PodParley PodParley
PodParley
#274 - Yucking Your Yum

EPISODE · Apr 21, 2024 · 1H 16M

#274 - Yucking Your Yum

from Innocuous Basterds · host JonSquared Media

“Yucking Your Yum” The ‘Sterds™ opined on polarizing foods and films they would remake if given the chance | Creative Commons Music: "Habitual Ritual" by Revolution Void freemusicarchive.org/music/Revolution_Void/ | *** Warning: NSFW due to some harsh language, a few sexual references, and potential drunkenness of the hosts and/or guests. Listener discretion advised. | © 2015-2024, JonSquared Media

NOW PLAYING

#274 - Yucking Your Yum

0:00 1:16:27

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

Episode 45: Fuck Upham's Bitch Ass Ryan

May 6, 2026 ·77m

The Hartford Circus fire of 1944

Apr 30, 2026 ·68m

96 Rockstar Hacked Again, Zelda Movie, PlayStation First Party Strat, Game Pass Subscription, Windrose, NZXT

Apr 25, 2026 ·66m

95 Marathon, Gunzilla Games, Pokemon Go Champion, Playstation's Biggest Fan, Build a Rocket Boy

Apr 24, 2026 ·64m

The Rise and Fall of the Hindenburg – Part 2

Apr 23, 2026 ·52m

Am I a Creep to Joke About Pubes [AITA Bonus]

Apr 21, 2026 ·3m

Similar Podcasts

High Ping Basterds High Ping Basterds “We, to tell the actual absolute truth, don’t live in society, actually.”In the history of humans, for the first time after the glorious 18th Century have we had The 21st Century. If one strains their ears, one can gather echoes traveling back to us from a dismal future, hankering for the nostalgic and innocent and simpler times of The 21st Century. The 21st Century where we actually don’t live in a society. We live more in tubes, in simulations, in hypotheticals and in conspiracies. We live in line graphs, in word vomits, in feeds and filters, in videos and in games, and in video games. The Basterds navigate this terrain of solipsistic confabulations.“Two weeks to two minutes” Exclaimed Cyrus West Field—an American entrepreneur and financier, pointedly not an inventor, actually—when the telegraph line laid across Atlantic finally worked in 1866. Now in place of these obsolete thick copper cable lay nets upon nets of fiber optics where we Explicit Lords of Death Tenderfoot TV & Audacy While digging through an old memory box, host Thrasher Banks discovers forgotten VHS tapes, police reports, and faded letters regarding a 1995 murder in Dayton, Ohio. Drawn to the connection between this murder and the other seemingly innocuous contents of the box, Thrasher begins an investigation. As he follows the threads, he finds that the 1995 murder may be connected to more than one brutal, unsolved case… Against the backdrop of Ohio in the 1980s and 90s, around the height of satanic panic, this true crime story explores memory, perception, and a personal quest for the truth. Join Thrasher as he unpacks this box and searches for answers about the “Lords of Death." Explicit The Podcast For Laundry with Brett Davis Forever Dog When we brought comedian and laundry enthusiast Brett Davis to "talk suds with his buds" on our network, we could never have expected the seemingly affable host and innocuous topic (laundry) to result in this. Regrettably, we are contractually obligated to present The Podcast For Laundry, and apologize to the many guests dragged into Brett's endless downward spiral. Listener discretion is advised. Explicit Premeditated Graham Cameron and Neil Zumwalde Etiquette has a new judge.Graham Cameron and Neil Zumwalde investigate improvised social lawbreaking in a moderately thrilling, low-stakes fictional true crime podcast. We weekly and boldly prosecute the most innocuous violations of social decorum in a world that’s both too polite for its own good, and too shamelessly chaotic to continue unpunished. In each episode, one of us brings a "case file", an unlegislated social law. We collectively create a scene in which this law is broken, leaving the other to react to the unfolding etiquette crime with shock, confusion, support, or judgment.Then we drop the act and deliberate on the correct legal consequences.The crime? Social faux pas that we all secretly fear. The trial? Ten to fifteen minutes of litigation. We bravely dig into these micro-crimes, cross-examine experts (ourselves), and debate whether these laws should be upheld, expanded, or struck from the record entire Explicit
URL copied to clipboard!