U.S. v. Sineneng-Smith - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

On February 25, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of United States v. Sineneng-Smith. At issue is "whether the federal criminal prohibition against encouraging or inducing illegal immigration for commercial advantage or private...

An episode of the SCOTUScast podcast, hosted by The Federalist Society, titled "U.S. v. Sineneng-Smith - Post-Argument SCOTUScast" was published on March 3, 2020 and runs 33 minutes.

March 3, 2020 ·33m · SCOTUScast

Summary

On February 25, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of United States v. Sineneng-Smith. At issue is "whether the federal criminal prohibition against encouraging or inducing illegal immigration for commercial advantage or private financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) and (B)(i), is facially unconstitutional." To discuss the cases, we have Brian M. Fish, Special Assistant, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland.As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.

Episode Description