PodParley PodParley

Sinners by Nature | Jonathan Edwards

An episode of the Reformed Thinking podcast, hosted by Edison Wu, titled "Sinners by Nature | Jonathan Edwards" was published on December 8, 2025 and runs 26 minutes.

December 8, 2025 ·26m · Reformed Thinking

0:00 / 0:00

Deep Dive into The Doctrine of Original Sin by Jonathan Edwards - Observations on Romans 5:6-10 and Ephesians 2:3 with the Context, and Romans 7The theological dispute between Jonathan Edwards and Dr. T. centers on whether biblical descriptions of "sinners" describe a universal, innate corruption or a specific national status. Dr. T. argues that in passages like Romans 5 and Ephesians 2, Paul addresses only the Gentiles in their heathen state. He contends that terms such as "sinners," "ungodly," and "enemies" are not moral descriptions of individuals, but collective titles distinguishing non-Jews from the chosen Jewish people. Furthermore, Dr. T. attempts to evade the doctrine of original sin by redefining the phrase "by nature" in Ephesians 2:3. He claims it is merely a metaphor meaning "truly" or refers to an "acquired habit" contracted through custom, rather than a condition present at birth.To explain why the Apostle Paul includes himself in these negative descriptions using the pronoun "we," Dr. T. argues that Paul speaks solely in his representative capacity as the "Apostle of the Gentiles." In this view, Paul identifies with his converts professionally without admitting that he or the Jewish people share their moral depravity.Edwards rigorously dismantles this interpretation, arguing it resurrects the very "partition-wall" of Jewish pride the gospel was designed to abolish. He asserts that the gospel proves Jews are "by no means better" than Gentiles, as all are under the power of sin. Edwards characterizes Dr. T.’s view of representative inclusion as absurd, noting that a physician does not call himself "sick" simply because he treats patients. Through linguistic analysis, Edwards demonstrates that the Greek words for "nature" and "children" explicitly refer to birth and generation, not habit. Ultimately, Edwards maintains that Paul deliberately uses "we" to confess a universal human reality: that all people, regardless of lineage, are born spiritually dead and equally in need of divine grace.Reformed Theologian GPT: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-XXwzX1gnv-reformed-theologianhttps://buymeacoffee.com/edi2730

Deep Dive into The Doctrine of Original Sin by Jonathan Edwards - Observations on Romans 5:6-10 and Ephesians 2:3 with the Context, and Romans 7


The theological dispute between Jonathan Edwards and Dr. T. centers on whether biblical descriptions of "sinners" describe a universal, innate corruption or a specific national status. Dr. T. argues that in passages like Romans 5 and Ephesians 2, Paul addresses only the Gentiles in their heathen state. He contends that terms such as "sinners," "ungodly," and "enemies" are not moral descriptions of individuals, but collective titles distinguishing non-Jews from the chosen Jewish people. Furthermore, Dr. T. attempts to evade the doctrine of original sin by redefining the phrase "by nature" in Ephesians 2:3. He claims it is merely a metaphor meaning "truly" or refers to an "acquired habit" contracted through custom, rather than a condition present at birth.

To explain why the Apostle Paul includes himself in these negative descriptions using the pronoun "we," Dr. T. argues that Paul speaks solely in his representative capacity as the "Apostle of the Gentiles." In this view, Paul identifies with his converts professionally without admitting that he or the Jewish people share their moral depravity.

Edwards rigorously dismantles this interpretation, arguing it resurrects the very "partition-wall" of Jewish pride the gospel was designed to abolish. He asserts that the gospel proves Jews are "by no means better" than Gentiles, as all are under the power of sin. Edwards characterizes Dr. T.’s view of representative inclusion as absurd, noting that a physician does not call himself "sick" simply because he treats patients. Through linguistic analysis, Edwards demonstrates that the Greek words for "nature" and "children" explicitly refer to birth and generation, not habit. Ultimately, Edwards maintains that Paul deliberately uses "we" to confess a universal human reality: that all people, regardless of lineage, are born spiritually dead and equally in need of divine grace.


Reformed Theologian GPT: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-XXwzX1gnv-reformed-theologian

https://buymeacoffee.com/edi2730

Contemporary Conversations Joseph & Nick Local Ministers having conversations on modern challenges that affect the local Church and our Christian walk. Using Scripture and Reformed thinking to navigate these waterways in a Biblically sound way. Axe to the Root with Bojidar Marinov | Reconstructionist Radio Reformed Network Reconstructionist Radio | Reformed Christian Podcast In theory, all of us know our orthodoxy. We know about the Trinity, about our redemption. We can speak about our solas, and we know our TULIP. But then, when most of us go out in the world and meet reality, we still view it and assess it through pagan eyes. That’s because our modern theology has become abstract, limited to the world of our personal faith, and divorced from God’s reality. Bojidar Marinov’s Axe to the Root Podcast will help you turn your abstract theology into a relevant, applied theology, by thinking covenantally about every area of life, and about every practical issue in today’s world. This is a production of Recon Radio. My Path to Atheism by Annie Besant (1847 - 1933) LibriVox My Path to Atheism is a remarkable document in many ways, not least that it was written by a woman in Victorian England, not the most open free-thinking of societies, especially for women at that time. It needed a remarkable woman to write such a revolutionary and to 19th century minds, heretical document in a society where the Church had such a stronghold. Besant herself was originally married to a clergyman, but her increasingly anti-religious views and writings led to a legal separation. She went on to become a member of the National Secular Society and thence to co-edit the National Reformer, which put forth ideas on revolutionary ideas at the time such as trades unions, national education, birth control and so on. In 1877 Besant published this book 'My Path to Atheism' which was compiled from a series of lectures in which she surgically dissects the basic tenets of Christianity. As one reads the chapters, one can follow the evolution of her ideas from Theism to Atheism, ending up Reformed Forum Reformed Forum Reformed Forum supports the church in presenting every person mature in Christ (Colossians 1:28) by providing Reformed theological resources to pastors, scholars, and anyone who desires to grow in their understanding of Scripture and the theology that faithfully summarizes its teachings.
URL copied to clipboard!