All Episodes - CloudLIMS - Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) Software Podcasts
Stay up-to-date with our lab management podcasts and gain valuable industry insights and updates through our Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) software podcast series, brought to you by CloudLIMS.
View Podcast Details2 Episodes
Under the Hood of Cannabis Testing: Tackling Cannabis Testing Faultlines with a Modern Cannabis LIMS
When you select a product at a grocery store, whether it is a can of soup, a bottle of juice, or a box of cereal, you likely check the label for ingredients, nutritional facts, and any certification marks. You trust the information provided on these labels is accurate and reliable. But what happens when the information on those labels is misleading or worse, completely wrong? This is a concern that is not just limited to food products; it extends to the cannabis industry as well, where consumers rely on the certificate of analysis (COA) to ensure the safety, potency, and compliance of the products they consume. Striking but not uncommon instances of COA manipulation have surfaced, where inaccurate or fabricated results are reported to customers, either unintentionally or as a result of fraudulent behavior. In this podcast, we explore the critical role of COAs in ensuring product quality and safety, and discuss the potential for fraud and manipulation within the industry with Dr. Susan Audino, Chemistry Laboratory Consultant at S. A. Audino & Associates, LLC, and a member of the Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) at CloudLIMS. Dr. Audino begins by defining what a COA is and explores the alarming issue of COA fraud, its impact on public health, and how manipulations of test reports can have long-lasting repercussions on industry reputation and consumer trust. Dr. Audino delineates the ways some laboratories are under pressure to meet customer expectations, which sometimes leads to bending or breaking the rules. The discussion also covers the limitations of laboratory accreditation and throws light on how labs, regulators, and manufacturers contribute to the current challenges in the cannabis testing landscape. We also discuss the role of informatics tools such as a modern cannabis LIMS in improving transparency in the cannabis industry and ensuring consumer trust. Tune in to the conversation for these and more such insights and perspectives on the state of cannabis testing and the need for aligning the market’s vocabulary, values, and assumptions with ethical practices.Key TakeawaysWhat is a COA?What are some common methods of COA fraud, and what far-reaching consequences can they have for public health, regulatory compliance, and the industry’s reputation?Despite well-intentioned efforts, the industry has encountered significant challenges, including litigation, THC inflation, and disparaging mudslinging. What are the factors that contribute to these challenges?What are some real-world examples of how laboratories exploit the principles of analytical chemistry to meet customer needs without regard for scientific integrity and the accuracy of test results?What are the limitations of laboratory accreditation and the potential risks associated with assuming that all accredited labs are equally competent?How do informatics tools help authenticate results and enable consumers to verify the composition stated on product labels?How do current regulatory frameworks affect the integrity of testing and reporting in the cannabis industry? Do some regulations need reform?Advice for stakeholders, for example, how should laboratories operate and provide test results consumers can trust? And on the other hand, how can consumers ensure they are getting what they are paying for and consuming a safe product?Who Should Listen to the PodcastLab managers, directors, quality managers, and technicians of cannabis testing labs.
Book a Ticket to Reliability: Start Your Cannabis Lab Proficiency Journey with LIMS
In this podcast, we unravel the significance of proficiency testing (PT) in the cannabis industry with Morgan Keefer, Accreditation Officer II at A2LA. We dive headfirst into the subject by demystifying PT, exploring its significance in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of cannabis test results. Morgan elaborates on the cannabinoids, microbial, and chemical attributes typically analyzed during PT. Morgan’s expertise guides the discussion on the PT and interlaboratory comparison (ILC) requirements essential for ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation along with best practices for effective PT preparation. We also discuss the frequency of PT participation mandated by state regulatory bodies, highlighting the diverse timelines across different states. Keefer explains how PT results are statistically evaluated and interpreted by PT providers to pass or fail a lab. She also discusses the impact of matrix interferences and sample heterogeneity on result accuracy. Furthermore, she provides tips for laboratories failing PT to determine the root cause and plan of action to remedy the failure. The discussion extends to practical examples of how PT has directly enhanced the operational efficiency and credibility of cannabis testing labs. Morgan also shares her foresight on advancements in PT for cannabis labs as testing requirements evolve. The podcast concludes with Morgan emphasizing the importance of informatics tools, including LIMS, in cannabis testing to support PT processes.Tune in to the conversation for these and more such insights and gain a deeper understanding of the role PT plays in ensuring quality assurance and compliance in the dynamic and rapidly evolving cannabis industry.Key Takeaways What is PT and why is it crucial for cannabis testing labs? What are some of the cannabinoids, microbial, and chemical attributes that cannabis labs typically test for during proficiency testing, and why are these important? What are PT and ILC requirements for ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation? What are the best practices for cannabis labs to effectively prepare for proficiency testing? How often labs are required to participate in proficiency testing to meet state regulatory requirements? Does the timeline vary from one state to another? How are PT results evaluated using statistical methods and interpreted by PT providers to pass or fail a lab in proficiency testing? How do matrix interferences and sample heterogeneity impact the accuracy and reliability of test results? And, what measures should labs take to minimize their effects? In the event that a laboratory fails PT, what is the recommended procedure for review along with a plan of action to correct the problems found?What are some practical examples of how proficiency testing has directly improved the operations or credibility of cannabis testing labs?What are the limitations of proficiency testing for cannabis labs and how can PT be improved for cannabis labs?Is proficiency testing more challenging for the cannabis industry compared to other industries, such as the food industry, due to the federal illegality of cannabis? If so, in what aspects?As cannabis testing requirements continue to evolve, what advancements or developments do you foresee in the field of proficiency testing for cannabis labs?How do informatics tools support proficiency testing in cannabis labs?Who Should Listen to the PodcastLab managers, directors, quality managers, and technicians of cannabis testing labs.