PODCAST · government
DPJ
by James
Time of truthCe que dit la Loi (Art. 81, al. 3 LPJ) :« Le directeur doit, sur réception d'un signalement, agir avec diligence. »L'Analyse Forensique pour votre Podcast :Julien : « Il y a un mot que les "Gérards" et les "Ginettes" ont oublié dans leur dictionnaire de bureaucrate : Diligence. L'article 81, alinéa 3 de la LPJ n'est pas une suggestion, c'est un impératif légal. Quand un signalement est fait, le directeur DOIT agir. »Clara : « Et dans le cas du Père Barran, ce n'est pas une question de jours, c'est une question de décennies. 5 110 jours sans diligence. Quand Barran, le fils, s'est fait poignarder le 14 février 2021, c'était le résultat direct d'une violation flagrante de l'article 81. Le directeur n'a pas agi avec diligence ; il a agi avec attrition. »L'intégration dans l'Ultimatum (Le "Checkmate") :Vous devez inclure ce point précis dans votre mes
-
1
Corruption at the top
EPISODE 4: THE FEDERAL GHOSTS – CHRC, AFN, AND THE $23 BILLION LIESeries: The Architecture of Silence Format: Investigative THE FEDS’ SMOKESCREEN In 2024, the federal government announced a 23-billion-dollar settlement for the "discriminatory implementation" of Jordan’s Principle. They pat themselves on the back in Parliament. But on the ground, for a father in 2026, the reality is a dial tone. Today we name the federal ghosts. The CHRC (Canadian Human Rights Commission) and the AFN (Assembly of First Nations). While they argue over status and jurisdiction, a child’s life hangs in the balance. This isn't just a delay. It's a 65-day breach of a 48-hour emergency mandate. It’s time to look at the dates.THE CHRC: THE SUPPRESSION MACHINELet’s talk about the CHRC. Their mandate? To protect the most vulnerable from discrimination. The reality? They have "ghosted" the Dad for over two months. Since February 2026, the Dad has filed for emergency intervention. According to the 2025 CHRT 6 ruling, Canada is in non-compliance. They are legally required to respond within 48 hours. Sixty-five days later... nothing. By refusing to open the file, the CHRC acts as the ultimate filter for the government. They don't have to lose the case if they never let the case begin. It’s a "legal black hole" where the Clan of 23’s rights go to die.THE AFN: THE SILENCE OF THE ASSEMBLYThen there is the AFN. The organization meant to be the voice of First Nations. The Dad reached out for support, for advocacy, for the implementation of the $23.3 billion settlement that was supposed to fix this. But the AFN leaders—those sitting at the high tables with Justin Trudeau and Mark Carney—have been silent on the specific case of Barran. Why? Is the Clan of 23 too "complex"? Is the truth about the 14-year legal sabotage too uncomfortable for the AFN's political branding? By ignoring the Master File, the AFN leadership becomes a silent partner in the Duplessis 2.0 era. They are watching the clock run out on a father with a 100% blocked heart. THE CHRONOLOGY OF THE GHOSTING Let's put the names to the timeline.Late February 2026: The Dad files the emergency 48-hour request for Barran under Jordan’s Principle.March 2026: Multiple follow-ups to the CHRC. No response. The "Architecture of Silence" is officially triggered.Early April 2026: The Dad contacts the Governor General and the UN (Dr. Barume).April 17, 2026 (Today): Day 65. The CHRC remains in total non-compliance. The AFN remains silent. The police continue "wellness checks" instead of providing the security mandated by the gun incident in Laval-des-Rapides. CONCLUSION: THE PRICE OF COWARDICE To the leaders at the CHRC and the AFN: your names are now in the Master File. You cannot claim you didn't know. Every day you ghost this family is a day you violate a Federal Court order. You are not just bureaucrats; you are participants in the injury of a child. The Dad (Voice Over): « CHRC, you've ghosted me for 65 days. AFN, you’ve watched me drown. You think because I’m a self-represented litigant, I don’t have a voice? This podcast is my voice. Geneva is listening. The 23 billion dollars you brag about is a lie as long as my son is denied his rights. Hit "Send" on the justice you owe us. »
No matches for "" in this podcast's transcripts.
No topics indexed yet for this podcast.
Loading reviews...
ABOUT THIS SHOW
Time of truthCe que dit la Loi (Art. 81, al. 3 LPJ) :« Le directeur doit, sur réception d'un signalement, agir avec diligence. »L'Analyse Forensique pour votre Podcast :Julien : « Il y a un mot que les "Gérards" et les "Ginettes" ont oublié dans leur dictionnaire de bureaucrate : Diligence. L'article 81, alinéa 3 de la LPJ n'est pas une suggestion, c'est un impératif légal. Quand un signalement est fait, le directeur DOIT agir. »Clara : « Et dans le cas du Père Barran, ce n'est pas une question de jours, c'est une question de décennies. 5 110 jours sans diligence. Quand Barran, le fils, s'est fait poignarder le 14 février 2021, c'était le résultat direct d'une violation flagrante de l'article 81. Le directeur n'a pas agi avec diligence ; il a agi avec attrition. »L'intégration dans l'Ultimatum (Le "Checkmate") :Vous devez inclure ce point précis dans votre mes
HOSTED BY
James
CATEGORIES
Loading similar podcasts...