The Antidote with Dan Goyal

Are we being manipulated into caring less about each other? While there is some merit in the notion that caring can be difficult, the repeated attacks on empathy are both ignorant and harmful - to us as individuals and society as a whole. This episode cuts through the pseudoscience and half-baked notions, including the made-up term “suicidal empathy,” to reveal what this rhetoric truly aims to achieve.We dive deep into the real science of empathy. As a crucial neurological function essential for human cooperation and survival, to diminish it is to diminish our ability to relate to each other. Lastly, we discuss the conditions when compassion can lead to burnout and ‘compassion fatigue’, and discuss ways to prevent this.This is a useful listen for anyone invested in ethics, humanity, and the future of cooperation in society. No billionaire is going to fund this work. If you can afford to subscribe, please do. £20 for a year’s subscription ($2 per month). All content remains free.The podcast expands on the ideas raised in these two articles:Empathy, War on Empathy, Elon Musk, Suicidal Empathy, Morality, Ethics, Civilization, Cooperation, Neurological Function, Psychopathy, Social Commentary, Intellectual Debate. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

This is a more detailed look at the short video I recently posted: Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

Expanding on this week’s topic of news consumption, in this episode, I argue that we don’t need constant exposure to the news in order to make the changes to our societies that we need. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

This episode comes from the shores of Loch Etive. Worth watching the video if you can - a beautiful part of the world. My brother joins me (apologies about his sound - he thinks I did it on purpose). We cover why I haven’t produced much content of late and ask the question: do we need to stay up to date with the news to change the world. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

In this episode, we focus on the important difference between psychosis and psychopathy. My main point here is that labelling Trump as deranged misses the point. We are not looking at some deluded ideology trying to take over the world. We are looking at the greedy trying to steal the collective wealth. Yes, it does sound crazy to the civilised mind, but it is far more manipulative than that. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

On the face of it, and if following certain media outlets, it may seem that there is a surge in support for far-right policies. Here we discuss how this ‘support’ has been manufactured by those desperate to perpetuate inequality. It will ultimately fail. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

It was a fascinating deep dive into the neuropsychology and neuroscience of what makes decisions our own. But more surprising was the realisation that many of those who gravitate towards authoritarian leaders probably aren’t making decisions for themselves. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

Will being ruled by Oligarchs make us less intelligent humans?In this episode, Dr. Dan Goyal discusses the basics of ‘human intelligence,’ including what it means to be a sentient being and the consequences of trying to develop young minds in an environment focused on materialism and hyper-competitiveness. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

In today’s episode, we explore the science behind the greedy brain. As oligarchs attempt to take over society, we ask whether they have the cognitive development to do so. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

Recently, we discussed the brain changes associated with greed. Undoubtedly, greed remains a significant motivator for those oligarchs trying to coopt democracy for their own gains. However, there is a more worrying motivation that is likely superimposed on their greed: a God-Complex. Indeed, if we are trying to understand why someone with more wealth than they can spend wants to rule over others, knowing that they are likely trying to recreate the world in their vision is helpful.Here we will briefly explore the motivation of greed and the God-complex behind those taking over society.The Greedy BrainIt’s more than 10 years since I started my research in neuroscience. I remember the sense of astonishment. Soon, I got used to how remarkable the brain was and the ingenuity of neuroscientists (and others) trying to learn more about it. But when I delved into the neuroscience of greed, I was once again greeted by that same sense of astonishment I had ten years previously.I was astonished at the sheer volume of research undertaken on both Dispositional Greed (a consuming drive to constantly want more money and/or power) and Greed Personality Trait. So convincing is the evidence of neuropathology that the question as to whether Dispositional Greed is a mental disorder or not has now been replaced by the question of what type of disorder it is - addiction, psychopathy, or part of the ‘dark triad’? I was also astonished at just how substantial the brain changes are in those who are consumed by their greed. I was surprised to find that so disruptive is greed to the normal, healthy development of the brain that cortical regulation (prefrontal cortex) on the emotional system (limbic) was significantly lacking. Those with Dispositional Greed are essentially underdeveloped. It has ramifications. For those consumed with greed, they are missing out on the best bits of life. Consistently, the evidence shows they are miserable. Indeed, they are so miserable that neuroimaging studies show actual changes to the structures of their brains. They are also angry and more likely to be aggressive. Evidence shows that those with Dispositional Greed seem to oscillate between being miserable and being angry. Perhaps though, the most stark (from the individual with Dispositional Greed’s perspective) is the lack of higher cortical innervation. That is, the Greedy Brian has significant deficits in higher cognitive brain functions such as "decision making, reasoning, personality expression, maintaining social appropriateness, and other complex cognitive behaviours” (some of the known functions of the prefrontal cortex). While difficult to quantify (neuroscience isn’t quite advanced enough yet), there is very likely to be an impaired ability to appreciate art, poetry, nature, relationships, and other meaningful aspects of life. As I say, the greedy brain is missing out on the best parts of life.For those of us who lay in their wake (which is more and more of us as they take over society), the deficits in the greedy brain have more worrying ramifications.Firstly, there is the obvious issue: greedy people will take more of our shared resources for themselves. This has been happening for centuries and is now set to peak once again. The consequences of this are far-reaching. The direct consequences include the lack of resources for others in society. Poverty, health inequality, further decline in educational opportunities, and a much weaker safety net for the vast majority of people seem unavoidable at this stage.Leading on from this are the ‘indirect’ consequences associated with the vast majority of society witnessing the gross inequity and disparity between normal, working people and the opulent lifestyles of the oligarchs. Be clear that this behaviour of the oligarchs is in direct opposition to the ‘civil agreement’. Humans have developed a strong sense of justice and fairness. It is inherent to the human brain due to the absolute necessity that within a vast and expansive cooperative (i.e. human civilisation) everyone in it must benefit from being in it. There is a strong push, present from an early age, for those who take too much from the collective resources to be held to account. Mutual cooperation - the pivotal aspect of humanity’s success - is contingent on fairness.The lack of fairness was a bit more tolerable when the ultra-wealthy were less dominant in society’s direct future. When oligarchs influenced society with soft power, their extreme wealth was seen as some sort of aberration or outlier - it was easier to accept that exploitation of the people was leading to ‘only’ a handful of individuals hoarding masses of wealth. It was almost tolerable. But now oligarchs have moved into positions of direct, hard power over the people, the disparity and lack of fairness their existence imbues is simply too much for ordinary folk to take. They’ve broken the civil agreement. Why then, should we abide by it? This is the indirect consequence of oligarch rule.Just to be clear, the answer is very straightforward. It is the civil agreement that has lifted so many of us out of pure survival considerations. To reverse this civil agreement based purely on the actions of those who have exploited so much wealth from society that they no longer have a ‘survival imperative’ to maintain the social agreement would be a foolish act of self-harm for the vast majority of us.The God-ComplexMake no mistakes, greed will remain a dominant motivation in the oligarch regime. They will take full advantage of their access to the collective resources; increasing their wealth and individual power (as they have done already). But the other part of their motivation (perhaps the primary motivation to seek hard power over society) is more concerning.We all have our world views. In a shared environment we try and permit each other to live out their own worldview, and when it concerns the whole group then typically the consensus view is taken forward. There is both freedom and compromise in a functioning society. We also each have (most of us, anyway) an inherent drive towards social connections and acceptance in the group. It need not be acceptance by all, but there is a shared human motive for the ‘self’ to be acknowledged by others.Oligarchs have both of these motives - to live by their worldview and to be accepted. Greed, as discussed, gets in the way of both of those objectives. The worldview becomes skewed towards acquisition. The validation of ‘self’ gets a bit buried beneath the fleeting validation of achieving more money and power. But the desire to have one’s worldview respected and one’s sense of ‘self’ to be appreciated remains. This is, I think, what we are seeing breaking through into the motives of the oligarchs to take over society.Now, typically we elect people whose worldview is close to our own. These elected leaders are permitted to push that worldview out into society and make the changes that follow. Oligarchs are different. They are not elected. Yet they have the power to inflict their worldview directly on society.It’s a problem. We neither need know what their worldview is nor agree with it in any real sense. It doesn’t matter. It will be pushed upon us anyway. This is even more problematic when we consider the ‘brain deficits’ they are likely to suffer.We end up with those who don’t understand the parts of life most of us view as the most important - relationships, values, morals, justice, fairness - pushing their worldview onto all of us. While adept at exploiting markets, these oligarchs have no expertise nor any real experience with the important parts of life, over which they will now govern.The need for their acceptance is another strong driver that will have ramifications for us all. Many are (in part due to their Dispositional Greed) socially awkward, and (not unlike psychopaths) are instinctively rejected by people who sense their uncivilised malintent. Some rehabilitate themselves, achieve some humility and rekindle their inherent sense of justice and fairness - they typically don’t pursue power over society but look to contribute to it. For those unwilling (or perhaps even unable) to generate any humility, or appreciate their own deficits and the need to change their character, they may well look to change the world to fit them, instead of them fitting into the world.This would all be fine if they were socially mature and moralistically developed. Sadly, they are neither. As such, we end up with the equivalent of spoiled, moody teenagers with the powers of Charles Xavier of the X-men, controlling a society they simply don’t understand.The wheels are already in motion. We are now at the whims of underdeveloped, narrow-minded oligarchs who know little about the society they are ruling over. Their moody outbursts and their struggles with getting to grips with the issues most of us deal with in early adulthood are now our problems. Their tantrums not just an annoying inconvenience but capable of substantial destruction. Knowing what their motivations are is helpful. Turning away from their influence and focusing on your own communities is helpful. It is also helpful to remain mindful that their greed and need for acceptance will still be dominant motivations for them. Making our opinions known through our own social connections and in how we spend our money may have a greater influence than we can currently imagine. Either way, have hope. They will fail in their bid to recreate the world in their image. It is an image we will all instinctively reject. The Antidote is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Notes:Reactivity of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, but not the amygdala, to negative emotion faces predicts greed personality trait | Behavioral and Brain Functions | Full TextGreed personality trait links to negative psychopathology and underlying neural substrates5 Personality Traits Linked to a Painful Childhood | Psychology Today United Kingdom5 Personality Traits Linked to a Painful ChildhoodI want more! The role of child, family and maternal characteristics on child dispositional greed and sharing behavior - Tilburg University Research PortalThe Psychology of Greed » Neel Burton author website and bookshopThe Founder: Dispositional Greed, Showbiz, and the Commercial Determinants of Health - PMCScarcity or luxury: Which leads to adolescent greed? Evidence from a large-scale Chinese adolescent sample - PubMedhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554483/#:~:text=The%20prefrontal%20cortex%20is%20known,and%20other%20complex%20cognitive%20behaviors. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

The takeover of media outlets has been extensive. Oligarchs have spared little expense in buying up newspapers, media outlets, and social media platforms. Musk spent more than the GDP of Paraguay on acquiring Twitter - a platform notorious for its poor revenue potential. While this tells us of their intent to control the masses, it also reminds us that they need to control us if they are to acquire more power for themselves.All power comes from the people. If it were not for human cooperation there would be no wealth. The masses working together is the fundamental power that has led to humankind’s dominance in the world. Crucially, such shared intentionality has allowed many of us to rise above mere survival considerations and, as such, we all have a vested interest in its continuation.We would not be reading this article now if it were not for this power. We would have no phones, cars, electricity, medicine, or Twitter, Amazon.com, Walmart, BP, or any other conglomerate if it were not for the agreement at the root of human civilisation. Every luxury we enjoy would not be possible if it were not for ‘the people’ working within the very human civilisation that our ancestors forged.It is this power that has created millionaires and billionaires. No one has reached those heights on their own. All wealth is built on the backs of the people. No wealth would exist without us. It is this truth that oligarchs would prefer us to forget. It is this truth that they hope to exploit to attain even more power.In democracies, the people must actively choose to submit their power. Political leaders must ‘win’ the power of the voters by, in some way or another, agreeing to what the masses want. The basic premise goes: we work collectively, pay into a shared pot, and then these shared resources are redistributed to improve our security, health, education, sanitation, justice system, and generally anything that will help the masses achieve a better life. Given that these are our resources, we have a say in how they are spent. Oligarchs don’t want us to have a say in how we spend the wealth that we create. Authoritarian governments around the world are working on possible solutions to force the masses to surrender their power to them. Ideas include restricting who can and who cannot vote; having voters take exams before voting; using a foot-vote (where you vote in person by walking to one side or another); shrinking the pooled resources and simply relying on the free market to exact the will of the people, and other such democracy-diminishing ideas. But here’s the thing. Even if the oligarchs manage to wrestle democracy from our grasp - effectively forcing us into submitting the power granted to us through democracy -, we will still hold the power.Greed is one of the most destructive forces on the planet. We have discussed the neuropathological basis for it before. As destructive as it is, there is a predictability and desperation that allows the people to hold onto the power. Whatever method these new oligarch-owned, authoritarian governments manage to put in place to limit our democratic power and limit the extent to which the collective will is to be realised, they will remain slaves to the market. Their greed will keep them dependent on capitalism.Capitalism requires cheap labour provided by the ‘lower-class’ to produce products that are then marked-up and sold to the middle-class, all so the wealthy can achieve even greater wealth. [FYI, I am not anti-capitalism, merely against exploitation of the people]. Whichever way you slice it, they remain dependent on us to achieve their wealth. Whether it’s the workers agreeing to work cheaply, or the middle-class deciding to buy their products, the choice very much remains ours, the people, to make. We decide if they gain more wealth or not. We decide if they get a slice of the power that we create.I do appreciate that the system is very much rigged in their favour. Money makes money. Tax breaks, off-shore accounts, and various loopholes will keep the rich rich. But how rich? How powerful? That most certainly still depends on us.They have to lie to us. Each time you see them lying to us remember that is because we have the power and they know we have the power. When they lie, smile. And then spend your money wisely.The Antidote is a reader-supported publication. Support if for $2 per month. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

In this week’s podcast, we discuss the main issues of the week. We discuss the neuroscience of genocide, in the hope that by understanding what is happening to the brain we can understand how to respond to it.The catastrophe that is the U.S. Healthcare System is under the spotlight this week. We look at how it compares to the rest of the world.We also discuss the core tenet of civilisation, that which we are hard-wired to follow, civility. Despite some great efforts to divide us all, the vast majority of us are civil and decent people. Most of us just want to get on with each other and life. It is worth remembering this basic truth of human civilisation.Finally, we discuss where the current fight is just now: between the givers and the takers; between those who contribute to society and those who try to rip society off.Let me know what you think. And if you can afford to upgrade to paid to support the creation of more of this kind of content please do - $25 per year. If not, no problem at all. Share. Comment. Let me know what you think. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

At first, the woke movement looked like it might bring a greater social consciousness. Following a concerted effort by the oligarch-owned media complex, as well as an extreme form of wokeism, the movement has come to a halt. In its place, we are left with the anti-woke movement, with its boundless capacity to assign any social issue to the ‘woke’ bin.We examine the origins and way through. To support my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. $25 for a full year’s subscription. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

In this episode, we discuss what became—understandably so—a contentious topic: the differences between the left-wing and right-wing brains. I discuss in more detail the key findings in the scientific literature and explain how such insights can be applied. I also discuss many of the comments made on the original Substack article in more detail. Thanks for listening.To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. $25 for a full year’s subscription. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

I’ve been pleasantly surprised by the public engagement and the more global audience than I had expected. As such, I have re-recorded this episode to make it more relevant to the public and the global audience. I hope it’s helpful to you and helps you move on less encumbered. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

The key points in the introductory chapter are:* Sustainability is an all or nothing issue. Either something is sustainable - it will be replenished as it is used - or it is unsustainable - it consumes the environment. This is of relevance both for us as individuals but also for companies. “We are more sustainable” as a company should be”we are a sustainable company”. It’s a useful concept.* The carbon footprint of the majority of people in the world is close to or below a sustainable level. That is, most individuals only need make a small change for their impact to be within climate tolerable levels. The problem is that a minority are creating massive carbon footprints, hence why the rest of us must hold them to account - either by voting or being conscious of where we spend our money.If you find this helpful, do consider supporting via a paid subscription ($25/YEAR). Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

In Part 2, we discuss the pandemic response in a country that responded to the initial wave quite well. For those of us who had to face the pandemic with a chaotic government and a healthcare system that kept patients at arm’s length, it’s important to hear what a decent government response is like. That sense of abandonment and upset you may feel towards your country’s pandemic response is not only real but often very justified. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe

Here I share what it was like for many healthcare staff when Covid hit. I hope that by sharing it we can all understand the reality of what happened during the early years of the pandemic. Some of us were in a country that responded well and others were stuck facing this relatively unknown respiratory pathogen in a country that failed to respond properly to it. I was in both. For the first few months, I was a frontline medic in Gibraltar - a place that managed the initial pandemic well. I then moved back to the U.K. - a place that managed the pandemic very poorly. We all suffered trauma. No doubt, for those with an inept government flailing around and/or a healthcare leadership way behind the curve the trauma was greater, the betrayal more profound. Understanding what went wrong and what should have happened helps us move on less encumbered. It’s called a debrief. And it’s about time.Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. Get full access to The Antidote at dangoyal.substack.com/subscribe