and learning resources, 16, 10969. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10969 FitzGerald, C., & Hurst, S. (2017). Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC medical ethics, 18(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8 Kanter, J. (2020). Microaggressions aren’t just innocent blunders– research links them with racial bias. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/microaggressions-arent-just-innocent-blunders-research-links-them-with-racial-bias-145894 Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice. The American psychologist, 62(4), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271 Sue, D. W., Alsaidi, S., Awad, M. N., Glaeser, E., Calle, C. Z., & Mendez, N. (2019). Disarming racial microaggressions: Microintervention strategies for targets, White allies, and bystanders. The American psychologist, 74(1), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000296 Turner, J., Higgins, R., & Childs, E. (2021). Microaggression and Implicit Bias. The American Surgeon, 87(11), 1727–1731. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348211023418

In the second episode of the Health Equity in Pediatrics series, we explore implicit bias as unconscious attitudes and stereotypes held against a group that may even be contrary to one’s stated beliefs. Identifying your implicit bias is a best practice that can enable you to limit its impact on your behavior and prevent harm from altered clinical decision making that is based on preconceived notions.  In this episode, we discuss examples of how implicit bias can impact health care in children and the skills that provider’s can hone to combat its influence. Want to make a bigger difference in health equity? Complete an anonymous survey here after you listen to the episode or visit www.thepedsnp.com and click the “Complete a Survey” button at the top of the page. The responses will provide greater insight into how podcasts impact education and behavior through microlearning of health equity concepts. After you complete a survey, you’ll receive a separate link to enter your email to a raffle for a $15 Amazon gift card.  Winners will be chosen at random and notified by email one week after the original publication date. This raffle was made possible by grant funding from the sources below.  Disclaimer: This series was supported by the North Carolina Chapter of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners (NAPNAP) Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant whose mission is to support research and quality improvement aimed at improving health equity among infants, children, and adolescents. The content of this episode reflects my views and does not necessarily represent, nor is an endorsement of, NC NAPNAP or the Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant.  For more information, please community.napnap.org/northcarolinachapter. References: FitzGerald, C., & Hurst, S. (2017). Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC medical ethics, 18(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8 Gonzalez, C. M., Lypson, M. L., & Sukhera, J. (2021). Twelve tips for teaching implicit bias recognition and management. Medical teacher, 43(12), 1368–1373. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1879378 Goyal, M. K., Johnson, T. J., Chamberlain, J. M., Cook, L., Webb, M., Drendel, A. L., Alessandrini, E., Bajaj, L., Lorch, S., Grundmeier, R. W., Alpern, E. R., & PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE APPLIED RESEARCH NETWORK (PECARN) (2020). Racial and Ethnic Differences in Emergency Department Pain Management of Children With Fractures. Pediatrics, 145(5), e20193370. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-3370 Greenwald, A. G., Dasgupta, N., Dovidio, J. F., Kang, J., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Teachman, B. A. (2022). Implicit-Bias Remedies: Treating Discriminatory Bias as a Public-Health Problem. Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society, 23(1), 7–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006211070781 Jindal, M., Trent, M., & Mistry, K. B. (2022). The Intersection of Race, Racism, and Child and Adolescent Health. Pediatrics in review, 43(8), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2020-004366 Mossey J. M. (2011). Defining racial and ethnic disparities in pain management. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 469(7), 1859–1870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1770-9 Pediatric Nursing Certification Board. (2022). Pediatric Nursing Workforce Report 2022: A Demographic Profile of 53,000 PNCB-Certified Nursing Professionals. https://pncb.org/ sites/default/files/resources/PNCB_2022_Pediatric_Nursing_Workforce_Demographic_ Report.pdf Project Implicit. (2011). Take a test. https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html Raphael, J. L., & Oyeku, S. O. (2020). Implicit Bias in Pediatrics: An Emerging Focus in Health Equity Research. Pediatrics, 145(5), e20200512. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-0512 Sabin J. A. (2022). Tackling Implicit Bias in Health Care. The New England journal of medicine, 387(2), 105–107. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2201180 Smiley, R. A., Ruttinger, C., Oliveira, C. M., Hudson, L. R., Allgeyer, R., Reneau, K. A., Silvestre, J. H., & Alexander, M. (2021). The 2020 National Nursing Workforce Survey. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/s2155-8256(21)00027-2. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2023). Religious garb and grooming in the workplace: Rights and responsibilities. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/religious-garb-and-grooming-workplace-rights-and-responsibilities#_ftn17

Welcome to the Health Equity in Pediatrics series!  In the first installment of our series, we define health equity and review some communities often affected by health disparities that limit a person’s opportunity to be as healthy as possible.  While health equity can seem like a seismic public health crisis that is too big for one person to tackle, each episode in this series will give listeners tangible best practices that can be implemented immediately to provide more equitable care in your workplace.  As you learn to view every patient encounter through a lens of health equity, you’ll be able to apply these concepts to the evaluation and management of the diverse children for whom you care and improve their journey toward health. When you become a partner in the health equity care plan, rather than just an authority in health care, you bring practicality to your recommendations and interventions that augment the expert knowledge you share.  In this episode we will apply these concepts to a challenging example with a historical precedent that will shape how you understand the approach to overcoming obstacles on the journey to health equity. Want to make a bigger difference in health equity? Complete an anonymous survey here after you listen to the episode or visit www.thepedsnp.com and click the “Complete a Survey” button at the top of the page. The responses will provide greater insight into how podcasts impact education and behavior through microlearning of health equity concepts. After you complete a survey, you’ll receive a separate link to enter your email to a raffle for a $15 Amazon gift card.  Winners will be chosen at random and notified by email one week after the original publication date. This raffle was made possible by grant funding from the sources below.  Disclaimer: This series was supported by the North Carolina Chapter of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners (NAPNAP) Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant whose mission is to support research and quality improvement aimed at improving health equity among infants, children, and adolescents. The content of this episode reflects my views and does not necessarily represent, nor is an endorsement of, NC NAPNAP or the Dr. Rasheeda Monroe Health Equity grant.  For more information, please community.napnap.org/northcarolinachapter. References: American Psychological Association. (2022). Racial and ethnic identity. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/bias-free-language/racial-ethnic-minorities Braveman, P., Arkin, E., Orleans, T., Proctor, D., & Plough, A. (2017). What is health equity? Achieving health equity. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2017/05/what-is-health-equity-.html Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022, August 2). Health equity guiding principles for inclusive communication. https://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/Health_Equity.html Duke Health. (2020). Weight management for children and teens. Duke Health. https://www.dukehealth.org/pediatric-treatments/childhood-obesity Jindal, M., Trent, M., & Mistry, K. B. (2022). The Intersection of Race, Racism, and Child and Adolescent Health. Pediatrics in review, 43(8), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2020-004366 Pediatric Nursing Certification Board. (2022). Pediatric Nursing Workforce Report 2022: A Demographic Profile of 53,000 PNCB-Certified Nursing Professionals. https://pncb.org/ sites/default/files/resources/PNCB_2022_Pediatric_Nursing_Workforce_Demographic_ Report.pdf Zippia. (2022, September 9). Family nurse practitioner demographics and statistics in the US. https://www.zippia.com/family-nurse-practitioner-jobs/demographics/

Got milk? The answer is complicated.  While plant-based beverages are accused of posing as animal by-product imposters, the FDA claims that consumers know the difference.  But most parents don't recognize that plant-based milks lack the same micro and macronutrient profile as cow's milk or soy milk.  This leaves pediatric providers with the very important job of assessing nutrition and guiding parents on what beverages their infants and toddlers should be drinking.  

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.  In the depths of respiratory virus season, providers often order unnecessary tests that won't alter the course of treatment for the child presenting with upper respiratory symptoms.  This episode covers 5 common pathogens, the indications to test a child presenting with symptoms, and how to talk to families requesting tests.   References: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022). Influenza antiviral medications: Summary for clinicians. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/antivirals/summary-clinicians.htm#Table1 Frost, H. M., & Hersh, A. L. (2022). Rethinking Our Approach to Management of Acute Otitis Media. JAMA pediatrics, 176(5), 439–440. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.6575 Giovanni Piedimonte, Miriam K. Perez; Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection and Bronchiolitis. Pediatr Rev December 2014; 35 (12): 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.35-12-519 Liu, J. W., Lin, S. H., Wang, L. C., Chiu, H. Y., & Lee, J. A. (2021). Comparison of Antiviral Agents for Seasonal Influenza Outcomes in Healthy Adults and Children: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA network open, 4(8), e2119151. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19151 Parikh R, Mathai A, Parikh S, Chandra Sekhar G, Thomas R. Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan-Feb;56(1):45-50. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.37595. PMID: 18158403; PMCID: PMC2636062. Spencer D. Johnson, Jennifer S. Harthan, Tammy Than, Mary K. Migneco, Ellen Shorter, Meredith M. Whiteside, Christina E. Morettin, Christian K. Olson, Crystal A. Rosemann, Mathew S. Margolis, Leonard W. Haertter, Julia B. Huecker, Bojana Rodic-Polic, Richard S. Buller, Gregory A. Storch, Mae O. Gordon, Andrew T. E. Hartwick; Predictive Accuracy and Densitometric Analysis of Point-of-Care Immunoassay for Adenoviral Conjunctivitis. Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech. 2021;10(9):30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.9.30. Stanford T. Shulman, Alan L. Bisno, Herbert W. Clegg, Michael A. Gerber, Edward L. Kaplan, Grace Lee, Judith M. Martin, Chris Van Beneden, Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis: 2012 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 55, Issue 10, 15 November 2012, Pages e86–e102, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis629 Stanford Medicine. (2022). Common cold in children. Retrieved from https://www.stanfordchildrens.org/en/topic/default?id=upper-respiratory-infection-uri-or-common-cold-90-P02966 Walsh, P. S., Schnadower, D., Zhang, Y., Ramgopal, S., Shah, S. S., & Wilson, P. M. (2022). Association of Early Oseltamivir With Improved Outcomes in Hospitalized Children With Influenza, 2007-2020. JAMA pediatrics, 176(11), e223261. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3261 World Health Organization. (2019). WHO launches new global influenza strategy. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/11-03-2019-who-launches-new-global-influenza-strategy

Not all bacterial infections need an antibiotic.  It may sound hard to believe, but if we all followed the AAP guidelines on the management of otitis media in children and actually used a watch-and-wait approach in appropriate patients, upwards of 75% of the antibiotics prescribed for otitis media could be avoided.  Why? Because the microbiology of AOM has changed, but our prescribing practices haven't.  This episode is a great guideline refresher and microbiology update while learning how to talk parents into partnership on watchful waiting.    References: American Academy of Pediatrics. (2019). Chapter quality network improving antibiotic prescribing for children: Change package. Retrieved from https://downloads.aap.org/DOCCSA/CQN%20ABX%20Change%20Package%20Final%20October%202019.pdf Frost, H. M., & Hersh, A. L. (2022). Rethinking Our Approach to Management of Acute Otitis Media. JAMA pediatrics, 176(5), 439–440. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.6575 Lieberthal, A. S., Carroll, A. E., Chonmaitree, T., Ganiats, T. G., Hoberman, A., Jackson, M. A., Joffe, M. D., Miller, D. T., Rosenfeld, R. M., Sevilla, X. D., Schwartz, R. H., Thomas, P. A., & Tunkel, D. E. (2013). The diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics, 131(3), e964–e999. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-3488 Sanchez, G.V., Fleming-Dutra, K.E., Roberts, R.M., & Hicks, L.A. (2016). Core elements of outpatient antibiotic stewardship. MMRW Recomm Rep., 65(6), p. 1-12. doi: 10.15585/mmrw.rr.6506a1 Smolinski, N. E., Antonelli, P. J., & Winterstein, A. G. (2022). Watchful Waiting for Acute Otitis Media. Pediatrics, 150(1), e2021055613. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-055613 Sun, D., McCarthy, T. J., & Liberman, D. B. (2017). Cost-Effectiveness of Watchful Waiting in Acute Otitis Media. Pediatrics, 139(4), e20163086. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3086 Venekamp, R. P., Sanders, S. L., Glasziou, P. P., Del Mar, C. B., & Rovers, M. M. (2015). Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015(6), CD000219. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000219.pub4

If you've been looking for a New Year's Resolution to make a real difference in your practice, stop prescribing diphenhydramine.  Despite being a common over-the-counter medication, its potent anticholinergic side effects and sedation make it a poor choice for children.  Review the common misuses for the drug and practical, evidence-based alternatives to help get diphenhydramine out of your prescribing practice in 2023.   References: Bachur RG, Monuteaux MC, Neuman MI. A comparison of acute treatment regimens for migraine in the emergency department. Pediatrics 2015;135:232-238. Brady, K.B. (2020). 'Benadryl challenge": What pediatricians need to know. AAP News. Retrieved from https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/6210/Benadryl-Challenge-What-pediatricians-need-to-know Chehab, H., Fischer, P. R., & Christenson, J. C. (2021). Preparing Children for International Travel. Pediatrics in Review, 42(4), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2018-0353 Ghossein N, Kang M, Lakhkar AD. Anticholinergic Medications. [Updated 2022 May 16]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555893/ Green, J.L., Wang, G.S., Reynolds, K.M., Banner, W., Bond, G.R., Kauffman, R.E., Palmer, R.B., Paul, I.M., Dart, R.C. (2017). Safety profile of cough and cold medication use in pediatrics. Pediatrics, 139(6), e20163070. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3070 Guthrie, C.C., & Nathani, Y. (2019). Acute treatment of pediatric migraine. Pediatric Emergency Medicine Reports. Relias Media. Retrieved https://www.reliasmedia.com/articles/144150-acute-treatment-of-pediatric-migraine Palmer, R. B., Reynolds, K. M., Banner, W., Bond, G. R., Kauffman, R. E., Paul, I. M., Green, J. L., & Dart, R. C. (2020). Adverse events associated with diphenhydramine in children, 2008-2015. Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 58(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2019.1609683 Paul, I.M., Yoder, K.E., Crowell, K.R., Shaffer, M.L., McMillan, H.S., Carlson, L.C., Dilworth, D.A., Berlin, C.M. (2004). Effect of dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, and placebo on nocturnal cough and sleep quality for coughing children and their parents. Pediatrics, 114(1), e85-e90. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.e85 Shaker, M. S., Wallace, D. V., Golden, D. B. K., Oppenheimer, J., Bernstein, J. A., Campbell, R. L., Dinakar, C., Ellis, A., Greenhawt, M., Khan, D. A., Lang, D. M., Lang, E. S., Lieberman, J. A., Portnoy, J., Rank, M. A., Stukus, D. R., Wang, J., Collaborators, Riblet, N., Bobrownicki, A. M. P., … Wang, J. (2020). Anaphylaxis-a 2020 practice parameter update, systematic review, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 145(4), 1082–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2020.01.017 Stern J, Pozun A. Pediatric Procedural Sedation. [Updated 2022 Sep 6]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK572100/ Trottier ED, Bailey B, Lucas N, Lortie A. Prochlorperazine in children with migraine: A look at its effectiveness and rate of akathisia. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:456-463

In the last case study in our series on Cognitive Bias in Healthcare, attribution error (among others) of an adolescent female with foot burning reveals how two more best practices for avoiding cognitive bias can help providers think metacognitively.  Review all 8 best practices and start to implement them to reduce diagnostic error. References: Marshall, T.L., Rinke, M.L., Olson, A.P.J., Brady, P.W. (2022). Diagnostic error in pediatrics: A narrative review. Pediatrics, 149 (Supplement 3): e2020045948D. 10.1542/peds.2020-045948D The Canadian Medical Protection Authority. Common cognitive biases: Influences on decision making. Good Practices Guide. https://www.cmpa-acpm.ca/serve/docs/ela/goodpracticesguide/pages/human_factors/Cognitive_biases/common_cognitive_biases-e.html Yale, S. C., Cohen, S. S., Kliegman, R. M., & Bordini, B. J. (2022). A pause in pediatrics: implementation of a pediatric diagnostic time-out. Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany), 9(3), 348–351. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2022-0010

The next case study in our series on cognitive bias in healthcare follows an obese adolescent female with arm and neck pain who felt unheard during the 4 prior emergency room visits that week.  Listen as the differential diagnosis takes on a completely different angle and the pressure of making the diagnosis goes sky high!  We will unpack additional forms of cognitive bias and 2 more best practices for avoiding diagnostic error in the clinical setting.   References: Hulens, M., Rasschaert, R., Vansant, G., Stalmans, I., Bruyninckx, F., & Dankaerts, W. (2018). The link between idiopathic intracranial hypertension, fibromyalgia, and chronic fatigue syndrome: exploration of a shared pathophysiology. Journal of pain research, 11, 3129–3140. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S186878 Mondragon J, Klovenski V. Pseudotumor Cerebri. [Updated 2022 Sep 29]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536924/ Norris, D., Clark, M. S., & Shipley, S. (2016). The Mental Status Examination. American family physician, 94(8), 635–641. Phelan, S. M., Burgess, D. J., Yeazel, M. W., Hellerstedt, W. L., Griffin, J. M., & van Ryn, M. (2015). Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity. Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 16(4), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12266 The Canadian Medical Protection Authority. Common cognitive biases: Influences on decision making. Good Practices Guide. https://www.cmpa-acpm.ca/serve/docs/ela/goodpracticesguide/pages/human_factors/Cognitive_biases/common_cognitive_biases-e.html Villines, Z. (2021). What to know about obesity discrimination in health care. Medical News Today. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/obesity-discrimination-in-healthcare

In the first case study of our mini-series on Cognitive Bias in Health Care, we meet a 4 month old female referred to the emergency department for constipation.  Spoiler alert: We know it's not constipation... so we explore how her presentation and physical exam clash with the initial medical decision making.  Try to spot the cognitive bias and test yourself on building a differential diagnosis.  Lastly, we explore 4 best practice techniques to help you avoid bias in the first place.   References Abimanyi-Ochom, J., Bohingamu Mudiyanselage, S., Catchpool, M., Firipis, M., Wanni Arachchige Dona, S., & Watts, J. J. (2019). Strategies to reduce diagnostic errors: a systematic review. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 19(1), 174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0901-1 Benninga, M. A., Faure, C., Hyman, P. E., St James Roberts, I., Schechter, N. L., & Nurko, S. (2016). Childhood Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Neonate/Toddler. Gastroenterology, S0016-5085(16)00182-7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.016 Bolick, B.N., Reuter-Rice, K., Madden, M.A., & Severin, P.A. (2021). Pediatric Acute Care: A Guide for Interprofessional Practice (2nd ed). Elsevier. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Botulism: Diagnosis and treatment. https://www.cdc.gov/botulism/testing-treatment.html Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care; Board on Health Care Services; Institute of Medicine; The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, editors. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2015 Dec 29. 3, Overview of Diagnostic Error in Health Care. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK338594/ Ely, J. W., & Graber, M. A. (2015). Checklists to prevent diagnostic errors: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany), 2(3), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2015-0008 Graber, M. L., Sorensen, A. V., Biswas, J., Modi, V., Wackett, A., Johnson, S., Lenfestey, N., Meyer, A. N., & Singh, H. (2014). Developing checklists to prevent diagnostic error in Emergency Room settings. Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany), 1(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2014-0019 Marshall, T.L., Rinke, M.L., Olson, A.P.J., Brady, P.W. (2022). Diagnostic error in pediatrics: A narrative review. Pediatrics, 149 (Supplement 3): e2020045948D. 10.1542/peds.2020-045948D O’Hagan, T., Fennell, J., Tan, K., Ding, D., & Thomas-Jones, I. (2019). Cognitive bias in the clinical decision making of doctors. Future Healthcare Journal, 6(1), s113. Tabbers, M. M., DiLorenzo, C., Berger, M. Y., Faure, C., Langendam, M. W., Nurko, S., Staiano, A., Vandenplas, Y., Benninga, M. A., European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, & North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology. (2014). Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: Evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 58(2), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000266 The Canadian Medical Protection Authority. Common cognitive biases: Influences on decision making. Good Practices Guide. https://www.cmpa-acpm.ca/serve/docs/ela/goodpracticesguide/pages/human_factors/Cognitive_biases/common_cognitive_biases-e.html Zabidi-Hussin Z. A. (2016). Practical way of creating differential diagnoses through an expanded VITAMINSABCDEK mnemonic. Advances in medical education and practice, 7, 247–248. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S106507

There are many factors that contribute to the way we perceive and interpret information... and lots of ways that our brains skew our perspectives that can lead to cognitive bias.  The second episode in our Cognitive Bias in Healthcare mini-series discusses the features of information delivery that impact our decision-making and how our brains distort them to cause diagnostic error.   References: Arokszallasi, T., Balogh, E., Csiba, L., Fekete, I., Fekete, K., & Olah, L.. (2019). Acute alcohol intoxication may cause delay in stroke treatment – case reports. BMC Neurology, 19, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1241-6 Berkwitt, A., & Grossman, M. (2014). Cognitive bias in inpatient pediatrics. Hospital pediatrics, 4(3), 190–193. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2014-0002 Clark, B. W., Derakhshan, A., & Desai, S. V. (2018). Diagnostic Errors and the Bedside Clinical Examination. The Medical clinics of North America, 102(3), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2017.12.007 Croskerry, P., Singhal, G., & Mamede, S. (2013). Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change. BMJ quality & safety, 22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2), ii65–ii72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001713 Galvani, A. P., Parpia, A. S., Foster, E. M., Singer, B. H., & Fitzpatrick, M. C. (2020). Improving the prognosis of health care in the USA. Lancet (London, England), 395(10223), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33019-3 Mamede, S., Splinter, T.A.W., Gog, T., Rikers, R., & Schmidt, H.G. (2012). Exploring the role of salient distracting clinical features in the emergence of diagnostic errors and the mechanisms through which reflection counteracts mistakes. BMJ Quality & Safety, 21, p. 295-300. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000518 Marshall, T.L., Rinke, M.L., Olson, A.P.J., Brady, P.W. (2022). Diagnostic error in pediatrics: A narrative review. Pediatrics, 149 (Supplement 3): e2020045948D. 10.1542/peds.2020-045948D

This episode is the first installment on a new mini series on cognitive bias in pediatric healthcare.  We begin by discussing what cognitive bias is, how it becomes diagnostic error, and the impact on healthcare in America.  Begin to think about how you think and explore the interesting ways our brains use mental shortcuts to arrive at an answer. References: Balogh, E. P., Miller, B. T., Ball, J. R., Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine, & The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (Eds.). (2015). Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. National Academies Press (US). Berkwitt, A., & Grossman, M. (2014). Cognitive bias in inpatient pediatrics. Hospital pediatrics, 4(3), 190–193. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2014-0002 Bordini, B. J., Stephany, A., & Kliegman, R. (2017). Overcoming Diagnostic Errors in Medical Practice. The Journal of pediatrics, 185, 19–25.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.02.065 Carberry, A. R., Hanson, K., Flannery, A., Fischer, M., Gehlbach, J., Diamond, C., & Wald, E. R. (2018). Diagnostic Error in Pediatric Cancer. Clinical pediatrics, 57(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922816687325 CRICO. (2014). Malpractice risks in the diagnostic process. Retrieved from https://www.rmf.harvard.edu/Malpractice-Data/Annual-Benchmark-Reports/Risks-in-the-Diagnostic-Process Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academies Press (US). Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academies Press (US). National Geographic Kids. (No date). 10 facts about great white sharks! Retrieved from https://www.natgeokids.com/uk/discover/animals/sea-life/great-white-sharks/ Royce, C.S., Hayes, M.M., & Schwartzstein, R.M. (2019). Teaching critical thinking: A case for instruction in cogntitive biases to reduce diagnostic errors and improve patient safety.

Developmental surveillance and screening work best to identify delays when used together.  The AAP and CDC teamed up to create a standardized developmental milestone checklist in order to improve the longitudinal monitoring of pediatric milestones at home by caregivers.  This episode reviews their publication and discusses what went into the checklist, its strengths, and areas for further research.   View the CDC's website for the full checklist and read the article here. References: CDC. (2022). Developmental surveillance resources for healthcare providers. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/actearly/hcp/index.html. Zubler JM, Wiggins LD, Macias MM, et al. Evidence-InformedMilestones for Developmental Surveillance Tools. Pediatrics. 2022;149(3):e2021052138

When accelerated BSN student Sam Mahaney wanted more practical bedside application of his knowledge of pediatric cardiology, we sat down to discuss the approach to assessment and management of undiagnosed and undifferentiated congenital heart disease from a primary care perspective.  The primary care clinician should be on the lookout for red flags in the history and physical exam that might suggest critical congenital heart disease and screen appropriately.  This episode has helpful perspectives for both the nurse and advanced practice provider. References: Abdurrahman, L., Bockoven, J. R., Pickoff, A. S., Ralston, M. A., & Ross, J. E. (2003). Pediatric cardiology update: Office-based practice of pediatric cardiology for the primary care provider. Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care, 33(10), 318–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1538-5442(03)00137-8 CDC. (2022). Critical congenital heart defects. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/heartdefects/cchd-facts.html. Cleveland Clinic. (2022). Cyanotic heart disease. Retrieved from https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/22441-cyanotic-heart-disease Glidewell, J., Grosse, S.D., Riehle-Colarusso, T., Pinto, N., Hudson, J., Daskalov, R., Gaviglio, A., Darby, E., Singh, S., & Sontag, M. (2019) Actions in support of newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease — United States, 2011–2018. Morbity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68:107–111. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6805a3external icon Mahle, W. T., Martin, G. R., Beekman, R. H., 3rd, Morrow, W. R., & Section on Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Executive Committee (2012). Endorsement of Health and Human Services recommendation for pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics, 129(1), 190–192. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-3211 Martin, G. R., Ewer, A. K., Gaviglio, A., Hom, L. A., Saarinen, A., Sontag, M., Burns, K. M., Kemper, A. R., & Oster, M. E. (2020). Updated Strategies for Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatrics, 146(1), e20191650. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1650 Puri, K., Allen, H. D., & Qureshi, A. M. (2017). Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatrics in review, 38(10), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2017-0032 Strobel, A. M., & Lu, l. (2015). The Critically Ill Infant with Congenital Heart Disease. Emergency medicine clinics of North America, 33(3), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2015.04.002

Infant dyschezia refers to the discomfort an infant experiences when bearing down against a closed anal sphincter, and is often misidentified as constipation by parents.  As long as red flags are absent, this functional, self-limited condition is easily diagnosed using the Rome IV Criteria.  In this episode, you will learn how to reassure parents and what contraindicated treatments should be discussed.   References: Children’s Wisconsin. (2020). Infants straining to move bowels. https://childrenswi.org/-/media/chwlibrary/publication-media-library/2020/03/30/20/48/2144en.pdf LeLeiko, N. S., Mayer-Brown, S., Cerezo, C., & Plante, W. (2020). Constipation. Pediatrics in review, 41(8), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2018-0334 Tabbers, M. M., DiLorenzo, C., Berger, M. Y., Faure, C., Langendam, M. W., Nurko, S., Staiano, A., Vandenplas, Y., Benninga, M. A., European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, & North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology (2014). Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 58(2), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000266 Zeevenhooven, J., Koppen, I. J., & Benninga, M. A. (2017). The New Rome IV Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Infants and Toddlers. Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5223/pghn.2017.20.1.1

Vision screening is one of the most important preventative health screenings that a primary care provider does at well visits.  But the infant eye exam can feel obtuse and complicated if you don't understand vision development, physical exam maneuvers, and red flags for referral.  Because of the risk of significant amblyopia if ocular pathology is left untreated, every pediatric provider should know how to complete an age-appropriate vision screening in an infant. References: American Academy of Ophthalmology Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus Panel. (2012). Preferred practice pattern guidelines. Pediatric eye evaluations. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Bell, A.L., Rodes, M.E., & Collier Kellar, L. (2013). Childhood eye examination. American Family Physician, 88(4), p. 241-248. Brookman K. E. (1983). Ocular accommodation in human infants. American journal of optometry and physiological optics, 60(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198302000-00001 Loh, A.R., & Chiang, M.F. (2018). Pediatric vision screening. Pediatrics in Review, 39(5), 225-234. Rosenfield, M. Development of accommodation in human infants. Retrieved from https://entokey.com/development-of-accommodation-in-human-infants/ Wang, J., & Candy, T. R. (2010). The sensitivity of the 2- to 4-month-old human infant accommodation system. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 51(6), 3309–3317. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4667

With national formula shortages over 40% and growing, the pediatric provider can encourage the establishment and maintenance of breastfeeding in moms who have chosen this path.  Breastfeeding isn't without struggles and woes, so providers can help support mothers by understanding these tips based on breastfeeding physiology and advising the pair when the process isn't as easy as it seems. References: American Academy of Pediatrics. (2021). Breastfeeding overview. Retrieved from https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/breastfeeding/breastfeeding-overview/ La Lache League. (2022). Breastfeeding info A to Z. Retrieved from https://www.llli.org/breastfeeding-info/ Laura R. Kair, Daniel Kenron, Konnette Etheredge, Arthur C. Jaffe, Carrie A. Phillipi (2013). Pacifier restriction and exclusive breastfeeding. Pediatrics, 131 (4): e1101–e1107. 10.1542/peds.2012-2203 Nice, F.J., & Francell, M. (2020). Selection and use of galactogogues. Leader Today. Retrieved from https://www.llli.org/selection-and-use-of-galactagogues-2/ Pisani, J. (2022). Why is there a baby formula shortage? What to know and what is being done about it. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-baby-formula-shortage-11652188230 Thompson, D. (2022). What’s behind America’s shocking baby-formula shortage? The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/05/baby-formula-shortage-abbott-recall/629828

Two of the most common over-the-counter medications in pediatrics are not as simple and benign as you might think.  This episode uncovers the dark past of acetaminophen, the pearls and pitfalls of prescribing them, and how to talk to families about giving the medications safely. References: Clark, E., Plint, A.C., Correll, R., Gaboury, I., & Passi, B. (2007). A randomized, controlled trial of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and codeine for acute pain relief in children with musculoskeletal trauma. Pediatrics , 119 (3): 460–467. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1347 Jones, K., Engler, L., Fonte, E., et al. (2021). Opioid reduction through postoperative pain management in pediatric orthopedic surgery. Pediatrics, 148(6):e2020001487 Kleinman, K., McDaniel, L., & Molloy, M. (2021). The Harriet Lane handbook (the Johns Hopkins Hospital) (22nd ed.). Elsevier. Miller, T.C. & Gerth, J. (2013). Dose of confusion. Propublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/tylenol-mcneil-fda-kids-dose-of-confusion National Capital Poison Center. (2020). Poison statistics. https://www.poison.org/poison-statistics-national. Sullivan, J.E., Farrar, H.C., & the Section on Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Committee on Drugs. (2011). Fever and antipyretic use in children. Pediatrics , 127(3): 580–587. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3852 Trippella, G., Ciarcià, M., de Martino, M., & Chiappini, E. (2019). Prescribing controversies: An updated review and meta-analysis on combined/alternating use of ibuprofen and paracetamol in febrile children. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 7:217. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00217. Yin, H.S., Neuspiel, D.R., Paul, I.M., et al. (2021). Preventing home medication administration errors. Pediatrics,148(6): e2021054666

Children with acute gastroenteritis and mild or moderate dehydration can be managed at home with oral rehydration.  Learn how to partner with families and take an extra five minutes in your visit to explain the reasoning, detailed instructions, and expectations of home care as we discuss the evidence behind the rationale.   References: Carson, R.A., Mudd, S.S., & Madati, P.J. (2016). Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of pediatric acute gastroenteritis in the outpatient setting. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 30(6), p. 610-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2016.04.012 Carson, R.A., Mudd, S.S., & Madati, P.J. (2017). Evaluation of a nurse-initiated acute gastroenteritis pathway in the pediatric emergency department. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 43(5), p. 406-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2017.01.001 Fedorowicz, Z., Jagannath, V. A., & Carter, B. (2011). Antiemetics for reducing vomiting related to acute gastroenteritis in children and adolescents. The Cochrane Collaboration, 9. doi: 10.1002/144651858.CD005506.pub5. Freedman, S.B., Ali, S., Oleszczuk, M., Gouin, S., & Hartling, L. (2013). Treatment of acute gastroenteritis in children: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions commonly used in developed countries. Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal, 8, 1123-1137. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1932 Freedman, S. B., Gouin, S., Bhatt, M., Black, K. J., Johnson, D., Guimont, C.,…Plint, A. (2011). Prospective assessment of practice pattern variations in the treatment of pediatric gastroenteritis. Pediatrics, 127(2), e287-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2214 Freedman SB, Willan AR, Boutis K, Schuh S. Effect of dilute apple juice and preferred fluids vs electrolyte maintenance solution on treatment failure among children with mild gastroenteritis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(18):1966–1974. Hartman, S., Brown, E., Loomis, E., & Russell, H.A. (2019). Gastroenteritis in children. American Family Physician, 99(3), p. 159-165. PMID: 30702253. Nir, V., Nadir, E., Schechter, Y., & Kline-Kremer, A. (2013). Parents’ attitudes toward oral rehydration therapy in children with mild-to-moderate dehydration. The Scientific World Journal, 2013, 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/828157 Schnadower, D., Tarr, P.I., Casper, T.C., Gorelick, M.H., Dean, J.M., O’Connell, K.J., Mahajan, P., Levine, A.C., Bhatt, S.R., Roskind, C.G., Powell, E.C., Rogers, A.J., & The PECARN Probiotics Study Group. (2018). Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG versus placebo for acute gastroenteritis in children. New England Journal of Medicine, 379(21), p. 2002-2014. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802598 World Health Organization. (2005). The treatment of diarrhoea: A manual for physicians and other senior health workers. 2005. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43209/1/9241593180.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2022.

The well visit is time to screen for issues in primary care, which includes diet and nutrition.  Picky eating is a common problem that often plagues parents, especially when parenting styles or child development clashes with recommended feeding practices.  Dr. John Lyles joins The Peds NP to discuss evaluation and recommendations for feeding difficulties in primary care.  References: Boruta, M.K.R., Lyles, J., Mavis, A.M., & Morgan, S. (in press). Pediatric gastrointestinal and liver disorders. In Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Health. Kerzner, B., Milano, K., MacLean, W.C., Berall, G., Stuart, S., & Chatoor, I. (2015). A practical approach to classifying and managing feeding difficulties. Pediatrics, 135(2), p. 344-353. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1630 Menella, J.A., & Bobowski, N.K. (2015). The sweetness and bitterness of childhood: Insights from basic research on taste preferences. Physiology & Behavior, 152(0), p. 502-507. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.015

Dr. Mansi Kotwal, Allergy and Immunology fellow at Johns Hopkins, joins The Peds NP podcast again to talk about a few dermatologic manifestations of allergy.  She discusses how history is an essential component of diagnosis and goes on to discuss management of these common and benign conditions in pediatrics.  

Season 5 of The Peds NP returns with an introduction to the first exam a person will ever get: The newborn exam.  This episode focuses on that first encounter from the prenatal and birth history to the exam and screenings.  Learn to concentrate on the unique features of a newborn and consider how to document the findings on this ever-changing patient. References: Chiocca, E. (2019). Advanced pediatric assessment (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company. Hagan, J.F., Shaw, J.S., & Duncan, P. (2017). Bright futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents (4th ed.). American Academy of Pediatrics. Maaks, D.L.G., Starr, N.B., Brady, M.A., Gaylor, N.M., Driessnack, M., & Duderststadt, K.G. (2019). Burn’s Pediatric Primary Care (7th ed.). Saunders Elsevier.

Provider variation has plagued the management of febrile neonates for decades, but the wait for standardization is over!  The AAP published its long-awaited recommendations on the evaluation and management of well-appearing febrile infants 8 to 60 days old in August 2021.  This episode picks apart the nuances and key features to help pediatric providers provide fast, safe, and effective care to this population.  Follow along with full guideline available at https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-052228   References: Pantell, R.H., Roberts, K.B., Adams, W.G., Dreyer, B.P., Kupperman, N., O’Leary, S.T., … & Subcommittee on Febrile Infants. (2021). Evaluation and management of well-appearing febrile infants 8 to 60 days old. Pediatrics, 148(2), p. 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-052228

Human trafficking, specifically sex trafficking, is a worrisome reality that pediatric providers need to recognize and manage with speed and grace.  With tools to better understand the at risk populations that may present as hidden victims of this terrible human rights violation, we can better protect our vulnerable child and youth populations. References: Greenbaum, J., & Bodrick, N. (2017). Global human trafficking and child victimization. Policy statement. American Academy of Pediatrics, 140, e20173138. National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners (Executive Producer). (2021). Child trafficking: Case studies and tools on identifying warning signs [Audio podcast]. TeamPeds Talks. https://anchor.fm/teampeds-talks/episodes/Child-Trafficking-Case-Studies-and-Tools-on-Identifying-Warning-Signs-S3-E3-e1833t0 Peck, J.L., Meadows-Oliver, M., Hays, S.M., & Maaks, D.G. (2020). White paper: Recognizing child trafficking as a critical emerging health threat. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 35(3), p. 260-269. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2020.01.005 Philips, A. (2021). 8 terms you should know about human trafficking. Retrieved from https://restorationhousekc.org/6-human-trafficking-terms-you-should-know/ Shared Hope. (2019). Report trafficking. Retrieved from https:// sharedhope.org/join-thecause/report-trafficking/ U.S. Department of Justice. (2020). Child sex trafficking. Retrieved online from https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/child-sex-trafficking

Recognition of anaphylaxis can be difficult for some providers, and the courage to give epinephrine for treatment can be even more so.  Johns Hopkins Allergy & Immunology fellow, Dr. Mansi Kotwal, discusses the anaphylaxis presentation and diagnosis in ways you may not have considered.  And she reviews adjunct drugs for management in a way that might just change your practice.   References: Sampson, H.A., Muñoz-Furlong, A., Campbell, R.L., Adkinson, N.F., Bock, S.A., Branum, A., et al. (2006). Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: Summary report—Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 117, p. 391–397.

Infections in the central nervous system can be very dangerous in children, so prompt recognition and treatment is important to avoid morbidity and mortality.  A review of various etiologies of CNS infections and their workup yields a valuable discussion on a pearl of wisdom that any provider needs to understand. References American Academy of Pediatrics. (2018). Meningococcal infections. In Kimberlin, D.W., Brady, M.T., Jackson, M.A., & Long, S.S. Red Book (31st ed., pp. 550-561). American Academy of Pediatrics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Immunization schedules. Retrieved online from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html Pantell, R.H., Roberts, K.B., Adams, W.G., Dreyer, B.P., Kupperman, N., O’Leary, S.T., Okechukwu, K… & The Subcommittee on Febrile Infants. (2021). Evaluation and management of well-appearing febrile infants 8-60 days old. Pediatrics, 148(2), p. 1-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-052228 Roy, A.G., Panicker, J., & Kumar, A. (2014). Acute CNS infections. Amrita Journal of Medicine, 10(2), p. 1-44. Swanson, D. (2015). Meningitis. Pediatrics in Review, 36(12), p. 514-526. doi: 10.1542/pir.36-12-514