PodParley PodParley

Anders Ericsson: Dismantling the 10,000 Hour Rule

An episode of the Good Life Project podcast, hosted by Jonathan Fields / Acast, titled "Anders Ericsson: Dismantling the 10,000 Hour Rule" was published on May 16, 2016 and runs 64 minutes.

May 16, 2016 ·64m · Good Life Project

0:00 / 0:00

Ever hear of the 10,000 rule? The idea that it takes 10,000 hours to become world-class at anything?Well, what if it wasn't true?And, what if the research it was based on actually said something very different? Something that somehow got "lost in translation" when the data went mainstream.In today's conversation, we sit down with K. Anders Ericsson, PhD, Professor of Psychology at Florida State University. He studies what it takes to be the best in the world in domains such as music, chess, medicine, and sports. And it was his research that served of the basis for the now wildly popular 10,000 hour rule that's been cited in some of the biggest books of the last 10 years..Problem is, as you're about to discover, it's a lie. There never was a 10,000 rule. That number, along with the idea of a "rule," is based on a series of misinterpretations of his work.In this new book, Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise, and in today's conversation, Ericsson finally sets the record straight. He distills three decades of myth-shattering research into a powerful learning strategy that is fundamentally different from the way people traditionally think about acquiring new abilities.EIn This Episode You’ll Learn:The difference between "traditional" practice, "purposeful" practice and "deliberate" practice.How Malcolm Gladwell may have misinterpreted Ericsson's research on the 10,000 hour rule.How Ericsson sees the importance of the role of a teacher in accelerating the path to expertise.What actually motivates someone to do the often grueling work for the years it takes to become great.How he's studied people who have learned and developed systems to memorize long strings of numbers.Mentioned In This Episode:Outliers: The Story of Success by Malcolm GladwellWhiplash Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ever hear of the 10,000 rule? The idea that it takes 10,000 hours to become world-class at anything?

Well, what if it wasn't true?

And, what if the research it was based on actually said something very different? Something that somehow got "lost in translation" when the data went mainstream.

In today's conversation, we sit down with K. Anders Ericsson, PhD, Professor of Psychology at Florida State University. He studies what it takes to be the best in the world in domains such as music, chess, medicine, and sports. And it was his research that served of the basis for the now wildly popular 10,000 hour rule that's been cited in some of the biggest books of the last 10 years..

Problem is, as you're about to discover, it's a lie. There never was a 10,000 rule. That number, along with the idea of a "rule," is based on a series of misinterpretations of his work.

In this new book, Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise, and in today's conversation, Ericsson finally sets the record straight. He distills three decades of myth-shattering research into a powerful learning strategy that is fundamentally different from the way people traditionally think about acquiring new abilities.

EIn This Episode You’ll Learn:

  • The difference between "traditional" practice, "purposeful" practice and "deliberate" practice.
  • How Malcolm Gladwell may have misinterpreted Ericsson's research on the 10,000 hour rule.
  • How Ericsson sees the importance of the role of a teacher in accelerating the path to expertise.
  • What actually motivates someone to do the often grueling work for the years it takes to become great.
  • How he's studied people who have learned and developed systems to memorize long strings of numbers.


Mentioned In This Episode:


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

What Makes a Good Life? Jordyn Flores This is a school project about what makes a good life. What defines a good life Taneesh Topic: How do you define a good life? What you think, and why (and how it changes throughout this project)What a friend/peer thinks, and whyWhat two famous writers/thinkers think, and whyWhat a fictional character (not from Cyrano) thinks, and whyWhat an adult (at least age 35) whom you personally know thinks, and why Good Morning Ngoc Ha GoodMorningNgocHa Je m’appelle Isaline, et si tu es ici c’est probablement que tu me connais déjà et surtout que tu connais mon projet de partir an en volontariat en Asie.En effet, j’ai quitté mon poste à Paris pour devenir Coach dans un Life Project Center de Hanoï pour l’association LP4Y, afin d’accompagner une équipe d'une quinzaine de jeunes femmes issues des minorités responsables d'une activité micro-économique qui fonctionne comme une boulangerie. Pendant un an je vais grandir auprès des populations locales tout en contribuant au développement des plus délaissés. Pour documenter cette expérience, j’ai eu envie de me lancer le défi de faire un podcast.Ayant déjà vécu à l’étranger je sais déjà que je ne suis pas une bonne rédactrice de newsletter, mais le format podcast me parle plus. J’aime l’idée de vous raconter mon quotidien directement dans vos oreilles. L’objectif principal de ce podcast est de partager mon quotidien avec vous, mes proches, mais aussi d’observer mon évolution pendant Project: "We Thrive" Chadrick McGriff So many married couples secretly struggle financially in life. Hey, we've personally been there. I believe that every marriage has untapped ability to create an abundant life & it has a lot more to do with how you think and act than how much money you have.Project "We Thrive" is my attempt to help couples take their first steps to crafting their version of the good life.
URL copied to clipboard!