Inside Politics: Fake Pipeline Progress in Ottawa, Schoolyard Politics in Manitoba

Canada’s political divide is growing — and this episode of Inside Politics pulls no punches. Kevin Klein is joined by Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky, KC, and former Liberal MP Robert-Falcon Ouellette for a fiery discussion on Mark Carney’s economic update, Canada’s exploding deficit, Alberta separation fears, pipelines, inflation, food bank use, and the growing frustration many Canadians feel toward government. The panel debates whether Canada is heading in the wrong direction as affordability continues to dominate everyday life. Is the federal government doing enough to create jobs? Why are more Canadians struggling despite massive government spending? And what happens if Alberta’s growing anger toward Ottawa reaches a breaking point? The conversation also dives into Keystone-style pipeline politics, the future of Canada’s energy sector, Western alienation, social media influence, voter apathy, and whether politicians have lost touch with ordinary Canadians. Plus: Is Mark Carney simply Trudeau 2.0? Why are Canadians tuning out politics? Could Alberta separation become a real national crisis? Are governments focusing on optics instead of results? Is Canada’s economy being managed — or manipulated? This is one of the most intense and wide-ranging episodes of Inside Politics yet. If you care about Canada’s future, the economy, affordability, pipelines, taxes, political division, or the growing disconnect between politicians and voters, this is an episode you won’t want to miss. Subscribe, follow, and share Inside Canadian Politics with Kevin Klein for weekly debates on the issues shaping Canada today.

Canada’s electric vehicle dream is running out of gas — and the latest episode of Inside Politics doesn’t pull a single punch. Winnipeg Sun publisher Kevin Klein is joined once again by Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky, KC, and former Liberal MP Robert-Falcon Ouellette for a heated debate over Ottawa’s collapsing green agenda, Canada’s struggling economy and the billions of taxpayer dollars tied to EV projects that may never materialize. The conversation explodes almost immediately as the panel dissects reports that Honda is reconsidering its massive EV investment in Canada, joining a growing list of electric vehicle projects now facing delays, uncertainty or outright cancellation. Pinsky calls the Liberal government’s industrial policy a “complete failure,” while Klein argues Canadians are paying more in taxes and fuel costs while seeing little economic benefit in return. At the centre of the debate is a staggering figure: hundreds of billions spent on green initiatives, subsidies and net-zero policies — with critics now questioning whether the promised jobs and economic boom were ever realistic. The panel also dives deep into Canada’s worsening economic anxiety. Food prices remain painfully high. Families are struggling with rising costs. Small businesses are disappearing. Meanwhile, politicians continue promising green transformations many Canadians no longer believe will happen. Ouellette offers a different perspective, arguing that climate concerns remain real for many voters and that governments are trying to balance economic growth with environmental responsibility. But even he acknowledges growing frustration with the slow pace of results and the uncertainty surrounding Canada’s future competitiveness. The discussion soon broadens into a fierce argument over pipelines, trade, Alberta separatism and Prime Minister Mark Carney’s leadership. Is Ottawa sacrificing Canada’s economy to chase global climate credibility? Why does Eastern Canada still import foreign oil while Alberta struggles to get pipelines approved? Has Canada become so consumed with politics that leaders now care more about re-election than solving real problems? The sparks fly throughout the episode as the panel debates Donald Trump, Europe’s environmental agenda, government spending, and whether Canada is slowly pricing itself out of prosperity. For viewers tired of scripted political talking points, Inside Politics delivers something increasingly rare: raw, unscripted debate from voices willing to challenge each other openly. The full episode is now streaming online and already generating strong reaction from Canadians worried about jobs, affordability and the future of the country. #politics #canadapolitics #canada

In this explosive episode of Inside Politics, Kevin Klein is joined by Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky and Robert-Falcon Ouellette to break down Premier Wab Kinew’s controversial plan to restrict social media access for youth—and slap tech companies with billion-dollar fines. Sounds bold. But is it realistic… or just political theatre? The panel digs into the real questions: Can the government actually control social media use? Will this protect kids—or push them to find workarounds? Is this about safety… or control? And why are politicians who rely on social media suddenly trying to regulate it? From failed attempts in other countries to the growing frustration among parents and voters, this conversation pulls no punches. You’ll hear arguments on responsibility, freedom, government overreach—and whether this plan is even enforceable. Plus, the discussion goes deeper: 📉 Are politicians distracting from bigger issues? 📢 Is social media shaping politics more than ever before? 🗳️ Why are voters tuning out—and does it matter? This is the debate everyone is having—but few are willing to say out loud. 👉 Watch now and decide for yourself. 💬 Join the conversation: Should kids under 16 be banned from social media? 👍 Like, subscribe, and share to support independent local journalism. 📰 Read more at WinnipegSun.com #InsidePolitics #Manitoba #WabKinew #SocialMediaBan #CanadaPolitics #FreeSpeech #BigTech #News #WinnipegSun

A ballooning deficit, rising food bank use, stalled pipelines and a growing sense of economic unease—this week’s episode of Inside Politics doesn’t hold back. Host Kevin Klein is joined by Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky and former Liberal MP Robert-Falcon Ouellette for a fast-paced, sharply divided discussion on Canada’s spring economic update—and what it means for everyday Canadians. The headline number is hard to ignore: a federal deficit nearing $70 billion. But what grabbed the panel’s attention is what’s behind it. Pinsky calls the government’s plan “depressing” and warns Canada is on a “path to decline,” arguing that borrowed money and increased spending are masking deeper structural problems. His criticism of a proposed “sovereign wealth fund”—which he describes as “a sovereign debt fund”—adds fuel to an already fiery debate. Ouellette offers a more measured view, pointing to an unexpected surge in oil revenues that helped soften the blow. Without it, he suggests, the deficit could have been far worse. But even he acknowledges underlying risks, noting that government spending appears to be propping up economic growth at a time when many Canadians are struggling to keep up. And that’s where the conversation hits home. From grocery store choices shifting from butter to margarine, to the growing number of working Canadians relying on food banks, the panel agrees on one point: the cost of living is squeezing households harder than ever. Klein presses the question many are asking—what is the government actually doing to create jobs and make life more affordable? The discussion then pivots to energy—always a flashpoint in Canadian politics. With renewed talk of pipelines, including U.S. support for a revived Alberta route, the panel debates whether Canada is missing a critical economic opportunity. Pinsky argues the project has already been studied “to death” and should be moving forward, while Ouellette cautions that consultation and environmental considerations remain essential. Hovering over it all is a deeper concern: national unity. With Alberta frustration growing and economic disparities widening, Klein raises the stakes—what happens if the provinces driving Canada’s economy feel pushed too far? It’s a blunt, often uncomfortable conversation—but one that reflects the mood of a country facing tough questions. For listeners looking to understand where Canada is headed—and why so many are worried—this episode of Inside Politics is one to follow.

In this episode of Inside Canadian Politics, Kevin Klein is joined by Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky and former Liberal MP Robert-Falcon Ouellette for a sharp, wide-ranging discussion on the direction of Canada—and the decisions shaping its future. At the centre of the conversation is Prime Minister Mark Carney’s newly announced advisory council on Canada-U.S. trade. Is it a serious effort to strengthen negotiations, or a strategic move to manage risk and share accountability if talks falter? The panel digs into what’s really driving the decision—and who is actually influencing Canada’s negotiating strategy. From there, the discussion expands to the growing tension in Western Canada. With frustration building over energy policy, stalled development, and federal priorities, are we seeing the early signs of a deeper national divide? The conversation explores Alberta’s rising discontent, questions around representation, and what it could mean for the future of Confederation. The episode also tackles declining voter turnout and public disengagement. Are Canadians losing faith in politics—or are political decisions themselves driving people away from the process? It’s a candid, thoughtful exchange that cuts through talking points and gets to the core issues: affordability, leadership, national unity, and trust in government. If you’re trying to make sense of where Canada is heading, this is a conversation you won’t want to miss.

Host Kevin Klein puts that question directly to his panel—Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky, KC, and former Liberal MP Robert-Falcon Ouellette—and what follows is a lively, at times pointed discussion that goes far beyond partisan talking points. Ouellette suggests the pressure is now firmly on Carney. With no opposition roadblocks to blame, Canadians will expect results—and quickly. “Now he becomes responsible,” Ouellette notes, pointing to affordability, housing and rising living costs as issues that can no longer wait. Klein presses the issue further, questioning whether the government is focused on the right priorities at all, particularly as Canadians struggle with everyday expenses. He points to billions spent abroad while food bank use rises at home—an argument that fuels one of the episode’s more animated exchanges. Pinsky, meanwhile, takes a broader view, warning of what he sees as troubling signals from the Liberal government, including policy direction and economic decisions that could have long-term consequences. He argues that Canadians may soon feel the impact of those choices in their daily lives. But it’s not just Carney under the microscope. The panel dives into the political optics of a recent high-profile floor crossing in Ottawa—an issue that sparks debate over political ethics, loyalty and whether voters are being properly represented. Klein calls it part of a larger problem: a system where politicians focus more on staying in power than delivering for the public. Ouellette offers a more measured take, acknowledging the realities of political life while still conceding the move raises legitimate questions. The conversation then shifts to the broader political landscape, including the state of the Conservative Party and the emergence of new voices on the left. Could shifting voter frustrations reshape the next election? And why, despite rising concerns, are fewer Canadians showing up to vote? That question—low voter turnout—becomes one of the episode’s most telling themes. The panel suggests many Canadians are simply disengaged, overwhelmed by rising costs and uncertain about whether politics can deliver real change. For viewers, that’s where this episode resonates most. It’s not just about who’s winning or losing in Ottawa—it’s about whether anyone is truly addressing the issues Canadians care about. With sharp debate, candid opinions and no shortage of tough questions, this episode of Inside Politics offers a compelling reason to tune in. The full episode is available now on YouTube and podcast platforms under Inside Canadian Politics.

A fiery exchange inside Manitoba’s political arena—and the reaction to it—drives a must-watch episode of Inside Politics, as host Kevin Klein and his panel unpack a controversy that is quickly gaining attention. Joined by Winnipeg Sun columnists Robert-Falcon Ouellette and Lawrence Pinsky K.C., Klein opens the discussion with a clip involving a senior minister in Premier Wab Kinew’s government—one whose past comments and conduct are already well known in political circles. The moment, Klein suggests, raises broader questions about tone, accountability and the standards expected of those in public office. The panel wastes little time getting into it. Klein recounts previous incidents involving the minister, including inflammatory social media remarks and heated rhetoric directed at political opponents. While an apology was issued in one case, he questions whether enough has been done to address a pattern of behaviour that critics say crosses the line. That sets the stage for a candid and at times pointed conversation. Pinsky, a former human rights adjudicator, weighs in on the importance of maintaining respect and professionalism in public life, particularly in a legislative setting. Ouellette, drawing on his experience as a former Member of Parliament, offers a broader perspective on how political discourse has shifted—and whether it is becoming more personal and less productive. What makes this episode compelling is not just the clip itself, but what it represents. The discussion quickly moves beyond one individual to examine a larger issue: the growing intensity of political language, both inside legislatures and online. Are politicians becoming too quick to label opponents? Has respectful debate been replaced by confrontation? And what does that mean for public trust? Klein presses the point, suggesting that many Manitobans are increasingly frustrated with what they see as distractions from real issues. With economic pressures mounting and key policy challenges ahead, he questions whether this style of politics serves anyone. The panel does not always agree—but that is part of the draw. Viewers are given an unfiltered look at how experienced voices from different backgrounds approach the same issue, offering insight rather than rehearsed talking points. For readers considering whether to tune in, the appeal is clear: this episode delivers more than a headline moment. It offers a deeper look at the tone of modern politics in Manitoba—and a conversation that many will recognize as reflective of a broader shift across the country. The latest episode of Inside Politics is available now on YouTube and podcast platforms under Inside Canadian Politics.

In this powerful episode of Inside Politics, Kevin Klein is joined by Lawrence Pinsky, KC, and former MP Robert-Falcon Ouellette for a discussion that starts with Canada Post—but quickly turns into something much bigger. 🔥 The real moment comes at the end. What begins as a debate about government services evolves into a raw, unfiltered conversation about division in Canada, identity politics, and whether we’ve lost the ability to simply talk to each other. 👉 Are terms like “colonizer” helping—or hurting? 👉 Is free speech under pressure in Canada? 👉 Why does it feel like we’re more divided than ever? 👉 And can we get back to common ground? This isn’t scripted political talk—this is a real conversation, with real disagreement, and real questions that Canadians are asking right now. If you’ve ever felt like something has changed in this country… you need to watch this. 🎙 Featuring: Kevin Klein (Host, Inside Politics) Lawrence Pinsky, KC (Winnipeg Sun Columnist) Robert-Falcon Ouellette (Former Liberal MP) 💬 Join the conversation: Do you think Canada is more divided today? Comment below. 👍 Like | 🔔 Subscribe | 📢 Share

I thought this was a skit… but it actually happened in the Manitoba Legislature. In this explosive episode of Inside Politics, Kevin Klein is joined by Lawrence Pinsky, KC, and former MP Robert-Falcon Ouellette to break down a bizarre on-camera moment that has people asking: what is going on in our legislature? From shocking behaviour caught live… to serious questions about professionalism, accountability, and respect inside government—this is a conversation you don’t want to miss. But it doesn’t stop there. The panel also dives into the federal NDP convention, controversial messaging, and the growing disconnect between politicians and everyday Canadians struggling with rising costs. 👉 Is this just politics as usual—or something worse? 👉 Why aren’t more people talking about this? 👉 And how did things get this far? Watch the full episode and decide for yourself. 🎙 Featuring: Kevin Klein (Host, Inside Politics) Lawrence Pinsky, KC (Winnipeg Sun Columnist) Robert-Falcon Ouellette (Former Liberal MP) 📺 Watch. React. Share your thoughts in the comments. 👍 Like the video 🔔 Subscribe for more Inside Politics 📢 Share with someone who needs to see this #InsidePolitics #Manitoba #CanadianPolitics #BreakingNews #Politics #Winnipeg #NDP #Canada #ViralVideo

As the federal NDP gathered in Winnipeg for a leadership convention that could define its future—or confirm its decline—the city felt… quiet. No buzz. No urgency. No sense that a national political moment was unfolding. That silence set the tone for a fiery episode of Inside Politics, where host Kevin Klein and panellists Royce Koop, Lawrence Pinsky, and Robert-Falcon Ouellette pulled no punches in dissecting what they see as a party—and a country—drifting in the wrong direction. “I forgot they were even having a convention,” Robert-Falcon Ouellette admitted, capturing the broader concern: if Canadians aren’t paying attention now, when will they? The discussion quickly escalates from the NDP’s identity crisis to a much bigger question—why Canadian politics seems increasingly focused on optics over outcomes. Panellists agree Jagmeet Singh’s tenure left the party weakened, but they clash on what comes next. Some argue new leadership candidates at least “believe something,” offering bold—if controversial—ideas. Others warn that those ideas could push Canada further toward economic instability. And that’s where the conversation hits its stride. With Canada facing rising debt, job losses, and stubborn affordability issues, Klein presses the panel: why are voters rewarding politicians who perform well on camera instead of those who deliver results? “Why aren’t we electing builders?” he asks. The critique doesn’t stop at the NDP. Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew comes under sharp scrutiny for comments blaming global issues on U.S. politics—remarks the panel calls distracting at best, damaging at worst. Meanwhile, deeper concerns emerge: a weakening Canadian dollar, rising taxes, and what some describe as a political class more focused on social media than solutions. Yet amid the criticism, there’s a thread of cautious optimism. With shifting political winds and growing public frustration, panellists suggest there may still be time to correct course—if leaders start prioritizing substance over style. It’s a fast-moving, at times explosive conversation that cuts through headlines and challenges viewers to think harder about the future of Canadian politics. And if the NDP convention lacked energy, this episode certainly doesn’t.

Kevin Klein is joined by Winnipeg Sun columnists Robert-Falcon Ouellette, Lawrence Pinsky, and political science professor Royce Koop for a sharp, unfiltered debate on the Air Canada language controversy—and why it may be distracting from far more serious problems facing the country. ✈️ The panel dives into the outrage over Air Canada’s CEO not speaking French… 💥 While two pilots lost their lives and critical safety questions remain unanswered. Is this about respect—or political opportunism? ⚖️ The conversation then shifts to Quebec’s controversial Bill 21, sparking a deeper debate on: Religious freedom vs. provincial rights The future of the notwithstanding clause Whether Canada’s core values are being tested 💬 Do provinces have the right to make these decisions—or is this a national issue? 📉 Meanwhile, major concerns loom: Rising unemployment Economic pressure on Canadians Growing household debt So why are politicians and media focused elsewhere? 🔥 This episode tackles the tough questions: Are politicians chasing easy headlines instead of real solutions? Is outrage politics taking over serious discussion? And what does this mean for Canada’s future? 👉 Watch the full episode and decide for yourself. 👍 Like, comment, and subscribe for more real conversations 📰 Read more at: WinnipegSun.com #InsidePolitics #CanadaPolitics #Bill21 #AirCanada #cdnpoli #Quebec #BreakingNews #PoliticalDebate

Did Manitoba’s Premier go too far? This episode of Inside Politics is one you can’t miss. Kevin Klein is joined by political science professor Royce Koop and former human rights adjudicator Lawrence Pinsky for a heated, no-holds-barred discussion on Premier Wab Kinew’s controversial comments about Donald Trump, Iran, and global conflict. 🚨 The panel reacts to Kinew’s claim that the Iran war was started to distract from the Epstein files—sparking intense debate about leadership, credibility, and political responsibility. 💬 Is this bold leadership… or reckless rhetoric? 💰 Why is Manitoba spending big in Washington while criticizing the U.S.? 📉 Are voters rewarding style over substance? 🌍 And what happens when local politics collides with global crises? In a dramatic moment, the conversation takes a real-world turn as sirens sound live from Israel, where Pinsky is joining the show—bringing home the seriousness of the conflict. This episode dives deep into: Wab Kinew’s rising popularity vs. growing criticism Canada-U.S. relations and political messaging The cost of political “clickbait” in leadership Manitoba’s economic reality vs. political narratives 👉 Whether you agree or disagree, this is the kind of conversation Canadians need to hear. 👍 Like, Comment & Subscribe for more unfiltered political discussion 📰 Read more at: WinnipegSun.com

A fiery and, at times, surreal episode of Inside Politics is drawing sharp attention after host Kevin Klein and panellists Royce Koop and Lawrence Pinsky took direct aim at Premier Wab Kinew’s controversial comments about the Iran conflict. The discussion was sparked by Kinew’s recent remarks suggesting U.S. President Donald Trump’s actions in Iran were tied to distracting from domestic controversies—comments that quickly ignited backlash. Klein didn’t hold back, calling the statement “unbecoming of a leader” and questioning why a provincial premier was wading so deeply into complex global affairs. Pinsky, joining from Israel, delivered one of the most forceful responses of the episode, calling the remarks “ignorant” and “deeply dismissive,” particularly in light of the suffering of Iranian civilians under their regime. He warned that such commentary risks trivializing real geopolitical crises and alienating communities, including thousands of Iranian Canadians. Koop, a political science professor, struck a more measured tone but agreed the comments crossed a line. He argued that provincial leaders should remain focused on domestic priorities like health care and the economy, rather than engaging in international speculation. At best, he said, the remarks resembled “conspiracy theorizing,” and at worst, risked echoing narratives that undermine Canada’s credibility. The panel also zeroed in on what they described as a contradiction in the premier’s approach—criticizing U.S. leadership while reportedly spending significant public funds on representation in Washington. The debate broadened into a larger conversation about political strategy, with Klein suggesting that attacking Trump has become a “shortcut” to boosting approval ratings among certain voters. Despite the criticism, the panel acknowledged a political reality: Kinew remains highly popular. Koop noted that early-term premiers often enjoy strong approval numbers, but warned that public patience can wear thin without tangible results on core issues like Manitoba’s deficit and cost of living. In a dramatic moment that underscored the global stakes being discussed, warning alarms sounded during Pinsky’s live appearance from Israel, briefly interrupting the conversation and bringing a stark reminder of the real-world consequences behind the headlines. By the end of the episode, one question lingered: are Canadian leaders prioritizing substance—or simply chasing political momentum? The full episode is now streaming, and if this conversation is any indication, it’s one Canadians won’t want to miss.

The latest episode of Inside Politics, hosted by Kevin Klein, featured a wide-ranging discussion on international conflict, Canadian security and political leadership, while also introducing a new voice to the panel. Joining Klein were Winnipeg Sun columnists Royce Koop and Lawrence Pinsky, KC, along with the program’s newest panellist, Robert-Falcon Ouellette. Ouellette, a former Liberal Member of Parliament for Winnipeg Centre and recent Winnipeg mayoral candidate, is also a professor at the University of Ottawa and serves as a chaplain with the Canadian Armed Forces’ Fort Garry Horse. The discussion began with Ouellette outlining the theme of his first column for the Winnipeg Sun, which explores the religious dimensions surrounding the conflict involving Iran. Ouellette noted that rhetoric surrounding the war has, in some cases, invoked religious language, including references to biblical prophecy and “end times.” He contrasted those perspectives with Indigenous traditions, explaining that while Indigenous cultures historically practiced ceremonies and prayers before conflict, wars were rarely framed as efforts to convert others to a belief system. “When conflicts are framed as battles between good and evil, particularly in religious terms, it becomes very difficult to find a path to peace,” Ouellette said. Koop agreed religion often plays a role in global conflicts, particularly in the Middle East, though he noted that geopolitical interests frequently intersect with religious motivations. Pinsky offered a different perspective, arguing the conflict with Iran is rooted more in political and human-rights concerns than religion. He described Iran’s ruling regime as oppressive and highlighted its treatment of women, LGBTQ citizens and political opponents. The panel also examined Canada’s response to the conflict and debated whether Prime Minister Mark Carney’s shifting public position could weaken perceptions of leadership. Ouellette suggested leaders should consult caucus members before announcing positions on major global issues to ensure consistency and unity within government. “If your values appear to change day by day, it raises questions about leadership and stability,” he said. Another major topic was security within Canada. The panel discussed reports that members of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps may be living in the country and whether Canada should more aggressively investigate and deport individuals linked to hostile regimes. Koop argued that immigration oversight weakened during the pandemic years and called for stronger screening and enforcement. The discussion concluded with questions about Canada’s military readiness. Ouellette noted that Canada currently lacks much of the equipment required to make a meaningful military contribution overseas, pointing to aging naval vessels, limited fighter aircraft and equipment shortages. Despite those limitations, panellists agreed Canada should play a stronger diplomatic and strategic role internationally. Klein closed the program by encouraging viewers to read the panellists’ columns at WinnipegSun.com and follow Inside Politics online and through podcast platforms. Read their columns at winnipegsun.com

A fiery new episode of Inside Politics delivers exactly what political junkies want: blunt takes, insider experience and a widening debate over whether Canada’s political system is being gamed in plain sight. Host Kevin Klein opens the show with a question that quickly turns explosive: should MPs who cross the floor be forced into a byelection? What follows is not a polite exchange. It is a sharp, revealing clash over power, loyalty and whether politicians still owe voters anything once they get elected. Joining Klein are Winnipeg Sun columnists Royce Koop and Lawrence Pinsky, along with new panellist Robert-Falcon Ouellette — former Liberal MP, professor at the University of Ottawa and chaplain with the Canadian Armed Forces. Ouellette’s arrival adds a new layer to the discussion, especially as the panel dissects the controversial decision of Nunavut MP Lori Idlout to leave the NDP and join the Liberals. Klein argues the move proves what he has warned about for months: floor crossings are becoming a backroom strategy to hand Prime Minister Mark Carney the majority government voters never gave him. Ouellette offers a more nuanced view, saying politicians sometimes cross because they believe they can better deliver for their communities from inside government. But even he stops short of giving the practice a free pass, saying a byelection could strengthen an MP’s legitimacy and silence the critics. That point ignites the panel. Koop says he has come around to the idea of forcing floor crossers to face voters again, warning that turning a minority into a majority through political poaching is “massively problematic” for democracy. Pinsky is even harsher, arguing voters and donors are being betrayed when elected representatives abandon the party label they ran under. But the episode does not stop at Ottawa. The conversation veers into Manitoba politics, where Tory turmoil is becoming impossible to ignore. Klein raises alarm bells over MLA Bob Lagassé leaving the Progressive Conservatives, saying it is more proof that the party is unravelling. The panel openly questions whether Premier Wab Kinew could exploit the chaos by calling an early provincial election while the opposition is still weakened. By the end, the show becomes bigger than one floor crossing. It becomes a hard look at ambition, party control and the creeping sense that elections are becoming tools for politicians instead of the public. It is tense, candid and packed with moments that will leave viewers arguing long after the credits roll.

On this episode of Inside Politics, host Kevin Klein and Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky and Royce Koop took on a story that has sparked outrage in Winnipeg: a Dollarama shoplifting incident that ended in shocking violence, a criminal charge against a security guard, and a city once again forced to confront its growing crime crisis. The discussion began with the disturbing video that has now circulated widely, showing a suspected shoplifter being violently subdued by a security guard. Koop drew a hard line, arguing that while shoplifting is not a victimless crime and must be taken seriously, what was seen on the video went far beyond detention and crossed into brutality. He said Canadians should not be forced to accept either rampant theft or excessive violence as normal parts of daily life. Pinsky pushed back, cautioning that the full context remains unknown and that a short clip cannot tell the entire story. He noted that downtown businesses have been repeatedly hit by theft, disorder and intimidation, leaving store owners, staff and security guards on edge. He argued the deeper issue is not just one confrontation, but a broader breakdown of public safety that governments have failed to address. Klein took the conversation to the bigger picture, arguing that the most alarming part of the story is that stores now need security guards just to operate, and even those guards are effectively powerless until something explodes. He said politicians keep making announcements about safety while residents and business owners see the opposite on the ground: rising theft, rising disorder and fewer consequences for repeat offenders. The panel agreed that the roots of the problem go far beyond one Dollarama incident. They pointed to weak bail policies, repeat offenders cycling through the system, under-resourced policing and a refusal by governments to confront organized crime and drug trafficking with real force. Klein argued that too many leaders are afraid to say the obvious — crime is crime — and that excuses such as “survival crime” only deepen division rather than solve the problem. Yet the conversation also turned to a deeper moral challenge: homelessness, addiction and untreated mental illness. Pinsky and Koop both argued that governments should stop tolerating people living in misery on streets, in parks and under bridges, and start treating that reality as a public failure. Klein agreed, calling housing, treatment and intervention not an expense, but an investment in Canada’s future. The result was one of the show’s bluntest discussions yet: crime must be stopped, but so must the social collapse feeding it.

Floor crossing drama took centre stage on this week’s episode of Inside Politics, as host Kevin Klein and Winnipeg Sun columnists Royce Koop and Lawrence Pinsky, KC, debated the latest defection on Parliament Hill — and whether Canada’s rules need to change. The discussion followed the surprise move by a Conservative MP who had publicly ruled out switching parties, citing family reasons and pledging loyalty to Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, only to later join Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberals. The move, which reportedly includes a role as a special adviser, has reignited questions about inducements and backroom negotiations. Klein argued the practice has reached a breaking point. “If you want to cross the floor, it should trigger a byelection,” he said, insisting voters elect candidates under a party banner and deserve a fresh say if that allegiance changes. Koop, who previously opposed automatic byelections, said he is reconsidering. He referenced an alternative proposal from political scientist Alex Marland, which suggests a 30-day cooling-off period during which MPs would sit as Independents before formally joining another party. “These floor crossings create a tawdry media circus,” Koop said, arguing that weeks of political gossip overshadow substantive issues facing Canadians. Pinsky maintained that while floor crossing is a long-standing parliamentary tradition, he finds the practice troubling. He suggested potential legal challenges from donors or campaign workers who supported candidates affiliated with one party. “It’s a misrepresentation,” he said, adding that greater transparency about any inducements should be required. Beyond the partisan drama, the panel expressed frustration that attention on defections is diverting focus from pressing national concerns — including trade tensions with the United States, looming recession risks, and federal deficits. Koop criticized the current government for what he described as a lack of tangible accomplishments despite heavy public messaging. “We still don’t have tariff relief,” he noted, adding that economic pressures and job losses deserve more scrutiny than political manoeuvring. The panel also speculated about whether more MPs could cross the floor ahead of a potential spring election. With Parliament finely balanced, even one or two defections could shift political dynamics, though Koop suggested diminishing returns if the government secures only a razor-thin majority. As Klein concluded, the episode underscored growing public unease with political deal-making behind closed doors — and renewed calls for reforms to restore voter confidence. Read Klein, Koop, and Pinsky at www.winnipegsun.com

A billion-dollar price tag for refugee health care and rising global tensions dominated this week’s episode of Inside Politics, as host Kevin Klein and Winnipeg Sun columnists Royce Koop and Lawrence Pinsky, KC, examined the cost of federal policies — and the broader anxiety many Canadians are feeling about the world. The discussion began with new figures from the Parliamentary Budget Officer showing the Interim Federal Health Program, which provides medical coverage for asylum claimants and certain other migrants, is projected to cost roughly $1 billion annually. The program covers services including dental care, vision care and pharmaceuticals — benefits not universally available to all Canadians under provincial plans. Koop noted the only reason the updated costs became public was that Conservative MPs pressed the issue at committee. He argued that while providing basic care to those awaiting refugee decisions may be defensible, the scale and scope of the benefits raise serious questions — particularly at a time when Canada is running large deficits. “Canada used to have a broad political consensus on immigration,” Koop said. “Now that consensus is fracturing.” He suggested that overspending and poor transparency are eroding public confidence in the system. Pinsky was more blunt, calling the program emblematic of fiscal mismanagement layered onto rising national debt. He pointed to Canada’s weakening dollar and growing deficits, arguing such expenditures contribute to broader economic strain. Klein questioned the return on investment, contrasting the $1 billion health-care cost with record food bank usage and homelessness. “If we’re spending that kind of money,” he said, “what are Canadians getting back?” The panel also criticized the growth of the federal civil service — reportedly up roughly 80% over the past decade — and questioned whether Canadians are seeing improved services as a result. Midway through the episode, breaking news added a new dimension: the U.S. Supreme Court ruling against certain tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. Pinsky called it a decisive constitutional moment in the United States, while cautioning Canadian leaders not to inflame rhetoric. Koop argued Canada must avoid emotional reactions and focus on preserving critical trade relationships. The conversation ended on a more personal note, with Klein raising concerns expressed by his son about global instability and the possibility of wider conflict. While Koop downplayed fears of a world war, Pinsky acknowledged rising geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East, and the need for sober awareness without alarmism. As the episode concluded, the panel emphasized the importance of measured debate in uncertain times — urging Canadians to stay informed without succumbing to fear.

Prime Ministerial power and provincial popularity were put under the microscope on the latest episode of Inside Politics, but the sharpest exchange wasn’t about slogans or campaigns — it was about money: how governments spend it, how politicians earn it, and why taxpayers keep footing the bill. Host Kevin Klein was joined by Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky, KC, and political science professor Royce Koop to unpack a new Fraser Institute report ranking premiers on fiscal performance. The study, authored by the institute’s director of fiscal studies Jake Fuss, measured provincial leaders on government spending, taxes and debt. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith ranked first, Ontario Premier Doug Ford placed second — and Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew came dead last with an overall score of just 10.9%, a number that stunned the panel. Koop said Manitoba’s poor ranking was driven by rapid program spending increases and weak performance on debt and deficits, warning that governments can’t “spend and spend” forever without consequences. Pinsky agreed, arguing poor fiscal policy eventually leads to higher taxes, fewer services, or both — and Manitobans are already feeling the squeeze through inflation and strained public services. Klein pushed the conversation deeper, arguing fiscal recklessness is fueled by a political culture that rewards short-term vote buying. Premiers, he said, think only in four-year election cycles, spending taxpayer dollars to look like heroes while ignoring long-term consequences. That led to a broader debate: what politicians are paid, and whether they deserve annual raises while Canadians struggle. Klein noted that federal MPs are set to make more than $210,000 annually after April 1, with raises that continue even during economic hardship, while many Canadians face rising food costs and growing reliance on food banks. “How do you take that raise,” he asked, “and then tell people you need cuts?” Pinsky argued public office comes with real personal costs and that competitive pay helps attract qualified candidates — but suggested raises could be redirected to charities in tough times. Koop raised the idea of tying political pay to performance metrics such as balanced budgets, a concept Klein embraced, arguing taxpayers should not reward failure. The episode ended with Klein inviting viewers to weigh in: do politicians make too much — and should their pay be linked to results?

Ottawa is selling a “tough on crime” comeback — but the Inside Politics panel says Bill C-16 may be little more than a glossy brochure wrapped around a loophole.   Host Kevin Klein sat down with Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky, KC, and political science professor Royce Koop to unpack the Liberal government’s latest promise: bring back mandatory minimum sentences and finally clamp down on repeat offenders.   Koop didn’t mince words. Mandatory minimums were created because Canadians were fed up with “slap on the wrist” sentencing and judges using wide discretion. But after years of court rulings striking down minimums as “cruel and unusual,” the Liberals’ answer isn’t real backbone — it’s what Koop called mandatory minimums without the mandatory part.   In other words: a “minimum” sentence that a judge can simply decline to apply.   Pinsky went further, warning that the legal test has drifted into a subjective mess. Courts have used “cruel and unusual” reasoning to erase minimum penalties — including, he noted, a mandatory one-year sentence for child pornography offences. Bill C-16, he argued, lowers the bar even more: judges wouldn’t even need to find a sentence “cruel.” They can just declare it “not appropriate.”   Klein, who has long pushed for real accountability in public safety policy, linked the debate back to what Manitobans see on the ground: repeat offenders released, re-arrested, then released again — including the terrifying case of a sex offender entering a Winnipeg school and targeting a child. “What are you doing to fix it?” Klein demanded, blasting political “tough talk” that never becomes real consequences.   To be fair, the panel acknowledged Bill C-16 does contain provisions dealing with coercive control and domestic violence, and measures that could increase penalties when violence is driven by hatred or intimate-partner abuse. But the core Liberal sales pitch — “we’re getting tough” — doesn’t survive close reading, they argued.   Koop summed it up: public safety requires peace and order first, and repeat violent offenders must face real consequences. Pinsky’s verdict was blunt: the Liberals may claim law-and-order credibility — but Bill C-16, as written, won’t deliver it.   And Canadians are tired of being sold slogans while crime keeps climbing.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s much-hyped pipeline breakthrough and the embarrassing behaviour of Manitoba MLAs shared the spotlight on the latest episode of Inside Politics with Kevin Klein—and neither came out looking good. Klein, joined by Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky, KC and Royce Koop, opened by giving Carney rare credit for his recent moves on the steel sector and a new memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith on a proposed pipeline to the West Coast. But the panel quickly stripped away the spin. Koop called the deal a clear political shift from the Trudeau era and acknowledged that regulatory carve-outs for Alberta could help spur development. Still, he warned viewers not to confuse an MOU with an actual project: no binding commitments, no shovels, no tankers—just a political framework that still faces resistance from First Nations, British Columbia Premier David Eby, Quebec politicians and investors who’ve been burned before. Pinsky went further, branding the MOU “political, not economic,” and likening it to Schrödinger’s cat without the possibility it exists at all. The only firm change, he noted, is a higher industrial carbon price in Alberta by 2026, while the supposed path to a pipeline remains vague and revocable. “Don’t mistake this for economic development,” he warned. “It’s a talking point, not a turning point.” The panel then turned their fire closer to home: the Manitoba Legislature, where Klein said he’d “never been more disappointed” in elected officials. They condemned a recent question period meltdown in which: NDP minister Nahanni Fontaine allegedly shared a post celebrating the death of U.S. commentator Charlie Kirk and branded all male PC MLAs “misogynists”; Progressive Conservatives responded by dredging up Premier Wab Kinew’s decades-old criminal record, for which he has a pardon; The Speaker himself got drawn into the mud, reportedly telling a Tory MLA he was “not clever” before later apologizing. Koop defended the idea of question period but said Manitoba now has “probably the worst atmosphere in Canada,” arguing that the Premier sets the tone and that Kinew has chosen confrontation over seriousness. Pinsky called the exchanges “schoolyard stupidity” at a time when Manitobans are dying in ER waiting rooms and the economy is faltering. Klein’s closing verdict on Canada’s political class—federal and provincial—was blunt: too much performance, not enough governing.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s much-hyped pipeline breakthrough and the embarrassing behaviour of Manitoba MLAs shared the spotlight on the latest episode of Inside Politics with Kevin Klein—and neither came out looking good. Klein, joined by Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky, KC and Royce Koop, opened by giving Carney rare credit for his recent moves on the steel sector and a new memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith on a proposed pipeline to the West Coast. But the panel quickly stripped away the spin. Koop called the deal a clear political shift from the Trudeau era and acknowledged that regulatory carve-outs for Alberta could help spur development. Still, he warned viewers not to confuse an MOU with an actual project: no binding commitments, no shovels, no tankers—just a political framework that still faces resistance from First Nations, British Columbia Premier David Eby, Quebec politicians and investors who’ve been burned before. Pinsky went further, branding the MOU “political, not economic,” and likening it to Schrödinger’s cat without the possibility it exists at all. The only firm change, he noted, is a higher industrial carbon price in Alberta by 2026, while the supposed path to a pipeline remains vague and revocable. “Don’t mistake this for economic development,” he warned. “It’s a talking point, not a turning point.” The panel then turned their fire closer to home: the Manitoba Legislature, where Klein said he’d “never been more disappointed” in elected officials. They condemned a recent question period meltdown in which: NDP minister Nahanni Fontaine allegedly shared a post celebrating the death of U.S. commentator Charlie Kirk and branded all male PC MLAs “misogynists”; Progressive Conservatives responded by dredging up Premier Wab Kinew’s decades-old criminal record, for which he has a pardon; The Speaker himself got drawn into the mud, reportedly telling a Tory MLA he was “not clever” before later apologizing. Koop defended the idea of question period but said Manitoba now has “probably the worst atmosphere in Canada,” arguing that the Premier sets the tone and that Kinew has chosen confrontation over seriousness. Pinsky called the exchanges “schoolyard stupidity” at a time when Manitobans are dying in ER waiting rooms, and the economy is faltering. Klein’s closing verdict on Canada’s political class—federal and provincial—was blunt: too much performance, not enough governing.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s much-hyped pipeline breakthrough and the embarrassing behaviour of Manitoba MLAs shared the spotlight on the latest episode of Inside Politics with Kevin Klein—and neither came out looking good. Klein, joined by Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky, KC and Royce Koop, opened by giving Carney rare credit for his recent moves on the steel sector and a new memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith on a proposed pipeline to the West Coast. But the panel quickly stripped away the spin. Koop called the deal a clear political shift from the Trudeau era and acknowledged that regulatory carve-outs for Alberta could help spur development. Still, he warned viewers not to confuse an MOU with an actual project: no binding commitments, no shovels, no tankers—just a political framework that still faces resistance from First Nations, British Columbia Premier David Eby, Quebec politicians and investors who’ve been burned before. Pinsky went further, branding the MOU “political, not economic,” and likening it to Schrödinger’s cat without the possibility it exists at all. The only firm change, he noted, is a higher industrial carbon price in Alberta by 2026, while the supposed path to a pipeline remains vague and revocable. “Don’t mistake this for economic development,” he warned. “It’s a talking point, not a turning point.” The panel then turned their fire closer to home: the Manitoba Legislature, where Klein said he’d “never been more disappointed” in elected officials. They condemned a recent question period meltdown in which: NDP minister Nahanni Fontaine allegedly shared a post celebrating the death of U.S. commentator Charlie Kirk and branded all male PC MLAs “misogynists”; Progressive Conservatives responded by dredging up Premier Wab Kinew’s decades-old criminal record, for which he has a pardon; The Speaker himself got drawn into the mud, reportedly telling a Tory MLA he was “not clever” before later apologizing. Koop defended the idea of question period but said Manitoba now has “probably the worst atmosphere in Canada,” arguing that the Premier sets the tone and that Kinew has chosen confrontation over seriousness. Pinsky called the exchanges “schoolyard stupidity” at a time when Manitobans are dying in ER waiting rooms, and the economy is faltering. Klein’s closing verdict on Canada’s political class—federal and provincial—was blunt: too much performance, not enough governing.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s much-hyped pipeline breakthrough and the embarrassing behaviour of Manitoba MLAs shared the spotlight on the latest episode of Inside Politics with Kevin Klein—and neither came out looking good. Klein, joined by Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky, KC and Royce Koop, opened by giving Carney rare credit for his recent moves on the steel sector and a new memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith on a proposed pipeline to the West Coast. But the panel quickly stripped away the spin. Koop called the deal a clear political shift from the Trudeau era and acknowledged that regulatory carve-outs for Alberta could help spur development. Still, he warned viewers not to confuse an MOU with an actual project: no binding commitments, no shovels, no tankers—just a political framework that still faces resistance from First Nations, British Columbia Premier David Eby, Quebec politicians and investors who’ve been burned before. Pinsky went further, branding the MOU “political, not economic,” and likening it to Schrödinger’s cat without the possibility it exists at all. The only firm change, he noted, is a higher industrial carbon price in Alberta by 2026, while the supposed path to a pipeline remains vague and revocable. “Don’t mistake this for economic development,” he warned. “It’s a talking point, not a turning point.” The panel then turned their fire closer to home: the Manitoba Legislature, where Klein said he’d “never been more disappointed” in elected officials. They condemned a recent question period meltdown in which: NDP minister Nahanni Fontaine allegedly shared a post celebrating the death of U.S. commentator Charlie Kirk and branded all male PC MLAs “misogynists”; Progressive Conservatives responded by dredging up Premier Wab Kinew’s decades-old criminal record, for which he has a pardon; The Speaker himself got drawn into the mud, reportedly telling a Tory MLA he was “not clever” before later apologizing. Koop defended the idea of question period but said Manitoba now has “probably the worst atmosphere in Canada,” arguing that the Premier sets the tone and that Kinew has chosen confrontation over seriousness. Pinsky called the exchanges “schoolyard stupidity” at a time when Manitobans are dying in ER waiting rooms and the economy is faltering. Klein’s closing verdict on Canada’s political class—federal and provincial—was blunt: too much performance, not enough governing.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s much-hyped pipeline breakthrough and the embarrassing behaviour of Manitoba MLAs shared the spotlight on the latest episode of Inside Politics with Kevin Klein—and neither came out looking good.   Klein, joined by Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky, KC and Royce Koop, opened by giving Carney rare credit for his recent moves on the steel sector and a new memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith on a proposed pipeline to the West Coast. But the panel quickly stripped away the spin.   Koop called the deal a clear political shift from the Trudeau era and acknowledged that regulatory carve-outs for Alberta could help spur development. Still, he warned viewers not to confuse an MOU with an actual project: no binding commitments, no shovels, no tankers—just a political framework that still faces resistance from First Nations, British Columbia Premier David Eby, Quebec politicians and investors who’ve been burned before.   Pinsky went further, branding the MOU “political, not economic,” and likening it to Schrödinger’s cat without the possibility it exists at all. The only firm change, he noted, is a higher industrial carbon price in Alberta by 2026, while the supposed path to a pipeline remains vague and revocable. “Don’t mistake this for economic development,” he warned. “It’s a talking point, not a turning point.”   The panel then turned their fire closer to home: the Manitoba Legislature, where Klein said he’d “never been more disappointed” in elected officials. They condemned a recent question period meltdown in which:   NDP minister Nahanni Fontaine allegedly shared a post celebrating the death of U.S. commentator Charlie Kirk and branded all male PC MLAs “misogynists”;   Progressive Conservatives responded by dredging up Premier Wab Kinew’s decades-old criminal record, for which he has a pardon;   The Speaker himself got drawn into the mud, reportedly telling a Tory MLA he was “not clever” before later apologizing.   Koop defended the idea of question period but said Manitoba now has “probably the worst atmosphere in Canada,” arguing that the Premier sets the tone and that Kinew has chosen confrontation over seriousness. Pinsky called the exchanges “schoolyard stupidity” at a time when Manitobans are dying in ER waiting rooms and the economy is faltering.   Klein’s closing verdict on Canada’s political class—federal and provincial—was blunt: too much performance, not enough governing.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s much-hyped pipeline breakthrough and the embarrassing behaviour of Manitoba MLAs shared the spotlight on the latest episode of Inside Politics with Kevin Klein—and neither came out looking good.   Klein, joined by Winnipeg Sun columnists Lawrence Pinsky, KC and Royce Koop, opened by giving Carney rare credit for his recent moves on the steel sector and a new memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith on a proposed pipeline to the West Coast. But the panel quickly stripped away the spin.   Koop called the deal a clear political shift from the Trudeau era and acknowledged that regulatory carve-outs for Alberta could help spur development. Still, he warned viewers not to confuse an MOU with an actual project: no binding commitments, no shovels, no tankers—just a political framework that still faces resistance from First Nations, British Columbia Premier David Eby, Quebec politicians and investors who’ve been burned before.   Pinsky went further, branding the MOU “political, not economic,” and likening it to Schrödinger’s cat without the possibility it exists at all. The only firm change, he noted, is a higher industrial carbon price in Alberta by 2026, while the supposed path to a pipeline remains vague and revocable. “Don’t mistake this for economic development,” he warned. “It’s a talking point, not a turning point.”   The panel then turned their fire closer to home: the Manitoba Legislature, where Klein said he’d “never been more disappointed” in elected officials. They condemned a recent question period meltdown in which:   NDP minister Nahanni Fontaine allegedly shared a post celebrating the death of U.S. commentator Charlie Kirk and branded all male PC MLAs “misogynists”;   Progressive Conservatives responded by dredging up Premier Wab Kinew’s decades-old criminal record, for which he has a pardon;   The Speaker himself got drawn into the mud, reportedly telling a Tory MLA he was “not clever” before later apologizing.   Koop defended the idea of question period but said Manitoba now has “probably the worst atmosphere in Canada,” arguing that the Premier sets the tone and that Kinew has chosen confrontation over seriousness. Pinsky called the exchanges “schoolyard stupidity” at a time when Manitobans are dying in ER waiting rooms and the economy is faltering.   Klein’s closing verdict on Canada’s political class—federal and provincial—was blunt: too much performance, not enough governing.