Continuity and Transformation in Islamic Law

Episode 430 with Nurfadzilah Yahaya hosted by Chris Gratien Download the podcast Feed | iTunes | GooglePlay | SoundCloud During the 19th century, Southeast Asia came under British and Dutch colonial rule. Yet despite the imposition of foreign institutions and legal codes, Islamic law remained an important part of daily life. In fact, as our guest Fadzilah Yahaya argues, Islamic law in the region underwent significant transformation as a result of British and Dutch policies. But rather than merely a top-down transformation, Yahaya highlights the role of the small and largely mercantile Arab diaspora as a major factor in European policy towards Islamic law in Southeast Asia. In our conversation, we  discuss Islamic law and the Arab diaspora in Southeast Asia during the colonial period as well as some of the more unusual court cases arising from this period and the implications of this history for Southeast Asia today. « Click for More »

Episode 345 with Will Hanley hosted by Taylor M. Moore Download the podcast Feed | iTunes | GooglePlay | SoundCloud In this episode, Will Hanley transports us to the gritty, stranger-filled streets of the Egyptian port city of Alexandria, as we discuss his book, Identifying with Nationality: Europeans, Ottomans, and Egyptians in Alexandria. We explore how nationality—an abstract tool in the pages of international legal codes—became a new social and legal category that tangibly impacted the lives of natives and newcomers to Alexandria at the turn of the twentieth century. We consider how nationality brought together the previously impersonal, stranger networks using an array of paper technologies, vocabularies, and legal practices that forged bonds of affiliations between the individuals and groups that inhabited the city. Finally, we discuss how Egyptians and non-European foreigners, such as Algerians, Tunisians, and Maltese, benefited or were disenfranchised from a legal hierarchy that privileged white, male Europeans. « Click for More »

with Julie Stephenshosted by Chris Gratien and Tyler Conklin Download the podcast Feed | iTunes | GooglePlay | SoundCloud During the 1920s, a publisher in Lahore published a satire on the domestic life of the Prophet Muhammad during a period of religious polemics and communal tension between Muslims and Hindus under British rule. The inflammatory text soon became a legal matter, first when the publisher was brought to trial and acquitted for "attempts to promote feelings of enmity or hatred between different classes" and again when he was murdered a few years later in retaliation for the publication. In this episode, Julie Stephens explores how this case highlights debates over the meaning of religious and political liberties, secularism, and legal transformation during British colonial rule in South Asia. In doing so, she challenges the binary juxtaposition between secular reason and religious sentiment, instead pointing to their mutual entanglement in histories of law and empire. « Click for More »

with Elyse Semerdjianhosted by Chris Gratien Download the podcast Feed | iTunes | GooglePlay | SoundCloud The changing of one's religion may be viewed today as a matter of personal spirituality or identity, but as the historiography of the Ottoman Empire and elsewhere increasingly shows, conversion was often a public act with political, socioeconomic, and gendered components. In this episode, Elyse Semerdjian returns to the podcast to discuss her research on conversion in early modern Aleppo and how women sometimes utilized the act of conversion (or non-conversion) and the legal structures of the Ottoman Empire to gain the upper hand in familial and economic matters. « Click for More »

with Omar Chetahosted by Zoe Griffith Download the podcast Feed | iTunes | GooglePlay | SoundCloud The Capitulations are regarded as one of the most obvious and humiliating signs of European dominance over Ottoman markets and diplomatic relations in the 19th century, granting European merchants and their Ottoman protégés extensive extraterritorial privileges within the empire. In this podcast, Professor Omar Cheta probes the limits of the Capitulations in the Ottoman province of Egypt, where the power of the local Khedives intersected and overlapped with the sovereignty of the sultan and the capitulatory authority of the British consulate. Commercial disputes involving European merchants and their protected agents on Ottoman-Egyptian soil reveal the ambiguous and negotiable nature of jurisdiction and legal identities in the mid-19th century. These ambiguous boundaries provided spaces for merchants and officials to contest the terms of extraterritorial privileges. The creation of new legal forums such as the mixed Merchants' Courts gave rise to new norms and procedures, while reliance on Shari'a traditions continued to appear in unexpected places.  « Click for More »

with Cengiz Kırlı hosted by Chris Gratien Within Anglophone historiography, the Tanzimat period is conventionally represented as an era of centralizing reforms emanating from the imperial center that represent a trend often labeled as &quot;modernization&quot; or &quot;Westernization.&quot; Less attention has been given to what these administrative changes meant in practice and how they were carried out in the different provinces of the Ottoman Empire. In this episode, Cengiz Kırlı discusses his work on various facets of the Tanzimat and its implementation, offering a preview of his new Turkish-language monograph on the &quot;invention of corruption&quot; in the Ottoman Empire and examining the interplay of local and imperial power during an the early Tanzimat period in the Balkans. <!-- function toggle_visibility(id) { var e = document.getElementById(id); if(e.style.display == 'block') e.style.display = 'none'; else e.style.display = 'block'; } //--> a:hover { cursor:pointer; } with Cengiz Kırlı hosted by Chris Gratien Download the episode Podcast Feed | iTunes | Soundcloud Within Anglophone historiography, the Tanzimat period is conventionally represented as an era of centralizing reforms emanating from the imperial center that represent a trend often labeled as &quot;modernization&quot; or &quot;Westernization.&quot; Less attention has been given to what these administrative changes meant in practice and how they were carried out in the different provinces of the Ottoman Empire. In this episode, Cengiz Kırlı discusses his work on various facets of the Tanzimat and its implementation, offering a preview of his new Turkish-language monograph on the &quot;invention of corruption&quot; in the Ottoman Empire and examining the interplay of local and imperial power during an the early Tanzimat period in the Balkans. (This podcast refers to visuals available below) « Click for More »

with Samy Ayoub hosted by Hadi Hosainy and Christopher Rose Download the episode Podcast Feed | iTunes | Soundcloud Much of the scholarship on the Hanafi school of Islamic jurisprudence, which had its roots in the sociopolitical context of the 8th century Iraq, focuses on the early centuries of that school&#39;s development. Meanwhile, recent scholarship on the later periods emphasizes the transformations within the Hanafi jurisprudence in the early modern and modern periods, particularly as a result of the increasing role of the Ottoman state in the process of lawmaking. Dr. Samy Ayoub presents a different approach on Ottoman Hanafi jurists, who maintained the integrity of the legal discourse while recognizing the needs of the times. In this episode, Dr. Ayoub shares some of his reseach on the question of continuity and change under the self-desctibed “late-Hanafis” from the 16th century until the making of mecelle, the first attempt at codifying Islamic law, during the late 19th century. « Click for More »

with Michael Talbot &amp; Güneş Işıksel hosted by Arianne Urus and Sam Dolbee Download the episode Podcast Feed | iTunes | Soundcloud This podcast explores murky boundaries in two senses. The first has to do with Anglo-Ottoman commerce and diplomacy in the early modern period. Like the more well-known case of the the British East India Company in South Asia, British diplomatic representation in Constantinople was also controlled by a corporate entity. Known as the Levant Company, the institution ensured that from the late 16th to the early 19th century there was little distinction between merchants and statesmen when it came to British diplomacy in the Ottoman Empire. The blurred lines gave way to what might be called a “cycle of necessity,” in which British diplomats gave gifts to secure commercial privileges for British merchants who would then fund the diplomats to provide gifts again. Yet the cycle did not always proceed smoothly, and discrepancies between translations of agreements often played a key role in hitches, in the process raising basic yet profound questions about what treaty-making meant. The second part of the podcast considers Ottoman maritime space and legal order more broadly. With respect to this theme, murkiness makes another appearance, this time as it related to the ability to possess or control the sea. What did it mean to draw a line across the waves, to differentiate between su and derya? Particularly in an age of imprecise mapmaking technologies, these efforts at delineation often were accompanied by a good deal of ambiguity, pointing to the complexity - if not always plurality - of legal cultures and claims to sovereignty that existed in the Ottoman maritime space and, indeed, that extended even ashore the well-protected domains as well. « Click for More »

with Khaled Fahmy hosted by Susanna Ferguson Download the podcast Feed | iTunes | GooglePlay | SoundCloud How have the immense transformations of the nineteenth century impacted Egyptian state and society? Our guest Dr. Khaled Fahmy has devoted much of his work to the study of that very question in the realms of military, medicine, and in this episode, law, which is the subject of his forthcoming book. In this episode, we explore the emergence to of new legal institutions under Mehmed Ali&#39;s government in Egypt and ask Dr. Fahmy what this meant for Egypt and how it fits into the broader changes afoot in the Ottoman world. « Click for More »

with Kent Schull hosted by Chris Gratien This episode is part of our series on Islamic law Download the seriesPodcast Feed | iTunes |&nbsp;Soundcloud While humans have devised no shortage of ways to punish each other throughout history, the rise of the prison and incarceration as a method for dealing with crime is primarily a nineteenth century phenomenon. In this episode, Kent Schull discusses his recent book about the development of the Ottoman prison system and explores the lives of Ottoman prisoners. Stream via Soundcloud (US / preferred) Kent Schull is Associate Professor of History at State University of New York, Binghamton. (see academia.edu) Chris Gratien is a doctoral candidate at Georgetown University researching the social and environmental history of the Ottoman Empire and the modern Middle East. (see academia.edu) Episode No. 158 Release date: 7 June 2014 Location: German Orient Institut, Istanbul Editing and production by Chris Gratien Bibliography courtesy of Kent Schull Erzurum: the prison and prisoners (Source: Keghuni, No. 1-10, 1903, &nbsp;2nd year, Venice, St Lazzaro) from houshamadyan.org SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY Schull, Kent F. Prisons in the Late Ottoman Empire: Microcosms of Modernity. 2014. Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books, 1977. Adams, Bruce F. The Politics of Punishment: Prison Reform in Russia, 1863-1917 (DeKalb, Ill: Northern Illinois University Press, 1996). Ignatieff, Michael. A Just Measure of Pain: The Penitentiary and the Industrial Revolution, 1750-1850 (New York: Pantheon Books, 1978). Maksudyan, Nazan, ‘Orphans, Cities, and the State: Vocational Orphanages (ıslahhanes) and Reform in the Late Ottoman Urban Space’, IJMES 43 (2011), pp. 493-511. Peters, Rudolph. Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law: Theory and Practice from the Sixteenth to the Twenty-first Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005). Yıldız, Gültekin. Mapusane: Osmanlı Hapishanelerinin Kuruluș Serüveni, 1839-1908&nbsp;(İstanbul: Kitabevi, 2012). Abrahamian, Ervand. Tortured Confessions Prisons and Public Recantations in Modern Iran. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.

with Fariba Zarinebaf hosted by Nir Shafir and Zoe Griffith The capitulations, a series of bilateral agreements with European states and merchants, are sometimes held up as symbols of early Ottoman concessions to European powers and the beginnings of Ottoman economic decline. This misreading, which is in part the product of a misinterpretation of the word "capitulation" itself, impedes a proper understanding of Ottoman Empire and the legal context of the early modern Mediterranean. In this episode, Fariba Zarinebaf offers a different look at the capitulations or ahdnames within the broader context of law and diplomacy in Ottoman Galata and other port cities. Stream via Soundcloud (US / preferred) Stream via Hipcast (Turkey / Türkiye) Fariba Zarinebaf is an Associate Professor of History at University of California-Riverside. (see faculty page) Nir Shafir is a doctoral candidate at UCLA studying Ottoman intellectual history. (see academia.edu) Zoe Griffith is a doctoral candidate at Brown University studying the early modern Mediterranean. (see academia.edu) Episode No. 144 Release date: 8 February 2014 Editing and production by Chris Gratien Citation: "Galata, Ottoman Ports, and the Capitulations," Fariba Zarinebaf, Nir Shafir, and Zoe Griffith, Ottoman History Podcast, No. 144 (8 Feburary 2014) http://www.ottomanhistorypodcast.com/2014/02/ottoman-empire-capitulations.html. Griffith is a doctoral candidate at Brown University studying the early modern Mediterranean - See more at: http://www.ottomanhistorypodcast.com/2011/11/ottoman-lebanon-property.html#sthash.qU9EtwKA.dpuf Zoe Griffith is a doctoral candidate at Brown University studying the early modern Mediterranean - See more at: http://www.ottomanhistorypodcast.com/2011/11/ottoman-lebanon-property.html#sthash.qU9EtwKA.dpuf

Fikret Yılmaz&nbsp; Emrah Safa Gürkan'ın sunuculuğuyla Download the seriesPodcast Feed | iTunes | Hipcast | Soundcloud Osmanlı'da kamusal alan ile özel yaşam arasındaki sınır nasıl çizilmiştir? Herkesin birbirinin muhbiri olduğu bir toplumda iktidar, toplum ve birey arasındaki ilişki nasıl düzenlenmiştir? Bu sorulara yanıt aradığımız bu podcastımızda Fikret Yılmaz ile erken modern Osmanlı toplumunda mahremiyetin sınırları üzerine konuştuk. Ayrıca, Osmanlı toplum tarihçiliğinin sıkıntılarına dikkat çekerek, kavramsal çalışmaların gerekliliğine dikkat çektik. Where did the boundary between the public and private spheres lie in the Ottoman Empire? How was the relationship between government, society and individual configured in a society where everyone spied on their neighbors? In search of answers to these questions, this episode of Ottoman History Podcast explores the boundaries of privacy in early modern Ottoman society with Dr. Fikret Yılmaz, drawing attention to the lacuna in historiography on Ottoman society and the need for conceptual studies. (podcast is in Turkish) Stream via Soundcoud (US / preferred) Stream via Hipcast (Turkey / Türkiye) &nbsp; Erken modern Osmanlı toplum tarihi üzerine uzmanlaşan Dr. Fikret Yılmaz Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi'nde öğretim üyeliği yapmaktadır.&nbsp;(see academia.edu) Yeniçağ Akdeniz ve Osmanlı İmparatorluğu üzerine uzmanlaşan Dr. Emrah Safa Gürkan İstanbul 29 Mayıs Üniversitesi'nde öğretim üyeliği yapmaktadır.&nbsp;(see academia.edu) Episode No. 129 Release date: 9 November 2013 Location: Kuzguncuk, Üsküdar Editing and production by Chris Gratien Bibliography courtesy of Fikret Yılmaz Citation: "Osmanlı'da Mahremiyetin Sınırları," Fikret Yılmaz, Emrah Safa Gürkan, and Chris Gratien, Ottoman History Podcast, No. 129 (November 9, 2013) http://www.ottomanhistorypodcast.com/2013/11/private-public-sphere-ottoman-empire.html. SEÇME KAYNAKÇA Fikret Yılmaz, "Zina ve Fuhuş Arasında Kalanlar: Fahişe Subaşıya Karşı,” Toplumsal Tarih 220 (April 2012): 22-31. Fikret Yılmaz, “Boş Vaktiniz Var Mı? veya 16. yüzyılda Anadolu’da şarap, eğlence ve suç,” Tarih ve Toplum: Yeni Yaklaşımlar 1 (Bahar 2005): 11-49. Fikret Yılmaz, “16. yüzyılda tarımsal yapılarda değişim, Akdeniz mutfağı ve yağ kullanımı,” Tarih ve Toplum: Yeni Yaklaşımlar 10 (Bahar 2010): 23-42. Fikret Yılmaz, “XVI. Yüzyıl Osmanlı toplumunda mahremiyetin sınırlarına dair,” Toplum ve Bilim 83 (Kış 1999-2000): 92-110. Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie, Montaillou: Village occitain de 1294 à 1324 (Paris: Gallimard, 1975).

Selim Karahasanoğlu Sadreddinzade günlüğünden örnek sayfalar Kaynak: BOA, KK 7500, 158-159 Osmanlı tarihyazımında cevabı aranan önemli bir soru da Osmanlı kültüründe günlük, anı, hatırat gibi ben anlatılarının bulunup bulunmadığıdır. Bu bölümümüzde Selim Karahasanoğlu ile son çalışması Sadreddinzade Telhisi Mustafa Efendi ceridesi hakkında konuştuk. 18. yüzyılın önde gelen ulema ailelerinden birine mensup bu Osmanlı kadısının 24 yıl boyunca düzenli olarak tuttuğu bu günlüğün tarihsel kaynak olarak değerine ve &nbsp;Avrupa'daki diğer örneklerle arasındaki fark ve benzerliklere değindik. Ayrıca, yazma kütüphanelerinde karşılaşılan kurumsal zorlukların nasıl Osmanlı kültür tarihi araştırmalarının önünü tıkadığının altını çizerek, bir kaç eser üzerinden genellemeler yapmanın zorluğundan bahsettik. Stream via Soundcloud (US / preferred) Stream via Hipcast (Turkey / Türkiye) 18. yüzyıl Osmanlı tarihi üzerine uzmanlaşan Dr. Selim Karahasanoğlu İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi'nde öğretim üyeliği yapmaktadır. (see his page) Yeniçağ Akdeniz ve Osmanlı İmparatorluğu üzerine uzmanlaşan Dr. Emrah Safa Gürkan İstanbul 29 Mayıs Üniversitesi'nde öğretim üyeliği yapmaktadır.&nbsp;(see academia.edu) SEÇME KAYNAKÇA Selim Karahasanoğlu Akçetin, Elif. “A Frustrated Scholar of the Post-Conquest Generation: Wang Jingqi (1672-1726) and his Casual Jottings of my Journey to the West (1724).” Basılmamış Makale. Behrendt, S. D. A. J. H. Latham, D. Northrup. The Diary of Antera Duke, an Eighteenth-Century African Slave Trader (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010). Beydilli, Kemal. Osmanlı Döneminde İmamlar ve Bir İmamın Günlüğü (İstanbul: TATAV, 2001). Çeçen, Halil, haz. Niyazî-i Mısrî’nin Hatıraları (İstanbul: Dergah Yayınları, 2006). Çelebi, İlyas. “Rüya.” DİA, cilt: 35 (İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, 2008), 306-309. Di Cosmo, Nicola. haz., The Diary of a Manchu Soldier in Seventeenth-Century China: “My Service in the Army,” by Dzengšeo (London: Routledge, 2007). Elger, Ralf ve Yavuz Köse. eds. Many Ways of Speaking About the Self: Middle Eastern Ego-Documents in Arabic, Persian, and Turkish (14th-20th century) (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2010). Erünsal, İsmail E. “Bir Osmanlı Efendisi’nin Günlüğü: Sadreddinzâde Telhisî Mustafa Efendi ve Cerîdesi.” Kaynaklar, 2 (1984): 77-81. “Türk Edebiyatı Tarihinin Arşiv Kaynakları III: Telhisî Mustafa Efendi Ceridesi,” Ege Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2 (1983): 37-42. Hassam, Andrew. Writing and Reality: A Study of Modern British Diary Fiction (Wesport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1993). _____. “Reading Other People’s Diaries.” University of Toronto Quarterly, 56: 3 (1987): 435-442. Houldbrooke, Ralph, ed. English Family Life, 1576-1716: An Anthology from Diaries (New York: Basil Blackwell, 1989). Huff, Cynthia A. “Reading a Re-Vision: Approaches to Reading Manuscript Diaries.” Biography, 23: 3 (2000): 504-523. Işıközlü, Fazıl. “Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivinde Yeni Bulunmuş Olan ve Sadreddin Zâde Telhisî Mustafa Efendi Tarafından Tutulduğu Anlaşılan H. 1123 (1711)-1148 (1735) Yıllarına Ait Bir Ceride (Jurnal) ve Eklentisi.” 7. Türk Tarih Kongresi: Kongreye Sunulan Bildiriler, cilt: 2 (Ankara: TTK, 1973), 508-534. Jarrick, Arne. Back to Modern Reason: Johan Hjerpe and Other Petit Bourgeois in Stockholm in the Age of Enlightenment (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1999). Jones, Susan E. “Reading Leonard Thompson: The Diary of a Nineteenth-Century New Englander.” Atenea, 24: 2 (2004): 117-127. Kafadar, Cemal. “Self and Others: The Diary of a Dervish in Seventeenth Century Istanbul and First-Person Narratives in Ottoman Literature.” Studia Islamica, 69 (1989): 121-150. Káldy Nagy, Gy.&nbsp; “Kādī: Ottoman Empire.” EI2, cilt: 4 (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1978), 375. Karahasanoğlu, Selim. “A Tulip Age Legend: Consumer Behavior and Material Culture in the Ottoman Empire (1718-1730).” Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, State University of New York at Binghamton, 2009. _____. “Osmanlı Literatüründe Ben-Anlatılarına (Ego-dokumente) Katkı: Sadreddinzade Telhisi Mustafa Efendi Günlüğü (1711-1735).” 20th Ciépo Symposium, New Trends in Ottoman Studies: Programme&amp;Abstracts (Rethymno: Grafotehniki, 2012), 87-88. _____. “1700′lerin başında Kadı Mustafa Efendi’nin Günlüğünden: Cariyeyi Rızasız Eve Kapayan Doktor Dükkânı Önünde Asıldı.”&nbsp;Atlas Tarih, 12 (2012): 45. _____. "İstanbul'un Lale Devri mi?: Tarih ve Tarih Yazımı." Tarih İçinde İstanbul Uluslararası Sempozyumu: Bildiriler, yay. haz. D. Hut, Z. Kurşun, A. Kavas (İstanbul, 2011), 440-443. Kuhn-Osius, K. Eckhard. “Making Loose End Meets: Private Journals in the Public Realm.” The German Quarterly, 54: 2 (1981): 166-176. Lejeune, Philippe. “The Practive of the Private Journal: Chronicle of an Investigation (1986-1998).” Marginal Voices, Marginal Forms: Diaries in European Literature and History (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1999), 185-211. Makdisi, George. “The Diary in Islamic Historiography: Some Notes.” History and Theory, 25: 2 (1986): 173-185. _____. “Diary of an Eleventh-Century Historian of Baghdad-V.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies [BSOAS], 19: 3 (1957): 426-443. _____. “Diary of an Eleventh-Century Historian of Baghdad-IV.” BSOAS, 19: 2 (1957): 281-303. _____. “Diary of an Eleventh-Century Historian of Baghdad-III.” BSOAS, 19: 1 (1957): 13-48. _____. “Diary of an Eleventh-Century Historian of Baghdad-II.” BSOAS, 18: 2 (1956): 239-60. _____. “Diary of an Eleventh-Century Historian of Baghdad-I.” BSOAS, 18: 1 (1956): 9-31. Matthews, William. American Diaries: An Annotated Bibliography of American Diaries Written Prior to the Year 1861 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1945). _____. British Diaries: An Annotated Bibliography of British Diaries Written between 1442 and 1942 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1950). Paperno, Irina. “What Can Be Done with Diaries?.” The Russian Review, 63 (2004): 561-573. Ransel, David L. A Russian Merchant’s Tale: The Life and Adventures of Ivan Alekseevich Tolchënov, Based on His Diary (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009). _____. “The Diary of a Merchant: Insights into Eighteenth-Century Plebeian Life.” The Russian Review, 63 (2004): 594-608. Sajdi, Dana. “A Room of His Own: The ‘History’ of the Barber of Damascus (fl. 1762).” The MIT Electronic Journal of Middle East Studies, 3 (2003). _____. “Peripheral Visions: The Worlds and Worldviews of Commoner Chroniclers in the 18th Century Ottoman Levant.” Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, Columbia University, 2002. Saleh, Nabil. The Qadi and the Fortune Teller (Northampton: Interlink Publishing, 2008). Sherman, Stuart. Telling Time: Clocks, Diaries and English Diurnal Form, 1660-1785 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996). Struve, Lynn A.&nbsp; “Self-Struggles of a Martyr: Memories, Dreams, and Obsessions in the Extant Diary of Huang Chunyao.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 69: 2 (2009): 343-394. Şeyh Ahmet El-Bedirî El-Hallâk. Berber Bedirî’nin Günlüğü, 1741-1762: Osmanlı Taşra Hayatına İlişkin Olaylar. çev. Hasan Yüksel (Ankara: Akçağ, 1995). Terzioğlu, Derin. “Man in the Image of God in the Image of the Times: Sufi Self-Narratives and the Diary of Niyazi-i Misri (1618-94).” Studia Islamica, 94 (2002): 139-165. _____. “Sufi and Dissident in the Ottoman Empire Niyazi-i Mısri (1618-1694).” Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, Harvard University, 1999. Ulrich, Laurel Thatcher. A Midwife’s Tale: The Life of Martha Ballard Based on Her Diary, 1785-1812 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1990). Webb, Nigel ve Caroline. The Earl and His Butler in Constantinople: The Secret Diary of an English Servant among the Ottomans (London: I. B. Tauris, 2009). White, Sam. The Climate of Rebellion in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011). Zilfi, Madeline C. “Bir Müderrisin Günlüğü: Osmanlı Biyografi Çalışmaları İçin Yeni Bir Kaynak.” çev. Selim Karahasanoğlu, Doğu Batı, 20 (2002): 184-194.

with Nora Barakat Groups variously labeled as nomadic and tribal formed an integral part of Ottoman society, but because their communities exercised a wide degree of autonomy, they are often represented as somehow separate or "other" to urban and settled populations. However, the social history of these communities reveals that tribes and their members were involved in the continual transformation of Ottoman society not just as a force of resistance or hapless victims of state policies but also as participants. In this podcast, Nora Barakat deals with the social history of such communities, which appear in the court records of Salt (in modern Jordan) as "tent-dwellers," and their place in the complex legal sphere of the Tanzimat era during which both shar`ia law courts as well as new nizamiye courts served as forums for legal action. Stream via Soundcloud (US / preferred) Nora Barakat is a PhD candidate at UC-Berkeley studying the legal and social history of Ottoman Syria Chris Gratien is a PhD candidate studying the history of the modern Middle East at Georgetown University (see academia.edu) Citation: "Pastoral Nomads and Legal Pluralism in Ottoman Jordan." Nora Barakat and Chris Gratien. Ottoman History Podcast, No. 61 (July 24, 2012) http://www.ottomanhistorypodcast.com/2012/07/pastoral-nomads-and-legal-pluralism-in.html. SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY Agmon, Iris. Family &amp; court: legal culture and modernity in late Ottoman Palestine. Syracuse, NY : Syracuse University Press, 2006. Kasaba, Reşat. A moveable empire : Ottoman nomads, migrants, and refugees. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2009. Mundy, Martha, and Richard Saumarez Smith. Governing Property: Making the Modern State Law Administration and Production in Ottoman Syria. London: I.B. Tauris, 2007. Rogan, Eugene L. Frontiers of the State in the Late Ottoman Empire: Transjordan, 1850-1921. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Rubin, Avi. Ottoman Nizamiye Courts: Law and Modernity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.